VH (H->bb) Cut Flow Status

Introduction Hoping to start the mini-ntuple etc production now Some push over last few days but still not as much as would have liked Where are we now … ? 11 groups have filled in the object-level cut flow so far CERN/Ed, Liv/Bham, Sinica/DESY, Harvard, CPPM, UCL, Barcelona, Lisbon, Tsukuba, Dubna, Bonn ≥ 2 groups for both 0 and 2; no inputs from e.g. Freiberg/Iowa for 1 lepton Differences at level of ≤ % in general but some large outliers More details on next slides Many groups have not filled all numbers -> please update! 9 groups for 1 lepton, 2 groups for 0/2 lepton Quite some differences No data numbers for 1 lepton; only 1 group for 2 lepton; 2 for 0 lepton 11/10/2013HSG5 Meeting2

Overview 11/10/2013HSG5 Meeting3 No groups agree! Mostly ≤ 1% differences } } } Mostly < 1 % } White = agree -100 = no results Way too much red still for comfort and a lot of missing numbers!

Objects: Leptons Electrons Main differences in: VeryLooseLH: Liv/Bham and Bonn Liv/Bham understood and rerunning (thanks Ines!) E T > 7/25 GeV: Harvard, Bonn, Dubna and Lisbon Calo isolation: Mainly CPPM; Lisbon smaller Other quantities generally very good Muons Many differences in p T >7/25 GeV and WH signal calo/track isolation In latter two cases in each pair no groups agree! AOD groups seem to have quite large differences Harvard: Large differences in CB+ST muid numbers and not all filled Liv/Bham: Tight Muid, Track isol, p T > 7 GeV, Z 0, hit cuts Believe due to wrong classifications (e.g. inc SiAssoc) and rerunning On a positive note, calo muons perfect for most groups 11/10/2013HSG5 Meeting4

Objects: Jets/MET Jets Main differences in: p T : many groups; seems to be bimodal JVF: several groups, particularly AOD ones (but not same as each other) Liv/Bham have diffs in E > 0; Harvard have diffs in eta b-tagging Differences in b-tag cuts, mostly (but not all) due to definitions Also some differences in truth matching Need to get agreement on reconstructed objects before tackle this Many groups have not filled these in! MET No groups agree for low/high bin and several have not filled in values! Where they are filled in, agreement mostly better than %-level Differences likely due to propagation of other objects Overlap removal not filled in by many groups! 11/10/2013HSG5 Meeting5

Event 2 lepton Harvard, Liv/Bham, Tsukuba Liv/Bham ran over full DS not just TID and rerunning Harvard have 50% difference after 1 signal lepton cut! Don’t think it can all be due to object-level differences 1 lepton CERN/Ed, Lisbon, UCL, Boon, Tsukuba Fairly large differences in 3 jet events UCL have diff in MET cleaning; Bonn have diff from 1 WH signal lepton Only 2 groups have P T Z dependent cuts but have pretty good agreement Only 1 group has filled m(bb) cuts, CRs, SFs and event flavour! We have often had quite large differences here -> please fill in 11/10/2013HSG5 Meeting6

Event (2) 0 lepton Sinica/DESY, Liv/Bham, Barcelona, Tsukuba, CPPM (only first part) Liv/Bham have difference in MET > 90 GeV (and lepton veto) Due to different order of cuts and rerunning Liv/Bham and Sinica have pretty good agreement for p T Z cuts though Sinica and Barcelona agree perfectly up to dR cut Sinica and Tsukuba also differ significantly from dR Only 1 group has filled m(bb) & event flavour; none have filled SFs/CRs Please update! No one except Liv/Bham and Sinica yet posted full data numbers For 0 lepton, Liv/Bham were applying trigger cut early to save time and are rerunning Very important to have check on data too so get same candidates! 11/10/2013HSG5 Meeting7

Clarifications/Updates Reminder: agreed to ask for exactly 2 b-tags in all channels Looking at all jets not just 2 leading ones! m(jj): use b-jets in 2-tag; b-jet and lead jet for 1 tag; 2 lead jets for 0 tag b-jet corrections only applied for 2-tag case (both DT/TT) Still need to update Muon/egamma packages after cut flow but before run mini-ntuple production. Need to double-check tags. MuonEfficiencyCorrections ElectronEfficiencyCorrection egammaAnalysisUtils /10/2013HSG5 Meeting8

Links to Further Details Selection: Packages and information: Cut flow datasets and clarifications: Spreadsheet (2012): mM0JYSEtneWxqXzRwQ1FaaHc#gid=29 11/10/2013HSG5 Meeting9