Detector Benchmarking Norman Graf (SLAC) TILC08, ACFA Physics & Detector Workshop Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan March 4,2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
Advertisements

S. Martí i García Liverpool December 02 1 Selection of events in the all-hadronic channel S. Martí i García CDF End Of Year Review Liverpool / December.
1 Benchmarking the SiD Tim Barklow SLAC Sep 27, 2005.
Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) Introduction to Single-Top The measurement.
Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Veronique Boisvert, Fabrizio Salvatore, Tao Wu LCWS 08, Chicago, 18 November 2008 Sensitivity to the Higgs self-coupling.
Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Veronique Boisvert, Fabrizio Salvatore, Tao Wu ILD Workshop, Cambridge, 12 September 2008 Sensitivity to the Higgs.
Simulating SiD for the LOI Norman Graf (SLAC) SiD Phone Meeting July 30, 2008.
1 Higgs Self-Coupling Analysis – How To Tim Barklow SLAC October 25, 2007.
1 Jet Energy Studies at  s=1 TeV e + e - Colliders: A First Look C.F. Berger & TGR 05/08.
 k0k0 ++ -- -- p ILC Technical Design Report Physics and Detectors – Detailed Baseline Design Juan A. Fuster Verdú, IFIC-Valencia PAC Meeting, KEK.
Software Common Task Group Report Akiya Miyamoto KEK ALCPG09 30 September 2009.
E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Precise Measurements of SM Higgs at the ILC Simulation and Analysis V.Saveliev, Obninsk State University, Russia /DESY, Hamburg ECFA Study Workshop, Valencia.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
Taikan Suehara, ECFA08, Warsaw, 2008/06/11 page 1 Tau-pair and SUSY analysis for ILD optimization in Jupiter/Marlin framework Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The.
Summary of Simulation and Reconstruction Shaomin CHEN (Tsinghua University)  Framework and toolkit  Application in ILC detector design Jupiter/Satellites,
E. Devetak – CERN CLIC1 LCFI: vertexing and flavour-tagging Erik Devetak Oxford University CERN-CLIC Meeting 14/05/09 Vertexing Flavour Tagging Charge.
1 A.Nomerotski SiD LoI: Benchmarking Andrei Nomerotski, University of Oxford TILC09, Tsukuba, 17 April 2009.
Sim/Recon DBD Editors Report Norman Graf (SLAC) Jan Strube (CERN) SiD Workshop SLAC, August 22, 2012.
ILC DBD Common simulation and software tools Akiya Miyamoto KEK ILC PAC 14 December 2012 at KEK.
SiD performance for the DBD Jan Strube CERN. Overview Software Preparation (CERN, SLAC) Machine Environment (CERN, SLAC) Tracking Performance (C. Grefe)
14-18 November, PrahaECFA/DESY Linear Collider Workshop 1 TRILINEAR GAUGE COUPLINGS AT PHOTON COLLIDER - e  mode DESY - Zeuthen Klaus Mönig and Jadranka.
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs at the Tevatron presented by Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations Moriond.
Taikan Suehara, 16 th general meeting of ILC physics (Asia) wg., 2010/07/17 page 1 Model 500 GeV Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo.
Lcsim software: status and future plans ECFA-LC DESY May 28, 2013 Norman Graf (for the sim/reco group)
Benchmarking SiD Andrei Nomerotski, Univ.of Oxford SiD meeting in Paris, 11 Feb 2008.
Monte-Carlo event generation for CEPC 1 Xin Mo Institute of High Energy Physics Oct. 19, 2015 Monte-Carlo event generation for the CEPC.
Software Common Task Group Report Norman Graf (SLAC) PAC, Vancouver May 10, 2009.
Itamar Roth, Ehud Duchovni Group meeting 19/01/15 1.
1 D.Chakraborty – VLCW'06 – 2006/07/21 PFA reconstruction with directed tree clustering Dhiman Chakraborty for the NICADD/NIU software group Vancouver.
Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting 14/9/2009 CERN.
Software Common Task Group Report Akiya Miyamoto ILC PAC POSTECH 3 November 2009.
2° ILD Workshop Cambridge 11-14/09/08 The sensitivity of the International Linear Collider to the     in the di-muon final state Nicola D’Ascenzo University.
Calorimeter Simulation Infrastructure Norman Graf Arlington ‘03.
Benchmark for detector performance 11. Nov. meeting in 7 th ACFA LCWS in Taipei Y. Sugimoto KEK.
SiD LOI Benchmark Simulation and Reconstruction Norman Graf (SLAC) LCWA09, Albuquerque September 30, 2009.
ILC Jet Energy Working Group: introduction and discussion Norman Graf (SLAC) LCWS07, Hamburg June 2, 2007.
SiD Simulation Status Report Norman Graf (SLAC) SiD Workshop, Boulder April 14,2008.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Summary of MC requests for DBD benchmarks ILD Workshop, Kyushu University May 23,
Top Higgs Yukawa Coupling Analysis – Status Report Hajrah Tabassam Quai-i-Azam University, Islamabad ON BEHALF OF: R. Yonamine, T. Tanabe, K. Fujii, KEK.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Signatures and Benchmarking Andrei Nomerotski, University of Oxford ALCPG2007, 26 Oct 2007.
Lcsim software: status and future plans ECFA-LC DESY May 30, 2013 Norman Graf (for the sim/reco group)
Status of the ALCPG simulation & reconstruction Norman Graf (SLAC) TILC09, Tsukuba April 19, 2009.
1 Overview of Benchmarking Tools Tim Barklow SLAC Oct 10, 2006.
Generator status Akiya Miyamoto KEK 23 February 2016.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Standard Monte Carlo Event Samples Norman Graf SLAC November 11, 2004.
GEANT4 for Future Linear Colliders
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
Global ILC Simulation Status Report (Personal summary from TILC08)
Erik Devetak Oxford University SiD Workshop 24/02/2009
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Electroweak physics at CEPC
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Monte-Carlo event generation for CEPC
slicPandora: slic + pandoraPFANew
Top Tagging at CLIC 1.4TeV Using Jet Substructure
Computing in ILC Contents: ILC Project Software for ILC
ILD Optimisation: towards 2012 University of Cambridge
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Mar 2-7 Sendai Satoru Uozumi (Kobe University)
ZHH: Linear collider Benchmark
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
M. Ohlerich, A. Raspiareza, W. Lohmann DESY and MPI Munich
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Monte-Carlo event generation for CEPC
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Presentation transcript:

Detector Benchmarking Norman Graf (SLAC) TILC08, ACFA Physics & Detector Workshop Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan March 4,2008

From Physics Studies to Benchmarking We believe that the physics case for a TeV- scale linear e + e - collider has been made. The emphasis of analyses now shifts towards  Optimization, evaluation and comparison of detector choices  Realities required by engineering: e.g. amount and distribution of readout and support material, …  Realities required by realistic detector response simulations: e.g. electronics digitization, noise, …  Realities required by reconstruction algorithms: e.g. track finding & fitting, PFA, jetfinding, …

Motivation for Common Benchmarks Detector concepts will naturally seek to optimize their designs using physics processes. The wider community would like to see demonstrated physics capabilities from mature detectors, e.g. with a reasonable level of engineering, costing, etc. Natural, then, especially with limited resources, to agree upon a common set of analyses to be used by all the concepts in the LOI process.

Common LOI Benchmarks …The evaluation of the detector performance should be based on physics benchmarks, some of which will be the same for all LOIs based upon an agreed upon list and some which may be chosen to emphasize the particular strengths of the proposed detector… “Guideline for the definition of a Letter of Intent …”, 3 October ‘07

Benchmark Selection Process WWS Software panel (Akiya Miyamoto, KEK, Ties Behnke, DESY, Norman Graf, SLAC,) in consultation with the detector concepts and the WWS Roadmap Panel and starting from the Benchmark Panel Report has drafted a short list of processes which are:  consistent with the ILC baseline  sensitive to detector performance  not overly dependent on sophisticated analysis techniques. i.e. emphasis is on demonstrating detector performance Expect, and welcome, input from IDAG

Benchmark Processes e + e - →ZH, H→e + e - X,     X (M H =120 GeV, E cms =250 GeV) tracking efficiency and momentum resolution material distribution in the tracking detectors EM shower ID, kink reconstruction (bremsstrahlung) Higgs Mass and cross section e + e - →ZH, H→c c, Z→ν ν (M H =120 GeV, E cms =250 GeV) heavy flavour tagging, secondary vertex reconstruction multi jet final state, c-tagging in jets, uds anti-tagging test anti-tagging by studying the H→gg BR(H  cc)

Benchmark Processes e + e - →ZH, H→c c, Z→q q (M H =120GeV, E cms =250GeV) in addition to the charm tagging, this final state tests the confusion resolution capability BR(H  cc) e + e - →Z→τ + τ - ( E cms =500 GeV ) tau reconstruction, aspects of particle flow π 0 reconstruction tracking of very close-by tracks , A FB, and  polarization

Benchmark Processes e + e - →t t, t→bW, W→qq’ (M top =175GeV, E cms =500 GeV) multi jet final states, dense jet environment particle flow b-tagging inside a jet maybe lepton tagging in hadronic events (b-ID) tracking in a high multiplicity environment , A FB, and m top e + e - →χ + χ - /χ 2 0 χ 2 0 (E cms =500 GeV) particle flow (WW, ZZ separation) multi-jet final states SUSY parameter is point 5 of Table 1 of hep-ex/ , and masses

Standard Model Backgrounds All analyses used in the context of the detector optimization and LOI process will need an inclusive sample of the Standard Model Background. Will provide the SM sample centrally in stdhep format, for all concepts to use. Provide all information and tools necessary to produce specific signal samples individually with exactly the same setup as this SM sample.

Event Generators No single MC generator is optimal for everything. However, Whizard is a multi-purpose Matrix Element generator.  Signals and backgrounds of all types (SM + MSSM) can be produced with the same settings  It contains all interferences, hence it is more accurate than generators like Pythia, especially for complex final states (6f and more)  Some inaccuracies remain, but benefits outweigh these minor issues.

Whizard SM Sample Generate an inclusive set of MC events with all SM processes WHIZARD Monte Carlo used to generate all 0,2,4,6-fermion and t quark dominated 8- fermion processes. 100% e - and e + polarization used in generation. Arbitrary electron, positron polarization simulated by properly combining data sets. Fully fragmented MC data sets are produced. PYTHIA is used for final state QED & QCD parton showering, fragmentation, particle decay. Events are weighted!

Standard Model Sample Full 2ab -1 SM sample available via ftp from SLAC. Each file corresponds to a particular initial e-/e+ polarization and final state ftp://ftp-lcd.slac.stanford.edu/ilc/whizdata/ILC500/ cumbersome to work with for end user Have to mix polarizations by hand Each file contains only processes of one type, so need to run over complete data set (thousands of files) to get faithful subset. 500 fb -1 sample of these events generated with 80% e -, 30% e + polarizations, randomly mixed events from all processes  ftp://ftp-lcd.slac.stanford.edu/ilc/ILC500/StandardModel/ ftp://ftp-lcd.slac.stanford.edu/ilc/ILC500/StandardModel/

Next Steps for SM Data Sample Remove 120 Higgs from n fermion final states at 500 GeV, and add explicit ffH, ffHH, etc. final states. Regenerate states with  in final state using TAUOLA.  Coding done at DESY, to be incorporated soon. Produce full SM data set at 250 GeV  Need agreed-upon machine parameters.

Additional Signal Processes Detector concepts are free (and encouraged) to add additional processes to this list in order to optimize their designs or demonstrate the capabilities of the detectors. These should, however, be generated using conditions as close as possible to those used for the canonical samples. It is more important for this process that we use a common, well-understood set of events than it is to pick the “best” generator for each final state. We are comparing detector response, not making physics case for the machine.

Producing Signal Samples All necessary files to set up Whizard in exactly the same way as done for the SM sample:  mples mples Beam Parameters can be set up using information at:  ftp://ftp-lcd.slac.stanford.edu/ilc/ILC500/StandardModel/whizard- src/user.f90 ftp://ftp-lcd.slac.stanford.edu/ilc/ILC500/StandardModel/whizard- src/user.f90  ftp://ftp-lcd.slac.stanford.edu/ilc/ILC500/StandardModel/guinea- pig/ilc_0500_may05_run05_seed06/ ftp://ftp-lcd.slac.stanford.edu/ilc/ILC500/StandardModel/guinea- pig/ilc_0500_may05_run05_seed06/ Fragmentation can be set up using information at:  ftp://ftp- lcd.slac.stanford.edu/ilc/ILC500/StandardModel/a6f/include/ilc_fragment_call.f90 ftp://ftp- lcd.slac.stanford.edu/ilc/ILC500/StandardModel/a6f/include/ilc_fragment_call.f90  ftp://ftp- lcd.slac.stanford.edu/ilc/ILC500/StandardModel/a6f/include/calc_a1sq_a2sq.f90 ftp://ftp- lcd.slac.stanford.edu/ilc/ILC500/StandardModel/a6f/include/calc_a1sq_a2sq.f90

Additional Backgrounds GuineaPig pairs and photons (Cain too?)  Added crossing angle, converted to stdhep, available here.here Muons and other backgrounds from upstream collimators & converted to stdhep.  Need to validate and understand normalizations.  hadrons generated as part of the “2ab -1 SM sample.” All events then capable of being processed through full detector simulation. Additive at the detector hit level, with time offsets, using LCIO utilities.  i.e. simulate response separately for signals and backgrounds, then add at digitization/reconstruction level.

Additional Simulation Issues Crossing Angle  Agree that events will be generated with 0° and the 14mr crossing angle will be accounted for at the time of simulation. Detector Magnetic Fields  Implementing full field maps in Geant is very CPU consuming. Propose to generate signals using simplified fields, full fields for far-forward backgrounds. Essential to fully document and maintain a provenance for all files (and analyses?)

“Validation” Process Transparency in the analysis comparisons would be ensured if input and output were strictly controlled. Generating and providing a canonical data sample ensures common input. As I understand the LOI process, this benchmarking is primarily a detector concept exercise. Can we more fully involve the physics working groups? Could we develop and release “canned” physics analyses to reduce systematic uncertainties in e.g. jet- finding, combinatorics, constrained fits, …  Create library of analysis drivers which target LCIO lists of ReconstructedParticle.  Write out standard set of histograms or analysis metrics. Strengthens the “horizontal” nature of the physics working groups, does not disenfranchise them from LOI. personal thoughts

Analysis Flow Input Events (stdhep) Jupiter Mokka slic others? Marlin org.lcsim Uranus others? Output Events ReconstructedParticles (lcio) ? ? Common Analysis Suite (Physics Groups?) Standard metrics ? Three regional efforts, ACFA-LC, ALCPG, ECFA-LC all support the LCIO event data model, making interoperability possible. personal thoughts simreco analysis

Summary The WWS Software Panel has produced a short list of physics processes to be studied by each of the concepts for the LOI. Individual concepts will also analyze additional reactions in the process of optimizing their detector designs. A common set of Standard Model physics and machine backgrounds is being / has been generated. Events will be provided in stdhep format. Performance metrics have been identified. Details still to be resolved, and changes may still be made, but the benchmarking process is well underway.