Exploration of Key Instructional Advances in Mathematics Mimi Alkire of StandardsWork, Inc. U.S. Department of Education Office of Career, Technical, and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Development on the Instructional Shift of Focus Lets Focus on Focus.
Advertisements

Professional Development Module Common Core Math Shift: Focus Grade 6.
Kindergarten Instructional Shifts-Focus. Why Common Core? Initiated by the National Governors Association (NGA) and Council of Chief State School Officers.
Transition to CCSS Math What it means and what are the expectations for learning? Middle School Parent Meeting March 26, 2014.
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
Common Core State Standards Wolcott Elementary School West Hartford Public Schools.
C OMMON C ORE /PARCC I NFORMATIONAL S ESSION AGENDA Introductions Common Core Standards Overview of CCS in Math & ELA Implementation of Standards PARCC.
Common Core State Standards—Mathematics Introduction/Overview 1 Cathy Carroll
Rigorous Curriculum Design Showcase
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Unit 1 Focusing on the Major Work of the Levels Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and.
Unit 3 Engaging the Three Components of Rigor Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor,
College and Career Readiness Mathematics at Middle School Poway Unified School District 2014.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: The Key Shifts.
2010 New Math Standards. Mathematical Practices 1. Attend to precision 2. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others 3. Make sense.
Welcome to your child’s 6 th Grade Math Class On Team (6B) Welcome to your child’s 6 th Grade Math Class On Team (6B) Where we try to make sense of numbers.
Instructional Shifts for Mathematics. achievethecore.org 2 Instructional Shifts in Mathematics 1.Focus: Focus strongly where the Standards focus. 2.Coherence:
Middle School Liaison Meeting
Why the Common Core?: How these Standards are Different.
GV Middle School Mathematics Mrs. Susan Iocco December 10, 2014.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW The Shifts: What they are and why they are important.
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Transitioning to the Common Core.
Understanding the Shifts in the Common Core State Standards A Focus on Mathematics Wednesday, October 19 th, :00 pm – 3:30 pm Doug Sovde, Senior.
Three Shifts of the Alaska Mathematics Standards.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Review Focus and Coherence A Closer look at Rigor.
Mathematics Shift 1: Focus What the Student Does…What the Teacher Does…What the Principal Does… Spend more time thinking and working on.
Background Information The CCSSM were a result of a state-led initiative in June 2009 by the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governor’s.
Standards for Mathematics Standards for Mathematical Practice Apply across all grade levels Describe habits of mind of a mathematically proficient student.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
 Declining US competitiveness with other developed countries  Largely flat performance on NAEP over the past 40 years  High rates of college remediation.
How to read the grade level standards Standards Clusters Domains define what students should understand and be able to do. are groups of related standards.
Welcome! U.S. Department of Education Office of Career, Technical and Adult Education StandardsWork, Inc. New Orleans April 1—2, 2014.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
The Common Core State Standards emphasize coherence at each grade level – making connections across content and between content and mathematical practices.
Adapted from Engageny.org. What the Student Does… What the Teacher Does… What the Principal Does… Spend more time thinking and working on fewer concepts.
Common Core State Standards THE MATHEMATICS STANDARDS.
Teachers today must prepare students for a world of possibilities that may not currently exist. The workforce of tomorrow must be flexible, motivated,
Math and the Common Core An Informational session for parents about the demands of Common Core Eastwood Elementary January 21, 2014.
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
Unit 2 Thinking Across Levels to Connect Learning Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and.
The Common Core State Standards August Common Core Development Initially 48 states and three territories signed on Final Standards released June.
Making Sense Of The New Standards K-12 Alliance Staff Developer Training January 25, 2013.
1 Grade-Level Standards  K-8 grade-by-grade standards organized by domain  9-12 high school standards organized by conceptual categories Common Core.
A CLOSER LOOK AT THE CCSS FOR MATHEMATICS COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS PRESENTED BY: BEATRIZ ALDAY.
Unit 4 Connecting Standards for Mathematical Practice to Content Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork,
Standards Development Process College and career readiness standards developed in summer 2009 Based on the college and career readiness standards, K-12.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards March 2012 These slides were taken from: and I have deleted.
Mathematics Shifts and Integration of Initiatives Common Core State Standards Session 2 K-5 Mathematics.
January 8,  Common Core State Standards  Fully implemented by 2013/2014  New state assessment  This year’s First Graders 
Common Core Math Instructional Shifts. Introduction  Be college and career ready  Greater master through focus and coherence  Aspirations for math.
Overview of CCSS Statistics and Probability Math Alliance September 2011.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. 1.How many vertices are on a cube? 2.Subtract ½ from half a baker’s dozen. 3.How many prime numbers are between.
Common Core Standards Implementation ELA/Literacy and Mathematics Understand the Change Be the Change How to Change.
DO NOW On your handout, Identify what you know about the common core state standards and Questions you have about the common core.
2010 Arizona Mathematics Standards (Common Core).
INSTRUCTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners, Inc. May 30, 2012.
Instructional Implications of the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners October 11, 2011.
Key Advances, Math Practices, and Translating Math Standards Into College and Career Readiness-Aligned Curriculum and Instruction.
Mt. Olive Elementary School February 9, 2015 Joyce Bishop, Ph.D.
Day 2 Summer 2011 Algebraic Reasoning Institute 1.
Mathematics in the Common Core 6 instructional shifts cassandra sponseller director of teaching and learning.
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Adapted from: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Dr. Judy BulazoMr. Andy Lucas Director Middle School Math of Curriculum Curriculum Leader.
Math Course & Placement Information Night Avon Grove Intermediate School May 9, 2016.
1 Common Core Standards. Shifts for Students Demanded by the Core Shifts in ELA/Literacy Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction and informational.
Navigating the Instructional Shifts of the Common Core Learning Standards: Shifting Perspectives – Changing Actions.
Key Advances, Math Practices, and Translating Math Standards Into College and Career Readiness-Aligned Curriculum and Instruction.
Core Math Instruction RtI Innovations in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI October 12-13, 2017.
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Math Shifts Focus Coherence Rigor
Presentation transcript:

Exploration of Key Instructional Advances in Mathematics Mimi Alkire of StandardsWork, Inc. U.S. Department of Education Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education Day One

Mathematics Coaches  Kaye Forgione  Joanne Kantner  Henry Kranendonk  Chonda Long  Fabio Milner 2

Day One Mathematics Work Sessions  10:15 – 11:15 a.m. Focusing on the Major Work of Each Level  11:15 a.m. – noon Thinking Across Levels to Connect Learning Noon – 1:15 p.m. Lunch  1:15 – 2:00 p.m. Thinking Across Levels to Connect Learning (continued)  2:00 – 3:45 p.m. Integrating the Mathematical Practices Into Lessons 3

Recap of the Three Key Advances Prompted by the CCR Standards 4 1.Focus: Focus strongly where the CCR standards focus. 2.Coherence: Design learning around coherent progressions level to level. 3.Rigor: Pursue conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application—all with equal intensity.

Mathematics Advance One: Focus Strongly Where the CCR Standards Focus 5

Implications for Instruction  Focus where the CCR standards focus means that some content is more important than other content: Focusing narrows but deepens the scope of content and shows the “power of the eraser.” Rather than “a mile wide and an inch deep,” focusing results in a “mile deep and an inch wide.” Focusing opens the door to strengthening understanding— fewer topics on the list means more time to spend on each one.  Other content supports the more important content ow what we call the major work of the level. 6

Major Areas of Focus  Level A: Whole numbers—addition and subtraction concepts, skills, and problem solving to 20; place value and whole number relationships to 100; and reasoning about geometric shapes and linear measures  Level B: Whole numbers and fractions—place value, comparison, and addition and subtraction to 1000, fluency to 100; multiplication and division to 100; fractions concepts, skills, and problem solving; and 2-dimensional shape concepts; standard units and area measurements 7

 Level C: Whole numbers, fractions, and decimals—fluency with multi-digit whole number and decimal operations; decimal place value concepts and skills to thousandths; comparing, ordering, and operating with fractions; fluency with sums and differences of fractions; understanding rates and ratios; early expressions and equations; the coordinate plane, including creating dot plots from data; area, surface area, and volume; classification of 2-dimensional shapes; and developing understanding of data distributions 8 Major Areas of Focus

 Level D: Rational numbers—fluent arithmetic of positive and negative rational numbers; rates, ratios, and proportions; linear expressions, equations, and functions; classification and analysis of 2- and 3-dimensional figures; similarity and congruence concepts; random sampling of populations to summarize, describe, display, interpret, and draw inferences; and development of probability concepts 9

 Level E: Real numbers—extending number system to include all real numbers; expressions involving radicals and integer exponents; reasoning with units and levels of precision; linear, quadratic, exponential expressions, equations, and functions; linear inequalities; algebraic and graphic models of functions; right triangle relationships; probability concepts; and 1- and 2-variable data sets, including frequency tables 10 Major Areas of Focus

Focusing on the Major Work of Each Level  Purpose of Activity  Materials  Directions 11 Begin Activity

Mathematics Advance Two: Design Learning Around Coherent Progressions Level to Level 12

Implications for Instruction  Lessons should build new understanding on foundations based on previous lessons or levels so that content unfolds meaningfully.  Explicit connections between concepts should be made in lessons across the levels but also within each level.  Students and teachers should begin to expect knowledge and skills to build and grow: Each standard is not a new event, but rather an extension of previous learning. 13

Thinking Across Levels to Connect Learning  Purpose of Activity  Materials  Directions “Fluency, Expressions and Equations, and Applications” 14 Begin Activity

Thinking Across Levels to Connect Learning  Purpose of Activity  Materials  Directions “Fluency, Expressions and Equations, and Applications” 15 Continue Activity

Connect the Standards for Mathematical Practice to content in both instruction and assessment. 16

Implications for Instruction  The Standards for Mathematical Practice are meant to be applied across all levels.  Not all Standards for Mathematical Practice are appropriate for every lesson—focus should only be on those practices that are central to the lesson.  Make sure there are opportunities to experience all of the Standards for Mathematical Practice for students over the course of the unit or the level of study. 17

Standards for Mathematical Practice MP.1Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. MP.2Reason abstractly and quantitatively. MP.3Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. MP.4Model with mathematics. MP.5Use appropriate tools strategically. MP.6Attend to precision. MP.7Look for and make use of structure. MP.8Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. 18

Integrating the Standards for Mathematical Practices Into Lessons (Part 1)  Purpose for Activity  Materials  Directions 19 Begin Activity

Integrating the Standards for Mathematical Practices Into Lessons (Part 2)  Purpose for Activity  Materials  Directions 20 Begin Activity

Questions and Comments 21

Exploration of Key Instructional Advances in Mathematics Mimi Alkire of StandardsWork, Inc. U.S. Department of Education Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education (OCTAE) Day Two

Resources: Common Core Standards Initiative: Illustrative Mathematics: OER Commons: NCTM NCSM: Network-Communicate-Support-Communicate The University of Arizona – Bill McCallum Progressions 23

What’s New in Mathematics Assessments? 24

Key Advances in Assessments  Emphasis is on the components of rigor: conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, and application  Focus is on the major work of the levels 25

Special Role of Technology in Advancing Assessments FromTo Bubble sheets or selected response Machine scorable multi-step tasks that ask for deep understanding of the concepts and are efficient to administer and score Paper and pencil Transformative formats that allow for simulations, audio input, drawing tools, etc. Simple right-or-wrong responses Capturing complex student responses through open ended questions and device interface Limited accessibility Providing increased accessibility (e.g., zoom in or hover over a word to hear it or see its definition) 26

Mathematics Advance Three: Pursue Conceptual Understanding, Procedural Skill and Fluency, and Application—All With Equal Intensity 27

Implications for Instruction Rigor in lessons relates to the depth at which the major work of each level should be addressed: Conceptual Understanding: Lessons should help students deeply understand key concepts and see math as more than a set of discrete procedures. Fluency: Some class time and homework should be devoted to students’ practice with calculations and mathematical procedures so they gain speed and accuracy. Application: Fluency practice is critical but not an end in itself; rather it is used to support problem solving and deeper mathematical thinking. 28

Why Are the Three Components Necessary?  Knowing more than “how to get the answer” allows students to generalize knowledge to new situations and types of problems (conceptual understanding and application).  Being able to perform core calculations quickly and accurately allows students to extend to more complex mathematical thinking (fluency).  Engaging with “equal intensity” ensures that students will have all the tools they need to apply their knowledge to a wide variety of problems. 29

Example for Applying the Components of Rigor Conceptual Understanding: They need to comprehend why 7 x 8 is 56. Fluency: Students need to simply know that 7 x 8 is 56. Application: They need to know the benefit of knowing that 7 x 8 is

Engaging the Three Components of Rigor  Purpose for Activity  Materials  Directions 31 Begin Activity

Questions and Comments 32

College and Career Readiness Standards for Mathematics Mimi Alkire