Library Media Specialist Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Teacher Work Sample
Advertisements

Sue Sears Sally Spencer Nancy Burstein OSEP Directors’ Conference 2013
The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
PORTFOLIO.
Teacher Excellence and Support System
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
Lead. inspire. teach. Welcome! Mentor Collaboration working together to increase student achievement.
0 Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits This sample lesson and accompanying documentation are.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
The “Highly Effective” Early Childhood Classroom Environment
National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) PE Coordinator’s Mini-Conference Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Framework for Effective Teaching.
Understanding the EPC Rating rubrics
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
Planning, Instruction, and Technology
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Professional Growth Portfolio Your Name Here Date.
 Rubric – Appendix pg. 26  Four components ◦ Planning – will look at tomorrow ◦ Classroom management ◦ Instruction ◦ Professional Notebook.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Interim Evaluation Documents evidence of meeting standards
New Teacher Preparation: Compass Teacher Evaluation
Presentation by D. McDonald. A Dose of Magic This resource for general education teachers describes 60 strategies for helping learners with special needs.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits Simulation.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Standards For Teacher Preparation. What do you see in the previous slide? Students who are ready to answer the question? Students who are listening and.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Improving relevant standards. Aims and objectives Familiarize ourselves with best practice standards of teaching To think about how we can implement the.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Teaching Expected Behaviors. Teach Expected Behaviors Behavior is learned. All students have not had same opportunity to learn school skills. Social skills.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
PARLI PROS Conducting Meetings To Teach State Standards.
Alternative Educators Evaluation Hamblen County Department of Education.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 Keys to Successful 21 st Century Educational Leadership Jazzar and Algozzine Chapter 8 Curriculum Considerations & Implementations.
K-12 Technology Literacy Curriculum and Assessment.
Marzano’s Instructional Design Questions Spencer Bragan Lois Neumann University of New England EDU 751 October 6, 2013.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Source : The Problem Learning and innovation skills increasingly are being recognized as the skills that separate students who are.
Warm Up Read through the Presenting Instructional Content indicator on your rubric (1 minute) Watch this! clips/here-comes-the-boom/restoring-
Facilitate Group Learning
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Meeting Norms and Expectations Be punctual and prepared Support each other by actively listening and staying engaged Stay on topic according to what is.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Joshua Miller Blytheville Middle School 7 th Grade Math Student Engagement.
Simulation 1 – Elementary School Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Scripting a Lesson Scoring a Lesson Lesson Evidence
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Scripting a Lesson Scoring a Lesson Lesson Evidence
Faculty Instructional Rubric
TAP Instructional Rubric
Digging into TEAM Instructional and Environment Indicators Exceeding Expectations through Reflection, Analysis, and Coaching.
Megan Poor Date: Grade level/course: 8th grade History
SOUTH CAROLINA TEACHING STANDARDS 4.0 SUMMATIVE EVALUATION TRAINING
Presentation transcript:

Library Media Specialist Evaluation Hamblen County Department of Education

Types and Frequency of Observations Professional Rubric Type Frequency Length Pre-Conference Planning Announced 1 15 mins Yes Instruction Lesson Environment Unannounced No

Types and Frequency of Observations Apprentice Level Rubric Type Frequency Length Pre-Conference Planning Announced 1 15 mins Yes Instruction Unannounced Lesson No Environment Planning + Environment

Evaluation Components 15% 50%

Evaluation Computation The average of all observation scores including professionalism score (1 – 5) Individual or School-Wide TVAAS Scores(1-5) Score on agreed upon measure (1-5)

Translation

3 1 2 4 5 The Scale Significantly Below Expectations (1) At Expectations (3) Significantly Above Expectations (5)

Instruction Rubric Domains Standards and Objectives Motivating Students Presenting Instructional Content Lesson Structure and Pacing Activities and Materials Questioning Academic Feedback Monitoring Student Understanding LMS/LIS Content Knowledge LMS/LIS Knowledge of Students Thinking Information Literacy Skills

Standards and Objectives At Expectations (3) The quality of the goals or objectives varies. The goals or objectives are more appropriate than inappropriate. Goals and objectives are consistent with the school goals and take into account other related curriculum areas as appropriate. Expectations for student performance are clear. Objectives are frequently displayed and clearly communicated. There is evidence that most students demonstrate mastery of the objective.

Motivating Students Most students are engaged in learning activities. At Expectations (3) Most students are engaged in learning activities. Some activities provided help students recognize the purpose and importance of learning. Procedures are sometimes adjusted to enhance student involvement.

Presentation of Instructional Content At Expectations (3) Presentation of content most of the time includes: visuals that establish the purpose of the lesson, preview the organization of the lesson, and include internal summaries of the lesson. examples, illustrations, analogies, and labels for new concepts and ideas. modeling by the LMS/LIS to demonstrate his or her performance expectations. concise communication. logical sequencing and segmenting. all essential information. no irrelevant, confusing, or non-essential information.

Lesson Structure and Pacing At Expectations (3) Most lessons start promptly. The lesson's structure is coherent, with a beginning, middle, and end. Pacing is appropriate, and sometimes provides opportunities for students who progress at different learning rates. Routines for distributing materials are efficient. Little instructional time is lost during transitions.

Activities and Materials At Expectations (3) Activities and materials include most of the following when appropriate: show accommodation of students’ needs and differences. are appropriately varied and matched to lesson objective. are relevant to students’ lives. incorporate multimedia and technology. incorporate quality resources (e.g., LMS/LIS made materials, manipulatives, resources from museums, cultural centers, etc). address higher-order thinking skills. sustain students’ attention.

Questioning At Expectations (3) LMS/LIS questions are varied and high quality providing for some, but not all, question types: knowledge and comprehension, application and analysis, and creation and evaluation. Questions are usually purposeful and coherent. A moderate frequency of questions asked. Questions are sometimes sequenced with attention to the instructional goals. Questions sometimes require active responses (e.g., whole class signaling, choral responses, or group and individual answers). Wait time is sometimes provided. The LMS/LIS calls on volunteers and non-volunteers,and a balance of students based on ability and sex.

Academic Feedback At Expectations (3) Feedback is mostly academically focused, frequent, and mostly high-quality. Feedback to students is usually in a timely basis and includes strengths as well as recommendations or suggestions for improvement. The LMS/LIS circulates during instructional activities to support engagement, and monitor student work. Feedback from students is sometimes used to monitor and adjust instruction.

Monitoring Student Understanding At Expectations (3) Some learning activities are analyzed and paced to accommodate student differences. Monitoring usually occurs through questioning techniques and checking students’ performances as they are engaged in learning activities. Monitoring techniques sometimes address higher order skills when appropriate. Re-teaching occurs when necessary and sometimes includes a variety of re-teaching approaches.

LMS/LIS Content Knowledge At Expectations (3) LMS/LIS displays accurate content knowledge of all the subjects he or she teaches. LMS/LIS sometimes implements subject-specific instructional strategies to enhance student content knowledge. The LMS/LIS sometimes highlights key concepts and ideas, and uses them as bases to connect other powerful ideas.

LMS/LIS Knowledge of Students At Expectations (3) LMS/LIS practices display understanding of some student anticipated learning difficulties. LMS/LIS practices sometimes incorporate student interests and cultural heritage. LMS/LIS sometimes provides differentiated instructional methods and content to ensure children have the opportunity to master what is being taught. Data is used to assess student interest and performance for the purpose of improving resources, instruction, and services to users. Changes to various aspects of the library program are based on a variety of either formal or informal evaluation techniques. Program decisions are sometimes made as a result of appropriate analyses of the data.

Thinking At Expectations (3) In the context of a collaborative lesson with a classroom teacher, the LIS/LMS consistently and thoroughly teaches two types of thinking analytical thinking where students analyze, compare and contrast, and evaluate and explain information. practical thinking where students use, apply, and implement what they learn in real-life scenarios. creative thinking where students create, design, imagine and suppose. research-based thinking where students explore and review a variety of ideas, models, and solutions to problems. The LIS/LMS sometimes provides opportunities where students: generate a variety of ideas and alternatives. analyze problems from multiple perspectives and viewpoints.

Information Literacy Skills At Expectations (3) Over the course of multiple observations, the LIS/LMS implements activities that teach and reinforce 4 or more of the following information literacy skills. Critical Thinking Categorization Drawing Conclusions/Justifying Solutions Predicting Outcomes Evaluating Information Ethical Use of Information Information Seeking Strategies Identifying Relevant/Irrelevant Information Generating Ideas Creating and Designing Synthesize Information Self Assessment Strategies

Planning Media Center Management Media Center Resources Media Center Collaboration

Media Center Management At Expectations (3) Input from LMS/LIS and professional staff is generally used to determine student needs and to provide resources which relate to curriculum demands and instructional goals and objectives. The LMS/LIS sometimes initiates communication and follow-up activities to determine effectiveness of selected resources. Procedures have been established to prioritize needs. The LMS/LIS has established procedures and has obtained needed materials, resources, and equipment, all of which have been labeled and are in order for easy access. Procedures are in place to deal with challenged materials. Circulation procedures have been established to maximize use of library resources. Materials and resources are current and up to date. There are some protocols for maintenance of equipment or resources repair.

Media Center Resources At Expectations (3) Resources are integrated with instruction and management procedures. Plans, policies and procedures are available for library staff. Materials and media are equitable and accessible to most users. Facilities are arranged to accommodate some types of activities, and student movement is usually meaningful. LMS/LIS and user activities allow for moderate use of learning time. Community resources are sometimes used. Promotional activities are incorporated in the library program.

Media Center Collaboration At Expectations (3) The LMS/LIS frequently provides cursory and in-depth assistance to teachers, as needed. The LMS/LIS sometimes collaborates with teachers in planning units of instruction. The LMS/LIS assists with some equipment operation, materials production, and instruction, as needed. The LMS/LIS correlates the library program with that of the school curriculum.

Environment Domains Expectations Managing Student Behavior Environment Respectful Culture

Expectations At Expectations (3) LMS/LIS sets high and demanding academic expectations for every student. LMS/LIS encourages students to learn from mistakes. LMS/LIS creates learning opportunities where most students can experience success. Students complete their work according to LMS/LIS expectations.

Managing Student Behavior At Expectations (3) Students are mostly well-behaved, and on task, some minor learning disruptions may occur. LMS/LIS establishes rules for learning and behavior. The LMS/LIS uses some techniques such as social approval, contingent activities, and consequences to maintain appropriate student behavior. The LMS/LIS overlooks some inconsequential behavior, but other times addresses it stopping the lesson. The LMS/LIS deals with students who have caused disruptions, yet sometimes he or she addresses the entire class.

Environment The library welcomes most members and guests. At Expectations (3) The library welcomes most members and guests. is organized and understandable to most students. supplies, equipment, and resources are accessible. displays student work. is arranged to promote individual and group learning.

Respectful Culture At Expectations (3) LMS/LIS-student interactions are generally friendly, but may reflect occasional inconsistencies, favoritism, or disregard for students' cultures. Students exhibit respect for the LMS/LIS, and are generally polite to each other. LMS/LIS is sometimes receptive to the interests and opinions of students.