Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Kate Lonner Winter Ecology Spring 2015 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Kate Lonner Winter Ecology Spring 2015 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder."— Presentation transcript:

1 Kate Lonner Winter Ecology Spring 2015 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder

2  The word moose come from the Algonquin Indian word meaning "eater of twigs” (Colorado Parks & Wildlife)  Moose are loners – rarely travel with more than 1 or 2 other companions (National Park Service)  Their preferred diet contains willow, aspen, and aquatic plants (National Park Service)  Prefer less than 3 feet of snow for easier travel and more accessible vegetation (National Park Service)

3  I am interested in moose travel and if they prefer a certain type of vegetation  Where do they like to walk, graze, rest, and other business?  If there is a preference, it will help to track moose and know what to focus on to maintain their preferred habitats

4  Null: Moose have no travel preference in regards to vegetation structure.  Alternative: Moose do have a preference on where they travel in regards to vegetation structure.  Predicted outcome: Due to the preferred diet consumed by moose, I hypothesize that they will more likely travel through aspen and willow trees.

5

6  Found moose tracks  6 random 5 m transects along tracks  6 random 5 m transects along control  Pseudoreplicates

7  There was more abundant vegetation in the site along the tracks.  Some transects in each site had greater numbers of each tree and some had fewer number, there was no pattern.

8  Anova test Site type (tracks vs. control): p-value = 0.042, Tree type: p-value = 6.14 *10 9 Interaction: p-value = 0.446  Type of Vegetation at Each Site

9  Anova test Site type (tracks vs. control): p-value = 0.042, there is a significant relationship that suggests where the moose are wandering is different from the control Tree type: p-value << 0.0001, there is significant data that suggests that the proportion of trees is uneven, the forest isn't uniform Interaction: p-value = 0.446, there is NO significant data that suggests there is a difference in vegetation between the two sites

10

11  More abundant vegetation in the tracks.  There is no relationship between where the moose walked and the vegetation composition.  My hypothesis that the moose would rather walk through aspen and willow trees due to their preferred was incorrect  This can be due to different factors including lack of replication, depth of snow, and the reason why the moose are traveling

12  United States. National Park Service. (2015, February 27). Moose. Retrieved February 28, 2015, from http://www.nps.gov/romo/naturescience/m oose.htm  "COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE." Colorado Parks & Wildlife. Web. 28 Feb. 2015..  Thank you to Tim Kittle for this wonderful class and to Genevieve for helping me collect data

13

14


Download ppt "Kate Lonner Winter Ecology Spring 2015 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google