Massachusetts Employers Largely Support Health Care Reform: Few Signs of Crowd-out. Jon Gabel Heidi Whitmore Jeremy Pickreign National Opinion Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Employee Benefits BENCHMARKING DATA from 2010 and prior Resource: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation (not Kaiser Permanente) discover the DBS difference.
Advertisements

1 Survey of Retiree Health Benefits, 2007: A Chartbook Jon Gabel, Heidi Whitmore, and Jeremy Pickreign National Opinion Research Center September 2008.
Expanding Health Insurance Coverage Through Incremental Reforms: Snapshots of Employer Views Heidi Whitmore, Sara R. Collins, Jeremy D. Pickreign, and.
Health Savings Accounts: Early Estimates Of National Take-Up Roger Feldman, Stephen T. Parente, Jean Abraham, Jon B. Christianson and Ruth Taylor
Impact of Health Reform Bills on California Families and Employers Charts and Tables from Recent Briefs February 2010.
The Impacts of Massachusetts Health Reform on Coverage and Health Care Access and Affordability for Women Shanna Shulman, Ph.D. Blue Cross Blue Shield.
Employee Benefits & Healthcare Reform: An Opportunity in Disguise.
KEY FINDINGS FROM THE 2012 MASSACHUSETTS HEALTH REFORM SURVEY SHARON K. LONG URBAN INSTITUTE MARCH 26, 2014.
Massachusetts Employer Survey 2007 Division of Health Care Finance and Policy Executive Office of Health and Human Services.
Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Firms That Report They Made the Following Changes as a Result of the Economic Downturn, by Firm Size,
Health Benefits 2007: A USA and California Update Jon R. Gabel Senior Fellow National Opinion Research Center.
Employer Health Benefits KFF/HRET 2008 Survey Health Benefits in 2008: Premiums Increase Modestly as CDHP Grows and Deductibles Rise Sharply Jon Gabel.
Employer-Sponsored Health Coverage Release Slides Tuesday, September 11, 2012 March 15, 2013.
Health Insurance Coverage of California’s Working Latinos Howard Greenwald Suzanne O'Keefe Mark DiCamillo University of Southern California California.
Jon R. Gabel Senior Fellow National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.
Employer Health Benefit Survey Release Slides Tuesday, August 20, 2013.
How to Use Voluntary Benefits to Reduce Your Benefit Costs Pressure Jay Hutchins Vice President Broker Marketing & Sales.
Minnesota’s Small Group Market Select Statistics Health Care Access Commission Small Group Insurance Market Work Group September 23, 2010 Stefan Gildemeister.
1 Making Universal Health Care Work Jon Forman Alfred P. Murrah Professor of Law University of Oklahoma “The Future of Employer-Provided Benefits” John.
1 Facts on Health Coverage in the USA Prepared for Cover the Uninsured and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation by the Employee Benefit Research Institute.
Evolution of Managed Care. Introduction What is Managed Care? Brief History.
Medicare: An Overview September 30, 2014 Society for Financial and Professional Development 7 th Annual Financial Literacy Leadership Conference Christina.
Excess cost growth in Medicare, Medicaid, and all other health care spending Source: CBO, A Federal Perspective on Health Care Policy and Costs, 2008.
Rosemarie Day Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer 3 rd National Medicaid Congress Friday, June 6, 2008 Washington, DC Massachusetts Health Care.
Review of Trends in Minnesota Health Insurance Coverage Health Care Transformation Task Force September 17, 2007 Julie Sonier Director, Health Economics.
Employer Health Benefit Survey 2015
-AND Findings from the Kaiser/HRET and Kaiser/Hewitt Employer Surveys.
THE URBAN INSTITUTE How Have Employers Responded to Health Reform in Massachusetts? Evidence from the Perspective of Employees Sharon K. Long Urban Institute.
Figure 1. Distribution of Individuals Covered by Private Health Insurance, by Type of Health Plan Comprehensive = health plan with no deductible or
State & Federal Approaches to Health Reform: What works for the working poor? June 9, 2008 Ellen Meara Meredith Rosenthal Anna Sinaiko Katherine Baicker.
The Hilltop Institute was formerly the Center for Health Program Development and Management. Evaluating Small Group Employer Participation in New Mexico.
Modeling Health Reform in Massachusetts John Holahan June 4, 2008 THE URBAN INSTITUTE.
Employer Health Benefits Survey Release Slides September 10, 2014.
1 Costs Driving Employer Action Against Obesity National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago Jon Gabel, Senior Fellow In conjunction with:
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Exhibit 1. Employer Coverage Continues to Be Major Source of Coverage for Employees of Larger Firms Percent of firms offering health.
The Kaiser/HRET 2002 National Survey of Employers: What Are Its Implications for Health Insurance? Jon Gabel Vice President, Health System Studies Health.
Effects of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program on Children with Chronic Health Conditions Amy J. Davidoff, Ph.D. Genevieve Kenney, Ph.D. Lisa.
Web Briefing for Journalists: How the ACA’s Employer Requirements and Related Provisions Affect Businesses and Workers Thursday, December 18, 2014 Presented.
Average Annual Premium Increases for Family Coverage,
Effects of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program on Children with Chronic Health Conditions Amy J. Davidoff, Ph.D. Genevieve Kenney, Ph.D. Lisa.
Trends in Employer-Based Health Insurance Jon Gabel Senior Fellow, NORC.
Premium Sensitivity Among Workers Chapter What Is the Relevant Premium? The “risk premium”? The “risk premium”? The “loading fee”? The “loading.
Advancing the health of Ohioans through informed policy decisions Insurance basics: Provisions of the Affordable Care Act and how Ohioans are covered Reem.
Supplementary Data Tables, Trends in Overall Health Care Market
After the Mandates: Massachusetts Employers Continue to Support Health Reform As More Firms Offer Coverage Jon R. Gabel Heidi Whitmore Jeremy Pickreign.
Employer Health Benefits Survey 2017
Exhibit Among Firms Offering Health Benefits with 50 or More Employees, Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled at a Firm That Offers Benefits Through.
Figure 1. Distribution of Individuals Covered by Private Health Insurance, by Type of Health Plan, 2005–2007 Comprehensive = health plan with no deductible.
Exhibit 8.15 Distribution of Covered Workers with the Following Annual Employer Contributions to Their HRA or HSA, for Family Coverage, 2016 NOTE: For.
Exhibit 8.18 Among Firms Offering Family Coverage and an HSA-Qualified HDHP, Percentage of Firms That Vary Their HSA Contribution for Family Coverage on.
Chartbook Section 3 Employment-Based Health Insurance.
Supplementary Data Tables, Trends in Overall Health Care Market
Credit per employee $9,435—projected family premium 50% employer
Exhibit 1.7 Distribution of Annual Premiums for Single and Family Coverage Relative to the Average Annual Single or Family Premium, 2016 Percentages.
Exhibit 3.4 Among Workers in Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Eligible Workers Who Take Up Health Benefits Offered by Their Firm, by Firm.
Exhibit 3.3 Among Workers in Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Workers Eligible for Health Benefits Offered by Their Firm, by Firm Characteristics,
Exhibit 6.20 Distribution of the Percentage of Total Premium Paid by Covered Workers for Single and Family Coverage, by Firm Wage Level, 2016 SINGLE COVERAGE.
Exhibit 2.9 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Firms That Offer to Part-Time Workers, by Firm Size, 1999–2016 * Estimate is statistically.
Exhibit 3.5 Among Workers in Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Workers Covered by Health Benefits Offered by Their Firm, by Firm Characteristics,
Exhibit 2.10 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage That Offer Health Benefits to Temporary Workers, by Firm Size, 1999–2015 * Estimate is statistically.
Exhibit 3.4 Among Workers in Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Eligible Workers Who Take Up Health Benefits Offered by Their Firm, by Firm.
Exhibit 2.9 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage That Offer Health Benefits to Part-Time Workers, by Firm Size, 1999–2015 * Estimate is statistically.
Exhibit 14.8 Among Offering Firms With Fewer Than 500 Employees, Percentage of Employers who Provide Benefits Through a Co-Employment Arrangement with.
Exhibit 6.18 Distribution of the Percentage of Total Premium Paid by Covered Workers for Single and Family Coverage, by Wage Level, 2013 SINGLE COVERAGE.
Exhibit 8.14 Distribution of Covered Workers with the Following Annual Employer Contributions to Their HRA or HSA, for Single Coverage, 2016 NOTE: For.
Exhibit 3.4 Among Workers in Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Eligible Workers Who Take Up Health Benefits Offered by Their Firm, by Firm.
Exhibit 3.5 Among Workers in Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Workers Covered by Health Benefits Offered by Their Firm, by Firm Characteristics,
Low Wage Level Less Than 35% Earn $23,000 a Year or Less *
Exhibit 3.3 Among Workers in Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Workers Eligible for Health Benefits Offered by Their Firm, by Firm Characteristics,
Exhibit 6.19 Distribution of the Percentage of Total Premium Paid by Covered Workers for Single and Family Coverage, by Wage Level, 2014 SINGLE COVERAGE.
Presentation transcript:

Massachusetts Employers Largely Support Health Care Reform: Few Signs of Crowd-out. Jon Gabel Heidi Whitmore Jeremy Pickreign National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago Financial support for this study was from the Blue Cross Blue Shield Massachusetts Foundation and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Study Objectives Examine Massachusetts employers’ –Attitudes about health care reform –Anticipated responses to health care reform Provide baseline documentation comparing health benefits in Massachusetts with the nation

Methods Survey of about 1,000 randomly selected Massachusetts public and private firms with three or more workers (RWJF/NORC Mass. Employer Benefits Survey). Comparison group is Kaiser Family Foundation/Health Research and Educational Trust (KFF/HRET) national survey. Massachusetts survey includes core questions from KFF/HRET national survey, plus additional questions on employer attitudes about Massachusetts health care reform. National Research LLP conducted telephone interviews with employee benefit managers conducted from February to June 2008 for RWJF/NORC survey. Use of statistical weights –Employer weights –Employee weights

Coverage Estimates Category Firms with 3-50 Workers All Firms MassachusettsUnited StatesMassachusettsUnited States Percentage of employees covered by their employer, firms offering and not- offering health benefits. 47%45%57%59% Percentage of employers offering coverage 70%*57%73%*60% Take-up rate 72%*79%78%*82% Coverage rate 58%*65%61%65% Percentage of workers enrolled in family coverage 41%*34%45%*38% Percentage of firms where same sex couples are eligible for coverage 59%*30%52%*38% Sources: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation/National Opinion Research Center Massachusetts Employer Benefit Survey, 2007; and Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation/Health Research and Educational Trust Employer Health Benefits Survey, * Massachusetts estimate is significantly different from United States estimate at p<0.05 level.

Employer Responsibility: Percentage of Firms Agreeing That Employers Bear Some Responsibility for Health Insurance, by Firm Characteristics, 2007 Source: RWJF/NORC Survey of Massachusetts Employers: 2007 * Distributions are significantly different from other firm sizes or offering status at p < 0.05.

Employer Support for Reform Plan’s Requirement to Offer Health Benefits or Pay Fair Share Contribution, and Against Exempting the Smallest Firms, by Firm Size, 2007 Firms agreeing with requirement to offer or pay fair share contribution Firms agreeing that smallest firms (10 or fewer workers) should not be exempted Source: RWJF/NORC Survey of Massachusetts Employers: 2007 * Distributions are significantly different from other firm sizes at p < 0.05.

Little Early Evidence of Crowd-Out among Firms with Workers * Tests found no significant differences between Mass. And USA. Source: RWJF/NORC Survey of Massachusetts Employers, 2007

Summary and Discussion Massachusetts employers hold views generally supportive of the spirit of health care reform. –View employers bearing some responsibility for providing health insurance for workers. –Support “fair share ” provision. –Support expanding requirements to firms with 10 or fewer workers. Little early evidence of crowd-out. Some aspects of health insurance make reform in Massachusetts challenging. –Employee contributions for single coverage are nearly twice the national average, reducing the take-up rate. –Premiums are more expensive than nationally, and increasing more rapidly.

Plan Characteristics Firms with 3-50 WorkersAll Firms MassachusettsUnited StatesMassachusettsUnited States Percentage increase in premiums, %6.8% 7.5%* 6.1% Monthly premium single coverage $426$403$445*$373 Employee contribution single (Percent contribution) $83* (20%) $46 (13%) $105* (24%) $58 (16%) HMO-POS Market Share 85%*49%77%*34% Percentage of workers with deductible 34%*55%19%*59% Sources: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation/National Opinion Research Center Massachusetts Employer Benefit Survey, 2007; and Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation/Health Research and Educational Trust Employer Health Benefits Survey, * Massachusetts estimate is significantly different from United States estimate at p<0.05 level.

Employee Responsibility: Percentage of Firms Agreeing That Employees Bear Some Responsibility for Health Insurance, by Firm Characteristics, 2007 Source: RWJF/NORC Survey of Massachusetts Employers: 2007 * Distributions are significantly different from other firm sizes or offering status at p < 0.05.