Test and Types of Tests.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing constructed response items
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
Alternate Choice Test Items
Test Taking Strategies
Gary D. Borich Effective Teaching Methods 6th Edition
Selected Response Tests
Constructing Exam Questions Dan Thompson & Brandy Close OSU-CHS Educational Development-Clinical Education.
M ATCHING I TEMS Presenter Pema Khandu B.Ed.II(S)Sci ‘B’
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Alternative Assessments FOUN 3100 Fall 2003 Sondra M. Parmer.
Assessment “We assess students not merely to evaluate them, but to improve the entire process of teaching and learning.” - Douglas B. Reeves, Making Standards.
Assessment: Reliability, Validity, and Absence of bias
Test Construction Processes 1- Determining the function and the form 2- Planning( Content: table of specification) 3- Preparing( Knowledge and experience)
Classroom Assessment FOUN 3100 Fall Assessment is an integral part of teaching.
Objective Examination Dr. Niraj Pandit MD Department of Community Medicine SBKS MIRC.
Stages of testing + Common test techniques
Improving Test Taking Strategies. Test Taking Skills  Most students have NEVER been taught test taking strategies.  Studies show that as many as 20.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A. Mertler Chapter 9 Subjective Test Items.
Classroom Test and Assessment
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER SCHOOL OF PHARMACY KRYSTAL K. HAASE, PHARM.D., FCCP, BCPS ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR BEYOND MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS.
Module 6 Test Construction &Evaluation. Lesson’s focus Stages in Test Construction Tasks in Test Test Evaluation.
Oscar Vergara Chihlee Institute of Technology July 28, 2014.
Completion, Short-Answer, and True-False Items
Constructing Objective Test Items: Simple Forms
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
CONSTRUCTING OBJECTIVE TEST ITEMS: MULTIPLE-CHOICE FORMS CONSTRUCTING OBJECTIVE TEST ITEMS: MULTIPLE-CHOICE FORMS CHAPTER 8 AMY L. BLACKWELL JUNE 19, 2007.
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
Multiple Choice Question Design Karen Brooks & Barbara Tischler Hastie.
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION. Copyright Keith Morrison, 2004 ITEM TYPES IN A TEST Missing words and incomplete sentences Multiple choice.
Session 2 Traditional Assessments Session 2 Traditional Assessments.
Teaching Today: An Introduction to Education 8th edition
Test Taking Strategies. Prepare to avoid errors: Analyze your past results and errors Arrive early and prepared for tests Be familiar with exam question.
Writing Supply Items Gronlund, Chapter 8. Supply Type Items Require students to supply the answer Length of response varies –Short-answer items –Restricted-response.
Guidelines to Test Preparation Guidelines to Test Preparation.
What is design? Blueprints of the instructional experience Outlining how to reach the instructional goals determined during the Analysis phase The outputs.
ASSESSING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Using Multiple Measures Prepared by Dean Gilbert, Science Consultant Los Angeles County Office of Education.
Law of Contrariness "Our chief want in life is somebody who shall make us do what we can. Having found them, we shall then hate them for it." Ralph Waldo.
Classroom Assessment (1) EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Writing Multiple Choice Questions. Types Norm-referenced –Students are ranked according to the ability being measured by the test with the average passing.
Assessment and Testing
What are the stages of test construction??? Take a minute and try to think of these stages???
Assessing Student Learning with Exams
March 11, 2013 Chicago, IL American Board of Preventive Medicine American Board of Preventive Medicine Clinical Informatics Examination Committee Measurement.
Assessment Item Types: SA/C, TF, Matching. Assessment Item Types Objective Assessments Objective Assessments Performance Assessments Performance Assessments.
Materials produced under Phare 2006 financial support Phare TVET RO 2006/ EUROPEAN UNION Project financed under Phare MoERI/ NCDTVET-PIU.
Test Question Writing Instructor Development ANSF Nurse Training Program.
Developing Assessment Instruments Instructional Design: Unit, 3 Design Phase.
Do not on any account attempt to write on both sides of the paper at once. W.C.Sellar English Author, 20th Century.
Using Multiple Measures ASSESSING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT.
EVALUATION SUFFECIENCY Types of Tests Items ( part I)
Multiple-Choice Item Design February, 2014 Dr. Mike Atkinson, Teaching Support Centre, Assessment Series.
©2013, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 6 Construction of Knowledge Tests.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. SELECTED.
 What are ‘Constructed-Response’ test questions?  How can I write excellent ‘constructed response’ test questions?  How well do ‘constructed response’
Assessment and the Institutional Environment Context Institutiona l Mission vision and values Intended learning and Educational Experiences Impact Educational.
Objective Examination: Multiple Choice Questions Dr. Madhulika Mistry.
 Good for:  Knowledge level content  Evaluating student understanding of popular misconceptions  Concepts with two logical responses.
Assessment in Education ~ What teachers need to know.
Copyright © Springer Publishing Company, LLC. All Rights Reserved. DEVELOPING AND USING TESTS – Chapter 11 –
Writing Selection Items
COMMON TEST TECHNIQUES FROM TESTING FOR LANGUAGE TEACHERs.
Muhammad Riaz Anjum Nasir Mahmood Irum Bajwa Muhammad Riaz Anjum Nasir Mahmood Irum Bajwa.
EDU 385 Session 8 Writing Selection items
Constructing Exam Questions
Classification of Tests Chapter # 2
Multiple Choice Item (MCI) Quick Reference Guide
Testing Receptive Skills
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A. Mertler Chapter 8 Objective Test Items.
Multiple Choice Item (MCI) Quick Reference Guide
Presentation transcript:

Test and Types of Tests

In a triad, discuss the following: What types of test do you commonly use? 2. Which do you often use? Why? 3. Which do you seldom use? Why? 4. What do you consider when choosing the type of test that you will use?

Product/ Performance test Types of Tests Essay Completion Matching type Multiple-choice test Product/ Performance test

Essay Test consists of a small number of questions to which the student is expected to demonstrate his/her ability to (a) recall factual knowledge, (b) organize this knowledge and (c) present the knowledge in a logical, integrated answer to the question either an extended-response essay item or a short-answer essay item

Essay test ADVANTAGES Easy to construct Demonstrates students’ ability to organize knowledge, express opinions and show originality Minimizes guessing Stimulates superior study methods DISADVANTAGES Limited sampling of the material covered Inadequate scoring key can make the scoring subjective and unreliable Scoring may be extremely time-consuming

Writing Essay Test Items Identify the type of behavior you want to measure Student's TASK is clearly indicated - underline critical words such as “compare,” “contrast,” “criticize,” and “evaluate” Indicate a point value or weight and an estimated time limit for answering Avoid giving the student a choice among optional items as this greatly reduces the reliability of the test

Completion Test Items ADVANTAGES requires the student to answer a question or to finish an incomplete statement by filling in a blank with the correct word or phrase ADVANTAGES provides a wide sampling of content efficiently measures lower levels of cognitive ability minimizes guessing as compared to multiple-choice or true- false items provides an objective measure of student achievement or ability

Completion Test Items DISADVANTAGES Difficult to construct such that the desired response is clearly indicated Difficulty in measuring learning objectives requiring more than simple recall of information

Completion Test Items DISADVANTAGES Time consuming to score when compared to multiple-choice or true-false items More difficult to score since more than one answer may have to be considered correct if the item was not properly prepared.

Writing Completion Test Items Omit only significant words from the statement Do not omit so many words from the statement that the intended meaning is lost Be sure there is only one correct response Make the blanks of equal length Avoid lifting statements directly from the text, lecture or other sources

Multiply-choice Test test question which has a number of alternative choices from which the examinee is to select the correct answer uses 4 or 5 choices per question, fewer alternatives often results in items with inferior characteristics assesses many levels of learning as well as a test taker's ability to integrate information considered as the strongest predictors of overall student performance compared with other forms of evaluations

Multiply-choice test Parts of multiply-choice test STEM - part of the item in which the problem is stated for the examinee a question, a set of directions or a statement with an embedded blank OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES - choices given for the item Key - correct choice for the item Distractors - incorrect choices for the item

Multiply-choice Test ADVANTAGES utility, reliability, and cost effectiveness can be used with different knowledge areas and skills minimum writing; needs less time to answer easy scoring objective assessment items – minus teacher’s bias can easily diagnose a test taker's difficulty with certain concepts

Multiply-choice Test DISADVANTAGES limited types of knowledge ; lower-order skills questions phrased ambiguously may cause test-taker confusion one answer may encapsulate a collection of previous options possible ambiguity in the examinee's interpretation of the item quality and quantity of distracters

Multiply-choice test difficult to construct DISADVANTAGES difficult to construct time-consuming to construct do not allow test takers to demonstrate knowledge beyond the choices provided may encourage guessing or approximation due to the presence of at least one correct answer do not test a test taker's attitudes towards learning because correct responses can be easily faked

Writing the Multiple-Item Test Consider the item as a whole it measures knowledge or a skill component which is worthwhile and appropriate for the examinees who will be tested; there is a markedly better way to test what this item tests; it is of the appropriate level of difficulty for the examinees who will be tested. When you review an item, write your comments on a copy of the item indicating your suggested changes. If you believe an item is not worth retaining, suggest it be deleted.

Writing the Multiple-Item Test Consider the stem clearly defined question, problem or task; does not contain unnecessary information; worded simply, clearly and concisely

Writing the Multiple-Item Test Consider the key best answer among the set of options for the item; actually answers the question posed in the stem; not too obviously relative to the other alternatives (with same length, number of details, grammatical structure)

Writing the Multiple-Item Test Consider the distractors examinees could justify one or more as acceptable correct answer; plausible enough to be attractive for examinees who are misinformed or ill-prepared; does not call attention to the key (no distractor should merely state the reverse of the key or resemble the key very closely unless another pair of choices is similarly parallel or involves opposites)

True/False Test for knowledge level learning for understanding of popular misconceptions when 2 logical responses are possible ADVANTAGES answers many questions in short time scoring efficiency and accuracy versatility in measuring all levels of cognitive ability highly reliable test scores objective measurement of student achievement or ability

True/False Test DISADVANTAGES easy; might not discriminate well low reliability - student has 50-50 chance of correct guess Possibility of confusing statements due to the difficulty of writing statements which are explicitly true or false can often lead an instructor to favor testing of trivial knowledge

Constructing True/False Test Base true-false items upon statements that are absolutely true or false, without qualifications or exceptions Avoid lifting statements from the text, lecture or other materials Specific determiners should be used with caution like all, always, none, never, impossible, inevitable, etc.

Constructing True/False Test Include only one central idea is each statement Avoid emphasizing trivial parts Do not use controversial issues Use greater number of false than true statements (false items tend to discriminate more highly than true items)

Matching Type Test Tests knowledge level learning of the who, what, when, where variety ADVANTAGES Maximum coverage of knowledge level learning with a minimum of space and preparation time Valuable in subject fields in which a great variety of facts must be learned provide scoring efficiency and accuracy DISADVANTAGES Not well suited for measuring higher level learning outcomes Difficult to construct due to the problem of selecting a common set of stimuli and responses

Matching Type Test TYPES OF MATCHING Terms or words with Definitions Symbols with Names Causes with Effects Problems with Solution Parts with Unit to which they belong

Writing Matching Type Test Include directions which clearly state the basis for matching the stimuli with the responses Arrange the list of responses in some systematic order if possible (e.g., chronological, alphabetical)

Product/Performance Test requires an examinee to come up with output; designed to assess the ability of a student to perform correctly in a simulated situation (i.e., a situation in which the student will be ultimately expected to apply his/her learning) concept of simulation is central in performance testing Example: Product: making a timeline of World War II Performance: delivery of an oration

Product/Performance Test ADVANTAGES Measure learning objectives which focus on the ability of the students to apply skills or knowledge in real life situations Provide a degree of test validity NOT possible with standard paper and pencil test items

Product/Performance Test DISADVANTAGES Difficult and time consuming to construct Used for testing students individually and not for testing groups - relatively costly, time consuming and inconvenient forms of testing Do not provide objective measure of student achievement or ability (subject to bias on the part of the observer/grader)

Writing Performance Test Items Elicit the type of output or behavior you want to measure Identify and explain the simulated situation to the student Make the simulated situation as "life-like" as possible Directions clearly inform the students of type of response called for (whether product or performance) through a rubric State time and activity limitations in the directions Train the observer(s)/scorer(s) to ensure that they are fair in scoring the appropriate output/behaviors

Choosing the Right Type of Test

Test Plan What objectives do you want to cover? How difficult should you make the test? Who is taking the test? How much time has been provided for testing? How many questions should you have on your test? What type of questions should be included in the test?

Item format indicates the kinds of skills and the balance of test content to be measured Example: multiple-choice questions may make sense for testing knowledge of the mechanics of a language BUT not a direct measure of writing skill based on the kinds of skills to be measured and NOT on some personal like or dislike for a particular item format No inherent goodness or badness in any type of question format

Criteria to Consider Goal-centered Learner-centered Context-centered Assessment-centered

Criteria in Choosing Test Items Goal-Centered Criteria congruent with the terminal and performance objectives by matching the behavior involved test item should measure the exact behavior and response stated in the objective performance of an objective states that learners will be able to state or define a term, the assessment item should ask them to state or define the term, not to choose the definition from a list of answers. point of testing is to be able to predict whether your learners will be able to do what you want them to do when they leave you, and the best way to do that is to observe the actual performance that you are trying to develop

Criteria in Choosing Test Items Learner-Centered Criteria consideration the characteristics and needs of the learners learners’ vocabulary and language levels, motivational and interest levels, experiences and backgrounds, and special needs free of any gender, racial, or cultural bias

Criteria in Choosing Test Items Context-Centered Criteria Consider both performance context and the learning context Make test items as realistic and close to the performance setting as possible - transfer of skills from the learning environment to the eventual performance environment Dick and Carey, "the more realistic the testing environment, the more valid the learners’ responses will be“

Criteria in Choosing Test Items Assessment-Centered Criteria Test items should be well written and free of spelling, grammar and punctuation errors Directions should be clearly written to avoid any confusion on the part of the learner. Avoid writing "tricky" questions that feature double negatives, deliberately confusing directions, or compound questions learners should miss questions because they do not have the necessary skill, not because your directions were unclear, or because you wanted to throw them off with unclear wording

Responsibilities of TEST ITEM WRITERS

Continuously develop new items Review and select items for inclusion in the written examination Monitor the content, task and cognitive skill distributions of items Monitor the content quality and difficulty of each item and avoid duplicate items on the same knowledge/skill Provide expert input into the criterion standard against which competencies are measured

Complete the statement In this session I realized/ discovered that__________ therefore I will __________.

Remember our learners