India’s Innovation System Sunil Mani and Parveen Arora.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WHY INDIA? September Quantum Advisors 2 Summary Overall, economic policy is geared towards growth India is a party to various global trade and tariff.
Advertisements

The Competitive Market in Public / Private Education.
Session I: Technology, Trade and Growth-lessons of Experiences Session I: Technology, Trade and Growth-lessons of Experiences Issues related to technology.
The design of the risk capital market in Slovakia ESTER meeting,Tel Aviv January 12, 2005.
Microsoft Business Technology Center Microsoft Business-Technology Center Establishment of MSBTC and the Possibility.
SC – Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
Human Resource in Science and Engineering The Indian Case Professor Sunil Mani Centre for Development Studies Trivandrum Kerala, India February.
2nd Workshop Prague 29/11/2007 WP4: Pilot action plan Region of Central Macedonia Isidoros Passas, URENIO Research Unit.
Capital Markets and Resource Mobilization
Europe’s Failure to Innovate: Is the venture capital industry to blame? Colin Mason Hunter Centre for Entrepreneurship University of Strathclyde Presentation.
China: Policies for Technology Development Kaoru Nabeshima DECRG World Bank September 21, 2006.
Results of the ESTER project in Slovakia Juraj Poledna Salamanca June 23, 2005.
Policy concepts and instruments for support of business innovation Keith Smith Australian Innovation Research Centre University of Tasmania.
Ari Kokko Industrial policy Why? How? Examples: EU Industrial Policy and Swedish Industrial Policy Sources
Country Competitiveness
1 Trade Facilitation A narrow sense –A reduction/streamlining of the logistics of moving goods through ports or the documentation requirements at a customs.
Building Innovative Capability Roy Green, MGSM University of Adelaide, October
Describe the key policy measures that make globalization sustainable.
Electronics India The Second Sunrise. Content Why India? Emerging Opportunities Policy Environment.
Main Legal Aspects of the Choice of TTO Model N.Romanova Saratov State University named after N.G.Chernyshevsky.
Lim Sei cK. Definition Examples Importance.
LOGO Foundation for Assistance to Small Innovative Enterprises (FASIE) 2014 State Activities to Support Innovations in Russia.
Innovation for Strengthening the Electronics Industry Technology Market Place Oct , 2011 BMICH, Colombo Eng. Sanath Panawennage, Arthur C Clarke.
A N Bhattacharya Professor & Chair, Marketing Leadership Program, School of Inspired Leadership, Gurgaon
Seminario Formativo materie Europee Regione Lombardia – Bruxelles 24 Giugno 2015.
Robert Wells Head, Biotechnology Unit Oslo, Norway 11 October Life Sciences for Health and Innovation: An OECD Perspective.
Enabling a Global Vision for the Baltic cleantech industry: Latvia country case Dr.sc.eng. Juris Vanags Latvian Biotechnology association Interregional.
European Commission Enterprise Directorate General Innovation Policy R&D and Innovation in the Regional Operational Programs Meeting with Regions 11 July.
Accelerating the development of world-class Irish companies to achieve strong positions in global markets resulting in increased national and regional.
The Emerging High Tech Competitors from Asia, Contrasts between the national systems of innovation and its performance of China and India Professor Sunil.
Office of Science and Innovation Universities and Innovation in the UK Chris North Office of Science and Innovation UK Department of Trade and Industry.
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System Margaret Sampson Partner, Vinson & Elkins LLP U. T. System Board of Regents’ Meeting Technology.
INNOVATION and SME The OECD innovation strategy Alessandra Proto OECD LEED Trento Centre for Local Development.
T2S Conference 2006 Policy and Networking: an RIS in Korea Yu Jin Jung School of Public Policy George Mason University.
Achieving Long-term Competitive Advantage Regional Economics (310) February 24, 2006 Lorna H. Wallace, Research Fellow.
Financing of Innovation in India Professor Sunil Mani Centre for Development Studies Prasantha Nagar Road Ulloor, Trivandrum Kerala, India April.
Research & Development for global competitiveness K.Vijayaraghavan.CMC.,FIMC Director, Sathguru Management Consultants. Visiting Faculty, Cornell University.
State Agency for Information Technology and Communications ICT Development in Bulgaria – Prospects and Challenges after 1-st January 2007 Dimitar Stanchev.
Venturing Forth: Private Equity Funds in Namibia By Robin Sherbourne Director of the Institute for Public Policy Research 14 May 2003.
( An IACBE Accredited Institution ) Industry Analytics Post Graduate Programme (2010 – 12) 3rd Term Alliance Business School Bangalore.
Policy options and recommendations José Palacín Chief, Innovative Policies Development UNECE Minsk, 19 June 2014.
Measuring Inbound Diffusion from Publicly Funded Research Organizations to Innovative Firms: A Statistical Perspective Frances Anderson Science, Innovation.
WIPO Pilot Project - Assisting Member States to Create an Adequate Innovation Infrastructure to Support University – Industry Collaboration.
International Seminar on Innovation and Development under Globalization: BRICS Experience Financial Innovation Discussion Cristiane Garcez Trivandrum,
1 Regional Innovation Strategies RIS. 2 About Regional Innovation Strategies The RIS projects aimed to support regions to develop regional innovation.
National Seminar on Intellectual Property and its Impact on Economic Development The Role of Intellectual Property in Promoting International Trade and.
HSC 6636: Pharmaceuticals & Medical Technology 1 Dr. Lawrence West, Health Management and Informatics Department, University of Central Florida
Measuring Innovation Professor Sunil Mani Centre for Development Studies Trivandrum Kerala, India.
INDUSTRIAL POLICY 1991 Govt. recognizes the need for – social and economic justice, to end poverty and unemployment and to build a modern, democratic,
Parramatta Economic Development Board Meeting of 9 June, 2004.
1 Innovation Nation UK Government White Paper on Science and Innovation David Evans Director for Innovation.
Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer Activities at CERN CERN/FC/5434/RA Technology Transfer Network Meeting – 10 th.
1 Trends in Science, Technology and Industry: An OECD Perspective Jerry Sheehan OECD Science & Technology Policy Division Knowledge Economy Forum III Budapest,
Markets, regulation and bridging the digital divide: The Indian experience in increasing the access to telecommunications services Professor Sunil Mani.
Globalization, Technology and Asian Development Joseph E. Stiglitz Asian Development Bank April 7, 2003 Manila.
GREECE: Meeting of the National Councils for S&T policy of the EU Member Countries Prague,25-26 May 2006 National Research Council General Secretariat.
Singapore – Strategy, Context and Performance By Group 1.
© 2016 Global Market Insights, Inc. USA. All Rights Reserved Fuel Cell Market size worth $25.5bn by 2024 Clinical Trial Management System.
Design of foresight-based evaluation in Tekes Activities
Research & Development for global competitiveness
Innovation Development Strategy
REGIONAL POLICY DIALOGUE SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION
WHY INDIA? September 2004.
Is this the Asian Century?
Responding to urban demand through domestic industry
ACADEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP, TECHNOLOGY INCUBATORS AND R&D ENTERPRISES
BRICS WORKSHOP, Aalborg
R&D FUNDING To increase sharply gross R&D expenditure by 2006 to 1,5% of GDP, making it comparable to EU average (1,8% of GDP in 1998) To increase.
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System
Prof. Kiran Kalia, Director NIPER Ahmedabad
Presentation transcript:

India’s Innovation System Sunil Mani and Parveen Arora

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 2 Outline Performance of India’s Innovation System R&D Investments (PA) Patents (SM) Technology content of exports(SM) Growth of R&D outsourcing (SM) Technology import (SM) Components – Overall policy framework (PA) – Physical technological infrastructure (PA) – Financing of innovation (SM) – Supply of scientists and engineers(SM) – Intellectual property right protection (SC)

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 3 Relative performance of India wrt Patenting in the USA

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 4 Share of local patents in the total number of Indian patents in the USA

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 5 Technology-wide distribution of Indian Patents,

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 6 Technology-wide distribution of Indian Patents in the US,

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 7 Technology-wide Distribution of Indian Patents in the USA: Differences between the two sub periods (Sub period 1: ; Sub period 2: ) First of all the there has been a significant increase in patenting during the second period by almost 370 per cent; Second, the share of the top 15 per cent has increased during the second period to nearly two-thirds from 57 per cent during the first period. Third, Pharmaceutical patents account for a significant share in both the periods, although its share in the top 15 have decreased in the second sub period; and Fourth, as a corollary of the above, the composition of the top 15 has undergone some changes in the second sub period. As against just one IT and electronic technology (including software) class during the first period, there are now 6 such technology classes in the second period. This shows the breadth of patenting by Indian inventors has increased.

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 8 Technology content of India’s Exports Studies have shown that only about 7 to 8 per cent of India’s manufactured exports can be termed as high tech. Most of it is accounted by pharmaceutical products; But the sustained growth of IT exports is changing the story. IT exports have two variants. The first one is direct IT exports and the second one is indirect IT exports in the form of remittances of knowledge workers; The direct IT exports now account for over 20 per cent of merchandise exports and over 13 per certcent of total exports.

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 9 Technology content of India’s Exports

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 10 Growth of R&D Outsourcing Two variants R&D outsourcing per se and growing clinical trials. No time series data as the phenomena is very new- just two years old, but on definite growth path

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 11 Growth of R&D outsourcing Evidence of high-end outsourcing is evident from the large number (over 150) established R&D outsourcing centres in India. In fact R&D outsourcing existed even before “outsourcing” became a fad. The R&D story dates back to when Texas Instruments was the first to set up a center in Bangalore. GE and Intel soon followed suit, as did other global technology and telecom companies like Cisco, Microsoft and Motorola. The trend gained strength as not just large but medium, small and even startups set up research bases in India. The R&D outsourcing market for IT in India is estimated to grow more than $8 billion by 2010 from $1.3 billion in 2005, at a CAGR of 30 per cent according to some industry estimates. Outsourcing models for R&D vary, from captive to third party to contract assignments. The pioneers of R&D outsourcing were from information technology. R&D centres in the telecom sector came next, and automobiles, pharmaceutical and biotechnology are the emerging areas where R&D outsourcing is bound to increase. This growth of R&D outsourcing brings to our attention two important dimensions. First of all, it shows that if R&D as a profession is incentivised, it is possible for the country to effect considerable increases in its R&D investments. The fact that foreign MNCs are able to establish contract R&D centres is a clear example of this possibility. Second contract R&D centres can be an important learning tool for the contract research organisations to emerge as important manufacturers in the future, provided that government is able to leverage this important opportunity through appropriate policy support. Such a policy support does not exist as of now.

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 12 Trends on technology imports to India during the post liberalization period (Number of collaboration agreements)

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 13 Payments made for technology import during the post liberalization period does not show any growth

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 14 Components of Innovation Policy Overall policy framework

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 15 Salient features of the New Innovation Policy of 2003 Optimal utilisation of existing infrastructure and competence; Strengthening infrastructure for S&T in academic institutions; New funding mechanisms for basic research ; Human resource development; Technology Development, Transfer and Diffusion; Promotion of Innovation; Industry and Scientific R&D; and Fiscal measures

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 16 Public sector allocation to S&T over the Indian five year plans

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 17 Composition of Indian R&D personnel (number)

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 18 R&D Personnel Both in absolute number and in density terms the number of R&D personnel in the country is very small; There is an explicit recognition of this fact in the new S&T policy of In my view it is more of a demand side phenomena. More on this point in my presentation on human resources.

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 19 Financing of Innovation The country has three broad schemes – Research grants – Tax incentives – Venture capital

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 20 Research Grants

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 21 Research Grants Large number of research grants administered by a plethora of organizations Most grants are targeted at public sector research institutes and enterprises The Matthew effect in grant disbursals owing to the principle of accumulative advantage

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 22 Tax Incentives There are five different types of tax incentives; Considerable year to year changes in its scope; Has not very effective in raising R&D investments with the notable exception of pharmaceutical industry.

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 23 Venture capital Venture capital was introduced in 1988; The country has a very vibrant VC industry The investment pattern of the VC industry represented an ideal model in phases I and II but no longer appears to be so.

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 24 Indian VC industry in historical perspective Phase I - Formation of TDICI in the 80’s and regional funds as GVFL & APIDC in the early 90s. Phase II - Entry of Foreign Venture Capital funds between Phase III - (2000 onwards). Emergence of successful India-centric VC firms Phase IV – US VCs’ increasing appetite to invest in India

Sunil Mani, BRICS, Aalborg 25 Source: IVCA/AVCJ India Venture Capital Investment Trends