Rose Asera, Ph.D Rethinking Pre-college Math Summer Institute Aug 22, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Advertisements

Implementing children's policy - the whole child challenge 6 th March, 2008 Elizabeth Canavan Office of the Minister for Children.
Bridging Research, Information and Culture An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Your Name Your Institution.
 will be able to write a learning outcome from the student perspective  will understand the difference between writing about an activity and learning.
Arkansas MSP Grants: Statewide Evaluation Plan Judy Trowell Arkansas Department of Education Charles Stegman Calli Holaway-Johnson University of Arkansas.
Riverpoint Partnership for Math and Science.  Who are we? A group of high school, college and university faculty from 7 school districts, 2 community.
SLAs – MAKING THE SHIFT. Session Goals Deepen understanding of Inspiring Education, Literacy and Numeracy Benchmarks (embedded in Curriculum Redesign)
Teruni Lamberg, Ph.D University of Nevada, Reno (775) Math Science Partnership Regional Meeting Sponsored by the U.S Department.
The Impact of Immersion in a Local Research Problem on Technology Skills and Use CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY PREPARING TOMORROW’S TEACHERS TO USE TECHNOLOGY.
Studying One’s Own Practice through Action Research
Math in the Middle What are we learning about rural mathematics education? Ruth Heaton and Jim Lewis University of Nebraska – Lincoln.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
1 Classroom-Based Research: How to Be a Researcher in Your Classroom Basic Skills Initiative Teaching and Learning Workshop October 2009 Darla M. Cooper.
Check-in on Curriculum Progress Next Steps.  Brings all of the pieces together.  Transparency  Creates curriculum conversation  A tool for the journey.
CRITICAL REFLECTION FOR CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: using the SOAP strategy to analyze pedagogical experience Padmini Boruah Department of English.
Extensive Reading Research in Action
1 Developing an Evaluation Plan _____________________ The Mathematically- Connected Communities MSP Developed for the February, MSP Conference Dr.
CRIOP Professional Development: Program Evaluation Evaluatio Susan Chambers Cantrell, Ed.D. Pamela Correll, M.A. Victor Malo-Juvera, Ed.D.
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Introduction to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Biology Scholars Institute July 16-19, 2008 Tony Ciccone Senior Scholar and Director Carnegie.
Curriculum Mapping Overview Based on the work of Heidi Hayes Jacobs, Ph.D and Susan Udelhofen, Ph.D Compiled and Presented to IUP undergraduate students.
 “…the systematic collection, review, and use of information about educational programs undertaken for the purpose of improving student learning and.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
Debby Deal Tidewater Team STEM Grades 4-5 August 4, 2011 Action/Teacher Research.
AU- MAEL Dr. Dan Bertrand
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
Reflect and Revise: Evaluative Thinking for Program Success Tom DeCaigny and Leah Goldstein Moses.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
Etta Hollins & Jamy Stillman Rossier School of Education University of Southern California PACT Implementation Conference November 13-14, 2008.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
PLMLC Leadership Series London Region Day 1 Ellen Walters, YCDSB Shelley Yearley, TLDSB Monday February 28, 2011.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
The Process of Conducting Research
Teacher Algebra Network: Our Model for Professional Development in Three Rural North Carolina Counties Presented by Katie J. Mawhinney and Tracie McLemore.
Rethinking Pre-College Math: A Brief Reminder about Why We’re Here and What We’re Trying to Do Overall context/purpose of project Defining characteristics.
Ensuring that Professional Development Leads to Improved Mathematics Teaching & Learning Kristen Malzahn Horizon Research, Inc. TDG Leadership Seminar.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Data-Driven Decision Making and School Leadership: Best Practices for School Improvement Theodore J. Kowalski Thomas J.
Why Collaborate?. “Why do we have to collaborate? I know my job. If I do my job and everybody else does his, we will be fine. The teachers I work with.
Discourse Discourse How can discourse be a significant means to formulate and articulate thinking? WERA March 27, 2008 Alisa Griffen, Laura Phillips, Nancy.
Urban Mathematics Education Leadership Academy Session 1 February 4-6, 2009 Dallas, TX.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Assessment in Student Affairs: Campus Life Programs Dan Bureau Mahauganee Shaw.
School of Education, CASEwise: A Case-based Online Learning Environment for Teacher Professional Development Chrystalla.
Introduction Teaching without any reflection can lead to on the job. One way of identifying routine and of counteracting burnout is to engage in reflective.
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
Assessment Presentation Day For Faculty Cindy J. Speaker, Ph.D. Wells College August 21, 2006.
Intro to Outcomes. What is “Outcomes”? A. a statewide initiative aimed at improving learning and accountability in education B. a standing SFCC committee.
2/2007AEIN Data Team Workshop “You never cross the same river twice…”
ONE-TO-ONE ADVISING SKILLS
Inquiry Learning and Social Studies College and Career Readiness Conferences Summer
PLMLC Leadership Series Thunder Bay Region Day 1 Brian Harrison, YRDSB Connie Quadrini, YCDSB Thursday February 3 rd, 2011.
PEER Module 4: Research & Evaluation Questions
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Quantitative and Qualitative research
Past, Present, & Key to our Future. * In 1995 a survey was conducted across DE and it was found that the predominant form of Science Education was textbook.
Ian Thompson, Harry Daniels, Lorena Ortega Ferrand, Sarah Cox, Nicole Dingwall. Funded by The John Fell Fund 1.
Working together to strengthen student learning: faculty inquiry in action California Statewide Academic Senate April 18, 2008.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Re-Thinking Pre-College Math: From “Professional Development” to “Professional Learning” August 2011 Institute.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
Deepening Student Impact Via Instructional Practice Data Joe Schroeder, PhD Associate Executive Director, AWSA.
 The area of focus consists of teachers creating an environment to help express how children learn through play.  The purpose of this study is to.
Supporting Regional AfL in K-12 Mathematics through Networked Professional Learning Panel: Eleanor Newman, Tammy Billen, Danielle LaPointe-McEwan, Sharon.
Lessons Learned from the Re-Thinking Pre-College Math (RPM) Project
Faculty Inquiry: Rose Asera Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Laney College Nov 9, 2007.
CLIL and English Teachers’ Competencies Improvement
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Institute August 22, 2017
Conference on Information Technology
Connecting Planning and Designing
Presentation transcript:

Rose Asera, Ph.D Rethinking Pre-college Math Summer Institute Aug 22, 2012

Move into a situation with questions: starting with questions will take you places that starting with answers won’t. Formal inquiry: an organized form of professional development that involves forming questions, gathering and analyzing data, and acting on and sharing results Informal inquiry: nurturing your intellectual curiosity and asking questions. Inquiry becomes a habit of mind.

 Your college ?  Your department ?  Your classroom ? What do you pay attention to in order to describe these cultures ?

 Culture is the connective tissue between formal changes (policy, structure, content) and individual experiences  Can someone ‘change’ culture? (Can someone ‘culture’ change?)  What are the levers of culture change?  How are the characteristics of the culture a resource to you? an obstacle to you?  What is the relationship of culture change to changing policy/ structure/ individuals?  What are the characteristics of a culture of inquiry?

 What have you done that has shifted the culture in your department?  How is the departmental culture communicated to new people or part-time faculty? to students?  What do you do to establish the culture in your classroom?  Has changing instruction changed the way you see students and learning?

 What works /for whom /under what conditions ?  What do you know about your students’ lives, aspirations, & challenges? What strengths do students bring to the classroom?  How does knowing your students affect your teaching?  What does learning look like?  How do students view mathematics?  What is the relationship between the data patterns and your observations in the classroom?

Besides colleagues in your department, whose work is affected by changes you are making in developmental math?  Who are your allies? Do you have connections across campus boundaries and silos? Why is this important?  Who needs to be involved in the changes? Who needs to be aware and informed?

 Community & colleagues  Collaboration & conversation  Students as Co-inquirers

 WHAT ARE YOUR NEXT QUESTIONS?

 Taking your teaching sensibility--  Intuition  Hunches  Observations  Puzzles  Dilemmas  Questions Seriously and systematically pursuing evidence to gain more insight into student learning & Sharing it

Who are my students?  Katie Hern’s students at Chabot College

What are we teaching?  Jay Cho & Friends at Pasadena City College &id=

 How do we know they are learning?  Laura Graff and friends at College of the Desert &id=

The cycle of inquiry: An outcome of inquiry is more inquiry …. GATHER DATA ANALYZE DATA ACTION MAKE YOUR WORK PUBLIC SHAPE QUESTION

 What is?  What’s the problem?  What works? How?  What’s possible?  Why?

 Campus data– trends, patterns, big pictures  Classroom observations  Examples of student work  Results of a common assessment  Think-alouds  Student surveys, interviews and focus groups  Looking outward as well as inward: evidence from other educational settings (research literature, cases, etc)

 Finding patterns  Quantitative analysis- when are statistics useful?  Qualitative analysis – beyond anecdotes - what are the patterns of response?  Finding outliers: when are outliers worthy of attention?

 How does what you have learned affect the situation?  What actions do your data indicate?  Are there changes that can be made?  How is inquiry part of implementation? Of ongoing improvement?

 To reflect and reconstruct the process  To critically reexamine data  To tell the story  To make public and invite conversation  To share ongoing questions  For others to build on

 To gain different perspectives on the problem  In isolation (classroom/office/campus) you can’t see the dimensions or magnitude of the problem  You understand more about your context by seeing other contexts  The problems we are addressing are bigger than any one person “I never think it’s my problem alone”

Students  bring a new perspective to data gathering and analysis  have access to informal aspects of other students’ lives  can translate across cultures  may have tech savvy

 Increased local knowledge of teaching and learning & common language  Greater understanding of students and their learning process  Shared responsibility for student learning  Integration of professional learning in work responsibilities  Analysis to action  More inquiry  Inquiry becomes a habit or mindset

 It doesn’t all work  Finding things that don’t work is part of inquiry  Sharing mistakes is part of learning and is very valuable (and not always easy)

 Teacher as Researcher  Faculty Learning Communities  Reflective Inquiry  Scholarship of Teaching and Learning  Faculty Inquiry Groups  Formative Evaluation

SPECC work/undergraduate-education &id= Faculty Inquiry Network Contact: