Preliminary Design Review “Analysis of Atmospheric Cosmic Radiation Distribution as a Function of Altitude” Steven Schroeder-Program Manager Damon Emerson-Rocket.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UF Hybrid Rocket Teams Mile High Club Brought to you by Chris Leonard, Ty Morton, Sam Darr, and Josh Childs.
Advertisements

Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA PDR P RESENTATION. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Simulations Future Work.
Our Mission Statement  Launch a high-power rocket to an altitude of one mile carrying the Operation: Epic Beep payload package. At lift off, the rocket’s.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Critical Design Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Critical Design Review “The Distribution of Ionizing Radiation with Altitude” Left to Right: Izzy S.- Audio Visual Tom L.- Payload James Z.-Construction.
St. Vincent – St. Mary FRR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Windward Community College University of Hawaii
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Hawaii - WCC.  5,280 ft  Carry a student payload  National CanSat program  No bigger than a 12 fl oz soda can  Mass no greater than 1 kg  USLI.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
November 7,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6.00 inches  Mass: oz. / 17.34lbs.  Span: inches  Center of Gravity: inches.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Tropos-1 Hybrid rocket Project
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Windward Community College University of Hawaii
Safety ► The safety officer for the entire team is Maia Madrid. ► During launch we will follow NAR safety rules and regulations. ► We will follow standard.
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
3/19/09. Animal Motor Works (AMW) K475WW High Power Rocket Motor. 54 mm casing, 40.3 cm long, 2.9 seconds burn time, 1394 N-sec total impulse, and
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT ADVANCE.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
UCF USLI Organization Team Development Proposal Requirements September 17 th, 2009.
WINDWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
USLI Flight Readiness Review Harding University Flying Bison 2010 USLI Rocket Team.
Flight Readiness Review “Analysis of Atmospheric gamma radiation as a Function of Altitude by means of Scintillator Probe” St. Thomas High School, Houston,
Preliminary Design Review “The Distribution of Ionizing Radiation with Altitude” Left to Right: Tom L.- Payload James Z.-Construction Izzy S.- Audio Visual.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
Hemodynamics Star Splitters 4-H Club Two Rivers, WI Hemodynamics.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
High Powered Rocket Team Fall Project Manager Wesley M. Harpster Team Members James Lawrence Ryan Horton Karna Shah James “Trey” Simmons Irfan Shaukat.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Preliminary Design Review 6 November 2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
Project Aegis Preliminary Design Review Team Members:
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
Preliminary Design review
* 07/16/96 Propulsion Lab 6 Winter Quarter *.
Critical Design Review Presentation
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
Preliminary Design Review
Georgia Tech NASA Preliminary Design Review Teleconference
November 7, 2014.
November 7, 2014.
Final Readiness Review
Characteristics,Construction, Recovery
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary Design Review “Analysis of Atmospheric Cosmic Radiation Distribution as a Function of Altitude” Steven Schroeder-Program Manager Damon Emerson-Rocket design Thomas Loughlin-Payload Andy Holm-Construction Gregory Katsaros- Audio Visual Nick Yuan- Safety Robert Forzano- Outreach/Publicity Chris Jardine-Communications Navin Kalluri-Communications Mr. Lynch- Head Mentor Mr. D. Laney,mentor Mr. M. Loughlinmentor St. Thomas High School, Houston, TX sli.sths.org

Agenda Mission Statement and Goals Launch Vehicle and Payload Summary Vehicle Body System Propulsion System Recovery System Payload System Payload Experiment Planning of System Tests Safety Budget and Outreach

Mission Statement and Goals Mission Statement Our mission is to supply accurate data about cosmic radiation by building a safe and functioning rocket that can provide ample time for data collection. Goals Reach an altitude of one mile. Payload records data on ionizing radiation. Both parachutes deploy at predetermined altitudes. Land within one square mile. Rocket retrievable with payload intact. Shed light on radiation variation with altitude.

Launch Vehicle, Payload Summary Vehicle: Length – ” Gross liftoff Weight: lb. Diameter ” Stability Margin – 1.97 Motor – K560W Launch System - 1.5”x1.5” (10’) Recovery: Drogue – 28” at Apogee Main – 120” at 1500 ft. Payload Experiment Summary: Measure levels of cosmic radiation with altitude through the use of a plastic scintillator probe whose data will be correlated with time and altitude.

SYSTEMS Vehicle Body PropulsionRecoveryPayload

(1)Vehicle Body System Modified LOC Precision Magnum 3e Three Body Tubes (5.40”- size needed for payload ) Lower (31”) – K560W, Main, G10 Fins, Camera Middle (28”) – Payload Bay Upper (11”) – Drogue Chute, Canards Nose Cone (21”) GPS Transmitter

(2) Propulsion System Motor: Aerotech K560W Thrust / Weight: N/lb Velocity off Launch Rod: ft/s Rail Length:120 in. Burn Time:4.97 s

(3) Recovery System Drogue Chute 28” LOC Precision Deployed at apogee (18.51 s) Perfectflite Dual Deployment Altimeter Main Chute 120” LOC Precision Deployment at 1500 ft (69.97 s) Perfectflite Dual Deployment Altimeter Landing Landing at s Landing Velocity: ft/s(V); ft/s(H); ft/s(M)

(4) Payload System Within Middle Body Tube Bay #1 - Circuit Board, Scintillator Probe Bay #2 - Two Altimeters – Linked to ejection charges at either end of Payload Bay. Within Nose Cone GPS Transmitter Outside of Lower Body Tube Video camera

Payload Experiment Hypothesis After consideration of the effects due to terrestrial radiation, we expect the altitude of minimum radiation to be approximately 700 ft. Of particular interest is the non- monotonic region in the graph of the data from our previous experiment. We expect terrestrial radiation may be scattered or reflected by the atmosphere

Payload Experiment Significance (1) Radiation will be measured using scintillator probes which are much more sensitive to gamma radiation than Geiger Mueller tubes and can give as a more accurate picture of how radiation is distributed with altitude. (2) Radiation levels are suggested to be associated with changes in atmospheric conditions (such as cloud formation and global warming; chlorine production and ozone depletion) (3) Radiation levels are linked to the breakdown of DNA in organic tissue and so merit further study.

Planning of System Tests Payload – Scintillator probe: (a) consistency of data collection, (b) background counts, (c) isolation of ray sources. GPS – Locality tracking. Recovery – Ejection charges and chute deployment. Safety and RF Signals. Propulsion – (a) Inspection of parts (b) assembly supervision. Vehicle – Scale model launch. Camera – Video testing.

Safety Plans Prior to each project phase: Review system risks and mitigations. Review Safety Codes. Pass test on Safety Procedures. Sign Safety Statement.

Budget and Outreach Budget Current major purchases LOC Precision Magnum 3-E kit with plastic fins $291 Payload materials (scintillator, photomultiplier tube, casing, and accessories) $400 Subtotal $691 Imminent Purchases Recovery System and motor $500 Remaining payload components $500 Subtotal $1000 Outreach Continued exploration of fund raising strategies. We helped boy scouts earn their space exploration merit badges by providing information on space exploration and by helping the boys build and successfully launch the rockets on our baseball field.