State of Maine: Quality Management and National Core Indicators.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

Making a Difference Improving the Quality of Life of Individuals with Developmental Disabilities and their families.
Defining The Role of The Service Broker Contact Details: – 88 th Avenue, Langley, British Columbia, Canada, V3A 3S8. Phone / Fax:
What It Means for HCS Participants & Their Families Hill Country Community MHMR Center March 23, 2010 Changing from HCS Case Management to Service Coordination.
From QA to QI: The Kentucky Journey. In the beginning, we were alone and compliance reigned.
Missouri Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (MO SW-PBS) Implementation Mary Richter MO SW-PBS State Coordinator.
11 Opportunities to Improve Care for Persons with Disabilities: The Community Living Initiative IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL HEALTH REFORM IN A DIFFICULT ECONOMIC.
Transition from Part C to Part B in Louisiana (Session # S & 115)
Catulpa Community Support Services.  Use of an electronic data entry program to record demographic data and case notes to reflect service delivery 
MAKING A CASE FOR EXPANDING SHARED LIVING IN PENNSYLVANIA.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
Person Centered Planning
2005 Consumer-Directed Supports: An Introduction.
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
Orientation to Performance and Quality Improvement Plan
New Employee Training Market Research
Person Centered Planning -- As Established in “The State Plan: A Blueprint for Change”
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
1. Self-AdvocacyObjective 1.1: Increase the number of individuals with developmental disabilities who participate in self- advocacy, leadership and self-determination.
Comprehensive Guidance and Counselling South Shore Regional School Board May, 2010.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
Providing leadership in the development of services and supports for persons with disabilities. Patricia A. Moss Interim Director.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
DELAWARE HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES Division of State Service Centers Office of Volunteerism The Corporation for National and Community Service.
INCOPORATING NCI INTO A QUALITY REVIEW SYSTEM CONNECTICUT DMR Laura Nuss, Director of Strategic Leadership Reinventing Quality Conference 2004.
11/8/2006 Benefits and Work Incentives Planning: System Development NCHSD Fall Conference November 8, 2006 Damon Terzaghi: Oregon Competitive Employment.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
1 The Basics: UCEDDs and the CPAC Orientation. 2 Acronyms The five most common acronyms in this slideshow are: DD Act: Developmental Disabilities Assistance.
Review of “One Way In” NAEH Coordinated Entry Briefing Paper Coordinated Entry Stakeholder Meeting May 23, 2013.
NATIONAL CORE INDICATORS ADULT CONSUMER SURVEY
June 4, Systems Change Grants: 2001 Real Choice & 2003 Independence Plus Presenters: Keith Jones, RCCPIG Co-Chair & Erin Barrett, Project Director.
United We Ride: Where are we Going? December 11, 2013 Rik Opstelten United We Ride Program Analyst.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
Evaluation framework: Promoting health through strengthening community action Lori Baugh Littlejohns & Neale Smith David Thompson Health Region, Red Deer,
Director of Evaluation and Accountability Manager, UW’s Grand Rapids, Michigan Robert McKown, CIRS Director of Evaluation and Accountability Sherri.
Guideposts for Success Strategic Service Delivery Component Disability Employment Initiative.
Enhancing the Medical Home for Children with Special Health Care Needs: A Quantitative Approach The Quality Colloquium August 20, 2008 Angelo P. Giardino,
Family Service System Reform Grant Application Training Video FY Donna Bostick-Knox, Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, Office of Children.
Evaluation of the AETC HIV Testing Initiative. Background In 2006, revised recommendations for routine HIV screening were released. AETCs have worked.
A Blueprint for Service Delivery
NCI-MAINE What is NCI?  NCI is a voluntary effort by public developmental disabilities agencies to measure and.
December 20, A Brief Overview: Real Choice and Independence Plus Systems Change Grants Connect the Dots Meeting December 20, 2004.
OHIO FAMILY & CHILDREN FIRST COORDINATORS ASSOCIATION CCAO Winter Conference December 2008 Welcome!
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
1 Measuring Quality Using Experience Surveys 2005 Center for Policy and Innovation Quality Assurance and Improvement January 26, 2006.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
Welcome to the IPFS Webinar The National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health and Health Care (The National CLAS.
Parent Satisfaction Surveys What is the Parent Satisfaction Survey?  Each year schools from our district are selected to participate in the.
Division of Aging Services State Plan on Aging Georgia Department of Human Services Presenter: Jean O’Callaghan Deputy Director Division of Aging Services.
Ivy Tech Community College Student Life Ivy Tech Community College Student Life June 29, 2011.
Unit 8: Implementation, Part II Seminar Wednesday pm ET.
Evaluating for Impact Learning Circle Project Faculty Presentation Name: Ellen RoweTitle: Community & Leadership Development.
Polk County Positive Behavior Support (PBS) Network.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
SunCoast Region Transformation Implementation Team November 2, 2012.
The Federal Telework Program U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Pickaway County Board of Developmental Disabilities THREE YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN
Patient-Centered Care and Person-Centered Planning What’s the Difference? Region 9 Implementation Forum Macomb Intermediate School District June 4, 2014.
1 Oregon Department of Human Services Senior and People with Disabilities State Unit on Aging-ADRC In partnership with  Portland State University School.
The Value of Person-Centered Planning
A Blueprint for Service Delivery
Everyday Lives: Values in Action Using IM4Q Data to Improve Statewide
Utilizing Data for Real Quality of Life Improvement
Office of Developmental Programs IM4Q Annual Training Quality Management Updates July 28, /18/2018.
Moving Forward Building and Leading a Business Relations Unit
PERSON CENTERED APPROACH
Implementing, Sustaining and Scaling-Up High Quality Inclusive Preschool Policies and Practices: Application for Intensive TA September 10, 2019 Lise.
Presentation transcript:

State of Maine: Quality Management and National Core Indicators

We may be very busy, we may be very efficient, but we will also be truly effective only when we begin with the end in mind. Steven Covey, 7 Habits of Highly Effective People

State of Maine Quality Improvement System Improve the overall quality and integrity of services and supports Ensure that programs and services are responsive to consumer and family needs

Principles of Maine’s Quality Improvement System 1. Focus on Consumer and Family Outcomes 2. Standardized data measurement 3. Use data to improve services 4. Use data to make policy decisions

Principles of Maine’s Quality Improvement System 5. Driven by Best Practices 6. Ensure Minimum Standards 7. Problem-Solving Orientation 8. Consumer Participation

How is this Accomplished? Routine monitoring of system capacity and growth Ongoing tracking of system Program and agency performance Incorporating best practice standards Using evaluation information to inform individual, system, program planning activities, and decision making

Maine’s Mental Retardation Services QI/QA Plan People are safe and healthy People participate in their communities People participate in their own service planning and are involved in systems development System is effective and efficient

Maine’s QI System at Work 1. Office of Quality Improvement conducts data collection using the National Core Indicators Consumer and Family Satisfaction Surveys 2. Office of QI develops standard reports and summaries based on data 3. Standardized reports to MR Program Director 4. MR Central Management Team reviews report to develop recommendations based on results of data

Maine’s QI System at Work (cont) 5. MR Regional Management Teams review recommendations for development of implementation plan 6. Quality Collaborative comprised of MR providers and self-advocates review recommendations for implementation plan 7. MR Program Director finalizes recommendation and implementation plan 8. MR Program Director presents recommendation and implementation plan to the Executive Management Team

Maine’s QI System at Work (cont) 9. MR Services implements plan 10. Office of Quality Improvement tracks recommendation and implementation

Quality Management and NCI Example 1

Why is this information important to consider? Related to MR Services QI/QA Plan (community inclusion core element) Standardized data measurement Driven by best practices Requires a problem-solving orientation Based on consumer experiences Respondents answering “no” have identified a need not currently being addressed by the system

Recommendation---Setting a Benchmark To increase the percentage of individuals reporting that they "have friends that are not staff or family" by 5% based on the results of the National Core Indicators Consumer Survey by June 2005.

Implementation: Responsiveness to Individual Needs and Community Inclusion Staff will meet on a bi-monthly basis to review community inclusion materials and tools that will be shared with all staff to assist them in this work. In addition other resources will be sought to provide training and support to staff from within our own agency. Building Capacity in Maine Communities Strengthening Inclusion Beginning A presentation about “Friendship” to be presented to all regional offices. Person Centered Planning- A work group will be established to explore ways enhance the role of PCP in meeting the outcome of this goal. An inclusion web site is now available on the MR- BDS web site. Explore the possibility of a statewide conference or leading speaker to address this issue.

National Core Indicators Adult Family Survey 2002: Choice and Control---Example 2 Q27. Do you or your family member choose the agencies or providers that work with your family? Q28. Do you or your family member choose the support workers that work with your family? Q30. Do you or your family member have control and/or input over the hiring and management of your support worker? Q31. Do you or your family member want to have control and/or input over the hiring and management of ;your support workers? Q32. Do you or your family member know how much money is spent by the MR/DD agency on behalf of your family member with a developmental disability? Q33. Do you or your family member get to decide how this money is spent?

National Core Indicators Adult Family Survey 2002: Services and Supports Q1. Do you receive information about the services and supports that are available to your family? Q3. Do you get enough information to help you participate in planning services for your family? Q11. When you ask the individual support coordinator for assistance, does he/she help you get what you need? Q12. Does your family get the services and supports you need? Q13. Do the services and supports offered meet your family needs? Q14. Are supports available when your family needs them? Q38. Overall, are you satisfied with the services and supports your family member currently receives? Q40. Are you satisfied with the way complaints/grievances are handled and resolved?

Recommendations—Example 2 Private Case Management Services to families Independence Plus Individual Service Options Brochure outlining service opportunities Information on state website to assist families in accessing information about their services

At the End of the Day: Evaluating Ourselves Does the system track the principles of a Quality Improvement Plan and act upon the data gathered to promote the principles of MR Services? Does the system have the ability to make adjustments based on the ongoing analysis, review and interpretation of information? Is the quality and integrity of services responsive to consumer, family and service provider needs?