ERCOT Reliability Operations Subcommittee Meeting June 10, 2010 Austin, Texas AEP-Texas: Load Projections/Forecasting and Steady State Base Cases.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Revenue Metering. 2 The Settlements Process Transfer Funds $ $ Invoice Participants Reconcile Markets Gather and Process Metering Data.
Advertisements

TNMP Load Forecasting Methodology for the ERCOT Steady State Cases
Overview of ERCOT Outage Coordination Woody Rickerson Director Grid Coordination January 2015.
1 Generation Adequacy Task Force Report to TAC April 7, 2005.
System Voltage Planning Brian Moss PD / Transmission Planning Transmission Planning Overview October 30, 2007.
GDS Associates, Inc. ERCOT Reliability Operations Subcommittee June 10, 2010 Tex-La Electric Cooperative of Texas Load Forecast Methodologies.
ERCOT Load Forecast and Reserve Margin Update June 2, ERCOT Load Forecast and Reserve Margin Update June 2, 2005.
1 Econometric Load Forecasting Peak and Energy Forecast 06/14/2005 Econometric Load Forecasting Peak and Energy Forecast 06/14/2005.
NERC LTRA Update / CDR Capacity Counting Issues
Resource Adequacy Forecast Adjustment(s) Allocation Methodology
2011 Long-Term Load Forecast Review ERCOT Calvin Opheim June 17, 2011.
1 Demand Response Implementing Demand Response and AMR / AMI Systems used by the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and.
PLWG Report to ROS July 9, PGRRs needing vote PGRR043 – FIS Scoping Amendment – PGRR043 moves the Subsynchronous Resonance (SSR) Study out of the.
Electric / Gas / Water Eric Fox Oleg Moskatov Itron, Inc. April 17, 2008 VELCO Long-Term Demand Forecast Methodology Overview.
Big Sandy Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis.
Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Coincident Peak Load Forecasting Methodology Prepared for June 3, 2010 Meeting with Division of Public Utilities.
Long Term Study Task Force Update Transmission Study Practices and Methodologies April 5th,2011 LTS.
2007 Planning Long-Term Hourly Demand and Energy Forecast Board of Directors Meeting May 16, 2007 Bill Bojorquez.
April 23 rd OWG UFLS Survey & Power Factor Review.
April 16, 2010 RPG Meeting ERCOT Five-Year Transmission Plan Update Jeff Billo.
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 W. Niederhuemer – Austria – RIF Session 4 – Paper PROBABILISTIC PLANNING FOR A HIGHER INTEGRATION OF WIND TURBINES.
Compiled by Load Profiling ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation
Grayson Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
ERCOT Long-Term Demand and Energy Forecasting February 20, 2007 Bill Bojorquez.
1 Planning Reserve Margin Dan Egolf Senior Manager, Power Supply & Planning.
Kirk Schneider American Electric Power Tulsa, Oklahoma AEIC Annual Load Research Conference Reno, Nevada September 10-13, 2006 System Load Calculation.
LAREDO PLANT RMR EXIT STRATEGY Presentation to Board of Directors March 16, 2004 Transmission Services Operations.
March 11, 2011 RPG Meeting Lower Rio Grande Valley (LRGV) Import.
UFE 2003 Analysis June 1, UFE 2003 ANALYSIS Compiled by the Load Profiling Group ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation June 1, 2005.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Introductions, Roles and Responsibilities.
ERCOT Planning WMS 10/20/2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System – Methodology.
© 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Matthew Rylander EPRI April 20, 2015 Streamlined Method for Determining Distribution.
April 15, 2003 UFE 2002 ANALYSIS. April 15, 2003 LOAD AND UFE – ERCOT PEAK 2002 This is a graphic depiction of load and UFE on the ERCOT Peak Day for.
March 1, 2011 Load Analysis Update Calvin Opheim Manager, Load Forecasting and Analysis.
ERCOT PUBLIC 6/17/ LTSA Load Distribution Methodology June 17, 2014.
May 03, UFE ANALYSIS Old – New Model Comparison Compiled by the Load Profiling Group ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation May 03, 2007.
Calculation of Net Energy for Load COPS. 2 2 Outline  Definition of Net Energy for Load  How Net Energy for Load is calculated in ERCOT.
PJM©2015 Updates to PJM Load Forecast Model OPSI Annual Meeting October 12, 2015 Tom Falin Manager – Resource Planning
Transmission Outage Process April Purpose In compliance with the Protocols and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) Operating Guides,
1 Knowing Your Customers Better Through Load Research Presented By: Lawrence M. Strawn Senior Retail Pricing Coordinator Orlando Utilities Commission September.
LCRA Manages Meters and Interval Data in ERCOT Tom Knutsen, LCRA SWEMA Corpus Christi, TX June 6, 2005.
AEP Corpus Christi TDC Advance Outage Scheduling Initiative.
2016 Long-Term Load Forecast
ERCOT UFE Analysis UFE Task Force February 21, 2005.
Blue Grass Energy Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
ERCOT PUBLIC 10/7/ Load Forecasting Process Review Calvin Opheim Generation Adequacy Task Force October 7, 2013.
Licking Valley Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by : East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis.
09/17/2006 Ken Donohoo ERCOT Peak Day August Initial Settlement Data by Fuel Type.
May 11, 2012 RPG meeting YTP Scope and Process – RPG Comments.
01/17/ CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.
South Texas Electric Cooperative Load Forecasting Methodology ROS Meeting, 6/10/10.
TRANSMISSION CONSTRAINTS KENNETH A. DONOHOO, P.E. Manager of System Planning, Technical Operations
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Introductions, Roles and Responsibilities.
Developing Load Reduction Estimates Caused by Interrupting and/or Curtailing Large Customers By Carl L. Raish 2000 AEIC Load Research Conference.
Methodology for Demand Forecasts for Bandera Electric Cooperative, Inc. Brian D. Bartos, P.E. Manager, Engineering Presented to ERCOT Reliability & Operations.
ERCOT Public 1 Project Panel 1 Dan Woodfin Director, System Operations August 15, 2014.
Oncor Transmission Service Provider Kenneth A. Donohoo Director – System Planning, Distribution and Transmission Oncor Electric Delivery Co LLC
ERCOT PUBLIC 3/25/ RTP Inputs and Assumptions March 25, 2014.
2015 California Statewide Critical Peak Pricing Evaluation DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impact Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May, 2016 Prepared.
Voltage Reduction Task Force Update September 25, 2014 Presentation to ERCOT TAC.
03/06/2008 TAC CREZ Transmission Optimization (CTO) Study Update Dan Woodfin Director, System Planning.
Calculations of Peak Load Contribution (PLC) AND Network Service Peak Load (NSPL) As of 1/1/2016.
1 PLANNING CONFERENCE ON MARYLAND’S ENERGY FUTURE WILLIAM GAUSMAN VICE PRESIDENT ASSET MANAGEMENT JULY 25 – 26, 2007.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
The New Texas Wholesale/Retail Market
2018 VELCO IRP Forecast Preliminary results
Independent Load Forecast Workshop
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Presentation transcript:

ERCOT Reliability Operations Subcommittee Meeting June 10, 2010 Austin, Texas AEP-Texas: Load Projections/Forecasting and Steady State Base Cases

2 Load Projections Initial POD non-coincident seasonal peaks are forecasted using time-series methods from 5 years historical metered loads. Load areas are done on econometric basis POD forecasts are adjusted as necessary to account for switching, construction, large customers, etc. Service area and load area (subregion) forecast growth rates bound the POD’s forecast growth rates. Load areas are defined by the transmission organization and include Laredo, Del Rio Triangle, Corpus Christi, Rio Grand Valley, San Angelo, Abilene, and Victoria. Resulting POD, Area & System forecasts are non-coincident. ALDR uses Company coincident load.

3 Large Industrial POD Projections& Self Serve Modeling Company meters on customers with large loads capture net load on the system. Customers with large loads on interruptible/curtailable type ERCOT driven programs are unknown to TDSP and thus not included in the ALDR. These loads do not vary seasonally or daily like other loads, so seasonal factors are not applied Modeling of self-serve generation and load is to the best of our knowledge, but is not based on metered values like other data

4 ALDR Processing for Base Cases Validated ALDR data is read into an Access database for TCC, TNC, and each of the coops and municipals that AEP serves Seasonal factors are used to develop case data for seasonal and off-peak load cases that aren’t in the ALDR Seasonal factors are summer, winter, spring and fall determined by company and load areas coincident with ERCOT peak, minimum and peak day minimum. Non-Coincident Peak loads must be adjusted downward to Coincident Peak loads for use in powerflow cases using coincident factors The practice in ERCOT has been for TSPs to represent company-coincident loads, which are slightly higher than ERCOT-coincident loads

5 Questions Questions Jeff Brown AEP Economic Forecasting (918) Vance Beauregard AEP Texas Transmission Planning (918) Additional Detail on following slide

6 Points of Delivery Load Projections AEP-Texas has 616 PODs in the ALDR. Initial POD non-coincident seasonal peaks are forecasted using time-series methods from historical metered loads from the preceding five years data. POD forecasts are adjusted as necessary to account for switching, construction, large customers, etc.

7 Load Projections AEP Economic Forecasting (aggregate loads by subregions or load areas and service company peaks) along with Distribution Asset Planning (points of delivery loads) prepares data for the Annual Load Data Request (ALDR) and submits the load data to ERCOT. ERCOT provides the date and time of the ERCOT summer peak, winter peak, and minimum load for the previous year. AEP obtains the load data for these times along with the peak load at each bus from historical records. The coincidence factor for each bus is calculated by dividing the load coincidental with the ERCOT peak by the seasonal peak load at the bus. This provides a percentage (coincidence factor) to calculate the future loads off of the forecasted peak at each bus.

8 Load Area Projections Forecasts for geographical areas (load areas) involve analysis of historical county sales and hourly data and economic forecasts. Sales data is obtained from the customer information system by revenue town and revenue class. Interval MW data is obtained from SCADA and MV90 recorders via Transmission Dispatch and Load Research. Economic/Demographic data is obtained from Moody’s Economy.com by county and aggregated to the defined area. Sales are forecast through the use of revenue class base econometric models driven by economic activity. Peaks are forecast through the use of normalized historical load and typical weather for the area.

9 ALDR from ERCOT AEP Transmission Planning receives ALDR data from ERCOT the first week of April ALDR data in the AEP Transmission footprint include TNC, TCC, as well as 8 – 10 rural electric cooperatives and municipal PODs

10 ALDR Raw Data Data for individual loads appear in the ALDR “LoadDetail” tab as non-coincident peak data for each summer and winter in the forecast Total system load appears in the ALDR “LoadSummary” tab as an ERCOT-coincident peak, for each summer and winter in the forecast

11 ALDR Analysis The ALDR data is analyzed Suspect bus numbers are corrected Summer and winter coincidence factors are investigated and corrected Bus numbers changes due to voltage conversions receive special attention

12 Load Calibration Systemwide coincidence factors are used to adjust ALDR non-coincident peak data to the ERCOT- coincident peak Transmission losses, which range from 3.2% to 4.0%, are subtracted from total system load Loads are calibrated to match the ERCOT- coincident peak value, plus 3.36% to account for company-coincident diversity