Objective Trees and Customer Needs Statements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing an Amazing Thesis Statement
Advertisements

S D S A.
Agenda For Today! School Improvement Harris Poll Data PDSA PLC
Agenda For Today! Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) School Improvement Snapshot School Improvement.
TRANSPORTATION PROCEDURES. WHY DO WE DO THIS? Child safety is our top priority Ensures that each child is picked up by a proper parent or guardian every.
Leadership and Strategic Planning
A3 PROBLEM SOLVING TOOL: Date: Contact: SOLUTIONS / COUNTERMEASURES What solutions will solve the root causes? (Tools: Brainstorming and Affinity Diagram)
Slide 1 Systems Analysis and Design with UML Version 2.0 Alan Dennis, Barbara Wixom, and David Tegarden Chapter 5: Requirements Determination John Wiley.
And Learning TEAL Consulting Limited a a Meeting Customer Demand in Challenging Times July 2010.
Teaching materials to accompany:
Project Closure CHAPTER FOURTEEN Student Version Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Product Design and Development. A Generic Development Process Concept developmen t System design Detail design Testing and refinement Production ramp.
Project Clarification: Objectives Tree BE 20–Engineering Design with Computer Applications Week 4: 15-September-2004.
R. I. T Mechanical Engineering Engineering Design Brief Case Study: What is the Engineering Design Process and Why is it Critical? Rochester Institute.
EDGE™ Needs Assessment prepared by Prof. Marcos Esterman (ISE) Copyright © 2005 Rochester Institute of Technology All rights reserved.
Case interrelations Relationships and integration Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event John Harrison Hu-Tech CAATS II Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009.
Strategic Planning …demystified Definition What it is: –Management tool –Choosing a desired future –Consciously responding to dynamic environment –Process,
Hospitality Operations Analysis Ch 07: Assessing and Rewarding Dr. Edward A. Merritt The Collins Endowed Chair of Management California State University.
Michelle Bard (ME) Alexander Ship (ME) David Monahan (ME) Kristin Gagliardi (ME) October 12, 2009.
1 Introduction to System Engineering G. Nacouzi ME 155B.
Leadership and Strategic Planning
TSM: Safety Management in a Quality Management Setting
Project Closure CHAPTER FOURTEEN Student Version Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
By the end of this chapter, you should:  Have an understanding of the types of projects electrical and computer engineers undertake.  Understand and.
Voice of the Engineer (VOE)
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 27 Slide 1 Quality Management.
 Planning provides the foundation for conservation district programs and operations.  The planning process broadly defines the vision of the future.
High Performance Development Model 360 Degree Feedback Process Respondent Orientation.
Quality Function Deployment
1 Portfolio Management – Agile How to plan like a VP Highsmith, Ch 12 CSSE579 Session 6 Part 2 One company’s software product portfolio.
1 Rev: 02/12/2007 MSE-415: B. Hawrylo MSE-415: Product Design Lecture #3 Chapter 4 Identifying Customer Needs.
Identifying Customer Needs
Project Management 6e..
Prepared by Afra`a Sayah. Introduction. Weekly Tasks. Plane Phase. Analysis Phase. Design Phase. Report Rules. Conclusion. 2.
JOIN THE MOBILE REVOLUTION AND MOBILIZE YOUR BUSINESS Interactive Consortium International, Limited.
THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF QUALITY, 5e, © 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning TM 1 Chapter 5 Leadership and Strategic Planning.
Module 2 Stakeholder analysis. What’s in Module 2  Why do stakeholder analysis ?  Identifying the stakeholders  Assessing stakeholders importance and.
Marcos Esterman, Associate Professor Industrial and Systems Engineering Department Rochester Institute of Technology Multidisciplinary.
SBD: Activity Design CS HCI Chris North Usability Engineering - Chapter 3.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
Lecture 7: Requirements Engineering
Requirements Gathering How do we find out what we are supposed to be building?
Slide 1 Requirements Determination Chapter 5. Slide 2 Objectives ■ Understand how to create a requirements definition. ■ Become familiar with requirements.
Where We Are Now 14–2. Where We Are Now 14–2 Major Tasks of Project Closure Evaluate if the project delivered the expected benefits to all stakeholders.
Design Project Management
R. I. T Mechanical Engineering March 4, 2013 Design Project Management Lecture 1: Introduction, projects, team behavior Rochester Institute of Technology.
R. I. T Mechanical Engineering Design Project Management Voice of the Customer: Interviews and Observations Rochester Institute of Technology Mechanical.
14–1 Project Closure and Review Deliverables FIGURE 14.1.
Mission Statement: Reduce the effect of fixture leakage on leakage data by minimizing the amount of test gas in the space between the o- rings Leakage.
R. I. T Mechanical Engineering Design Project Management Voice of the Customer: Background Research and Affinity Diagrams Rochester Institute of Technology.
The Tool for Participatory Assessment with Refugees Refugees at the centre of decision making.
Requirements Gathering
Identifying Customer Needs
Requirements in the product life cycle Chapter 7.
Chapter 4: Identifying Customer Needs Product Design and Development Fourth Edition by Karl T. Ulrich and Steven D. Eppinger.
Information Flow Between Tools Early in the Engineering Design Process Kate E. Nordland Advisor: Dr. Edward Hensel M.S. Thesis Presentation July 23, 2007.
A3 PROBLEM SOLVING TOOL: Date: Contact: SOLUTIONS What solutions will solve the root causes? (Tools: Brainstorming and Affinity Diagram) What solutions.
Product Design Process Customer Needs Assessment EDSGN100 Introduction to Engineering Design Junfeng Ma (With Acknowledgement to Prof. Sven G. Bilén, Prof.
Project Planning: Scope and the Work Breakdown Structure
Quality Function Deployment
Acknowledgement: Khem Gyawali
Leadership and Strategic Planning
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
PRODUCT PLANNING.
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Copyright © 2005 Rochester Institute of Technology
By the end of this chapter, you should:
Project Status Update PYYNNN – Project Title Here
Leadership and Strategic Planning
Where We Are Now 14–2. Where We Are Now 14–2 Major Tasks of Project Closure Evaluate if the project delivered the expected benefits to all stakeholders.
Presentation transcript:

Objective Trees and Customer Needs Statements Design Project Management Mechanical Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology Needs Assessment

Goals of Needs Identification Provide basis for product development decisions Elicit needs that may not be so obvious Provide basis for engineering metrics Ensure critical needs are elicited Develop a common understanding of the needs Archiving of needs Customers and design team come to agreement on scope From: Ulrich,K.T. and S. Eppinger, Product Design and Development, Third Edition, 2004

Steps in Identifying Customer Needs Gather the raw data (This is in your affinity diagram!) Interpret the raw data Organize the needs Establish relative importance of needs Sanity Check! From: Ulrich,K.T. and S. Eppinger, Product Design and Development, Third Edition, 2004

Shopping Cart Affinity Diagram

Examples of Interpreting Data Stay close to the customer language What, not how Specificity equal to the raw data Positive, not negative Product Attribute Avoid “must” & “should” I think value proposition is just another way of saying that you need to understand what the problems are. This doesn’t sound quite right for the sorts of projects our group is doing. From: Ulrich,K.T. and S. Eppinger, Product Design and Development, Third Edition, 2004

“What not how” Focus on the customer need, not a solution that was provided to you. “I want a Tesla mast on the cart” “I want seats not facing my parents”

The customer needs a shopping cart that is fun for children.

Specificity equal to raw data Don’t make generalizations based on specific examples provided by the customer. Don’t read a more specific meaning into a broad statement. “Easy to recycle”

Customer Need: The customer needs a shopping cart that is easy to recycle. Too specific: The customer needs a shopping cart that is made out of aluminum.

Positive not negative There are lots of things you don’t want your device to do or be. Focus on the smaller set of things you do want the device to do or be. “Don’t damage food in cart”

The customer needs a shopping cart that keeps groceries safe.

Product Attribute Your device interacts with its surroundings, but your work is constrained to the device, not the surroundings. “Don’t want carts to damage cars”

Customer Need: The customer needs a shopping cart that does not damage cars vs. The customer needs cars that are not damaged by carts

Avoid “Must” and “Should” That implies priority. More on this next week… “easy to maneuver individually”

Customer Need: The customer needs a shopping cart that is maneuverable. vs. The shopping cart must be maneuverable

Organize the Needs: Objective Tree Use your affinity groups! Some common themes to look for: Safety Cost Performance Ease of use Appearance

Objective Tree Mission Statement Main Objective 1 Customer Need 1

Shopping Cart (Partial) Objective Tree The stakeholders need a cost-effective shopping cart that is safe and easy to use Safe Safe for the environment Safe for shoppers Safe for children Maneuverable Individually maneuverable Maneuverable in chains Easy to separate

Test: Sanity Check Have we solicited input from all customer types? Have we sought out Latent Needs? Have we identified any follow-up areas? What do we know now that we didn’t before? Have we uncovered any surprises? From: Ulrich,K.T. and S. Eppinger, Product Design and Development, Third Edition, 2004

Test: Sanity Check Did the whole team participate in the process? What should we have done differently in retrospect? How can we improve the needs assessment process for next time? From: Ulrich,K.T. and S. Eppinger, Product Design and Development, Third Edition, 2004

In-Class Exercise Review your team’s Affinity Diagram (which may not be complete) Select one group of items that is fairly well-developed Identify an objective associated with these items Use the information in that affinity group to formulate needs statements 2 teams will present their results to the class and receive feedback.