SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION U.S. Department of Education June 12, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Superintendents Quarterly Meeting March 13, 2009.
Advertisements

Race to the Top Discussion Points to determine LUSD’s interest in participating in the State program January 7, 2010.
Principals Changing Schools Through Leadership and Advocacy 2009 NAESP-NASSP National Leaders’ Conference.
STIMULUS AND STATE FISCAL STABILIZATION BOROUGH ASSEMBLY MEETING AUGUST 20, 2009 NANCY WAGNER, FNSBSD SUPERINTENDENT TRACI GATEWOOD, GRANTS AND SPECIAL.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
2011 Bridge to Excellence Master Plan Annual Update Review Division of Student, Family, and School Support Office of Finance Division of Academic Reform.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Arizona Overview.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act School Finance Officials April 16, 2009.
American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 Education-related Stimulus Appropriations.
IDEA Recovery Funds for Services to Children and Youths with Disabilities | May 20, 2009.
Computing Leadership Summit STEM Education Steve Robinson U.S. Department of Education White House Domestic Policy Council February 22, 2010.
Driving Questions: Strategies for Uses of ARRA Funds Ongoing Professional Development.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
MSBO 2009 CONFERENCESEPTEMBER SECRETARY OF EDUCATION DISCRETIONARY FUNDS Sally Vaughn Deputy Superintendent, Ph.D. Michigan Department of Education.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION National Teacher Forum U.S. Department of Education April 30, 2009.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
U.S. Department of Education Grant and Funding Opportunities Overview June 24, 2009 Julie Ewart, Public Affairs Specialist U.S. Department of Education,
Understanding Stimulus Funding and Leveraging Philanthropy to Support Long-Term Education Goals A Webinar for the Foundation Community February 16, 2010.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION U.S. Department of Education March 24, 2009 The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act:
ARRA and Education Reform What the Stimulus can tell Us about ESEA Reauthorization Mary Kusler American Association of School Administrators September.
Massie Ritsch U.S. Department of Education ESEA REAUTHORIZATION.
Escondido Union School District Budget Update The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION U.S. Department of Education April 3, 2009 The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act:
Pennsylvania Department of Edward G. Rendell Governor, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak Secretary of Education.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act:
Texas Education Agency Texas Charter Schools Association 2 nd Annual Statewide Charter School Budget Bootcamp September 25, 2009.
ARRA, ESEA and Accountability RESOURCES, ASSURANCES, METRICS, AND A LISTENING TOUR TRANSFORMING STATE ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEMS May 7, 2009.
Leveraging Race to the Top to Maximize the Use of Data To Ensure College & Career Readiness Aimee R. Guidera Achieve ADP September 10, 2009.
Summary Document March 2010 Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official notice of.
1 Michigan and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 August 11, 2009 State Board of Education.
FY RACE TO THE TOP
An Affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 0f 2009 A Year in Review February 17, 2010.
ARRA Applications and Reporting Requirements MSBO BUSINESS MANAGER/CPA WORKSHOP Kellogg Center, June 3, 2009.
Update on ARRA Presentation for the National Network of State School Improvement Leaders Tom Corwin, Susan Wilhelm, and Carlas McCauley US Department of.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
Carmel Martin Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development - Tuesday, July 28, U.S. Department of Education Vision and Initiatives.
ARRA Education Grants ~ Virginia Barry, Commissioner Kathleen Murphy, Director Judy Fillion, Director Paul Leather, Director.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
Title 1, Part A Local Consolidated Plan (LCP) Application May 2009.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Debra Tica Sanchez Vice President, Government Relations Association of Public Television Stations (APTS)
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
Closing Using Federal Stimulus Funds To Purchase the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program Sue Thomas, Manager, Business Development, Hazelden Publishing.
Carmel Martin Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development - Tuesday, July 28, U.S. Department of Education Vision and Initiatives.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
NCLB- Title IA ARRA Update Webinar May 7, ARRA-Title IA NCLB- Title IA ARRA Update Webinar May 7, 2009 Welcome Introductions Today’s session Questions.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
1 State Funding for Education and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 New York State Education Department ■ April 6, 2009 Webcast.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and America’s Public Schools The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and America’s Public Schools AASA Advocacy.
NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Recognition that Education is the key to a better economy.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The Federal Stimulus Package for Education – Overview  The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act provides approximately.
Michigan and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Governor’s Education Summit April 28, 2009.
MEGS Applications and Reporting Requirements Restore and Reform: Implementing the ARRA Michigan Institute for Educational Management Kellogg Center, May.
Title I, IDEA Part B and IDEA Part C September 2, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Use of Funds Guidance 1.
June 15th, 2010 U.S. Department of Education Strategic Use of Title I & IDEA: How to Maximize ARRA, FY09 & FY10 Funds.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act K-12 Agenda Office of the Deputy Secretary September 2009.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Title 1, Part A Recovery Funds for Grants to Local Education Agencies.
1 SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND ADVANCING EDUCATION REFORMS The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act:
ESEA on Teacher Quality Pros Requires licensure, BA/BS, subject area knowledge Provides funding to states for PD Requires annual, measurable objectives.
Education Stimulus: Staggering Opportunity, Monumental Challenge Robert E. Floden Michigan State University President’s Education Forum April 21, 2009.
How can ARRA Funds Be Wisely Applied? How Researchers Can Help Lou Cicchinelli, Ph.D. Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning Fourth Annual IES.
Obama Education Policy: Beyond No Child Left Behind Susan Fuhrman Teachers College Lyon, France May 25, 2009.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION Shanker Institute: April 20, 2009 Marshall S. Smith The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act:
Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
Presentation transcript:

SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION U.S. Department of Education June 12, 2009

Spend Quickly to Save and Create Jobs Ensure Transparency and Accountability Thoughtfully Invest One-time Funds Advance Effective Reforms

 All ARRA funds must be tracked separately with the following reporting requirements:  Quarterly reports on financial information and how funds are being used  Estimated number of jobs created  Recipients must report information on sub-recipients  Reporting procedures being developed for use by states to capture required information  Transparency allows opportunity to quantify/define goals and mobilize support for improving results for all students

 State Stabilization – $32.5 billion (67% based on approvable application)  Released April 1  IDEA, Parts B & C – $6.1 billion (50%)  Title I, Part A – $5 billion (50%)  Vocational Rehabilitation – $270 million (50%)  Independent Living – $52.5 million (100% of formula monies; $87.5 million in competitive grants to follow)  Released April 10  Homeless Youth – $70 million (100%)  Impact Aid – $40 million (100% of formula monies; $60 million in competitive grants to follow)

 Pell & Work Study – $17.3 billion (100%)  State Stabilization – $16.1 billion (33%)  IDEA, Parts B & C – $6.1 billion (50%)  Title I, Part A – $5 billion (50%)  Title I School Improvement – $3 billion (100%)  Enhancing Education through Technology – $650 million (100%)  Vocational Rehabilitation – $270 million (50%)  Statewide Data Systems – $250 million (100%)  Teacher Incentive Fund – $200 million (100%)  Teacher Quality Enhancement – $100 million (100%)

 “Race to the Top” – $4.35 billion competitive grants to States making most progress toward the assurances  “Investing in What Works and Innovation” – $650 million competitive grants to LEAs and non-profits that have made significant gains in closing achievement gaps to be models of best practices  2010 grant awards will be made in two rounds – late 2009, 2010

College- and career-ready standards and high quality, valid, and reliable assessments for all students, including ELLs and students with disabilities Pre-K to higher education data systems that meet the principles in the America COMPETES Act Teacher effectiveness and equitable distribution of effective teachers Intensive support and effective interventions for lowest- performing schools

Overview of approach  Specific data metrics required on the four assurances  Transparency on state and local progress toward reforms will help drive conversations and focus action  Metrics available for public comment in the Federal Register  In application for phase two stabilization funds, states will provide plan for collecting and reporting these data

Teacher effectiveness and ensuring that all schools have highly qualified teachers  Number and % of teachers in the highest-poverty and lowest-poverty schools in the state who are highly qualified  Number and % of teachers and principals rated at each performance level in each LEA’s teacher evaluation system  Number and % of LEA teacher and principal evaluation systems that require evidence of student achievement outcomes

Higher standards and rigorous assessments that will improve both teaching and learning  Most recent math and reading NAEP scores  Action steps to improve assessments  Valid, reliable measures for ELLs and students with disabilities test in math and English Language Arts (ELA)  % of ELLs and students with disabilities tested in math and ELA  Number and % of students who graduate and complete one year of college

Intensive support, effective interventions, and improved student achievement in schools that need it the most  For schools in restructuring status:  Number of schools that demonstrated substantial gains in achievement, closed, or consolidated  Number of schools initially in the bottom 5% that demonstrated substantial gains in student achievement, closed, or consolidated  Number and % of schools that have made progress in math and ELA  For charter schools: Number operating, number closed for academic reasons, and presence of charter caps

Better information to educators and the public, to address the individual needs of students and improve teacher performance  Statewide data system includes elements of America COMPETES Act  All teachers in math and ELA in tested grades receive timely data and estimates of individual teacher impact on student achievement to inform instruction

Will the proposed use of ARRA funds:  Drive results for students?  Increase capacity?  Accelerate reform?  Avoid the funding “cliff” and improve longer-term productivity?  Foster continuous improvement?

Improving teacher effectiveness and equitable distribution of highly qualified teachers  Restructure personnel procedures to improve teacher quality and fill hard-to-staff positions  Redesign professional development and train effective teachers as great coaches and mentors  Establish and implement a fair and reliable teacher evaluation system

Developing rigorous standards and high-quality assessments  Increase student participation in rigorous college and career courses  Develop and adopt valid and reliable formative assessment systems  Purchase or adapt high quality curriculum aligned to standards with embedded assessments

Turning around low-performing schools  Close and re-open schools with new leadership and staff, new instructional programs, and expanded learning time  Create summer programs and 9 th grade academies so that students are equipped to succeed in algebra and college-preparatory classes  Launch a comprehensive literacy program

Establishing data systems and using data for improvement  Develop or enhance data systems that provide teachers information on student progress  Train educators to use data for decision-making to improve instruction  Implement online Individual Education Program (IEP) aligned to standards

Improving results for all students  Strengthen early learning programs  Use technology to improve teaching and learning  Increase student awareness of college and career options and provide transition supports  Invest in school modernization that advances up-to- date science labs, energy efficiency, community, and early childhood facilities

 State  Set vision and policy context  Align use of ARRA funds  Support for districts to advance reforms  Monitor to ensure appropriate uses of funds  District and School  Develop coherent and focused plans  Use data for continuous improvement  Seize the opportunity to use funds differently  Parents and Community  Ask the right questions  Examine data  Partner with schools for improvement

 Publishing Industry -- Support materials for new standards and assessments. -- Materials and support for lowest performing schools. -- Packaging technology and materials that can provide enduring support to schools. -- Get serious about fewer, higher standards and learning goals.

 ARRA Resources and Guidance: html#appsSFSF html#appsSFSF  SFSF Questions:  IDEA Questions:  Title I Questions:  Inspector General Questions:  Independent Living and Vocational Rehabilitation Questions: