General Education Framework Directors and Chairs Meeting Wednesday, August 25, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
Advertisements

Agenda Why the change? What changed?
What is LEAP? Roundtable Discussions October 19 & 20.
Proposal for the Process of Faculty Selection to Committees in the School of Undergraduate Studies History As the School of Undergraduate Studies (UGS)
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Advisory Committee on Undergraduate Admissions Report Bobbi Owen Senior Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education, College of Arts and Sciences.
Draft Report on University-Wide Breadth Requirements by The University Senate Ad Hoc Committee December 1, 2008.
Curriculum Renewal White Paper: Highlights Ryerson University Senate May 1, 2012.
QEP/NSE Timeline Topic Development and Articulation.
SEM Planning Model.
Final Recommendations.  A well-constructed curriculum:  Achieves the mission and the learning outcomes adopted by the University community  Is achievable.
Semester Conversion Report President’s ad hoc Committee on Semester Planning November 1, 2009.
Welcome to the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences Advising 1001.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
FACULTY MEETING September 26, 2008 Marty Wood Assistant Dean for Undergraduate Education Chair, SOE Curricula & Courses Committee.
Notes by Juan Manfredi February 11,  Passed by Arts and Sciences faculty in April 2002 and published in the A & S Gazette on April 15, 2003 (Vol.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
Undergraduate Core at Doane March 14, Overview of Undergraduate Core at Doane Philosophy of the Undergraduate Core at Doane (aligned with mission)
 Assessment is a Team Sport Leah Bradley Sandra Connelly, Ph.D. Elizabeth Hane, Ph.D. Anne Wahl, Ed.D. ANNY Presentation April 9, 2013.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
The College Board Standards for College Success CCSSO – SEC State Collaborative Alignment Study CCSSO-SEC Meeting and Content Analysis Workshop San Diego,
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
1 PENN STATE HARRISBURG CAPITAL COLLEGE Curricular Cooperation at Penn State: Major Themes and Goals
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
The Undergraduate Curriculum at Doane A briefing by the General Education Task Force Gerry Allen, John Burney, Alec Engebretson, Kay Hegler, Adam Hunke.
Ad hoc Committee on Faculty Bylaws Todd Ellis Michelle Hendley Jimmy Johnston Michael Koch Eileen McClafferty John Relethford Renee B. Walker (Chair)
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
Draft implementation plan for our new purposes and objectives for General Education. Interim report of the Task Force on General Education and the Faculty.
RSU #4 Library Media Program Preparing Students for the 21st Century.
College of Business California State University, Monterey Bay February 28, 2014 College of Business Committee Structure: Preparing for AACSB.
The Office of Curriculum Systems
1 TERMS OF REFERENCE Assoc.Prof.Dr. Osman YILMAZ April 20, 2004 University Curriculum Committee.
Introduction to CASSC. CASSC An acronym that stands for College Academic and Student Support Council and Campus Academic and Student Support Council.
Minimum Qualifications for Faculty in the California Community Colleges May 5, 2016 CTE Leadership Academy John Stanskas, ASCCC Secretary.
CAA Review Joint CAA Review Steering Committee Charge Reason for Review Focus Revision of Policy Goals Strategies Milestones.
Minimum Qualifications for Faculty in the California Community Colleges May 5, 2016 CTE Leadership Academy Pre-Conference Session John Stanskas, ASCCC.
Course Substitutions & Course Waivers Proposed New Policy AGC 1 st Presentation September 08, 2015 Patti Trepkowski and Diane Patrick.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
LIFEMAP 2.0 Dr. Joyce Romano, VP, Student Affairs Dr. Jill Szentmiklosi, Dean of Students Valencia College League for Innovation
An Introduction to the UCA Core The UCA Experience Explore. Enrich
Seminar Policy (7.14) AGC – September 2016.
Övergripande org. illustration
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Best Practices: Institutional Study Abroad Committees
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
Their role within Schools and Colleges
Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update
Curriculum and Accreditation
Conversation on University Structure
Proposed Policy 2: Undergraduate Curriculum Structure
Supporting Student Learning Through Effective Curricular Administration Welcome to the presentation “Supporting Student Learning Through Effective Curricular.
General Education Program
Guided Pathways at California Community Colleges
General Education Program Modification
Guided Pathways at California Community Colleges
Revision of the General Education Curriculum DGE and Department Heads
Guided Pathways at California Community Colleges
Erosion of Senate Authority Over Curriculum?
Their role within Schools and Colleges
Introduction to the AP Capstone™ Program
Their role within Schools and Colleges
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Assessment at Northeastern University
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Welcome to CAB
Senior Leadership Retreat
Presentation transcript:

General Education Framework Directors and Chairs Meeting Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Topics General Education Committee ◦ Function/Charge ◦ Members ◦ Guiding Principles Proposed General Education Framework ◦ Proposed changes ◦ General Education Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment General Education Approval Procedure ◦ General Education Courses ◦ “Concentrations”

Functions of the GEC To ensure the general education curriculum is established, monitored, reviewed, and assessed To oversee General Education Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan To determine which undergraduate courses qualify for general education credit To maintain the official catalog of RIT’s General Education Curriculum and associated courses

Academic Senate Charge to GEC Create a set of overarching principles to guide general education curricular reform that: ◦ complements RIT’s mission, ◦ serves RIT students, ◦ reflects the diversity of the University, ◦ conforms to New York State’s statutory requirements and ◦ complies with the RIT approved General Education Student Learning Outcomes

Academic Senate Charge to GEC Seek advice and consultation from the curriculum committees of the College of Liberal Arts and College of Science Ensure that the needs and interests of all colleges are appropriately considered

Academic Senate Charge to GEC Take into consideration budgetary implications Benchmark against colleges and universities of interest After consultation with the ICC, forward the proposed curriculum to the Academic Senate for action

GEC Membership Membership of the General Education Committee The chief academic officer or designee, ex-officio, voting, Dick Doolittle Academic dean representative, Robert Ulin Academic Senate representative, Amit Ray The Director of Student Learning Outcomes Assessment, ex-officio, non- voting, Anne Wahl Faculty representative from each college of the University: ◦ COS, Elizabeth Hane, Chair ◦ COLA, Franz Foltz ◦ SCB, TBD ◦ CAST, George Zion ◦ GCCIS, Rajendra Raj ◦ KGCOE, Surendra Gupta ◦ NTID, David Templeton ◦ CIAS, Naomi Orwin

GEC Guiding Principles Existing Framework Meet the New York State Education Department (NYSED) requirements ( Ensure that students achieve RIT’s General Education Learning Outcomes Be consistent with the Academic Program Profiles Support RIT’s goals, values, vision and mission Support the IWC Comprehensive Writing Program initiative Depth and Breadth Contribute to the development of a breadth of knowledge by providing course offerings from a broad range of disciplines, including math, humanities, and the natural and social sciences Allow students to explore a particular area of knowledge in depth through a series of related courses Provide opportunities for students to make connections between courses and across disciplines Be integrated into all four or five years of a student’s education at RIT

GEC Guiding Principles Supporting programs/majors Provide a progression of courses that are integrated with major fields of study Provide courses that support the basic requirements for students in the majors Implementation Be clear and concise to ease processes for: Scheduling, Auditing, Advising Offer students courses and programs that support their major field of study and other interests Provide students choices in how to fulfill their requirements Be clear and easy to understand for students, faculty, and staff Allow for easy adaptation for future reform Other Be intellectually stimulating for faculty and students Be adaptive to changing curricula and a changing world Support innovation, creativity, scholarship, and entrepreneurship

Proposed General Education Framework Proposed changes General Education Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment

How the New Framework Differs University-wide engagement Not disciplinary, but outcome driven First-Year Seminar Opportunities for integrated and inter-/trans-disciplinary experiences Intentional scaffolding Writing intensive

General Education Framework BSBFAASAAS Foundation First-Year Seminar/1 st -year writing intensive course 6666 Perspectives Categories TBD *15 12 Mathematical/Scientific/Tech Literacy 12 (4 courses) 066 Immersion Arts and Sciences Concentration Requirements * Choose 3 additional, related courses 9900 Number of Required Credits General Education Electives18030 TOTAL

First Year Seminar First Year Writing Perspectives 5 Quant Literacy Perspectives 4 Perspectives 3 Perspectives 2 Perspectives 1 Quant Literacy Science Literacy Conc. 3 Conc. 2 Conc. 1 Elective General Education courses to bring total to 60 credits Perspectives Foundation Immersion General Education Framework BS Degree Minor 4 (optional) Minor 4 (optional) Minor 5 ( optional) Basic Writing (optional) Capstone (optional)

First Year Seminar First Year Writing Basic Writing (optional) Conc. 3 Conc. 2 Conc. 1 Capstone (optional) Minor 4 (optional) Minor 4 (optional) Total should be a minimum of 30 credits Minor 5 ( optional) General Education – BFA Degree Perspectives Foundation Immersion Perspectives 5 Perspectives 4 Perspectives 3 Perspectives 2 Perspectives 1 Quant Literacy (optional) Quant Literacy (optional) Science Literacy (optional) Science Literacy (optional)

First Year Seminar First Year Writing Additional program determined or elective courses to bring total to 30 credits General Education – AS Degrees Perspectives Foundation Basic Writing (optional) Perspectives 5 Perspectives 4 Perspectives 3 Perspectives 2 Perspectives 1 Quant Literacy Science Literacy

First Year Seminar First Year Writing Additional program determined or elective courses to bring total to 25 credits General Education – AAS Degrees Choose 4 of 5; TBD Perspectives Foundation Basic Writing (optional) Perspectives 5 Perspectives 4 Perspectives 3 Perspectives 2 Perspectives 1 Quant Literacy Science Literacy

General Education Assessment Alignment/mapping of General Education Student Learning Outcomes to Courses Current Assessment Plan Implementation ◦ General Education Faculty Teams Assessment Management System ◦ Taskstream

Gen Ed Course Review/Approval GEC will review and evaluate all new proposals for courses for General Education credit using: ◦ State of New York Liberal Arts and Sciences Guidelines ◦ RIT Student General Education Student Learning Outcomes

Gen Ed Course Review/Approval The College Curriculum Committee provides: A cover memo (required form) : ◦ Process of approval ◦ Alignment to General Education Framework An outline for the course being reviewed in the ICC New/Revised Course Outline format

Gen Ed Course Review/Approval GEC reviews the proposed course and forwards the recommendation to the Chief Academic Officer GEC informs the ICC of the recommendations and the RIT community of the final decision regarding the course proposal GEC maintains database of currently approved courses

“Concentration” Approval Courses within a concentration go through the same approval process For approval as a General Education Concentration, a group of three courses ideally should: ◦ Explore a perspective area in greater detail ◦ Integrate across perspectives ◦ Lead to a minor with the addition of two courses

Questions?