Habitat Use of the Snowshoe Hare Melissa Pacheco Winter Ecology Spring 2010 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Winter Invertebrate Composition as a Function of Elevation How does invertebrate richness, diversity, and abundance change throughout an elevational gradient?
Advertisements

Spatial Variability of Aspen Bark Chlorophyll Content In the Winter Justin Burman, EBIO 4100, Spring 2011 Winter Ecology Mountain Research Station University.
Cavity Nest Preferences and Locations of Woodpeckers in Wild Basin, Rocky Mountain National Park Peter Dolan Winter Ecology, Spring 2012 Mountain Research.
Varying snow depths and the effect on moose Movement Alyssa Countway Winter Ecology Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Communities and Biomes
DO NOW 1. Why do you think there are different types of plants and animals in different areas of the world? 2. Why are there not the same animals in Canada.
Winter Foraging Habits of Communal Flocking Birds John Rudolph Winter Field Ecology, Spring 2010 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado at Boulder.
Forest Webquest Deer Mouse Snowshoe Hare Great Gray Owl Beaver Moose Black Bear Gray Wolf Wolverine Red Fox Chickadee Squirrel.
Matt Guyerson Winter Ecology Spring 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Ecosystems- Characteristics and Cycles
What are the effects of Exposure on the treeline ecosystem? Brian Schleckser Winter Ecology spring ’09 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado,
 Snowshoe hares belong to the mammals. They look like rabbits but they are bigger in size.  They are common in cold temperature zones of the world.
Interactions between predators and prey. What is a predator? Masked Shrew Sorex cinereus Mountain lion Puma concolor Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis.
Thesis  Erin Harrington  Advisors  Bobbi Low  Phil Myers.
Available Alpine Resources for the Insectivorous Golden- crowned Kinglet Shelley Nagata -Winter Ecology, 2010 – Mountain Research Station, University of.
Avalanches: Disaster or Miracle? A Changing Ecological Effect Jason Blair February 21, 2009 Winter Ecology Spring 2009 Mountain Research Station, University.
 Vegetation Density and Snow Accumulation Evan Esfahani Winter Ecology 2014 Mountain Research Station.
Winter Ecology, MRS 2013 Project by Rob McFadzean.
© SSER Ltd.. Ecological Techniques A variety of universal practical approaches exist for investigating the biotic and abiotic components of ecosystems.
Supranivean travel of snowshoe hares on Niwot Ridge Marieta Bialek EBIO 4100 Winter Ecology Spring 2012.
UTCFWRU Landscape dynamics of bird and small mammal communities in sagebrush-dominated mountain meadows: A hierarchical, multi- scale study Elizabeth J.
Biomes Specific Divisions of Biosphere. Ecosystems So almost every corner of this planet, from the highest to the lowest, the warmest to the coldest,
Impact of Recreational Snow Compaction on Small Mammals in the Subnivean Space Derek Sweeney EBIO 4120 Spring 2008 Mountain Research Station University.
Kim Tarde Vegetation Ecology Summer 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Utah’s Geography The study of the earth and its mountains, plateaus, valleys, deserts, rivers, lakes, and oceans.
KRISTY CAMPBELL WINTER ECOLOGY,SPRING 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder The Effect of Elevation on Mammal Behavior and Abundance.
Animal Activity and Tree Well Width Erin Kinney Winter Ecology 2011 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder Erin Kinney Winter Ecology.
Vulnerability of moose and roe deer to wolf predation in Scandinavia - does habitat matter? Contact Lisette Fritzon
Mammal activity in the sub-alpine urban- interface in relation to distance from settlement boundary. Kyle Poos-Benson Winter Ecology 2014 Mountain Research.
Canopy Dynamics and Tree Well Size Does the canopy height and size of coniferous trees affect the size of the tree well at the snow surface? J. Kalin Puent.
 Comparing Vegetation in a Riparian Zone to an Upland Area in a Colorado Montane Forest By: Abby Branson Vegetation Ecology, Summer 2013 Mountain Research.
By Michael R. McHugh Winter Ecology Spring 2010 Mountain Research Station – University of Colorado, Boulder.
Rachel Jones Winter Ecology Spring 2013 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder Photo by Yellow Wood Guiding.
Subnivean Access in Forests of Varying Density Patrick Ellsworth Winter Ecology, Spring 2013 Mountain Research Station.
The effect of tree density and height on tree-flagging of Lodgepole Pines in Niwot’s sub-alpine forest Michael D. Schuster Winter Ecology – Spring 2010.
Winter Soil Respiration Near Dead and Living Lodgepole Pines at Niwot Ridge, CO Justin D’Atri Winter Ecology Spring 2010 Mountain Research Station – University.
WINTERTIME MAMMAL ACTIVITY – SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS Brian Inglis EBIO Winter Ecology Mountain Research Station Spring ’12 CU Boulder.
A Winter Comparison Study of Dominant Alpine Plant Communities in the Southern Rocky Mountains and the Chugach Mountains of Southern Alaska What factors.
1 Importance of Forest in Nature Recycling of water and carbon dioxide It helps regulate climate It helps control runoff and soil erosion It provides homes/shelter.
By Lyla Renwick - Archibold Equipo 3
Winter Controls on the Distribution of Arboreal Hair Lichens in the Niwot Ridge Biosphere Reserve Keli Baker Winter Ecology Spring 2013 Mountain Research.
Are the Snowpack Structures Different Between the Riparian and Upland Environments? Allie B. Cunningham Winter Ecology Spring 2015 CU Mountain Research.
Moose Preference of Bark Chlorophyll Content Taylor Mendoza Winter Ecology – Spring 2015 CU Mountain Research Station.
Continental Lynx Movement Study. To understand the predator...
A snowpack comparison between a limber pine site and a spruce site within a spruce forest Sam Sartwell, Winter Ecology, EBIO 4100, Spring 2014, CU Mountain.
Kate Lonner Winter Ecology Spring 2015 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Biomes. Biomes are regions in the world that have their own kind of climate, soil, plants, and animals.
Rocky Mountain National Park By:Jeff Preussner. Location Rocky Mountain National Park is located in North Central Colorado. The Rocky Mountains are located.
TREE WELLS: COMPARISON OF CONIFEROUS AND DECIDUOUS TREES Magali Weissgerber, Winter Ecology, Spring 2015, CU Mountain research Station.
UC Research Station at Anza Borrego
Habitat & Niche Habitats and Niches June 4, 2018.
PCB 3043L - General Ecology Data Analysis.
Canada’s Natural Regions
Benchmark, part 1 Observation Record Environmental Science
Kristi Hannam SUNY-Geneseo
Distribution of Arboreal Lichens Relative to Snowpack
Keystone Species Questions and Answers.
Trail Effects on Squirrel and Snow Shoe Hare Density
Snowshoe hare behavior in different environments
Species Diversity Comparison North and South Slopes
Biomes.
Terrestrial Biomes: Taiga
Foraging and Nesting Habits of Woodpeckers in a Subalpine Forest
A Comparison of Riparian Vegetation Structures
Spatial and Temporal Soil Respiration in the Subalpine
SEASONAL DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS OF DEER.
Landscape Features Affecting Squirrel Cache Density and Location
Influence of canopy cover on behavioral traits of snowshoe hare
J. L. Period 2 Weasel.
The Human Impact on Earth
Presentation transcript:

Habitat Use of the Snowshoe Hare Melissa Pacheco Winter Ecology Spring 2010 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder

Introduction How does the snowshoe hare (lepus americanus) allocate time between different habitats? How does the spatial structure of the forest affect the habitat use of the snowshoe hare?

Introduction Specifically between two environments Semi-closed lodge pole pine forest Semi-open aspen and willow grove

Introduction Literature suggests: Hare avoid open areas due to predation risks (Orr, 1982) Shrubs are not an important component of cover (Malaney, 2006) Variety of vegetative features are important (Monzón, 2004) In Utah, lodgepole pine habitats were used much more extensively then aspen habitats (Dolbeer,, 1975) Hypothesis: There will be more evidence of snowshoe hare activity in the semi-closed environment.

Introduction Relevance to ecology: –Snowshoe hare are essential to ecosystems that they live in Predators include: foxes, coyotes, wolves, lynx, bobcats, mink, weasels, owls, mountain lions, hawks, & wolverine (Shefferly, 2007) –considered a keystone species (Kurta, 1995) depending on ecosystemKurta, 1995 –Gain knowledge of the ecology of important species

Methods Randomly selected study area with semi- open habitat bordered by semi-closed environment Stretched 100m field tape along border Random number generator picked 4 values –9,26,71,91 Walked either side of field tape for 10m at corresponding distances Recorded presence of hare tracks and depth into each environment

Methods Semi-open Habitat Semi-closed Habitat –100m field tape –10m transect into each microhabitat –Stream –100m field tape –10m transect into each microhabitat –Stream

Semi-closed HabitatSemi-open Habitat

Methods Limitations of study design Data collect required good weather/ snow conditions Depth into habitat had no meaning Study area included stream

Data TransectSemi- closed (m) Semi-open (m) , 6.4TNP , 8.5 4TNP0.8, 2.5 TNP- tracks not present

Data Semi-open Habitat Semi-closed Habitat – 100m field tape – 10m transect into each microhabitat – Stream Observed Tracks – 100m field tape – 10m transect into each microhabitat – Stream Observed Tracks

Data Semi-openSemi-closed Total # Tracks Present 45 Semi-openSemi-closed Frequency.75 Abundance Frequency

Results

Difference in abundance is not significant Frequencies between habitats were equal

Discussion Frequency suggests similar distribution between habitats Fail to reject null hypothesis Both habitats are likely to contain important features Type of predator may influence cover required Complimentary habitats being used in same way

Discussion Spatial structure not only factor differentiating habitats May have found different effect in other mountain winter ecosystems Possible sources of error –Not enough data, need replicates –Can not tell if tracks came from same individual or from separate SSH

Conclusion Frequency suggests similar distribution between habitats Both habitats likely include important features for snowshoe hare ecology Complementary habitats

Special Thanks My Mother & Justin D’Atri

Questions?

Literature Cited Dolebeer, R. A., C. R. Willam. “Population Ecology of Snowshoe Hares in the Central Rocky Mountains” The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 39, No. 3 (Jul., 1975) pp Kurta, A Mammals of the Great Lakes Region. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Malaney, J. L., J. K. Frey. “Summer Habitat Use by Snowshoehare and Cottontail at Their Southern Zone of Sympatry” The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 70, No. 3 (Jun., 2006), pp Monzón, A., P. Fernandes, and N. Rodrigues. "Vegetation structure descriptors regulating the presence of wild rabbit in the National Park of Peneda-Gerês, Portugal." European Journal of Wildlife Research 50.1 (2004): 1-6. Print. Orr, C., D. G. Dodds. “Snowshoe Hare Habitat Preferences in Nova Scotia Spruce-Fir Forests” Wildlife Society Bulletin, Vol. 10, No. 2 (Summer, 1982), pp Shefferly, N "Lepus americanus" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed February 06, 2010 at us_americanus.html. us_americanus.html