Mike Wright, Imperial College Business School © Imperial College Business School Barriers to technology transfer and policies 1 Presentation at Bologna,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE ROLE OF VENTURE CAPITAL IN SPURRING INNOVATION Yannis Pierrakis Head of Investments Research National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts.
Advertisements

Creating a Supportive Environment for Science and Innovation Dr Sally Ann Forsyth Director Science Parks Goodman.
The project is funded by the European Union Institutional capacity development of the three innovation centres and research sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
ACADEMIC TECH TRANSFERT IN FRANCE USTH workshop – September, 25, Setting-up of a new model Géraldine Karbouch Director, Technology Development.
SUSTAINABLE FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR START-UPS
Entrepreneurship youth
Marice Cumber Director. Getting Out of Bed Knowledge transfer for the creative industries.
Jean-Philippe Lallement Lan Zuo Gillet A spring board for your technology enterprises.
EXPRESS LICENSE AGREEMENTS Ted Hagelin Crandall Melvin Professor of Law Kauffman Professor of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Director, NY Science & Technology.
The Italian Literature Survey IFISE Meeting A.I.F.I. Italian Venture Capital and Private Equity Association Roberto Del Giudice Milan, 2nd February 2001.
ADAPTING THE FAMILY BUSINESS WHY CHANGE IS IMPORTANT BUT CHALLENGING AND HOW TO MAKE CHANGE HAPPEN Mike Wright Professor of Entrepreneurship & Director.
Corporate Venture and Corporate Venture Capital K. McNally Master in Engineering Policy and Management of Technology (2001) Bernardo Rodrigues, Carlos.
©2004 by South-Western/Thomson Learning 1 Strategic Entrepreneurship Robert E. Hoskisson Michael A. Hitt R. Duane Ireland Chapter 12.
Supporting technology transfer: The role of business incubators John Gabriel Goddard Knowledge Economy Forum VII Ancona, Italy.
This project is funded by the European Union Integrated Innovation Support Programme Venture Capital – Challenges & Support Barriers and Solutions Robert.
The Canadian Chamber of Commerce Canada’s Opportunities and Barriers for Success May 12, 2011 Toronto, Ontario Chris Gray Director, Innovation Policy
GATEWAY TO FINNISH EXPERTISE 1 Commercialization guidelines – NanoCom and ProNano results Dr. Eeva Viinikka, Business Director Programme Director of National.
Unit The Entrepreneurial Process
Sustainable Smart Cities Symposium April 3, 2013 Richard B. Marchase Vice President for Research and Economic Development.
Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter 9 New Business Development
STAR Park – STAR One Science, Technology and Advanced Research A member of The Texas State University System.
Technology Business Development Center 2 The intrinsic complexity of the technology business start-up : n Intellectual Property is critical; n R&D dominating;
Stanford Technology Ventures Program Slide 1 State Policy Academy on Entrepreneurship New Orleans, July 16, 2001 “Human Capital.
MARKETING RURAL BUSINESS INCUBATORS: ROCKY FORD & ORDWAY, CO.
Advisory Board and Commission Retreat September 11-12, 2013.
European Commission Enterprise Directorate General Innovation Policy R&D and Innovation in the Regional Operational Programs Meeting with Regions 11 July.
Accelerating the development of world-class Irish companies to achieve strong positions in global markets resulting in increased national and regional.
ENTREPRENEURSHIP 6TH EDITION
Page 1 New Models for Commercialization Federal Partners in Technology Transfer June 18, 2009 A presentation by: Tom Corr Chief Executive Officer Accelerator.
Judie Kay & Peter Shadbolt Industry Liaison Beyond the Silos: Developing a Corporate Approach to Industry Engagement.
Mike Wright, Imperial College Business School © Imperial College Business School Entrepreneurship In and Around Universities: Myths and Challenges 1 Presentation.
1 Behavioural Additionality in Strategic Basic Research ‘New Frontiers in Evaluation’ Vienna, 24 April 2006 Jan Larosse, EC-DG RTD Paul Schreurs, IWT Flanders.
1 Financing Innovative SMEs in Europe José Palacín Economic Cooperation and Integration Division United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Dubai International.
University of Udine Ripartizione Ricerca Università degli Studi di Udine Vicolo Florio, Udine – Italy
Venturing Forth: Private Equity Funds in Namibia By Robin Sherbourne Director of the Institute for Public Policy Research 14 May 2003.
Competing For Advantage Part IV – Monitoring and Creating Entrepreneurial Opportunities Chapter 12 – Strategic Entrepreneurship.
Heterogeneity among research spin-offs: the case of “intellectual property-based firms” Margarida Fontes - INETI & DINAMIA Oscarina Conceição - DINAMIA.
Entrepreneurship As a Community Development Strategy John Gruidl and Deborah M. Markley.
October 5, 2004FPTT 2004 TechExpo1 Ideas vs Intellectual Property: The Carleton University Technology Transfer Approach: “Building True Innovation Capacity.
INNOVATION ADVANCEMENT PROGRAM Jonathan Coury Interim Director Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law Arizona State University.
©2003 Southwestern Publishing Company 1 Strategic Entrepreneurship Michael A. Hitt R. Duane Ireland Robert E. Hoskisson Chapter 13.
NETWORK STRUCTURE AND COOPERATION BETWEEN UNIVERSITIES AND INDUSTRY Prof. Ing. Tatiana Čorejová, PhD. Prof. Ing. Ján Čorej, PhD.
Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 8 Entrepreneurship and Innovation.
Generic Skills Survey 2003 DRIVERS OF SKILLS NEEDS.
Strategic Entrepreneurship
„ Innovations and role of state : „ Innovations and role of state : the Polish experience” Krzysztof Gulda Chairman of Team of experts on innovations and.
Making Universities More Entrepreneurial Dr. David Woollard Special projects Manager.
“IP Universities” May , 2013 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY Sabancı University Zeynep Birsel, Manager, TTO
Facilitating the Growth of New Technology-based Firms through Incubation: An Integrated Model. Professor David A. Kirby University of Surrey March 2007.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
UAB’s Life Sciences Entrepeneurship Program David Anthony, UAB’s MBA for Scientists Lisa Schwiebert,
“The new leader is a facilitator, not an order giver.” - John Naisbitt Learn Engage Create Module : Facilitators This project has been funded with support.
Financing Entrepreneurship: Rationale, Strategies and Practices for Eastern European Countries Vittorio Modena The University of Pavia Prepared for the.
1 Commercialization Segment Introduction Ralph Heinrich UNECE Team of Specialists on Intellectual Property Skopje, 1 April 2009.
Chapter 7: Franchising and Entrepreneurship. Types of Franchising Business format franchising: Single Unit Multiple Unit Area Franchise Master Franchise.
©2004 by South-Western/Thomson Learning 1 Strategic Entrepreneurship Robert E. Hoskisson Michael A. Hitt R. Duane Ireland Chapter 12.
©2004 by South-Western/Thomson Learning 1 Strategic Entrepreneurship Robert E. Hoskisson Michael A. Hitt R. Duane Ireland Chapter 12.
Creating Start-ups and framing it in the incubator Pim de Bokx Chairman DIA – Dutch Incubation Association Initiator of Pioneerz Partnership.
Building Innovation Capacity through Regional Business Incubation Systems Dr Takis Damaskopoulos Executive Director European Institute of Interdisciplinary.
Wharton Field Challenge Corporate Entrepreneurship Dina Saginur Shelby Zitelman MIF – IADB 20 th July 2007.
Venture Capital Guiding Fund for Technology-based SMEs
…. the Angel Perspective
Wired –Talent for Growth
ENTREPRENEURSHIP 6TH EDITION
Startup Financing Greg Adolphe-Nazaire Dalhousie University
MTECH Technology Entrepreneurship Activities
THE TRIANGLE: TTO- ACADEMICIAN-VC
Strategic Horizon Network
Elif KOŞOK TÜBİTAK TEYDEB Venture Capital Funding Group Executive Board Coordinator.
Presentation transcript:

Mike Wright, Imperial College Business School © Imperial College Business School Barriers to technology transfer and policies 1 Presentation at Bologna, February 2014

What barriers are there to technology transfer? How can the barriers to technology transfer be addressed? Focus on: –Universities –Spin-offs and academic entrepreneurs “10” barriers based on 15 year research programme Barriers and overcoming them © Imperial College Business School Introduction 3

Universities: spin-offs have contextual issues related to: University ownership of IP Time from research to market Potentially conflicting objectives and ambidextrous organizations –Revenue generation to meet budget constraints –Lack of commercial orientation Differences between universities regionally Links to varying local industry networks Need to understand dimensions of university context © Imperial College Business School Barrier 1 4

Disconnect between strategy, science base, –Quality and scope of research & faculty base –Expertise of TTO –Culture of Departments and academic tribes Supportive of commercialization? –Objectives, risks and returns unclear/unrealistic/conflicting © Imperial College Business School Universities strategies for academic entrepreneurship not aligned Barrier 2 5

Barrier 3 Mismatched Support Models for University Spin-Offs RESOURCES ACTIVITIES Resource deficient 41.8% Competence deficient 13.9% Low selective 23.3% Supportive 16.3% Incubator 4.7% Low High Low High

Traditional focus on hard science with patents by faculty or high growth ICT Alumni increasingly provide academic entrepreneurship: –Students, Drop-outs, Graduates Financial & social ventures Need to adapt TTO and education approaches © Imperial College Business School Narrow focus of technology being transferred Barrier 4 7

Academic start-up teams often lack skill & cognition diversity –Select who they know not what need –Don’t build links with those they need to help them Academic Entrepreneurs are doing it for the first time –But many academics are serial entrepreneurs –can mentor colleagues –Better than support agencies –Especially for getting beyond start- up © Imperial College Business School Insufficient attention to entrepreneurs & teams Barrier 5 8

Spin-off directors need skills & contacts to help firms grow, cross critical junctures and survive –Sector experience, successful prior entrepreneurial experience, …. Spin-offs with academics & TTO boards limited –Need contacts to identify required skills © Imperial College Business School Insufficient attention to building boards Barrier 6 9

Academics embedded in networks with other scientists for grants & publications –But embeddedness paradoxical –May not have networks with commercial actors Need to access these networks AND to know how to recruit the people who can give them that access Insufficient attention to building networks © Imperial College Business School Barrier 7 10

© Imperial College Business School 11 Need to be able to transform networks in different ways Barrier 7 Need ability to transform networks in different ways for different purposes

Framing opportunities may especially be problem in university context as: –distance from market readiness –Uncertainty of new markets Poses challenges in how opportunities exploited Recognise critical junctures and how they are overcome…. Challenges of moving from opportunity to market © Imperial College Business School Barrier 8 12

Market for products vs market for technology –Formal IP based spin-offs may take many years to generate product revenue –During this period value of technology may rise: License the technology, sell patents [technology market] Sell or IPO the company [financial market] –Value from expected future returns –Valuation uncertain and can be volatile Especially if regulatory hurdle not overcome Economic and social value Lack of attention to where value lies © Imperial College Business School Barrier 9 13

Especially an issue with innovations generated from universities –Far from market –Long timescales: Biotech/health vs ICT Much funding focuses on the beginning of start-up –Grants, accelerator programs …..But start-up is a process …many funding rounds before viability Multiple finance gaps Challenge to make investor-ready at a value acceptable to the university and the VC Limited filling of finance gap © Imperial College Business School Barrier 10 14

Direct academic entrepreneurship –Novel research to create innovations leading to spin-offs by academic scientists and students –Support for heterogeneity of types –Flexible human, social and financial capital over the evolving spin-off life-cycle process Indirect academic entrepreneurship –Education & research experience lead indirectly to entrepreneurial graduate actions via Corporate Spin-offs & alumni start-ups Redesign TTO & courses to support student & alumn start-ups –Start-up “garages” for students and alumns –Cross-disciplinary student /faculty projects –Develop different types of industry reach-out/reach-in © Imperial College Business School Rethink Academic Entrepreneurship Implications for Universities 15

Thank You! Questions?