© 2013 Boise State University1 What the Shifts in the Standards Mean for Learning and Instruction Michele Carney, PhD Spring 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence
Advertisements

2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12)
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Smarter Balanced Assessment a Closer Look Level 1 Part 6.
Understanding Depth 0f knowledge
Elementary Principals CCSS Update Robyn Seifert & Rita Reimbold April 10, 2013.
Welcome to Smarter Balanced Math Assessment Claims EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER - NORTH LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Spring 2014 Facilitator Name.
The International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme
Understanding the Smarter BalanceD Math Summative Assessment
Common Core State Standards K-5 Mathematics Kitty Rutherford and Amy Scrinzi.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. Structure of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Research-based learning progressions Internationally.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge USD 457. Objectives CO – Analyze and apply the four levels of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. LO – Read for the purpose of understanding.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
ADAPTED FROM A WORKSHOP PREPARED FOR THE RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION BY KRISTINA SPARFVEN The Rigors of Ratio and Proportional Reasoning in the.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
Math Instruction What’s in and What’s out What’s in and What’s out! Common Core Instruction.
The Use of Student Work as a Context for Promoting Student Understanding and Reasoning Yvonne Grant Portland MI Public Schools Michigan State University.
Presented by: COMMON CORE Standards Plus ®. A nonprofit group of educators All Learning Plus instructional materials are developed by educators. Our mission.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
CFN 204 · Diane Foley · Network Leader Engaging Students in Productive Challenge December 9, 2013 Presenter: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach CFN204.
Standards-Based Science Instruction. Ohio’s Science Cognitive Demands Science is more than a body of knowledge. It must not be misperceived as lists of.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
Sunnyside School District
Common Core State Standards
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
Mathematics Curriculum Roadmap. What Materials Will Be Used to Support Student Learning? Grade 8 Math Resource: EngageNY Supplemental resources are used.
Pamela T. Moore Associate Superintendent, Teaching and Learning Services Rita Vasquez Executive Director, High School Education The Florida Standards:
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Exploring Claim 2, 3, and 4 This material was developed for.
Sunnyside School District
Common Core Standards Madison City Schools Math Leadership Team.
Quality Instruction The ♥ of the matter is the depth of knowledge.
Sunnyside School District Math Training Conceptual Lessons.
CCSS Mathematics Fellows SUE BLUESTEIN ESD112 REGIONAL MATHEMATICS COORDINATOR.
Selected Responses How deep does the question dig?????
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
WALNUT HIGH SCHOOL CAASPP INFORMATION NIGHT How to Understand Your Child’s report
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
Alaska Measures of Progress (AMP) Summative Assessment Framework 1.
Major Science Project Process A blueprint for experiment success.
With great power comes great responsibility.
ACTion for Mathematics-ASPIRE. Background The math assessment was developed to reflect students’ knowledge and skill accumulation over time; capturing.
Walnut Valley Unified School District “Understanding Your Child’s 2015 CAASPP Report” California Assessment and Accountability System Performance and Progress.
Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
For Elementary Schools.  The structure of the new assessment  How does it inform instruction?  What the data tells us  Where are we now?  How do.
Assessment in Common Core. Essential Questions How is CAASPP different than STAR? How is SBAC different than CST? What do students have to know and be.
SBAC-Mathematics November 26, Outcomes Further understand DOK in the area of Mathematics Understand how the new SBAC assessments will measure student.
1 Common Core Standards. Shifts for Students Demanded by the Core Shifts in ELA/Literacy Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction and informational.
1 Cognitive Demand in Problems  Cognitive demand is a measure of what the instructional question (a question posed during class) or test item requires.
Linking Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment in Mathematics March 10, 2016 CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
CCSS & Smarter Balanced Mathematics: Key Shifts to Claims tinyurl.com/UPK5math University of Portland Brian Graham Camas School District TOSA M.Ed.
Update on State Assessment and CCSS Presentation to the West Hartford Parent Teacher Council.
Math and the SBAC Claims
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
Preplanning Presentation
Claim 3: Communicating Reasoning
Presentation transcript:

© 2013 Boise State University1 What the Shifts in the Standards Mean for Learning and Instruction Michele Carney, PhD Spring 2014

© 2013 Boise State University2 Agenda What does it mean to engage students in the practice of mathematics? Examine assessment items and categorize the type of cognitive demand that are required from students What does this mean for instruction?

What does it mean to say students need to engage in the ‘Practice of ELA/Mathematics’ Language ArtsMathematics We teach phonics, grammar, punctuation, spelling, etc. for the purpose of students’ engaging in the practice of language arts: – Reading – Writing Focused on teaching skills, facts, algorithms, procedures, etc. Now we are asking that students be able to put these into the practice of mathematics: – Problem solve – Model situations – Reason quantitatively – Critique the reasoning of others

© 2013 Boise State University4 Claim 1: Concepts & Procedures Claim 2: Problem Solving Claim 3: Communicate Reasoning Claim 4: Modeling & Data Analysis DOK 1 DOK 2 DOK 3 DOK 4 SBAC Assessment & Reporting Areas Areas assessed by the ISAT Areas assessed by SBAC

© 2013 Boise State University5 If we are going to ask students to meaningfully engage in the practice of mathematics: Then we must vary the type and depth of cognitive demand we are asking from students in classroom tasks, activities and assessments. Level of Cognitive Demand Rote, Skill or Recall Concepts Problem Solving Reasoning & Justification Modeling and Data Analysis Mathematics Practices Problem Solve Model Situations Reason Quantitatively Critique the reasoning of others

© 2013 Boise State University6 TYPES OF COGNITIVE DEMAND

© 2013 Boise State University7 Porter (2002) Memorize Perform Procedures Communicate Understanding Solve Nonroutine Problems Conjecture, Generalize, or Prove Webb (2007) RecallSkill/Concept Strategic Thinking Extended Thinking SBAC Claims Concepts and Procedures Problem Solving Communicate Reasoning Model with Mathematics

TypeDMT DescriptionExample Claim 1 Rote, Skill or Recall Rote, Skill, Recall items require students to produce a response by following a set of rote procedures, demonstrating procedural skills or recalling information (Webb, 2002). Typically procedural or algorithm focused problems Concepts Concept items require students to respond by producing models and diagrams or demonstrate an understanding of mathematical properties and their applications (Webb, 2002) Often involves asking for visual or iconic representation of a topic Claim 2 Problem Solving Problem Solving items require students to produce a response to a given problem for which there can be a variety of answers or problem-solving strategies. Solution methods are not readily apparent and require students to make decisions about how to solve the problem (Hiebert et al, 1992; Porter, 2002). Typically multi-part, contextual questions but must go beyond skill level applications Claim 3 Reasoning & Justification Reasoning and Justification items require students to justify their own reasoning or critique the reasoning of others through careful analysis and by explaining and modeling how a response is either correct or incorrect (de Lange, 1999) Identifying the incorrect solution strategy from two examples and how to correct it Claim 4 Modeling and Data Analysis Modeling and Data Analysis performance tasks require students to analyze complex, real-world scenarios and/or use mathematics models to interpret and solve problems (SBAC, 2011).

© 2013 Boise State University9 Type of Cognitive Demand As a group: – Solve each problem – Identify the type of cognitive demand required by each item

Type of Cognitive Demand: __________________________________

Type of Cognitive Demand: __________________________________

Type of Cognitive Demand: __________________________________

Type of Cognitive Demand: __________________________________

content/uploads/2012/09/performance-tasks/tulips.pdf Type of Cognitive Demand: ___________________________ p.5 p.6

© 2013 Boise State University16 Reflect upon the different types of cognitive demand: – How should these be integrated into classroom practice? – How do they promote different aspects of the mathematical practice standards? – Is there a particular order in which tasks with different cognitive demands should be sequenced? Discuss in your small groups and select one to two items to share with the whole group.

© 2013 Boise State University17 FOCUSING ON COGNITIVE DEMAND IN YOUR SCHOOL OR DISTRICT

6 th Grade Focus Areas Rate and ratio Dividing fractions and understanding rational (e.g., negative) numbers Writing, interpreting, and using expressions and equations Statistical thinking

6 th Grade Math Topics# of Days Expectations for Students Rote, Skill or Recall Concepts Problem Solving Reasoning & Justification Modeling and Data Analysis Rate and ratio A B C D Dividing fractions and understanding rational (e.g., negative) numbers A B C D Writing, interpreting, and using expressions and equations A B C D Statistical thinking A B C D Other A B C D (A) no emphasis; (B) slight emphasis (less than 25% of time spent on this topic); (C) moderate emphasis (accounts for 25–33% of time spent on this topic); and (D) sustained emphasis Adapted from Porter, A. C. (2002). Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 3-14.

© 2013 Boise State University20 Sample ISAT/NWEA MAP itemSample SBAC item Is the level of cognitive demand in the CCSS and assessed on the Smarter Balanced test what Idaho students need?

© 2013 Boise State University21 Describe the relationship you see between the mathematical practice standards and the levels of cognitive demand. Level of Cognitive Demand Rote, Skill or Recall Concepts Problem Solving Reasoning & Justification Modeling and Data Analysis Mathematics Practices Problem Solve Model Situations Reason Quantitatively Critique the reasoning of others