doc.: IEEE /0872r1 Submission June 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Clarification on outdoor deployments Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0872r1 Submission Cellular network outdoor deployment strategies (1/2) 2G-3G cellular network deployments had the objective of a full blanket coverage –operator have deployed base station in what is called “macro” sites. The cells are called macrocells. –Such sites are usually huge tours/masts in rural areas and at rooftop or 15m above rooftop in cities. –The backhaul is available and the site (expensive) is acquired by operators for cellular networks First deployments of 4G have the same blanket coverage objective and macro sites are deployed in priority. –Transmit power is between 20 and 60W –Inter-site distance (ISD) is 1950m in rural areas and 500m in dense urban –usually 3 sectors per site

doc.: IEEE /0872r1 Submission Cellular network outdoor deployment strategies (2/2) 3G-4G small cells are used to cover localized zones of high density (which require increased capacity) or badly covered by macrocells. The objective is no longer for blanket coverage –small cells incorporate microcells (10W) and picocells (1-2W) –they are deployed under rooftop (between 3 to 10m): lamp poles, hanged on cables, stuck to walls… –site acquisition is less expensive than macro sites but is still with the backhaul the most important Capex/Opex. 3GPP defines multiple scenarios for pico deployments –rural (10 picos per macro sector) –dense urban (4 picos per macro sector) with 500m macro ISD and 3 sectors per macro: density of 48 picos/Km²

doc.: IEEE /0872r1 Submission Wi-Fi outdoor deployment strategies With its limited transmit power, Wi-Fi is by nature a small cell technology. Wi-Fi will therefore be deployed in priority in zones which require high capacity (i.e. with high density of STAs) and will follow the same deployment strategy as 3G-4G small cells –Early operator deployments should be Wi-Fi-only but it is likely that deployments will evolve toward Wi-Fi co-located with 3G-4G small cells. deployed under rooftop (between 3 to 10m): lamp poles, hanged on cables, stuck to walls… side coverage (omni or directional) and overhead coverage (downtilt omni)

doc.: IEEE /0872r1 Submission Wi-Fi outdoor deployment strategies Micro/macro deployments: –For some reasons (site fees, low heights obstruction, power and network availability), APs can be placed at rooftop or even above it can therefore be co-localized with macro sites but it should be less frequent than pico deployments as macro sites are not specificaly placed in zones of high density and as the range difference between LTE and Wi-Fi would be too high

doc.: IEEE /0872r1 Submission Outdoor AP densities and channel model For these reasons, –The lowest density of outdoor APs should be around 50 APs/Km² for pico deployments maximum seperation between APs should be m –higher densities will be common of course but as the backhaul and site rental are expensive for such deployments, there should be as low sites as possible. Consequence: neighboring cells should overlap close to minimum sensitivity (high proportion of BSS-edge users with low SNR/SINR, especially in uplink) APs should use maximum Tx power question regarding the frequency reuse for one operator deployment: should frequency reuse 1 be favorable? If there were one channel model to select for outdoor deployments, we should clearly favor ITU UMi over ITU UMa. AP STA m

doc.: IEEE /0872r1 Submission Picocell interference characteristics It is very likely that in outdoor dense environments, multiple operators will make their own network deployment –even more true in case of co-location with 3G-4G small cells There will also be a high proportion of interfering private APs in the coverage of outdoor hotspots –indoor home or shop private APs leaking outdoors (usually in hidden node situation) –some of these APs can have community Wi-Fi (one private SSID and one public SSID)

doc.: IEEE /0872r1 Submission Traffic type on hotspots Traffic will be a mix of many types of traffic and there is a need for a realistic traffic model in the evaluation methodology As far as video is concerned, in hotspot scenario, highly compressed video will be the most common Compressed video throughput evolution takes into account: –New resolution, new coding/compression schemes, throughput increase in the backhaul or ADSL/VDSL/fiber network, availabilities of content in such format… Here are some prediction numbers that we got from our video experts: –Currently Orange HD requires 6.5Mbps for IPTV (15Mbps for DVB broadcast, 7Mbps for Netflix) –Evolution with HEVC: With new versions of H264, this IPTV will move to 5 or 5.5Mbps. With HEVC, we will gain between 40 to 50%, so a HD flow will be around 2.75Mbps. –Some 4k will be 3-4 times this, so there could be VHD flows as low as a bit more than 10Mbps. this is probably the lower bound and the average should be around 20Mbps. This will depend on the average available bandwidth in different networks. –predictions that 4k will start market around 2018 and will reach mass market around 2023, including the availability of content (predicted to be slightly slower than HD penetration). June 2013 Slide 8

doc.: IEEE /0872r1 Submission Conclusion Most outdoor deployments should be based on pico-sites –below rooftop (3 to 10m high) The lowest density of outdoor APs should be around 50 APs/Km² –maximum ISD between APs should be m –can be smaller than that obviously in denser networks We believe ITU UMi is more fitted than ITU UMa for outdoor deployments