1 DSS IT Capital Investment Briefing March 13, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Commonwealth of Virginia Puzzle: To clarify or solve (something confusing) by reasoning or study David E. Mix, PMP, MBA HIT/MITA Program Manager Department.
Advertisements

A Plan for a Sustainable Community Behavioral Health Information Network Western States Health-e Connection Summit & Trade Show September 10, 2013.
MEDICAL HOME 1/2009 Mary Goldman, D.O., President of MAOFP.
Department of Human Services Division of Medical Services Eugene Gessow Director.
Denise B. Webb State Health IT Coordinator May 9, 2013.
David Mix, PMP, MBA HIT/MITA Program Manager
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
Building the Digital Infrastructure for Vermont’s Learning Health System ONC HIT Policy Committee Testimony September 14, 2011 Hunt Blair, Deputy Commissioner.
Determining Your Program’s Health and Financial Impact Using EPA’s Value Proposition Brenda Doroski, Director Center for Asthma and Schools U.S. Environmental.
PMO Services RFP Overview Patty Fontneau ED and CEO.
Bidder’s Conference January 7, 2014 State of Vermont Agency of Human Services Pharmacy Benefits Management (PBM) RFP.
Truven Health Analytics State Exchanges - Data Collection & Analysis April 2014.
COUNTY DSS WORKLOAD ANALYSIS Name Title County Name.
What Happens after You Sign with Missouri Health Information Technology Assistance Center?
Meaningful Use, Standards and Certification Under HITECH—Implications for Public Health InfoLinks Community of Practice January 14, 2010 Bill Brand, MPH,
Linette T Scott, MD, MPH Chief Medical Information Officer, DHCS “Population Health” HIMSS NCal Educational Program, Sacramento, CA| February 4, 2014.
Protecting and Promoting the Practice of Good Medicine Getting Started with Meaningful Use: The impact on the professional eligible provider MMIC Health.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
“Reaching across Arizona to provide comprehensive quality health care for those in need” HIT/HIE Update AHCCCS EHR Incentive Program and Health Information.
August 2011 David Jenkins Administration for Children and Families ACF Interoperability Human Services 2.0 Overview.
Medicaid Information Technology Architecture (MITA) Where Louisiana Medicaid is Today and Where it Will To Be in the Future April 17, 2012.
Antonio Vega Health IT Advisor June 10 th, 2015 Patient Portal.
ConneCT Demo and Update State of Connecticut Department of Social Services (DSS) April 12, 2013.
WHAT'S AHEAD? Kathy Whitmire Dale Gibson February 15, 2011 HIPAA 5010, ICD-10, ACO's, VBP, HIGLAS, PECOS.
Navigating the Maze How to sell to the public sector Adrian Farley Chief Deputy CIO State of California
Rutgers Integrated Administrative System RIAS Phase III – HRMS, Budgeting, and Enterprise Reporting Treasurer’s Luncheon December 2, 2008.
ConneCT Project Overview State of Connecticut Department of Social Services (DSS) October 2013.
Lecture 14 Policy, Legal, and Regulatory Issues in HIS (Chapters 18,19,20)
HEALTH CARE REFORM: MANAGEMENT ACADEMY South Carolina Hospital Association Columbia, SC May 15, 2013 James Bentley, Ph.D. Silver Spring, Maryland.
The Role of Modernization in Public Service Delivery.
PROJECT NAME: DHS Watch List Integration (WLI) Information Sharing Environment (ISE) MANAGER: Michael Borden PHONE: (703) extension 105.
Screening Clients can anonymously screen themselves for eligibility to help determine the best program for them. Application Ability to apply for all programs.
An Integrated Healthcare System’s Approach to ACOs Chuck Baumgart, M.D., Chief Medical Officer Presbyterian Health Plan David Arredondo, M.D., Executive.
1 DSS IT Capital Investment Briefing September 11, 2013.
0 Presentation to: Health IT HIPPA Workshop Presented by: Stacey Harris, Director of Health IT Innovation September 26, 2014 Division of Health Information.
An Update on MUSC Performance in “Meaningful Use” of Electronic Health Record (EHR) Barton L. Sachs, M.D., MBA Professor of Orthopaedics Chief Medical.
1 Manatt Health Solutions NYS Office of Health Information Technology Transformation Academy Health State Health Research and Policy Interest Group 2008.
EMR Remedies Electronic Health Record Solutions Copyright – EMR Remedies Corporate Overview and General Information on Federal.
Chapter 6 – Data Handling and EPR. Electronic Health Record Systems: Government Initiatives and Public/Private Partnerships EHR is systematic collection.
State HIE Program Chris Muir Program Manager for Western/Mid-western States.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Recommendations Phase 2 David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of.
Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise Data Management, and Data Standardization Efforts at the U.S. Department of Education May 2006 Joe Rose, Chief Architect.
“Reaching across Arizona to provide comprehensive quality health care for those in need” AHCCCS/ADHS Report Summary & Recommendations.
Dwane J. McGowan HTM June, Founded in 1979 as an International Healthcare IT organization. Over 10,000 employees with 23 offices worldwide.
Catawba County Board of Commissioners Retreat June 11, 2007 It is a great time to be an innovator 2007 Technology Strategic Plan *
Health Information Technologies and Health Care Transformation James Golden, PhD Director, Division of Health Policy Minnesota Department of Health February.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Health Information Technology EHR Meaningful Use Milestones for HIT Funding Michele Madison
1 Balancing Incentive Program IT Capital Fund Request Department of Social Services December 10, 2014.
Adoption and Use of Electronic Medical Records (in Federally Qualified Health Centers) and Supporting an ASP Community Care Network of Virginia, Inc.
National Enrolment Service (NES) Overview October 2015 – June 2016.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Electronic Clinical Quality Measures – Session #1 ONC Resource Center.
Global Partnership for Enhanced Social Accountability (GPESA) December 19, 2011 World Bank.
April 22, 2015 Improving the Way California Delivers Health Care Services.
© 2014 By Katherine Downing, MA, RHIA, CHPS, PMP.
1 CDC Health Information Exchange (HIE) Accelerating State-wide Public Health Situational Awareness in New York Through Health Information Exchanges August.
Enterprise Solution Services Assessing the IT environment Oversaw 2014 Texas Legacy System Study report (HB 2738, 83R) Identified 4,130 business applications.
Pennsylvania Health Information Exchange NJHIMSS - DVHIMSS Enabling Healthcare Transformation Through Information Technology September, 2010.
Burden of Disease Research Unit (BOD) Towards a National Procedure Coding Standard for South Africa Lyn Hanmer Health Informatics R&D Co-ordination (HIRD)
Sachin H. Jain, MD, MBA Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT United States Department of Health and Human Services The Nation’s Health IT Agenda:
What is the Best Way to Select an EHR
Jim Bland Executive Director, CRIX International
Segmap Solutions Mapping segments.
Unit 5 Systems Integration and Interoperability
Hyper-V Cloud Proof of Concept Kickoff Meeting <Customer Name>
Department of Community Health’s Technology Project Update
NYHQ DSRIP Cultural Competency & Health Literacy Committee Kick-Off Meeting March 2015.
Module 1.4 Vision for the Master Facility List
Project Certification Planning Phase August 27, 2014
Presentation transcript:

1 DSS IT Capital Investment Briefing March 13, 2013

2 Contents / Agenda 1. ConneCT (Modernization of Client Service Delivery) and Health Insurance Exchange/Integrated Eligibility Project (CT HIX/IEP) 2. Health Information Exchange / Health Information Technology (HIE/HIT) 3. Shared Analytics and Business Intelligence

3 1/3 – ConneCT and Health Insurance Exchange/ Integrated Eligibility Project (CT HIX/IEP)

ConneCT Project Project Overview Purpose: The DSS ConneCT project will modernize the agency’s existing infrastructure with the implementation of a Modernization of Client Service Delivery (MCSD) solution utilizing three (3) specific technologies: Internet-based Client Access and Web Services, Document Scanning and Work Flow Management, and Interactive Voice Response (IVR) and Call Center Services. These technologies will be integrated with our existing eligibility legacy system known as EMS. These functionalities will increase the efficiency and effectiveness in how DSS serves its customers. Status of Project: As of December 31, 2012, two of the project's seven releases have been built and fully tested. These two releases feature Client Accounts and Pre-Screening functionality. In addition to Client Accounts and Pre-Screening, the state has completed the installation and configuration of approximately 95% of the new ConneCT Solution Platform. Project Timeline: 07/01/ /13/13 4

Health Insurance Exchange & Integrated Eligibility System Project (HIX / IEP) Project Overview Purpose: The Department of Social Services Integrated Eligibility System project will replace the Department’s existing 24 year old Eligibility Management System (EMS). The integrated eligibility platform, once designed, developed and implemented, will provide a seamless eligibility and enrollment process for Medicaid, CHIP and the CTHIX, and will ultimately be used to determine eligibility for other social service programs (e.g., SNAP, TFA). Specifically, the planned integrated eligibility function will initially address federal requirements for eligibility determinations for advance premium tax credits and reduced cost sharing through the Exchange, MAGI-based eligibility for Medicaid, complete individual responsibility exemption determinations, and coordinate enrollment. Anticipated Project Timeline: 02/1/ /31/15 5

6 Reach and Impact Integrated Eligibility (DSS) Integrated Eligibility (Cross-Agency) Reach & Impact:  New channels for DSS clients to get information.  New technology tools for DSS workers. Reach & Impact:  New population of clients who purchase/receive medical insurance.  New quasi-public agency. Reach & Impact:  Increased automation to improve service delivery to all DSS clients. Reach & Impact:  Enables cross-agency collaboration and the ability to serve the “whole client”. Tier 1 Tier 2 and 3 Tier 4 Time Achieving Incremental “Wins” for DSS and Connecticut These projects build on each successful milestone to increase reach and impact.

7 Objectives - ConneCT Improve Client Access Anywhere/anytime access via web services. Achieve Better Quality Outcomes Makes processes faster and more efficient by reducing “back and forth” and generation of paper. Enhance Customer Service Empowers workers with tools to help clients. Increases the number of workers who can help a client. Reduce Costs Reduces the need for paper (and associated storage costs). More efficient retrieval of documents. Provide a Technological Framework for the Future Integrated technologies support the business and allow for expansion. Through ConneCT we are using technology to generate positive business impact.

8 Building a Technological Framework for Future - ConneCT Technical MilestoneBenefit to DSS and Connecticut Built and deployed new server infrastructure at BEST Data Center. Allows to BEST to host a modern web-based system for DSS. Installed new telephone system at BEST and at three DSS offices. Single, centralized telephony platform enables a state- wide workforce and provides redundancy. Installed new optical fiber network. Enables high-speed connectivity between the BEST data center and DSS benefit center offices to support voice and data. Installed 700 new telephone lines at the BEST Data Center. Allows DSS customers to reach DSS via a central location and access telephony services. Deployed new web-based software platform. Provides modern, web-based systems for DSS clients and DSS workers to use. Installed leading COTS products including Rules Engine and Document Generation Software Provides modern, web-based systems for DSS clients and DSS workers to use. Extensible technical products support DSS now and in the future.

9 Release Update - ConneCT Functional OverviewStatus / Target Date Client Accounts Provides secure, anytime access to generic and case-specific information to clients via the Internet. Currently Live ( Pre-Screening Allows clients to independently check for potential eligibility online without having to visit or call DSS. Currently Live ( Interactive Voice Response (IVR) Provides secure, anytime access to generic and case-specific information to clients by phone. Coming Soon: March 2013 Document Management and Workflow Reduces the need for paper-based processing and provides centralized access to documents and visibility into document status. March 2013 (Rollout Begins) Benefit Center Provides a centralized, consistent enterprise system for receiving and servicing incoming calls. June 2013 (Rollout Begins) Online Application Allows clients to apply online and provides a dynamic verification checklist to clearly explain what verification is required. August 2013 Change Reporting and Online Redeterminations Allows clients to report changes and conduct redeterminations online. August 2013

OND JFMAMJJASO R1: Plan Management R2: Core Functionality R3/R4: Deferred Functionality June 2013: Enables the Loading of Plan Data October 2013: Allows Clients to Browse, Apply, Shop and Enroll Provides Additional Functionality to Enhance the Exchange Tier 1 Update and Timeline – CT HIX 10

11 Platform Capabilities for Tiers 2, 3 and 4 - IEP

Financial Estimates (SFY 13 – SFY 14) - ConneCT Estimated Total Development Cost Estimated total Capital Funding Request Estimated Annual Operating Cost One Time Financial Benefit Recurring Annual Financial Benefit $21,401,663$8,550,041$4,652,061$10,478,858$2,279,510 Explanation of Estimates Estimates are based on the information received from program staff. The total development cost is reimbursed by the Federal Government at a 49% FFP rate. The “One Time Financial Benefit” of $10,478,858 shown above reflects $2,279,714 of FFP against the Capital Equipment Purchase Fund expenditures of $4,652,478 in addition to the FFP of $8,199,144 for the federal share of this initiative. 12

Actual & Projected Expenditures – ConneCT Actual and Projected Development Expenditures Actual Expenditures: SFY ,840 SFY ,458 SFY ,014 SFY 20124,793,671 SFY 2013 Jul - Feb *7,642,074 Total Actual Expenditures Through 02/28/1314,631,057 Projected Expenditures: SFY 2013 Mar - Jun *10,618,676 SFY 20143,140,913 Total Projected Expenditures13,759,589 Grand Total All Expenditures28,390,646 Total SFY 2013 expenditures are projected to be $18,260,750. Not all expenditures are subject to FFP, such as Benefit Center build out. The above total includes expenses for years prior to SFY 2013 and 2014, the years for which we are currently seeking IT Capital Fund support. $7.0 m expended in prior years $21.4 m SFY 2013 & 2014 costs $28.4 m total project cost 13

Projected Expenditures (SFY 13 – SFY 14) - ConneCT *Does not include Maintenance & Operation expenditures (SFY13 - $1.9m, SFY14 - $4.5m, SFY15 - $4.7m). 14

Financial Estimates (SFY 13 – SFY 16) – CT HIX/IEP Estimated Total Development Cost Estimated total Capital Funding Request Estimated Annual Operating Cost One Time Financial Benefit Recurring Annual Financial Benefit $103,843,568$15,308,659$13,782,851$88,534,909$10,337,138 Explanation of Estimates The total development cost is reimbursed by the Federal Government at an 85% FFP rate. The estimated annual operating cost is calculated based on the SFY15 amount of $13,782,851. The recurring annual financial benefit is calculated by multiplying the estimated annual operating cost by 75%, as operating costs will be reimbursed at a 75% FFP rate. In the development of the cost estimates above, the majority of the cost is allocated to information technology systems and related support. These costs are highly dependent upon future activities, such as the structure of procurements, vendor solicitations, and the actual reusability of technology components. The costs also reflect assumptions on the approach to implementation including training, user acceptance test, pilot, conversion and the number of releases. The operational cost budget accounts for two (2) years of operations and maintenance, starting in January 1, 2014 and running through December 31, Assuming a full implementation of software around December 31, 2014, the estimate includes one full year of post implementation stabilization support. Furthermore, there is an anticipated future APD for Tier 4 Development Costs, which are not included in this submission. 15

Projected Expenditures (SFY 13 – SFY 16) – CT HIX/IEP *Does not include Maintenance & Operation expenditures (SFY14 - $2.8m, SFY15 - $13.8m, SFY16 - $3.9m). *Does not include anticipated future APD for Tier 4 Development Costs, which are undetermined at this time. *No Expenditures to date. 16

17 2/ 3 – Health Information Exchange and Health Information Technology (HIE/ HIT)

Health Information Exchange / Health Information Technology (HIE / HIT) Project Overview Purpose: This project comprises a multi-faceted development of improvements to Health Information Technology capabilities within Connecticut. The project will improve the ability of Medicaid health care providers to share health care information to improve care coordination. Additionally, patients will be able to share data with providers as needed. The improved data sharing mechanisms established via this project will improve the efficiency and efficacy of patients’ health care. Anticipated Project Timeline: 07/1/ /30/15* (*included in this package are projected expenditures through the end of SFY The HIT part of the project will be on- going until the federal EHR incentive program ends in HIE build support should end with the above date.) 18

Health Information Exchange and Information Technology – HIE/HIT With enhancement of Connecticut’s Health Information Exchange and Information Technology (HIE/HIT) capabilities, DSS aims to: improve the Medicaid population’s access to high quality, safe, affordable and efficient healthcare; increase patients’ active engagement in their own health care support active care coordination among care providers, patients, and families; promote evidence-based medicine, public health programs, outcome monitoring, and research to improve treatment quality; ensure the reliable, private, secure interoperable storage and sharing of healthcare data within Connecticut and between other states. 19

Health Information Exchange (HIE) – Business goals and benefits GoalBenefit Create a master Medicaid health care provider directory More accurate count, classification, and information on providers based on consolidated data and removal of obsolete listings Implement Direct messaging to support secure communication among providers regarding patient care. Reduced rates of hospital readmission for Medicaid patients; improved patient treatment outcomes Create a Medicaid member portal, allowing patients to access their treatment data from all of their providers, and allowing them to designate who may view their data. Providers will have more comprehensive data on patients, facilitating higher-quality, timely treatment; patients will become more involved in their own treatment. 20

21 HIT - Business goals/benefits of HIT development GoalBenefit Increase rate of Health IT adoption, implementation, and use of EHR’s among eligible professionals (EP’s - physicians, dentists, nurse practitioners, certified nurse midwives) and eligible hospitals (EH’s) via provision of EHR incentive payments Improved access overall to high quality, safe, affordable and efficient healthcare in Connecticut through the Meaningful Use of Health IT Increased engagement of patients and their families in their own health care by facilitating health literacy and active care coordination among care providers, patients and families Develop strategic plan for clinical data delivery, storage and usage; educate EP’s and EH’s about policies and enforce privacy and security requirements of MU stage 2 through audit strategy Reliable, private, secure interoperable storage and sharing of healthcare data within Connecticut and between other states as required for safe, effective and efficient healthcare

22 GoalBenefit Develop functional and technical requirements for warehousing of clinical data from multiple sources, e.g., providers’ EHR’s; DPH systems Clinical data is made available to support of evidence based medicine, public health programs, outcomes monitoring, and research HIT - Business goals/benefits of HIT development (cont)

Financial Estimates (SFY 13 – SFY 15) – HIE/HIT Estimated Total Development Cost Estimated total Capital Funding Request Estimated Annual Operating Cost One Time Financial Benefit Recurring Annual Financial Benefit $14,836,928$1,577,156$0$13,259,772$0 Explanation of Estimates The total development cost is reimbursed by the Federal Government at an 89% FFP rate. 23

Projected Expenditures (SFY 13 – SFY 15) – HIE/HIT *Expenditures to date: $241,323 (UConn Health Center & HP HIT Payments). 24

25 3/3 – Shared Analytics and Business Intelligence (SA/BI)

26 Goal – SA/BI The overarching goal is to move to an enterprise approach for health care business intelligence that will provide the State with an integrated health care data and information infrastructure, making decision support less reactive and more predictive and proactive.

Target Analytical and Decision Support Capabilities – SA/BI Establishment of data governance and standards Development of an integrated approach (within legal and regulatory constraints) to an Enterprise Date Warehouse / Business Intelligence (EDW/BI) infrastructure and data analytics Strong reporting and BI capabilities for participating organizations and collaborations Initial focus – DSS, private sector partners and UConn 27

Target Analytical and Decision Support Capabilities – SA/BI Provision of a robust BI capacity across the continuum of health care in the State: – Real-time interactive access, queries, manipulation, analysis and modeling of data and information – Greater support to anticipate, support and validate key decisions and activities at both the agency / program level and across the continuum of health care programs and services – Predictive and “What If” analytic capabilities – Addressing the key question “…we don’t know what we don’t know…” 28

Target Analytical and Decision Support Capabilities – SA/BI Enterprise data analytical capabilities that can support the protection and promotion of health and well-being at both the population and client level, across the State’s health care systems Compliance with national HIT interoperability standards to strengthen public/academic/private partnerships to improve quality and produce better outcomes more efficiently Compliance with Medicaid information technology architectural standards (MITA) 29

30 Shared Analytics and Business Intelligence Framework

Financial Estimates (SFY 13 – SFY15) – SA/BI Estimated Total Development Cost Estimated total Capital Funding Request Estimated Annual Operating Cost One Time Financial Benefit Recurring Annual Financial Benefit $21,745,000$5,436,250TBD$16,308,750TBD Explanation of Estimates The total development cost is reimbursed by the Federal Government at a 75% FFP rate. The Estimated Annual Operating Costs and Recurring Annual Financial Benefits are undetermined at this time. Anticipated Project Timeline:02/01/ /30/

Projected Expenditures (SFY 13 – SFY 15) – SA/BI *No Expenditures to date. 32

33 Questions?