Patrick Kelly National Center for Higher Education Management Systems Presentation to the Louisiana Postsecondary Education Review Commission September.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

Relationship Between Educational Attainment, Personal Income, and Economic Strength AL AZ AR CA CO CT DE IL IN IA KY LA MD MA MS NJ NY ND OK OR SC SD UT.
National Center for Higher Education Management Systems 3035 Center Green Drive, Suite 150 Boulder, Colorado Financing in Sync: Aligning the Pieces.
National Center for Higher Education Management Systems 3035 Center Green Drive, Suite 150 Boulder, Colorado Connecting Higher Education with the.
Exhibit 1. Premiums for Family Coverage, by State, 2011 Source: 2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey–Insurance Component. Dollars U.S. average = $15,022.
Revised Charts and Graphs for Hawaii A New Look at the Institutional Component of Higher Education Finance: A Guide for Evaluating Performance Relative.
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Millions of uninsured Source: Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: United States Census Bureau,
Background Information on the Newspoets Total Number: 78 active newspoets. 26 (of the original 36) newspoets from returned this year.
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
National Center for Higher Education Management Systems 3035 Center Green Drive, Suite 150 Boulder, Colorado State Profile: Arkansas Fayetteville,
National Journal Presentation Credits Producers: Katharine Conlon Director: Afzal Bari House Committee Maps Updated: March 19, 2015.
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, FY.
Uninsured Non-Elderly Adult Rate Increased from 17. 8% to 20
Medicaid Eligibility for Working Parents by Income, January 2013
House Price
WA OR ID MT ND WY NV 23% CA UT AZ NM 28% KS NE MN MO WI TX 31% IA IL
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, as.
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, as.
House price index for AK
Children's Eligibility for Medicaid/CHIP by Income, January 2013
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Other Adults, January 2017
NJ WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NH NV
The State of the States Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families
Medicaid Costs are Shared by the States and the Federal Government
Share of Births Covered by Medicaid, 2006
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
Coverage of Low-Income Adults by Scope of Coverage, January 2013
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
619 Involvement in State SSIPs
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Participation in Medicaid Expansion, as of March 2014
Percent of Women Ages 19 to 64 Uninsured by State,
States including governance in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including governance in their SSIP improvement.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Sampling Distribution of a Sample Mean
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Parents, January 2017
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Average annual growth rate
Sampling Distribution of a Sample Mean
Uninsured Rate Among Adults Ages 19–64, 2008–09 and 2019
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
The College Completion Agenda
Post-Reform: Projected Percent of Adults Ages 19–64 Uninsured by State
United States: age distribution family households and family size
Premiums for Family Coverage, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
Uninsured Nonelderly Adult Rate Has Increased from Percent to 20
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Presentation transcript:

Patrick Kelly National Center for Higher Education Management Systems Presentation to the Louisiana Postsecondary Education Review Commission September 29, 2009 Productivity and the Impact of Shifting Enrollments and Resources

Different Approaches to Analyzing Productivity State and Local Appropriations Tuition and Fees Endowment Income Government Grants and Contracts Private Gifts, Grants and Contracts Other E&G Revenue Instruction Student Services Academic Support Institutional Support Plant Operation and Maintenance Research Public Service Scholarships and Fellowships Programmatic Costs Student/Faculty Ratios Faculty Workload Faculty and Staff Attrition Administrative Staffing Patterns Academic Program Mix Course Delivery Modes Space Utilization Public Investment vs. Performance Institutional Spending vs. Performance Cost Savings and Efficiency General Revenues General ExpendituresInternal Operations Degree Production Retention and Graduation Rates External Research Outcomes and Performance 2

Different Approaches to Analyzing Productivity State and Local Appropriations Tuition and Fees Endowment Income Government Grants and Contracts Private Gifts, Grants and Contracts Other E&G Revenue Instruction Student Services Academic Support Institutional Support Plant Operation and Maintenance Research Public Service Scholarships and Fellowships Programmatic Costs Student/Faculty Ratios Faculty Workload Faculty and Staff Attrition Administrative Staffing Patterns Academic Program Mix Course Delivery Modes Space Utilization Public Investment vs. Performance Institutional Spending vs. Performance Cost Savings and Efficiency General Revenues General ExpendituresInternal Operations Degree Production Retention and Graduation Rates External Research Outcomes and Performance NCHEMS Approach Total Unrestricted Revenues 3

Different Approaches to Analyzing Productivity State and Local Appropriations Tuition and Fees Endowment Income Government Grants and Contracts Private Gifts, Grants and Contracts Other E&G Revenue Instruction Student Services Academic Support Institutional Support Plant Operation and Maintenance Research Public Service Scholarships and Fellowships Programmatic Costs Student/Faculty Ratios Faculty Workload Faculty and Staff Attrition Administrative Staffing Patterns Academic Program Mix Course Delivery Modes Space Utilization Public Investment vs. Performance Institutional Spending vs. Performance Cost Savings and Efficiency General Revenues General ExpendituresInternal Operations Degree Production Retention and Graduation Rates External Research Outcomes and Performance Delta Approach Education Related Expenses 4

Different Approaches to Analyzing Productivity State and Local Appropriations Tuition and Fees Endowment Income Government Grants and Contracts Private Gifts, Grants and Contracts Other E&G Revenue Instruction Student Services Academic Support Institutional Support Plant Operation and Maintenance Research Public Service Scholarships and Fellowships Programmatic Costs Student/Faculty Ratios Faculty Workload Faculty and Staff Attrition Administrative Staffing Patterns Academic Program Mix Course Delivery Modes Space Utilization Public Investment vs. Performance Institutional Spending vs. Performance Cost Savings and Efficiency General Revenues General ExpendituresInternal Operations Degree Production Retention and Graduation Rates External Research Outcomes and Performance 5

A New Look at the Institutional Component of Higher Education Finance: A Guide for Evaluating Performance Relative to Financial Resources (2005) The Dreaded “P” Work: An Examination of Productivity in Public Postsecondary Education (2009) NCHEMS Reports on Higher Education Productivity Available at 6

The Dreaded “P’ Word: An Examination of Productivity in Public Postsecondary Education 7

Internal Public Investment from State and Students Postsecondary Education Institutions Costs of Producing Degrees Production of Degrees – and Value to Students and the State Policy Focus External Focus of this Report 8

Calculating Public Higher Education Productivity (Using Alabama as an Example) Total State and Local Appropriations and Tuition Revenues for Public Higher Education = $2,394,572,347 Total Funding = Annual Degrees and Certificates Awarded in Public Colleges and Universities (Weighted for Market Value) = 42,548 Certificates and Degrees Awarded = Productivity Total Funding per Certificate and Degree Produced = $56,280 = Degrees Weighted by Value to the State and Individuals: Median Earnings in the State Employment Market Note: STEM includes credentials awarded in computer science and technology, architecture and engineering, mathematics and statistics, and biological and life sciences. * * “Some college, but no degree” was used as a proxy for median earnings of certificate degree-holders. 9

Total Funding per FTE Student ( ) Source: SHEEO State Higher Education Finance Survey

Total Funding per FTE Student by State and Student Share ( ) Source: SHEEO State Higher Education Finance Survey 2008 Tuition and Fees State and Local 11

Annual FTE Enrollment by Public Sector ( ) Source: NCES, IPEDS Fall Enrollment Survey 12

Degrees and Certificates Awarded* per 100 FTE Students ( ) * Adjusted for value of degrees in the state employment market (median earnings by degree type and level) Sources: SHEEO State Higher Education Finance Survey 2008; NCES, IPEDS Completions Survey; U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (Public Use Microdata Samples) 13

Degrees and Certificates Awarded* by Level ( ) * Adjusted for value of degrees in the state employment market (median earnings by degree type and level) Sources: NCES, IPEDS Completions Survey; U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (Public Use Microdata Samples) 14

Percentage of Degrees and Certificates Awarded in STEM Fields ( ) Sources: NCES, IPEDS Completions Survey 15

Productivity: Degrees Awarded per FTE vs. Total Funding per FTE AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY US ,0008,00011,00014,00017,00020,000 Low Resources, High Production Low Resources, Low Production High Resources, High Production High Resources, Low Production Performance: Degrees Awarded per 100 FTE Resources: Total Funding per FTE 16

Productivity: Total Funding per Degree* * Adjusted for value of degrees in the state employment market (median earnings by degree type and level) Tuition and Fees State and Local Sources: SHEEO State Higher Education Finance Survey 2008; NCES, IPEDS Completions Survey; U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (Public Use Microdata Samples) 17

Annual Certificates and Degrees Awarded by Control/Sector ( ) Source: NCES, IPEDS Copmpletions Survey 18

Productivity vs. Educational Attainment of the Adult Population Percent of Adults (25 to 64) with Associate Degrees or Higher (2006) Productivity: Total Funding per Degree ( ) Sources: SHEEO State Higher Education Finance Survey 2008; NCES, IPEDS Completions Survey; U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (Public Use Microdata Samples) AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY US ,00035,00045,00055,00065,00075,00085,00095,000 High Productivity, Low AttainmentLow Productivity, Low Attainment High Productivity, High AttainmentLow Productivity, High Attainment 19

Productivity: Total Funding per Degree (Two-Year Institutions) * Adjusted for value of degrees in the state employment market (median earnings by degree level) Source: Louisiana Board of Regents 20

Productivity: Total Funding per Degree (Four-Year Institutions) * Adjusted for value of degrees in the state employment market (median earnings by degree level) Source: Louisiana Board of Regents 21

The Impact of Shifting Enrollment and Resources 22

Louisiana = 56.5 Sources: Louisiana Board of Regents. Louisiana Dept. of Education. Note: High school graduates not available for High school graduates for Orleans Parish for 2007 only (2006 affected by hurricane). Public 4Yr Public 2Yr, CC LTC Louisiana Public Sector – First-Time Undergraduates Directly Out of High School as a Percent of High School Graduates, Annual Average 23

Louisiana = 42.1 Sources: Louisiana Board of Regents. Louisiana Dept. of Education. Note: High school graduates not available for High school graduates for Orleans Parish for 2007 only (2006 affected by hurricane). Louisiana Public 4-Year Sector – First-Time Undergraduates Directly Out of High School as a Percent of High School Graduates, Annual Average 24

Louisiana = 12.1 Sources: Louisiana Board of Regents. Louisiana Dept. of Education. Note: High school graduates not available for High school graduates for Orleans Parish for 2007 only (2006 affected by hurricane). Louisiana Public 2-Year/CC Sector – First-Time Undergraduates Directly Out of High School as a Percent of High School Graduates, Annual Average 25

Louisiana = 2.3 Sources: Louisiana Board of Regents. Louisiana Dept. of Education. Note: High school graduates not available for High school graduates for Orleans Parish for 2007 only (2006 affected by hurricane). Louisiana Technical College Sector – First-Time Undergraduates Directly Out of High School as a Percent of High School Graduates, Annual Average 26

27

28

29

30

What Some States are Doing to Address Cost Efficiency an Productivity Funding Completions – OK, OH, IN, TN, and TX Re-Designing Coursework – Particularly Remedial Education (TN, MS) Major Structural Delivery Changes– AZ, LA Establish Effectiveness and Efficiency Commissions – OH, MD Reaching Out to Adults with College Credit – KY, TN, NM, CO, IN, and OK Stackable Certificates – OH, OR, KY 31

Ohio and Maryland Ohio’s Effectiveness and Efficiency Commission – Identified five major areas of focus for cost savings – healthcare, IT-education, energy, procurement, and academic – Workgroup in place to work with institutions on best practices and establishing metrics to track progress in the five areas Maryland’s Strategies – Recognition that higher education system is growing faster than the state budget – Agreed to pay for three-quarters of the growth and institutions pay for one-quarter through cost-saving – Mandated that each institution increase student credit hours per FTE faculty by 10 percent 32

Patrick Kelly NCHEMS 33