21 st Century Commuting Patterns How is the Washington Area Different American Dream Coalition Alan E. Pisarski Reston Va. Dec. 4, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparing Marylands Workforce to Compete Globally Kenneth E. Poole, Ph.D. President CREC Executive Dir. C 2 ER.
Advertisements

Bay Area Council Economic Institute The Bay Area Regional Economic Assessment.
ANYBODY CAN RIDE! Examples of successful rural transit programs and practices elsewhere in the United States.
      The Marketing Environment Chapter
Changing Demographics and Workforce Trends KMSA April 22, 2004 Nancy Laprade Education Cabinet - Kentucky Workforce Investment Board.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
Tom Fairchild The R&D initiative of Arlington County Commuter Services.
SUBURBAN SPRAWL. What Causes it? 1.White flight 2.Technology 3.Government subsidizes 4.Space/Land/Entropy 5.Personal Preferences 6.Government Policies.
Copyright © 2010 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
RET565 – Construction Technology & Infrastructure Dr AHMAD HILMY ABDUL HAMID School of Housing, Building & Planning.
“Connect versus Control “ PRESENTER: Colleen Nelson, CRP, GMS Bristol Global Mobility.
Community Transportation Association of Idaho Supporting, Coordinating and Promoting Mobility in Idaho.
U.S. suburbanization and gentrification Soc 331 Population and Society
The 21st Century City: Urban Opportunities and Challenges in a Global Context Public Policy & Urban Affairs G6201 Seminar 1 “What Makes a City a City”
Commuting in America Using the ACS to Develop a National Report on Commuting Patterns and Trends Penelope Weinberger, CTPP Program Manager, AASHTO ACS.
YOUTH DEMOGRAPHICS IN THE CITY OF TORONTO Toronto Community and Neighbourhood Services: Social Development and Administration Division.
Future View of Transportation: Implications for Safety Alan E. Pisarski Stakeholder Workshop August 25-26, 2010.
Alternative Work Arrangements Brent Battye, Andrew Cook, Jeffery Inman, Brandon Long, Ryan Rumbold.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12.
The Aging U.S. Workforce: Trends and Challenges June 1, IAJVS Annual Conference, Boston MA Trends and Challenges June 1, IAJVS Annual.
ROBERT CHARLES LESSER & CO., LLC Demographic Changes Driving New Residential Development
IBTTA Washington Briefing Washington, D.C. March 30, 2015 Jonathan L. Gifford, Ph.D. George Mason University / Research.
COMMUTING IN AMERICA 2013 ALAN E. PISARSKI PRESERVING THE AMERICAN DREAM Oct 2013.
What would you expect to be the positive and negative reactions towards the Great Society?
White House Conference on Aging Transportation Policy Committee Testimony January 8, 2005 Looking Forward… Growing Older Public Transportation: Providing.
Linking Economic and Workforce Development: A Regional Sector Approach Bob Sheets Business and Industry Services Northern Illinois University September,
Broadband Needs, Challenges, and Opportunities in Rural America Presented to the Rural Broadband Workshop Federal Communications Commission March 19, 2014.
The Business Case for Workers Age 50+ Deborah Russell, Director, Workforce Issues AARP.
Transportation 101 June 12, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  GG & C Bus Company, Inc.  Mid Mon Valley Transit.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
WCF’s STATE OF THE WORKFORCE Central Florida - Fall 2006.
Community Mobility Institute New Directions in Economic Development Clark Anderson, Sonoran Institute Clark Anderson, Sonoran Institute May 11, 2015.
Every once in a while we need to build a road! The American Highway Users Alliance Alan E. Pisarski.
Commuting to Work in the Metropolitan Washington Region Some Preliminary Results from the 2000 Census Robert E. Griffiths Cooperative Forecasting and Data.
Transportation 101 August 7, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  IndiGO: Indiana County Transit Authority 
Social Welfare Policy Contending with Poverty In America.
Technology Impacts on the Future of Transportation Mark Hallenbeck, Director of the Washington State Transportation Center, University of Washington 1.
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
Higher Education and the Workforce  What’s the need?  What’s our response? 2002 Annual Meeting Roderick G. W. Chu Ohio Board of Regents.
Section 5 Americans Look to the Future Analyze the impact of immigration on American society. Summarize the causes and effects of changing demographics.
FOM 1 Environment & Corporate Culture 1.External Environment General Technological Sociocultural Economic Legal -Political 2.Task Environment Customers.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Additional Findings by Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
VALUES WORKSHOP Anne Arundel County | April 26, 2010.
CATS CONSORTIUM & THE SUSTAINABLE PLACES PROJECT CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS.
4.0 Understanding the Local Economy Exploring the Human Resources/Economic Development Connection Community Choices: Public Policy Education Program 8.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
© T. M. Whitmore TODAY Migration  Remittances (a consequence of international emigration from LA) Rural to rural migration within LA Rural to urban migration.
The Post-Industrial East Asian City Shahid Yusuf DECRG January 10 th 2005.
Washington Area Compensation and Benefits Association February 21, 2013 Uncertain Economic Times: Impacts on Local DC, MD and VA Employers and Employees.
Transportation 101 February 18, CommuteInfo Introducing… a better way to work.
30-Year National Transportation Policy Framework to the Future September 12,
Regional Transportation & Land Use IREM / BOMA Real Estate Forecast Breakfast 2009 Rich Macias, Director Regional & Comprehensive Planning Southern California.
Understanding Local Economies Goals To present export base theory as a model of the way a local economy works. To relate general export base theory to.
Presented by Harry M. Davis, Ph.D NCBA Professor of Banking and Economist Appalachian State University October 29, 2015.
Have the Social Change Project Pre- Planning Form on Your Desk!!! CAUSES OF SOCIAL CHANGE.
Today’s Quote We all have dreams. But in order to make dreams come into reality, it takes an awful lot of determination, dedication, self- discipline and.
Chapter 3: Migration By: Katie and Kristin
CREATING A UNIFIED VISION FOR OUR COMMUNITY January 17, 2012.
Transit is Smart Growth Matt Ryan Coconino County Supervisor Chair, NAIPTA April 24, 2012 Arizona Transit Association Annual Conference.
Portland 2040 Analysis. Portland residents drive less… While per capita vehicle miles traveled is increasing nationally at an average of 2.3% per year,
Elizabeth Garner State Demography Office Colorado Department of Local Affairs Transitions Population and Economic Trends.
The High Costs of High Cost Housing Michael C. Lens UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs Department of Urban Planning 1.
North American Motorcoach Travel: A Green & Safe Alternative 5 th European Bus & Coach Forum International Road Union Kortrijk Xpo, Belgium October 2007.
Industry Briefing 25 May 2016.
Segmentation, Targeting, and Positioning
Technical Committee Item # 9
Talent Advantage Series
Lorain County Transit Needs Assessment
Chapter 13 Urbanization.
Presentation transcript:

21 st Century Commuting Patterns How is the Washington Area Different American Dream Coalition Alan E. Pisarski Reston Va. Dec. 4, 2008

We are a major NATIONAL region  Fairfax at 1 million = Richmond metro area  Northern Va. at 2 million+ is a major national metro area by itself (= Pittsburgh; approaching Baltimore metro area )

Attributes of the No Va Commuting World  Wealth and stability  Multi-worker households  A leader in carpooling  More transit than expected  Fewer autos/commuter than all but NY  Gov’t still focused on center  Highest level of cross-county commutes

That’s why travel times stink

And why we get up so early

Annual Trips Per Household by Household Income USANo Va

HELP STAMP OUT AFFLUENCE! WE CAN DO IT ---- IF WE ALL PULL TOGETHER!

HELP STAMP OUT AFFLUENCE! WE CAN DO IT ---- IF WE ALL PULL TOGETHER! WE ARE ALMOST THERE!

We are rich because we work

Lots of cars

Mode shares 2007

Non-SOV mode shares 2007

Stolen from Bob Dunphy via Bob Chase

Va leads the nation in commuting out of residence county (Md #2)

Workers are our biggest export

WHAT HAPPENED IN FAIRFAX ! 1.Jobs rose and created balance with workers 2.Live/work; 85% of new workers 3.BUT IMPORTS BOOMED TO FILL REMAINING JOBS

Nice to lead the nation in something

Greater Mobility Makes Metro Areas Smaller And Bigger SMALLER  Easier Access to Jobs  to Services  Customer Markets  More affordable homes near work BIGGER  Distant areas now part of economic engine  Operate in world markets as a bigger player

The Challenge  Reaching skilled workers will be the key challenge for employers  Employers will go where the skilled workers are or where they want to be  Competition will be amenities-based  Good transportation will be one of the amenities  Metro areas that can meet this challenge will be the big winners

THANK YOU! Alan E. Pisarski

USDC MSAARLALXFFXLOUPW Total:139,259,6842,783,114127,464 80, ,300146,544190,924 Car, truck, or van:120,442,1882,172,55279,031 56, ,479129,719167,456 Drove alone105,954,6561,878,64568,593 51, ,899114,130133,935 Carpooled:14,487,532293,90710,438 5,496 55,58015,58933,521 2-carpool11,139,037211,3788,446 4,325 41,61211,18319,255 3 carpool1,963,01848,9111, ,3192,0338,906 4 carpool1,385,47733, ,6492,3735,360 Transit6,800,512371,13733,176 18,576 42,5742,4728,993 Walked3,954,21082,4196,900 1,657 9,3732,0953,085 bike, other2,386,15233,6822,680 1,143 6,1222,4462,700 Worked at home5,676,622123,3245,677 2,535 25,7529,8128,690 Total: % Car, truck, or van: 86.49%78.06%62.00%70.44%84.60%88.52%87.71% Drove alone 76.08%67.50%53.81%63.64%74.39%77.88%70.15% Carpooled: 10.40%10.56%8.19%6.79%10.21%10.64%17.56% 2-carpool 8.00%7.60%6.63%5.35%7.65%7.63%10.09% 3 carpool 1.41%1.76%1.07%0.39%1.71%1.39%4.66% 4 carpool 0.99%1.21%0.50%1.06%0.85%1.62%2.81% Transit 4.88%13.34%26.03%22.97%7.82%1.69%4.71% Walked 2.84%2.96%5.41%2.05%1.72%1.43%1.62% bike, other 1.71%1.21%2.10%1.41%1.12%1.67%1.41% Worked at home 4.08%4.43%4.45%3.13%4.73%6.70%4.55% CP + T 15.29%23.90%34.22%29.76%18.03%12.32%22.27%

THE COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT Location, Amenities, Flexibility  The increases in services in the economy will permit more population to act on location preferences as workers and employers are less tied to resources and more attracted by amenities.  Areas of the country will compete for workers on the basis of life-style, climate, and ease of living. Good transportation will be one of the competitive amenities.  Employers will be forced to be more flexible in schedules and benefits to attract workers.

Parsing the sprawl topic  An ideal gov. program – no definition of problem or measures of success!  Amorphous, ill defined goals –  What is public and what is private?  What is federal and what is local gov.?  Role of transportation  Public preferences

“Efficiency” in transportation; BEWARE!  A Very Dangerous Word  THE EFFICIENCY OF WHO OR WHAT?  Transit is a more “efficient” vehicle!  The key to all transportation is the efficiency of the users – passengers and freight – not the vehicles  That’s why trucks not trains – cars not buses  One colossal pizza delivery per night per neighborhood is “efficient”! THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO LIVE IN WAYS THAT MAKE GOVERNANCE MORE EFFICIENT!

“ BLAMING TRANSPORTATION FOR THE PROBLEMS OF SPRAWL IS LIKE BLAMING HEALTH CARE FOR THE PROBLEMS OF OLD AGE.” Brad Mallory, Sec DOT, Pa.

The sprawl debate diverts us from the real issues  Lack of workers/skilled workers  Mainstreaming minorities  Safety  Serving an aging population  Responding to pressures of time  enhancing economic opportunities  Global competitiveness

% LEAVING COUNTY TO WORK 1990  U.S. 23.9% 2000  U.S. 26.7%  Va. 52% 2007  U.S. 27.4%  Va. 52.5% COMMUTERS SPRAWL? ACCESS? OCCUPATIONS ?

The great loss from congestion is not the extra three minutes it takes to get home HOUSEHOLDS  It’s the decline in the number of jobs I could reach in ½ hr!  It’s the decline in the number of affordable homes accessible to my work!  It’s the decline in the assurance of arriving on time! BUSINESSES  It’s the decline in the number of workers within ½ hr of my employment site!  It’s the decline in the number of suppliers & customers within ½ hr of my business!  It’s the decline in ship- ment reliability!

THE FAIRFAX STORY 1

THE FAIRFAX STORY 2

THE FAIRFAX STORY 3

THE FAIRFAX STORY 4

Where did residents work?  Added 47,000 new workers  40,000 Workers stayed in County  15,000 fewer toward center  21,000 more toward edge & ring

WHAT HAPPENED IN FAIRFAX ! 1.Jobs rose and created balance with workers 2.Live/work; 85% of new workers 3.BUT IMPORTS BOOMED TO FILL REMAINING JOBS

Arlington – not quite perfect yet!

Transportation Makes Cities Both Smaller and Bigger  Smaller in that the times to traverse distances are reduced  Bigger in that a city knitted together with effective transportation acts bigger economically socially

A VERY POSITIVE FUTURE  Problems More Operable Today  The Resources to Respond are there People, Technology, Political & Financial  MUST RECOGNIZE CENTRAL ROLE OF MOBILITY IN OUR SOCIETY  MUST BE WILLING TO ACT TO FOCUS RESOURCES

A VERY POSITIVE FUTURE  Problems More Operable Today  The Resources to Respond are there People, Technology, Political & Financial  MUST RECOGNIZE CENTRAL ROLE OF MOBILITY IN OUR SOCIETY  MUST BE WILLING TO ACT TO FOCUS RESOURCES

The Demographic Story a New Phase in American Commuting 1.The Commuting in America series has been the history of the working years of the baby boom generation 2.The Boomers are now moving off stage creating a new phase in American commuting. 3.The key will be where will the new workers come from? 4.Advent of the immigrant workforce will be just one of the challenging concerns

#1 GREAT INCREASES IN WORKERS LEAVING HOME COUNTIES TO WORK  % of workers left home county  % (2007 almost 28%)  90’s meg. new Workers 51% Left home county (6.7 Meg.)  00’s - Of 5 meg. new workers 55% left home county (2.6 Meg.)  Wash DC Area leads nation!