Rebuilding Lives, Sharing Knowledge, Shaping Systems NAEH Conference: Targeting Interventions for Homeless Families and Individuals July 28, 2008 Suzanne.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing Coordinated Assessment Under the New CoC Regulations National Alliance to End Homelessness Monday, September 10, 2012.
Advertisements

Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
D AYTON -M ONTGOMERY C OUNTY F RONT D OOR A SSESSMENT National Alliance to End Homelessness First Contact: Creating a Front Door to Your Homelessness System.
Retooling Transitional Housing
Home Again A 10-year plan to end homelessness in Portland and Multnomah County Targeting Resources for Homeless Families Transitional Housing.
SSVF Program Launch: Establishing Services in Compliance with Goals and Regulations Practice Area 1: Outreach, Engagement and Admission.
THE COUNTY OF MADERA, CA THE FRONT DOOR A COST EFFECTIVE STRATEGY TO HELP FAMILIES EXIT OR AVOID HOMELESSNESS AND RETAIN PERMANENT HOUSING CALWORKS HOUSING.
County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services
DHSS DSAMH Department of Health and Social Services Division of Substance Abuse and Mental Health.
Housing First: Where it Works
Outreach Direct Calls: Referrals Outreach Not For Profit Agencies DSHS Mental Health Providers Congregations School Districts.
Preparing for Lease Up: Staff Training for Successful MHSA Supportive Housing Operations MHSA Operations TA Call January 5, 2011 Anne Cory, CSH
March 6, 2013 Suzanne Wagner, Housing Innovations 1.
Impact of the HEARTH Act on Metro Denver Homeless Planning John Parvensky President Colorado Coalition for the Homeless.
A housing first program operated by St. Vincent de Paul of Baltimore
A Place to Call Home 10 Year Plan to End Homelessness November 2006.
HOMELESSNESS TASK FORCE PRESENTATION August 15, 2013.
Homeless Assistance in Ohio Changes in the 2012 Consolidated Plan.
Informational Session: Coordinated Access and Assessment System Navigators and their Role June 9 th, 2014 – 1:00PM.
Coordinated Assessment ROANOKE COC Meeting Council Of Community Services August 20, 2013.
Broward County.  The HEARTH Act Final Regulations in 24 CFR 578 defined a centralized or coordinated assessment system as a process designed to coordinate.
1 Housing First Opportunities and Barriers South Central Pennsylvania Housing Recovery Summit April 29, 2014 Presented by: Presented by: Diana T. Myers,
HUD-VASH Case Management System Paul Smits, MSW Associate Chief Consultant, Roger Casey, PhD Director, Grant and Per Diem Program.
CMHCCC PATH PROGRAM Joe Leonard Homelessness Specialist Community Mental Health Center of Crawford County
Coordinated Assessment: Understanding Assessment Tools 1 Kim Walker & Norm Suchar November 2013.
Ending Family Homelessness The Basics National Alliance to End Homelessness Conference Seattle, Washington February 7, 2008 Sue Marshall The Community.
Coordinated assessment: The Basics
CalWORKs Housing support program
Coordinated Entry.  Helping people move through the system faster  Sends households to intervention best fit from the start  Reduce new entries into.
Federal and State Funding Shifts to Rapid Re-Housing: The Positive Impact on Emergency Shelter and Transitional Housing Programs Audio Conference sponsored.
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Santa Rosa Rapid Re-Housing Program (RHP) Presented by Jennielynn Holmes & Tanya Wulff.
Retooling the Crisis Response System Michelle Heritage Executive Director Community Shelter Board National Conference on Ending Homelessness.
Meaghan Bell University of Calgary Housing First & Screening Tools For Communities Stephen Gaetz Canadian Observatory on Homelessness, Professor, York.
HOMELESS SERVICES: A new approach Ed Gemerchak, LISW Assoc. Director, Men’s Shelter Services.
D AYTON -M ONTGOMERY C OUNTY F RONT D OOR A SSESSMENT National Alliance to End Homelessness First Contact: Creating a Front Door to Your Homelessness System.
2014 Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS) Data Standards for ESG Presented by Melissa Mikel September
5 th Annual Housing Institute June , 2012.
Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities Georgia Housing Voucher and Bridge Funding Programs SFY 2013 A Year in Review.
1 Rapid Re-Housing: An Overview Welcome Home: Addressing Today's Challenges in Homeless Services June 2,
COORDINATED ENGAGEMENT FOR YOUNG ADULTS Hannah Fisk, NWYS Emily Harris-Shears & Erin Maguire, CCSWW Washington State Conference on Ending Homelessness.
REGIONAL CONFERENCE NORFOLK, VA MARCH 16, 2009 CONDUCTED BY THE CENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES 1 South Hampton Roads Regional Housing Needs Assessment.
Monterey County Housing Support Program The Monterey County Department of Social Services partnered with the Housing Resource Center of Monterey County,
1 WHAT’S NEW, DOC? 2008 SuperNOFA. 2 Major Changes for 2008 Page of the NOFA e-snaps is the new electronic registration and application process.
2016 Emergency Shelter & Housing Assistance Program Information Meeting October 20, 2015.
2010 Florida HMIS Conference 1. Using HMIS to Inform Performance Measurement Outcomes Objective: –Enhance awareness and understanding on using HMIS to.
Housing Options for People with Disabilities And Homelessness Julie Grothe Guild Incorporated NAMI Conference
Mark Leeds Director of Long Term Care and Community Support Services April 26, 2012 Maryland Medicaid Advisory Committee: Balancing Incentive Program.
CAHS Process Flow operator completes pre-screen for shelter eligibility 3a operator transmits screening document over secure network to.
ORGANIZING THE FRONT DOOR: COORDINATED ASSESSMENT Emily Carmody & Corey Root NCCEH Rebecca Pfeiffer City of Charlotte.
Brap & Shelter Plus Care Programs. BRAP Bridging Rental Assistance Program.
 Award of $923,339  Substantial Amendment › $300,000Homelessness Prevention › $480,000 Rapid Re-housing › $80,000 Housing Relocation and Stabilization.
Learnings from the Maricopa County Human Services Campus, DAVID BRIDGE MANAGING DIRECTOR HUMAN SERVICES CAMPUS LODESTAR DAY RESOURCE CENTER.
The HEARTH Academy System Assessment and Design October 2010.
Behavioral Health Initiatives $17,000,000 seems like a large amount, however due to a lack of Medicaid funding, this money will be spent quickly. In order.
ABC’S OF HOUSING Florida Supportive Housing Coalition Fundamentals of Supportive Housing April 4, 2016 abilityhousing.org.
Link to Permanent Housing (Link) Overview At least 5% of a rental development’s total units are set-aside for ELI households with Special Needs that are.
Accessing Housing Resources through the LME Understanding Shelter Plus Care Program.
The Research Behind Successful Supportive Housing September 2016.
Norm Suchar Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs
Housing First: Ending Homelessness in North Carolina
Building an Effective Homeless Response System
Health Care for Homeless Veterans Programs (HCHV)
Rapid Rehousing Programs
5.14 Ending Long Stays in Shelter
Types Of Prioritization & Matching Primarily two: Bucket Prioritization Continuous Prioritization.
Building An Effective Coordinated Entry System
Agenda Introductions What is a Unified Shelter Model?
Keys to Housing Security
TPCH Sheltered & Unsheltered PIT 5 Year Review
CES 101: Making the Connections for Reentry Housing
Presentation transcript:

Rebuilding Lives, Sharing Knowledge, Shaping Systems NAEH Conference: Targeting Interventions for Homeless Families and Individuals July 28, 2008 Suzanne Wagner

Targeting Considerations  Targeting requires not just a tool but a process as well  Targeting can be done for a single resource such as PSH or can be done for multiple resources (e.g., program shelter, TH, rapid re-housing)  Common elements of systems targeting strategies include:  Assessment/application Process  Prioritization Criteria  Eligibility Determination  Housing/Program Referral Process  Need to engage community and look at your data to determine local needs, gaps, priorities and targeting process and tools 2

Targeting Considerations (2)  Targeting strategies generally strive to:  Be transparent and fair  Be simple and consumer-friendly  Effectively triage to ensure that limited resources are properly allocated  Take advantage of technology for gathering, sharing, and processing data  Identify priority population/s to be served and eligibility criteria  Evaluate current inventory of housing (including program models and specialization)  Involve an objective entity to determine eligibility and/or priority  Include input from relevant entities in design (e.g., funders, public agencies, consumers, providers)  Accommodate consumer and provider preferences  Comply with applicable regulations and laws regarding information sharing, fair housing and the ADA 3

Assessment and Prioritization Factors Common Information collected includes: Demographic Information Income/Entitlements Housing and Homeless History Housing Barriers Education and Employment History Service (medical and/or mental health) and emergency shelter utilization Prioritization Criteria Length of homelessness High Need – medical, BH vulnerability Service/System Utilization – hospital, jail/prison, foster care 4

Dayton – Front Door Assessment for Shelter System Assessment: Conducted at front door of shelter to determine placement in all housing options.  Collects information on: housing history, opportunities and barriers, income/entitlements, vocational/educational, social/family supports, medical, mental health, substance use, legal, ADL.  Includes Initial Triage Assessment and Housing Opportunities Assessment. Assessment Process:  Conducted at the Gateway shelters by professional case managements staff  Initial Triage Assessment evaluates: homeless status, diversion options, immediate needs related to medical, behavioral health or DV  Within 14 days of shelter entry, a preliminary housing opportunities assessment is done to identify clients to be rapidly placed into housing.  Within 30 days a full assessment is conducted  Assessment staff use other data sources, including: collaterals, records from hospitals or other treatment providers, data from HMIS 5

Dayton – Front Door Assessment for Housing System Triage/Placement:  The tool uses a scoring metric to quantify consumer need level.  Based on score and on resource availability appropriate applicants will be housed or wait-listed at: an acute care or residential treatment facility, a rapid re-housing or other housing subsidy program, a programmatic shelter, TH, or PSH  Homeless people who do not require supportive services will develop a housing plan to access other affordable housing 6

Chicago – Rental Housing Support Program Assessment: Determines eligibility for scatter site permanent supportive housing program. The Housing Service Needs Assessment is conducted once someone is accepted into the program.  Chicago Rental Housing Support Program Qualification form collects information on: Referral information, Household Demographics, Income, and Current services  Housing Service Needs Assessment collects information on: Demographic information, housing history/assessment, housing preferences, income, medical assessment, special needs assessment, stages of readiness, analysis and recommendations Application Process  Referral sources (Transitional housing, shelters and outreach teams) complete the Chicago Rental Housing Support Program Qualification and submit to the County Department of Human Services (DHS) 7

Chicago – Rental Housing Support Program Eligibility/Prioritization  Eligibility determination conducted by County Department of Human Services which includes verification of homeless history and income.  Priority for initial lease up was homelessness for one year or more.  Currently eligibility determination takes approximately three days. At initial lease-up of units, eligibility determination took up to several months. Placement  Once applicants is determined eligible, DHS refers client to one of two service agencies for housing and services. Consideration given to geographic preference.  Service agencies reach out to applicant to engage in services. 8

Hennepin County Housing Barrier Assessment for Rapid Exit Program Assessment: Determines level of housing barriers for homeless individuals and families for placement into Rapid Exit program.  Collects information on: barriers to housing, education level, vocational history, rent history, credit history, substance use, mental health, legal, physical health, relationships, family of origin  Scored on a scale from 1-5; Level 1 indicates very few housing barriers, 5 indicates severe barriers Application Process  All homeless families are referred to screener within 2-3 days of entry into shelter.  Homeless individuals are screened at drop-in centers or shelters.  Assessment conducted by County contracted not-for-profit staff; info on criminal and eviction history checked on public database and then Rapid Exit Screener meets in person with the family or individual  If eligible, screener refers applicant to participating service providers 9

Hennepin County Housing Barrier Assessment for Rapid Exit Program Eligibility  Requirements determined by Housing and Homeless Initiatives, Human Services and Public Health Department.  Screeners determine eligibility Families: All levels except Level 1 accepted into program. Level 1 families may receive some financial assistance. Individuals: Score of higher than a 3 - referred to PSH or more intensive housing Housing Placement  Rapid Exit providers locate housing for referred individuals and families and provide services for at least 6 months  Factors considered once deemed eligible: caseload (how many openings, on which caseloads), special skills of the agency (e.g. pregnant women, brain injury, etc), and geographic location (suburban, city)  Singles program is pilot, so not mandatory for all 10

Neighborhood Partnership Fund - Bridges to Housing PSH for Families, Portland-Vancouver Assessment: Used to assess for family housing first program with intensive case management  Homeless Families High-Resource Users Screen collects information on: substance use, mental health, foster care involvement, corrections, physical and cognitive health issues, DV, homeless history, mainstream resources involvement.  The tool is scored on a 30-point basis with 10 or more points indicating a very high resource user. Created by the Coalition for Homeless Families  Assessment conducted once families are accepted into the program and is conducted over time. The assessment helps provider decide on what services will be provided. Information collected: income, education, children’s needs, employment, entitlements, housing and credit history, transportation, disability, mental and physical health. Common screening and assessment tools are used across four counties and two states. 11

Neighborhood Partnership Fund - Bridges to Housing PSH for Families, Portland-Vancouver Application Process  The referral source completes the screening tool and forwards on to the one local participating provider for that area. Referral sources differ for each of the counties; in one case, there is a central phone number for all homeless services, in another case, the Mental Health and DV departments of the counties make the referral themselves. Eligibility Families have been properly screened by the time they reach the participating provider, so no one is turned away once they are referred. However, the provider agency does make the final formal approval. Placement  Once families are referred to the participating provider, families are often housed within two weeks 12

Questions? Contact Suzanne Wagner, Director CUCS Housing Resource Center 198 East 121 st Street, 6 th Floor New York, NY