Elizabeth A. Clark, Ed.D. Associate Superintendent Curriculum and Instruction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Advertisements

Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
Center of Excellence in Leadership of Learning October 5, 2010.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
“The Primary Goal of the Cleveland Metropolitan School District is to become a premier school district in the United States of America.” The Cleveland.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Instructional Leadership Team INCREASING COMMUNICATION ADEQUACY IN BIRDVILLE ISD.
Core Curriculum for College and Career Readiness Task Force Literacy Task Force Staff Leads: Jeannie Johnson, Sarah Breed, Phil Tucher, Elizabeth Macias,
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
College And Career Ready Through Personalized Student Learning.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Southeastern Louisiana University College of Education & Human Development Conceptual Framework: Setting the Standard for Excellence through Best Practice.
© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Math and Science Education Overview, Fall 2004.
40. Overcoming Barriers to Transformation Through System-Wide Leadership Dr. Carol Johnson, Superintendent Central Dauphin School District.
Building Professional Learning Communities to Improve Instructions and Raise Achievement Overview Supporting School and District Improvement in Massachusetts.
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
BUILDING STRONG TEACHERS FOR TEXAS STUDENTS Welcome to TAP Connect.
Building Teacher Effectiveness A Lab School Protocol.
Texas High School Project and the Texas Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Texas Regional Collaboration March 6, 2007.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Technology Leadership
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Presentation for. Powered by New Leaders and Pearson Transform Principal Practice Evidence-based Research-based Lead So Students Can Soar Real Challenges.
Florida Secondary School Redesign Initiative: Eventually, Change Turns into Work ! Presented by: Barbara McClamma Christine Crocco Senior Program Associates.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
Core Curriculum for College and Career Readiness Staff Leads: Jeannie Johnson and Sarah Breed.
Leading Change Through Shared Instructional Leadership
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California P-16 Council Recommendations The State’s Transformational.
NISD Summer Professional Development Update September 14, 2015.
High School Restructuring Cincinnati Public Schools.
School Improvement Planning Process OSPI PSESD
Creating Success through Academic Coaching Candler County Schools July 18, 2007.
Angilee M. Downing, M.Ed. Vision: Educational Excellence For All Students.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
“A New Chapter and a New Day” An Update on the School Improvement Grant Staff Meeting Friday, August 5, :30 a.m. LHS Commons.
Geelong High School Performance Development & Review Process in 2014.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
The College Board Standards for College Success CCSSO – SEC State Collaborative Alignment Study CCSSO-SEC Meeting and Content Analysis Workshop San Diego,
A Mission of Restoration
Systemic Transformative Actions for Improved Productivity
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
Why 21st Century Skills & STEM? Research indicates students across all grade-levels lack competencies in math and science. New demands have been placed.
1 NH PACE Tier 2 Leadership PLC Session 1 September 28, 2015.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
TEACHER LEADERSHIP AND COMPENSATION SYSTEM OVERVIEW.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
TBAISD Superintendents Association Leadership Academy 2010.
The Institute for Learning. l Established 1995 l Lauren B. Resnick l University of Pittsburg’s Learning Research and Development Center Background.
Created By: Erin McAlister Christiana Elder Sherene Mayner Freddie Martinez.
Activity 5a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
FLEXIBILITY and the DENVER PLAN Objectives for today: Understand DPS’ future direction related to academic supports. Understand DPS’ approach to.
The Pennsylvania Institute for Instructional Coaching (PIIC) Implementation years: 9/1/2008 – 6/30/2015.
ELI Educational Leadership Initiative Learning and Leading Together for a Brighter Future.
2010 NATIONAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PLAN Eva Perez EDIT 654 OL.
THE APPALACHIAN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
PROFESSIONAL LEARNING 2015 Board Update ENGAGE EQUIP EMPOWER.
MISIC Regional Webinar
The Fort Worth ISD Learning Model
Focus on Stakeholder Voices in North Carolina
NISD Leadership Academy “Excellence for All”
Who We Are For more than 20 years, we have believed the key to preparing student for a successful future is providing rigorous and relevant instruction.
Professional Development Update Summer Teacher Institutes and
Northwest ISD Elementary Education District Effectiveness Report
Model Schools Contract Revision
Presentation transcript:

Elizabeth A. Clark, Ed.D. Associate Superintendent Curriculum and Instruction

Administrative Leadership Conference Learning Outcomes Establish a clear vision regarding teaching and learning in Birdville ISD for the next three years Delineate expectations for deepening the implementation of Professional Learning Communities Clarify processes and protocols that will facilitate implementation of the district’s initiatives regarding teaching and learning Understand the impact of increased rigor in literacy and mathematics on student performance

Summer Institute for Instructional Leaders consist of 3 day Leadership Academy for 46 Instructional Coaches and Leaders Creating a Vision for College and Career Readiness – July 30 with Ray McNulty Collaborative Instructional Review Sessions for Instructional Coaches and Leaders (Includes 4 days onsite for 4 cohorts of Instructional Leaders) Use teachers from the Leaders of Learners to serve as collaborative partners with the 46 individuals being trained using Daggett’s Rigor and Relevance Rubrics

Use ILT to provide follow-up coaching to principals in the Collaborative Instructional Review Process for Instructional Leaders Provide a Summer Institute for Instructional Leaders that includes 3 day Leadership Academy for 33 principals. Provide collaborative instructional Review Sessions for Principals using teachers as Partners from the Leaders of Learners. This will include 4 days onsite for 3 cohorts. Use teachers from the Leaders of Learners to serve as collaborative partners with the 33 principals

Use the cadre of principals and other coaches and central office staff to help provide coaching support to teacher leaders. Schedule four half-day sessions for 200 participants – 2 days, 4 sessions with 50 participants for the Leaders of Learners who are charged with leading PLCs with the Rigor/Relevance Rubric Continue with training teachers throughout the year to use the Rigor and Relevance Rubrics.

o Dean for the School of Education at Southern New Hampshire University o Senior Fellow to International Center for Leadership in Education o Chair of the National Dropout Prevention Network o Formerly Chief Learning Officer for Penn Foster, President of ASCD, Senior Fellow of Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Afternoon Session

Implement the district and campus Problem of Practice Implement the Learning Expectation Rubric at the chosen level for each campus, which addresses 3 components of the Learning Platform Conduct data conferences at the campus level, PLC level, and classroom level after every CBA Improve the functionality of each PLC

“When teachers practice their craft at exemplary levels, learning is more likely to occur. The emphasis has to be on providing teachers with the tools, the time, the motivation, and the professional collaboration necessary to hone their craft and become experts at designing student tasks and creating learning environments where students can and will find learning exciting, engaging, and attainable”. Elizabeth A. Clark, Ed.D.

“Most of us seek quantum leaps in our performance levels by following a strategy of incremental investment. This strategy simply does not work. The land of excellence is safely guarded from unworthy intruders. At the gates stand two fearsome sentries—risk and learning. The keys to entrance are faith and courage.” Robert Quinn