Making LIGO wind-resistant Krishna Venkateswara Borrowing from J. Kissel, B. Lantz, L. Barsotti, S. Dwyer, R. Schofield, D. Talukder, G. Vajente, M. Vidrio,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stratagem EH4 Field Evaluation of Data Quality.
Advertisements

Simulink/Front Model & MEDM Screen Mods from ECR E (For SUS’ in BSC Chambers) J. Kissel for the SUS and ISC Team G v3 1.
1 S5 Environmental Disturbances: August ‘06 Robert Schofield, U of O Erik Katsavounidis (MIT), Laura Cadonati (MIT), Michele Zanolin (MIT), Dennis Ugolini.
Global longitudinal quad damping vs. local damping G v8 1.
How Tornadoes Work Created By Max Hawkes Use the Blue arrows to go forwards and backwards Press Esc to exit the presentation.
Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W E2 Amplitude Calibration of the Hanford Recombined 2km IFO Michael Landry, LIGO Hanford Observatory Luca Matone, Benoit.
Global longitudinal quad damping vs. local damping Brett Shapiro Stanford University 1/32G v13 LIGO.
How to increase allowable bending moment ?
Takanori Sekiguchi Italy-Japan Workshop (19 April, 2013) Inverted Pendulum Control for KAGRA Seismic Attenuation System 1 D2, Institute for Cosmic Ray.
The Wild Wind My report will blow you away! By: Sarah Culp.
LIGO-G D Suspensions Update: the View from Caltech Phil Willems LIGO/Caltech Livingston LSC Meeting March 17-20, 2003.
1 Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay.
1 S4 Environmental Disturbances Robert Schofield, U of O John Worden, Richard McCarthy, Doug Cook, Hugh Radkins, LHO Josh Dalrymple, SU I.Pre-S4 “fixes”
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Introduction Dennis Coyne April 12, 2002.
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002.
LIGO Student Investigations
Suspended Mirror control: Learning through Virgo Experience E. Majorana - I.N.F.N. Pisa Aspen GWAD February 16, 2004.
LIGO-G W Proposed LHO Commissioning Activities in May 02 Fred Raab 29 Apr 02.
S4 Environmental Disturbances Robert Schofield, U of O I.Pre-S4 “fixes” II.Some S4 veto issues III. Early coupling results from S4 PEM injections.
1 Environmental Disturbances: S4 and Pre-S5 Robert Schofield, U of O Doug Cook, Fred Raab, Richard McCarthy, LHO I.Seismic up-conversion II.Some peak identification.
LIGO-G D 1 Requirements Environment and constraints Performance requirements Functional requirements.
The 5th Antarctic Meteorological Observations, Modeling, and Forecasting Workshop. Columbus, Ohio July 12-14, A 20 Year Assessment of the Frequency.
LIGO-G M 1 Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Dennis Coyne LIGO Seminar March 29, 2002.
LIGO-G D 1 MEPI electroMagnetic External Pre-Isolator Backup alternative to the Hydraulic actuator approach Goal: maximum commonality with HEPI.
BROXBOURNE SCHOOL YEAR 12 EXPEDITION TRAINING. The weather controls an expedition more than anything else, it is the one thing that we cannot change.
Active Seismic Isolation Systems for Enhanced and Advanced LIGO Jeffrey S. Kissel 1 for the LSC 1 Louisiana State University The mechanical system for.
Wind. What is Wind? Wind Wind is moving air. Wind moves at different speeds. –Wind can move slowly. –Wind can move very fast. –Wind can blow gently.
Advanced LIGO Commissioning Overview Stanford LVC Meeting, August 27, 2014 Peter Fritschel.
Joshua Smith December 2003 Detector Characterization of Dual-Recycled GEO600 Joshua Smith for the GEO600 team.
Thoughts on short term improvements for Mirror Suspension Control G.Losurdo - P.Ruggi.
Quad-to-quad correlated motion in FLASH Ramila Amirikas, Alessandro Bertolini DESY Hamburg XFEL beam dynamics meeting, February 25 st 2008.
Virgo Commissioning update Gabriele Vajente for the Virgo Collaboration LSC/VIRGO Meeting – MIT 2007, July LIGO-G Z.
Optical Gyroscopes for Ground Tilt Sensing in Advanced LIGO The need for low frequency tilt sensing The optics in Advanced LIGO’s suspensions must be very.
Experimental tests of SA simulation Irene Fiori – Simulation Workshop – March 18, 2004 Virgo dataSiesta simulation 1. Inertial Damping simulation  test.
1 Environmental Coupling During S5 Robert Schofield (University of Oregon) I. PEM injection overview II.Acoustic/seismic coupling III.Seismic upconversion.
System Identification for LIGO Seismic Isolation Brett Shapiro GWADW – 19 May G v1.
6. Results The accompanying histograms show the empirical PDF of z for each interferometer (H1, H2 at Hanford, WA; L1 at Livingston, LA). The green areas.
Daniel Clark Dan DeBra Victor Herrera Brian Lantz Joe Hansen Jeff Kissel Michael Meyer Brian O’Reilly Celine Ramet & Staff at LLO Anamaria Effler Michael.
1 Virgo Commissioning progress ILIAS, Nov 13 th 2006 Matteo Barsuglia on behalf of the Commissioning Team.
Global longitudinal quad damping vs. local damping Brett Shapiro Stanford University 1/36 LIGO G v15.
Weather Instruments How do they help in predicting weather?
Observations SOEE1400 : Lecture 4.
MSC - 18 Oct 071 LOW FREQUENCY SEISMIC NOISE: LOCKING AND SENSITIVITY ISSUE Paolo Ruggi noise meeting.
LIGO-G D LSC Meeting Nov An Early Glimpse at the S3 Run Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Hanford.
New in-air seismic attenuation system for the next generation gravitational wave detector M.R. Blom, A. Bertolini, E. Hennes, A. Schimmel, H.J. Bulten,
The control of the Virgo Superattenuator: present and future Giovanni Losurdo - INFN Firenze/Urbino on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
1 ATF2 Project Meeting December 2006 Ground Stabilisation with the CERN STACIS 2000 Stable Active Control Isolation System LAViSta Laboratories in.
Gabriele Vajente ILIAS WG1 meeting - Frascati Noise Analysis Tools at Virgo.
SAT Plans for System R&D Signal Recycling Construction and A&I Short Suspension Upgrade Roberto Passaquieti Università di Pisa and INFN-Pisa AdV Review.
LIGO-G v1 Searching for Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of High Mass Black Hole Binaries 2014 LIGO SURF Summer Seminar August 21 st, 2014.
ALIGO 0.45 Gpc 2014 iLIGO 35 Mpc 2007 Future Range to Neutron Star Coalescence Better Seismic Isolation Increased Laser Power and Signal Recycling Reduced.
Active Vibration Isolation using a Suspension Point Interferometer Youichi Aso Dept. Physics, University of Tokyo ASPEN Winter Conference on Gravitational.
ALIGO HSTS Damping Loops Design Comparison J. Kissel, for the SUS and ISC Teams.
ALIGO QUAD "Level 2" Damping Loop Design (Supplemental to LLO aLOG 6949)LLO aLOG 6949 J. Kissel G v21.
ALIGO BSFM “Level 2” Damping Loop Design (Supplemental to LHO aLOG 6392) J. Kissel G v1.
Interferometric local sensing for 3G detectors
H1 Squeezing Experiment: the path to an Advanced Squeezer
Type-A SAS Local Control Simulation (Current Status)
Conor Mow-Lowry Thanks to: Krishna, Jeff, Brian, Jim, Hugh, Robert
Next Generation Low Frequency Control Systems
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
BSC HEPI Pier Amplification
PEM pre-O1 1) Current status of PEM system pre-O1: 80/90% working
Superattenuator for LF and HF interferometers
ALLEGRO calibration for the LLO-ALLEGRO stochastic analysis
Characterisation of the aLIGO monolithic suspensions
Some ideas on advanced Virgo Twins A. Giazotto-INFN Pisa
The Nature of Waves. The Nature of Waves What is a wave?
Presentation transcript:

Making LIGO wind-resistant Krishna Venkateswara Borrowing from J. Kissel, B. Lantz, L. Barsotti, S. Dwyer, R. Schofield, D. Talukder, G. Vajente, M. Vidrio, B. Shapiro, J. Warner for the SEI, PEM and ISC teams 05/20/2015 LIGO-G v1

Contents  Introduction: Wind-speed data  Effects of wind on ground motion  Effects of wind on the interferometer  Path forward

8 year study shows that wind is above 20 [mph] for 15% of the year (LHO aLOG 12996)LHO aLOG G v23 >4.5 >13.4 >22.4 >31.3 >40.3 >49.2 > 58.2 >8.9 >17.9 >26.8 >35.8 >44.7 >53.7 >62.6 Wind Speed [mph] It sure is windy at Hanford! M. Vidrio

Wind speed variation - monthly M. Vidrio

Wind speed variation - daily M. Vidrio

Impact of Wind on Ground Motion

4-month study (performed with data from late 2014), EY Y experiences more tilt than at EX X (LHO aLOG 17574), likely because prevailing winds are along the Y direction.LHO aLOG G v2 7 BRS comparison with GND T240 at EX shows assuming 30 to 80 [mHz] band is “all” tilt in a GND inertial sensor is a safe assumption Median points show clear factor of 2-3 more tilt from > 30 [mph] winds in EY than at EX Data for one wind stormData over whole 4 months D. Talukder Effect on Ground Motion

8 Requirement Ground tilt during 0-5 mph winds Ref: LHO 14322

Ground tilt during mph winds Ref: LHO

Ground tilt during mph winds 10 Ref: SEI 602, thanks to B. Lantz!

Ground tilt during mph winds 11 Ref: SEI 602, thanks to B. Lantz!

Tilt to translation TF Ref: SEI 602, thanks to B. Lantz!

Impact of Wind on Interferometer

Platform Motion 14 Ref: LHO 15146

Platform Motion Net Stage 1 Inertial Motion (45 mHz blend) 15 Ref: LHO Blends: Trade-off between isolation at f>0.1 Hz and re-injection at f< 0.1 Hz Tilt re-injection

Wind above even 5 [mph] has an impact on the sensitivity (LHO aLOG 17446)LHO aLOG G v2 16 Wind surpasses 5 [mph] Range becomes visibly correlated with wind Wind Substantially Impacts the Observatory and the Detector S. Dwyer

Comparison of hourly progression of ASDs at low frequency shows how low frequency motion up-converts into the bucket. (LHO aLOGs 17460)17460 Note: Calibration a below 1 [Hz] is inaccurate. ASD is too good by ~10 at 0.1 [Hz], and by ~100 at 0.02 [Hz] (see LHO aLOG 17708)LHO aLOG G v2 17 “1e-7” [m] “1e-6” [m] “1e-8” [m] 1e-19 1e-18 1e [Hz] 1 [Hz] Wind Substantially Impacts the Observatory and the Detector L. Barsotti

Wind greatly affects the alignment, and therfore the stationarity of the performance (LHO aLOG 17461)LHO aLOG G v ~ 30 [min] [Hz] Band-limited RMS of DARM [Uncalibrated Arbitrary Units] BLRMS Time Series Portion of BLRMS Time Series that’s predicted by coherent TF with WFS Wind Substantially Impacts the Observatory and the Detector Low Wind Conditions High Wind Conditions G. Vajente

Mechanism of Increased Alignment Fluctuation? Was mainly in ‘Yaw’ (LHO aLOG 17461)LHO aLOG  Longitudinal to Yaw?  Transverse to Yaw?  Others? T v6 B. Shapiro See Anamaria’s talk yesterday: G

Path forward

Simulate Wind? We have reasonable idea of what wind does to the ISI – it increases Longitudinal, Transverse motion ~ 100s of nanometers Pitch, Roll ~ few nanoradians  Perform tests by injecting these motions on BSC-ISIs (or on HEPI?), individually, and see how DARM/lock acquisition is affected. This gives an idea of which coupling is the most important.  Additionally, perform tests by switching between 45 and 90 mHz blends (during low wind-speeds) and see how DARM is affected. This gives an idea of how much seismic isolation is needed below 0.5 Hz.

The ISI can perform better with BRSs in medium wind, [mph] (LHO aLOG 17729)LHO aLOG G v2 22 Nominal Config Windy Config Order of magnitude less RMS motion Sacrifice only 2-3 here Same at QUAD Resonances and above J. Kissel Use Tiltmeters to improve ISI?

23 Put a tiltmeter on the ISI? Present BRS read out noise Compact BRS? Ref: LHO Frequency (Hz) Angle ASD (rad/rt(Hz))

Thank you!

Backup slides

Wind speed impact Beaufort Scale*Wind SpeedLand conditions 23.4–7.4 mphWind felt on exposed skin. Leaves rustle. Wind vanes begin to move –17.9 mphDust and loose paper raised. Small branches begin to move –31 mphLarge branches in motion. Whistling heard in overhead wires. Umbrella use becomes difficult. Empty plastic bins tip over –46.3 mphSome twigs broken from trees. Cars veer on road. Progress on foot is seriously impeded –63.6 mphTrees are broken off or uprooted, structural damage likely. >73 mph is considered a Hurricane! *The Beaufort scale is an empirical measure that relates wind speed to observed conditions at sea or on land. - Wikipediaempiricalwind speed

G v2 27 Also in LHO aLOG 17574: Different wind storms can have differing effects at each end station, likely due to wind directionLHO aLOG D. Talukder Effect on Ground Motion

Also in LHO aLOG 17574: Corner Station doesn’t tilt as much in the wind. (but this sensor was known to have problems, so is not very reliable. see LHO aLOG 18422)LHO aLOG 17574LHO aLOG G v2 28 End Stations Corner Station D. Talukder Effect on Ground Motion