Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Revised Charts and Graphs for Hawaii A New Look at the Institutional Component of Higher Education Finance: A Guide for Evaluating Performance Relative.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Revised Charts and Graphs for Hawaii A New Look at the Institutional Component of Higher Education Finance: A Guide for Evaluating Performance Relative."— Presentation transcript:

1 Revised Charts and Graphs for Hawaii A New Look at the Institutional Component of Higher Education Finance: A Guide for Evaluating Performance Relative to Financial Resources Revisions To Hawaii were made on February 9, 2006 as a result of double reporting the total state appropriation for the fringe benefits of the 10 campus public system.

2 State Systems of Higher Education

3 Figure 2: FTE Undergraduates (Fall 2003) per 100 18-44 With HS Diploma (2000) 15 25 35 45 55 65 $5,000$10,000$15,000$20,000 AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE GA HI IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MS MT NE NV NJ NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD UT VT VA WA WI US FL ID MI MN MO NH NM TN TX WV WY Total Funding Per FTE Performance Ratio of Performance to Funding Associated with the Average of all States Ratio of Performance to Funding Associated with States Performing at or Above the 80 th Percentile

4 Figure 3: Undergraduate Credentials Awarded per 100 FTE Undergraduates, 2002-03 10 15 20 25 30 $5,000$10,000$15,000$20,000 AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE GA HI IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MS MT NE NV NJ NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SD UT VT VA WA WI US FL ID MI MN MO NH NM NY SC TN TX WV WY Total Funding Per FTE Performance

5 Figure 4: PhD's per 1,000 Degrees Awarded (Baccalaureate and Above), 2002-03 AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE GA HI IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MS MT NE NV NJ NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD UT VT VA WA WI US FL ID MI MN MO NH NM TN TX WV WY 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 $5,000$10,000$15,000$20,000 Total Funding Per FTE Performance

6 Figure 5: Federal & Industry R&D Per Capita, 2002 $5,000$10,000$15,000$20,000 50 100 150 200 250 Total Funding Per FTE Performance 0 AL AK AZ AR CA CO DE GA HI IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MA MS MT NE NV NJ NY NC ND OH OK OR PA SC SD UT VT VA WA WI US CT FL ID MI MN MO NH NM RIRI TN TX WV WY MD ($273, $12,527)

7 Figure 6: Student Pipeline Result, 2002 Total Funding Per FTE Performance 10 15 20 25 30 $5,000$10,000$15,000$20,000 AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE GA HI IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MS MT NE NV NJ NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD UT VT VA WA WI FL ID MI MN MO NH NM NY TN TX WV WY US

8 Figure 7: Bachelor's Degrees as a Percent of High School Grads Six Years Earlier, 2003 NH 20 40 60 80 100 $5,000$10,000$15,000$20,000 AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE GA HI IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MS MT NE NV NJ NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD UT VT VA WA WI US FL ID MI MN MO NM TN TX WV WY Total Funding Per FTE Performance

9 Figure 8: State Systems of Higher Education – Overall Index Score – Average Performance Relative to Funding Per FTE

10 Public Research Institutions

11 Figure 9: Six-Year Baccalaureate Graduation Rate, 2003 Total Funding Per FTE Performance AK 20 40 60 80 $5,000$10,000$15,000$30,000 AL AZ AR CA CO CT DE GA HI IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MS MT NE NJ NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD UT VT VA WA WI FL ID MI MN MO NV NH NM TN TX WV WY US $20,000$25,000

12 Figure 10: Doctorate Degrees Per 1,000 Degrees (Baccalaureate and Above), 2002-03 Total Funding Per FTE Performance $5,000 10 30 40 50 60 70 $5,000$10,000$15,000$20,000$25,000$30,000 20 AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE GA HI IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MS MT NE NV NJ NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD UT VT VA WA WI US FL ID MI MN MO NH NM TN TX WV WY MA

13 Figure 11: Bachelor's Degrees Per 100 FTE Undergrads, 2002-03 10 15 20 25 30 $5,000$15,000$25,000$30,000$10,000$20,000 AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE GA HI IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MS MT NE NJ NY NC ND OH OR PA RI SC SD UT VT VA WA WI US FL ID MI MN MO NV NH NM OK TN TX WV WY Total Funding Per FTE Performance

14 Figure 12: Research Expenditures Per FT Faculty ($), 2003 10 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 $5,000$15,000$25,000$30,000$10,000$20,000 AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE GA HI IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MS MT NE NV NJ NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD UT VT VA WA WI US FL ID MI MN MO NH NM TN TX WV WY Total Funding Per FTE Performance

15 Figure 13: Public Research Institutions – Overall Index Score – Average Performance Relative to Funding Per FTE 134.5 133.5 122.7 120.3 118.6 113.4 113.1 112.0 111.7 111.5 110.7 109.8 106.4 104.2 100.9 100.1 99.4 97.897.6 94.8 94.6 94.494.2 93.1 92.9 92.7 92.2 92.0 91.4 89.6 88.2 87.1 84.8 81.9 81.1 79.6 77.1 75.4 74.6 72.9 72.5 71.2 70.3 70.0 63.1 59.4 88.0 91.3 94.9 0 40 80 120 160 ColoradoNew HampshireCalifornia Wisconsin Georgia Texas New JerseyWashington Virginia NebraskaKansas FloridaIllinoisRhode IslandIowa MichiganArizonaDelaware OklahomaMinnesotaOhio New YorkMontanaUtah Louisiana PennsylvaniaOregon MarylandSouth Carolina MassachusettsMississippi North Dakota HawaiiConnecticutIndiana South Dakota New MexicoNevada Alabama Missouri North Carolina Kentucky Arkansas West VirginiaIdahoMaine TennesseeWyoming AlaskaVermont

16 Public Baccalaureate and Masters Institutions

17 Figure 14: Six-Year Baccalaureate Graduation Rate, 2003 Total Funding Per FTE Performance 20 30 40 50 60 70 $2,000$7,000$12,000$22,000$15,000 AL AR CA CO CT DE GA HI IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MS MT NE NJ NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD UT VT VA WA WI FL ID MI MN MO NH NM TN TX WV US AK (17.7)

18 Figure 15: Bachelor's Degrees Per FTE Undergrads, 2002-03 5 10 15 20 25 $2,000$7,000$12,000$22,000$15,000 FL AL AK AR CA CO CT DE GA HI IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MS MT NE NJ NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD UT VT VA WA WI US ID MI MN MO NH NM TN TX WV Total Funding Per FTE Performance

19 Figure 16: Public Bachelor’s and Master's Institutions – Overall Index Score – Average Performance Relative to Funding Per FTE 121.7 121.1 120.2 118.2 115.4 114.3 111.5 110.4 108.3 107.6 107.5 106.5 105.2 102.6 101.6 100.8 100.1 99.0 97.6 94.9 89.9 88.4 87.287.1 84.9 84.8 84.0 83.5 81.6 81.281.0 76.276.1 74.9 73.7 72.7 71.4 69.7 68.8 63.4 56.7 47.7 33.4 96.0 83.3 77.4 0 30 60 90 120 150 Washington Iowa New Jersey VirginiaWisconsinColoradoNew Hampshire New York Minnesota Pennsylvania Massachusetts South Carolina KansasIllinois Utah California Nebraska Missouri Oklahoma South Dakota MarylandAlabama Rhode IslandWest VirginiaTexasArkansas Connecticut Michigan Tennessee North Carolina North Dakota MaineGeorgiaFlorida LouisianaHawaiiKentucky Oregon VermontMississippiMontana IdahoOhioIndianaNew MexicoDelaware Alaska

20 Public Two-Year Institutions

21 Figure 17: Total Credentials Awarded per 100 FTE Undergrads, 2003 5 15 25 35 45 $4,000$6,000$12,000$16,000$14,000$8,000$10,000 AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE GA HI IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MS MT NE NV NJ NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD UT VT VA WA WI US FL ID MI MN MO NH NM TN TX WV WY Total Funding Per FTE Performance

22 Figure 18: Three-Year Associate Graduation Rate, 2003 0 40 50 60 70 $4,000$6,000$12,000$16,000$14,000$8,000$10,000 30 20 10 AZ AL AK AR CA CO CTDE GA HI IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MS MT NE NV NJ NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD UT VT VA WA WI US FL ID MI MN MO NH NM TN TX WV WY Total Funding Per FTE Performance

23 Figure 19: Associate Degrees Awarded at Two-Year Colleges Per 1,000 Adults (25 to 64) with an Associates Degree 0 20 40 60 80 $4,000$6,000$12,000$16,000$14,000$8,000$10,000 TN AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE GA HI IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MS MT NE NV NJ NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD UT VT VA WA WI US FL ID MI MN MO NH NM TX WV WY Total Funding Per FTE Performance

24 Figure 20: Public Two-Year Institutions – Overall Index Score – Average Performance Relative to Funding Per FTE South DakotaMississippiCaliforniaWashingtonIowaFloridaUtahGeorgiaIllinoisKansasOklahomaVirginiaAlabamaNorth DakotaMinnesotaNebraskaArizonaArkansasColoradoMontanaTexasKentuckyAverage StateMissouriWest VirginiaSouth CarolinaNew YorkLouisianaNew HampshireNorth CarolinaMichiganNew JerseyMaineVermontWyomingOhioMassachusettsWisconsinTennesseeIndianaHawaiiOregonIdahoNew MexicoRhode IslandMarylandConnecticutPennsylvaniaDelawareNevadaAlaska 174.0 132.6 125.8 123.3 120.7 117.0 116.3 114.6 109.2 102.4 100.6 98.7 98.3 97.1 96.9 94.2 90.9 89.3 88.8 86.0 85.6 85.0 82.9 82.2 81.7 80.3 77.377.2 75.175.0 72.9 71.8 70.2 70.0 69.3 68.0 67.767.6 67.1 64.3 64.0 61.9 60.2 58.7 54.6 52.2 50.0 48.9 46.5 43.0 22.4 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175


Download ppt "Revised Charts and Graphs for Hawaii A New Look at the Institutional Component of Higher Education Finance: A Guide for Evaluating Performance Relative."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google