1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 20.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Attribution Bias in South Korea, Japan, Germany, USA: Intercultural and Intracultural Differences Andrea Zo-Rong Wucherpfennig University of Hamburg Andrea.
Advertisements

Henrik Singmann 1, A. Timur Sevincer 1, Hyekyung Park 2, & Shinobu Kitayama 2 1 University of Hamburg, 2 University of Michigan Henrik Singmann 1, A. Timur.
Culture, Communication Practices, and Cognition: Selective Attention to Content Versus Context Keiko Ishii Hokkaido University, Japan.
SELF CONSTRUALS Independent and Interdependent Selves.
Attribution Bias in Cultural Comparison: Dispositional versus Situational Attribution in South Korea and Germany Attribution Bias in Cultural Comparison:
Cognition and Perception Psych 448C 11/10/08. Objectives  Basic cognitive and perceptual processes may not be universal.  Holistic reasoning (middle-class,
AP Art History Ms. Sheets UHS
Alcohol Consumption Past 90-day drinking was assessed with self-report items measuring typical quantity of alcohol consumption, drinking frequency, and.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 18.
1 Psychology 320: Gender Psychology Lecture Invitational Office Hour Invitations, by Student Number for November 12 th 11:30-12:30, 3:30-4:30 Kenny.
Culture and Cognition LisaAllisonAronya HarperMenjivar Waller.
Culture and Cognition LisaAllisonAronya HarperMenjivar Waller.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 10.
4/12/2007dhartman, CS A Survey of Socially Interactive Robots Terrance Fong, Illah Nourbakhsh, Kerstin Dautenhahn Presentation by Dan Hartmann.
Memory of a controversial social event – relation to the individualism-collectivism dimension Elena Paspalanova New Bulgarian University International.
1 Psychology 305A: Personality Psychology November 13 Lecture 18.
Figuring Americans Out: Cultural Adjustment & Intercultural Communication 8/05 Center for Global Engagement Division of Student Affairs.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 22.
Culture and perceptual inference: Inferring the identity of an object from its parts or its blurred image Keiko Ishii (Hokkaido University) Collaborators:
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences Lecture 32.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology February 27 Lecture 13.
Chapter 4 Understanding Others ©2011 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. Gilovich Keltner Nisbett Social Psychology SECOND EDITION.
Social Psychology. The branch of psychology that studies how people think, feel, and behave in social situations.
What is Perception? Comes from the Latin word Percepio meaning receiving and collecting. How one takes possession of things and apprehends them within.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 11.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 10.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 18.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences January 6 Lecture 32.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 19.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 14.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 10.
1 Psychology 305A: Personality Psychology November 21 Lecture 21.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 22.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences March 10 Lecture 53.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Perception and Cognition.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology January 23 Lecture 6.
1 Psychology 320: Gender Psychology Lecture Invitational Office Hour Invitations, by Student Number for January 7 th 11:30-12:30, 3:30-4:30 Kenny.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 21.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences March 3 Lecture 50.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 19.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences Lecture 18.
Psychology 3051 Psychology 305A: Theories of Personality Lecture 4 1.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences March 28 Lecture 61.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences March 26 Lecture 60.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences Lecture 61.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences March 24 Lecture 59.
Psychology 3051 Psychology 305A: Theories of Personality Lecture 17 1.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 13.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences Lecture 48.
Fundamental attribution error
1 Psychology 320: Gender Psychology Lecture Papers are due on Friday, April 9th, Students are expected to submit their papers at the start.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences October 16 Lecture 16.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences Lecture 34.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences Lecture 53.
Making A Case Interviewing Witnesses. MAKING A CASE Interviewing Witnesses Interviewing Suspects Creating A Profile Recognising Faces.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 13.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 13.
Psychology 3051 Psychology 305A: Theories of Personality Lecture 20 1.
Psychology 3051 Psychology 305: Theories of Personality Lecture 17.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 6. 2 Reminders 1. The date of the midterm exam has been moved from Thursday, January 27 th to Tuesday, February.
1 Psychology 305A: Personality Psychology November 7 Lecture 17.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology April 8 Lecture 23.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences Lecture 31.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences January 27 Lecture 41.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences December 1 Lecture 22.
COE Postdoctoral Fellow
David Marchant, Evelyn Carnegie, Paul Ellison
Cross-cultural differences on object perception
Andrea Zo-Rong Wucherpfennig University of Hamburg Henrik Singmann
South Korea and Germany
Presentation transcript:

1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 20

2 Papers are due on Tuesday, April 5 th, Students are expected to submit their papers during class time. If you are unable to attend class on the day the paper is due, please have someone hand it in for you during class. Papers left in my mailbox, the TA’s mailbox, or submitted via will not be accepted. Reminders

Psychology 3053 Go to click on “New User” in the upper right hand corner of the screen to create your own account. You will need the following information to add this course to your profile: Class ID: Course: Psyc 307 – Cultural 2011 Password: cultures2011 Detailed step-by-step instructions for creating your user profile and submitting your paper are available at: TurnItIn Instructions

4 Announcements 1. Please note that grades for the second midterm exam are now available on the course website. The mean score on the exam was 66% (SD = 18%, range= %).

5 TA for students with last names A-Q: Kate, TA for students with last names R-Z: Will, The TAs will hold a review session for the midterm exam on Friday, April 1 st, at 12:00 PM. Please meet the TAs in Kenny, If you are unable to attend the session and would like to review your exam, you may see your TA during her/his office hours or contact your TA to schedule an appointment to meet.

6 2. Please note that course evaluations are available online. If you have not received an directing you to the evaluations for this course, you may provide your evaluation at: Course evaluations will be available until April 10 th. Your feedback is extremely valuable—both to the Psychology Department and to me.

7 Perception and Cognition 1.Does culture influence visual perception? (continued) 2.Does culture influence cognition?

8 2. define the terms analytic thinking, holistic thinking, field independence, and field dependence. 3. review research demonstrating cultural differences in field independence and field dependence. 1. discuss cultural variation in depth perception and artistic images. By the end of today’s class, you should be able to:

9 4. discuss explanations for cultural differences in field independence and field dependence. 5. discuss the influence of analytic thinking and holistic thinking on categorization and attribution.

10 ●In addition to pictorial depth perception, recent research (e.g., Masuda, Gonzales, et al., 2008) has demonstrated distinctions between Western and Eastern art in: position of horizon. size of focal object. Does culture influence visual perception? (continued) (b) Pictorial Depth Perception (continued)

12 Shama: Moghul Hunting Scene, Year Unknown

Da Vinci: Mona Lisa,

Manohar: Portrait of Jahangir Holding a Falcon,

Comparisons of Museum Paintings (Masuda, Gonzales, et al., 2008)

16 ●Similar distinctions have been observed in: drawings by laypersons in distinct cultures. photos taken by laypersons in distinct cultures.

Drawing by a European American Female (Masuda, Gonzales, et al., 2008)

Drawing by an East Asian Female (Masuda, Gonzales, et al., 2008)

Comparisons of Student Drawings (Masuda, Gonzales, et al., 2008)

American Photos (Masuda, Gonzales, et al., 2008)

East Asian Photos (Masuda, Gonzales, et al., 2008)

Photo Comparisons (Masuda, Gonzales, et al., 2008)

23 ●These differences in art and photography appear to reflect cultural differences in the tendency to focus on “object versus field.”

24 (c) Tendency to Focus on “Object versus Field” ● The Rod and Frame Task (RFT):

25 ●Research suggests that people from collectivistic cultures are more likely than people from individualistic cultures to perceive the rod as tilted. E.g., Ji, Peng, and Nisbett (2000): Found that Chinese, Japanese and Korean participants made more errors on the RFT than American participants of European descent.

26 ●In light of such findings, theorists suggest that people from individualistic cultures are relatively high in “field independence,” whereas people from collectivistic cultures are relatively high in “field dependence.”

27 ●The greater field independence of individualists and greater field dependence of collectivists has been demonstrated using other methodologies:  Example: Masuda and Nisbett (2001)  Recruited Japanese and American participants.

Instructions: Describe what you see.

 Found that: Americans typically started by describing the focal animal (i.e., the wolf). Japanese typically started by describing the context (i.e., the snowy forest scene). When the context was changed, Japanese recognition of the animal decreased; American recognition of the animal was relatively unaffected.

Accuracy

32  Example: Masuda, Ellsworth, et al. (2008)  Employed an eye monitor to track participants’ eye gaze as they looked at images of cartoons depicting distinct emotions.  Recruited Japanese and American participants.

How does the boy in the center feel?

 Found that: Judgments of the target’s facial expression were more strongly influenced by the facial expressions of surrounding others among Japanese than Americans. Japanese spent more time than Americans looking at the individuals surrounding the target.

American Gaze Japanese Gaze

37 ●Explanations for cultural differences field independence and dependence: (i) Socialization In contrast, members of collectivistic cultures are socialized to focus on the relations among people or objects. Members of individualistic cultures are socialized to focus on the attributes that distinguish people or objects.

38 (ii) Landscape Complexity American landscapes are less ambiguous and contain fewer elements than East Asian landscapes. Accordingly, living in American environments directs one’s attention to distinctive and focal objects, whereas living in East Asian environments directs one’s attention to the whole field.

39 E.g., Miyamoto et al. (2006): Found that (a) American landscapes contain fewer objects than Japanese landscapes and (b) the objects in American landscapes are more distinctive (i.e., stand out more) than the objects in Japanese landscapes.

40

41 Does culture influence cognition? ● Cultural differences in field dependence versus independence reflect a more general cognitive difference between people from individualistic cultures and people from collectivisitic cultures: People from individualistic cultures tend to engage in analytic thinking, whereas people from collectivistic cultures tend to engage in holistic thinking.

42 ● Theorists (e.g., Nisbett et al., 2001) argue that these styles of thinking have their origins in the traditions of ancient Greek and ancient Chinese civilizations, respectively. ● In addition to their impact on perception (e.g., the RFT), these styles of thinking have a profound influence on a variety of cognitive processes:

43 1. Categorization Americans are more likely than East Asians to categorize objects on the basis of their common attributes. In contrast, East Asians are more likely than Americans to categorize objects on the basis of their temporal, causal, or spatial relationships.

44 2. Attribution In contrast, East Asians are more likely than Americans to attribute behaviour to situational or transient factors. Americans are more likely than East Asians to attribute behaviour to the internal dispositions of the person (i.e., the fundamental attribution error).

45 Perception and Cognition 1.Does culture influence visual perception? (continued) 2.Does culture influence cognition?