IMAM Institute of Mechanics and Advanced Materials

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Steady-state heat conduction on triangulated planar domain May, 2002
Advertisements

Numerical Example - Contact Study A two layered [0 0 /90 0 ] laminate with a pre-existing delamination at the ply interface is considered. The plate is.
Anupam Saxena Associate Professor Indian Institute of Technology KANPUR
P. Venkataraman Mechanical Engineering P. Venkataraman Rochester Institute of Technology DETC2013 – 12269: Continuous Solution for Boundary Value Problems.
Point-wise Discretization Errors in Boundary Element Method for Elasticity Problem Bart F. Zalewski Case Western Reserve University Robert L. Mullen Case.
P. Venkataraman Mechanical Engineering P. Venkataraman Rochester Institute of Technology DETC2014 – 35148: Continuous Solution for Boundary Value Problems.
The Finite Element Method A Practical Course
© University of Wisconsin, CS559 Spring 2004
Selected from presentations by Jim Ramsay, McGill University, Hongliang Fei, and Brian Quanz Basis Basics.
1 Curves and Surfaces. 2 Representation of Curves & Surfaces Polygon Meshes Parametric Cubic Curves Parametric Bi-Cubic Surfaces Quadric Surfaces Specialized.
Designing Tensile Structures Using Generic CAD Applications. Structural membranes 2007, Barcelona, September 2007 Javier Sánchez, Tecnun, University.
Results Several two- and three-dimensional isogeometric shape optimization examples, all of which are non- self adjoint problems, are presented in figure3,
Meshless Elasticity Model and Contact Mechanics-based Verification Technique Rifat Aras 1 Yuzhong Shen 1 Michel Audette 1 Stephane Bordas 2 1 Department.
Chapter 17 Design Analysis using Inventor Stress Analysis Module
Section 4: Implementation of Finite Element Analysis – Other Elements
ECIV 720 A Advanced Structural Mechanics and Analysis
Developments on Shape Optimization at CIMNE October Advanced modelling techniques for aerospace SMEs.
Basic FEA Concepts. FEA Project Outline Consider the physics of the situation. Devise a mathematical model. Obtain approximate results for subsequent.
1 Internal Seminar, November 14 th Effects of non conformal mesh on LES S. Rolfo The University of Manchester, M60 1QD, UK School of Mechanical,
Boundary Element Method (BEM) Zoran Ilievski Wednesday 28 th June, 2006 HG 6.96 (TU/e)
Computational Fracture Mechanics
Outline Introduction to Finite Element Formulations
T-Splines and T-NURCCs
Finite Element Modeling with COMSOL Ernesto Gutierrez-Miravete Rensselaer at Hartford Presented at CINVESTAV-Queretaro December 2010.
Computational Fracture Mechanics
Bezier and Spline Curves and Surfaces Ed Angel Professor of Computer Science, Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Media Arts University of New Mexico.
ECIV 720 A Advanced Structural Mechanics and Analysis
M A MM A M I nstitute of M echanics & A dvanced M aterials I An isogeometric boundary element method for fracture modeling Xuan Peng, Cardiff University.
Bezier and Spline Curves and Surfaces CS4395: Computer Graphics 1 Mohan Sridharan Based on slides created by Edward Angel.
09/16/02 Dinesh Manocha, COMP258 Surfaces Locally a 2D manifold: i.e. approximating a plane in the ngbd. of each point. A 2-parameter family of points.
CS Subdivision I: The Univariate Setting Peter Schröder.
MCE 561 Computational Methods in Solid Mechanics
III Solution of pde’s using variational principles
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Smooth nodal stress in the XFEM for crack propagation simulations
The Finite Element Method
Introduction to virtual engineering László Horváth Budapest Tech John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics Institute of Intelligent Engineering.
Outline Lesson 1. Introduction to ANSYS Lesson 2. Basics Lesson 3. Solution phases Lesson 4. Modeling Lesson 5. Material Lesson 6. Loading Lesson 7. Solution.
Evolving Curves/Surfaces for Geometric Reconstruction and Image Segmentation Huaiping Yang (Joint work with Bert Juettler) Johannes Kepler University of.
Dual Evolution for Geometric Reconstruction Huaiping Yang (FSP Project S09202) Johannes Kepler University of Linz 1 st FSP-Meeting in Graz, Nov ,
A D V A N C E D C O M P U T E R G R A P H I C S CMSC 635 January 15, 2013 Spline curves 1/23 Curves and Surfaces.
Hybrid WENO-FD and RKDG Method for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws
V. Space Curves Types of curves Explicit Implicit Parametric.
Introduction to Computer Graphics with WebGL
Geometric Modeling using Polygonal Meshes Lecture 1: Introduction Hamid Laga Office: South.
Haptics and Virtual Reality
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods Li, Yang FerienAkademie 2008.
Stress constrained optimization using X-FEM and Level Set Description
Finite Element Analysis
Geometric Modelling 2 INFO410 & INFO350 S Jack Pinches
Ship Computer Aided Design MR 422. Geometry of Curves 1.Introduction 2.Mathematical Curve Definitions 3.Analytic Properties of Curves 4.Fairness of Curves.
Representation of Curves & Surfaces Prof. Lizhuang Ma Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Application: Multiresolution Curves Jyun-Ming Chen Spring 2001.
Splines Sang Il Park Sejong University. Particle Motion A curve in 3-dimensional space World coordinates.
M A MM A M I nstitute of M echanics & A dvanced M aterials I Crack growth analysis by a NURBS- based isogeometric boundary element method Xuan Peng, Elena.
Reverse Engineering of Point Clouds to Obtain Trimmed NURBS Lavanya Sita Tekumalla Advisor: Prof. Elaine Cohen School of Computing University of Utah Masters.
1 Non-Linear Piezoelectric Exact Geometry Solid-Shell Element Based on 9-Parameter Model Gennady M. Kulikov Department of Applied Mathematics & Mechanics.
CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis –Thermal Analysis –Structural Dynamics –Computational.
1 Copyright by PZ Bar-Yoseph © Finite Element Methods in Engineering Winter Semester Lecture 7.
Computational Fluid Dynamics Lecture II Numerical Methods and Criteria for CFD Dr. Ugur GUVEN Professor of Aerospace Engineering.
D. Herrero-Adan (1), Rui P.R. Cardoso (2), O.B. Adetoro (1)
Introduction Numerical model
Boundary Element Method
error-driven local adaptivity in elasto-dynamics
Chapter 10-2: Curves.
Boundary Element Analysis of Systems Using Interval Methods
COMPUTER AIDED GEOMETRY DESIGN AND MODELING
Óbuda University John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics
Analytical Tools in ME Course Objectives
A 2D isogeometric boundary element method for linear elastic fracture
Presentation transcript:

IMAM Institute of Mechanics and Advanced Materials Sensitivity Analysis and Shape Optimisation with Isogeometric Boundary Element Method Haojie Lian, Robert Simpson, Stéphane P.A. Bordas Institute of Mechanics and Advanced materials, Theoretical and Computational mechanics, Cardiff university, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, Wales, UK 1

Outline Isogeometric Analysis (IGA) Isogeometric Boundary Element Method (IGABEM) Sensitivity analysis and shape optimisation with IGABEM Numerical examples

Why isogeometric analysis Key idea 1 The key idea of isogeometric analysis (IGA) ( Hughes et al. 2005 ) is to approximate the unknown fields with the same basis functions (NURBS, T-splines … ) as that used to generate the CAD model. Reduce the time No creation of analysis-suitable geometry; Without the need of mesh generation. Exact representation of geometry Suitable for the problems which are sensitive to geometric imperfections. High order continuous field More flexible hpk-refinement. 3

NURBS curve 1. Knot vector: a non-decreasing set of coordinates in the parametric space. Where n is the number of basis functions, i is the knot index and p is the curve degree, 2. Control points: 3. NURBS basis function:

Properties of NURBS basis functions Partition of Unity Non-negative p-1 continuous derivatives if no knot repeated No Kronecker delta property Tensor product property Surface:

Challenges Surface representation Domain representation domain parameterization,

IGABEM Key idea 2: Isogeometric Boundary Element Method (IGABEM) (Simpson, et al. 2011). The NURBS basis functions are used to discretise Boundary Integral Equation (BIE). Recently this work is extended to incorporate analysis-suitable T-splines. Reasons: 1. Representation of boundaries; 2. Easy to represent complex geometries.

IGABEM formulation Regularised form of boundary integral equation for 2D linear elasticity where and are field point and source point respectively, and are displacement and traction around the boundary, and are fundamental solutions. The geometry is discretised by: The field is discretised by:

IGABEM formulation In Parametric space Integration in parent element Matrix equation

Special techniques for IGABEM 1. Collocation point (Greville abscissae) 2. Boundary condition Collocate on the prescribed boundary 3. Integration High order Gauss integration

Nuclear reactor

Dam

Propeller

IGABEM shape optimisation The advantages of IGABEM for shape optimisation. More efficient An interaction with CAD: 1. Analysis can read the CAD data directly without any preprocessing. 2. Analysis can return the data to CAD without any postprocessing. More accurate Design velocity field is exactly obtained for gradient-based shape optimisation.

IGABEM sensitivity analysis Governing equations in parametric space, which can be viewed as material coordinate system Differentiate the equation w.r.t. design variables (implicit differentiation) Discretise the derivatives of displacement and traction using NURBS basis Finally

Sensitivity Propagation h-refinement algorithm is also suitable for shape derivatives refinement, but need to convert NURBS in to B-splines in

Pressure cylinder problem Design variable is large radius b

Infinite plate with a hole Design variable is radius R

Cantilever Beam Design curve is AB Minimise the area without violating von Mises stress criterion

Fillet Design curve is ED Minimise the area without violating von Mises stress criterion

Conclusions Conclusions Future work: An isogeometric boundary element method (IGABEM) has been introduced. IGABEM can suppress the mesh burden and interact with CAD. IGABEM has been applied to gradient-based shape optimisation. IGABEM is more efficient and accurate for analysis and optimisation Future work: Topology optimisation with IGABEM Easy to handle topology optimisation compared to IGAFEM Easy to implement with the help of topology derivatives T-spline based IGABEM for 3D shape optimisation Local refinement Analysis suitable and flexible to construct the complex geometry 21

References TJR Hughes, JA Cottrell, and Y Bazilevs. Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 194(39-41):4135-4195, 2005. T Greville. Numerical procedures for interpolation by spline functions. Journal of the society for Industrial and Applied mathematics: Series B, Numerical Analysis, 1964. R Johnson. Higher order B-spline collocation at the Greville abscissae. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 52:63-75, 2005. Les Piegl and W Tiller. The NURBS book. Springer, 1995. RN Simpson, SPA Bordas, J Trevelyan and T Rabczuk. An Isogeometric boundary element method for elastostatic analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 209-212 (2012) 87–100.