Focus Topics and New Strategic Capabilities N. A. Schwadron, K. Kozarev, L. Townsend, M. Desai, M. A. Dayeh, F. Cucinotta, D. Hassler, H. Spence, M. PourArsalan,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMMREM Predicted Dose Rates for CRaTER N. Schwadron, L. Townsend, K. Kozarev, H. Spence, M. Golightly et al.
Advertisements

18-OCT-2005 Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center space radiation analysis group 1 Operational Aspects of Space Radiation Analysis October 18, 2005 Mark Weyland.
SEP Data Analysis and Data Products for EMMREM Mihir I. Desai & Arik Posner Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, Texas Mihir I. Desai & Arik Posner.
On the link between the solar energetic particles and eruptive coronal phenomena On the link between the solar energetic particles and eruptive coronal.
THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC TRANSPORT OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLES IN THE INNER HELIOSPHERE CRISM- 2011, Montpellier, 27 June – 1 July, Collaborators:
Yihua Zheng and Rebekah M. Evans Solar Energetic Particles (SEPs) Goals: identify SEPs in data, connect to drivers, identify characteristics of SEPs June.
OVERVIEW OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLE EVENT HAZARDS TO HUMAN CREWS Lawrence W. Townsend University of Tennessee.
June 21, 2011 Space Weather Enterprise Forum Human Safety and Response Preparedness John R. Allen, PhD NASA Headquarters Space Operations Mission Directorate.
Targeted Outcome: Phase , Safeguarding our Outbound Journey Determine Extremes of the Variable Radiation & Space Environments at Earth, Moon,
A General Cone Model Approach to Heliospheric CMEs and SEP Modeling Magnetogram-based quiet corona and solar wind model The SEPs are modeled as a passive.
NASA Sun-Solar System Connection Roadmap 1 Targeted Outcome: Phase , Safeguarding our Outbound Journey Determine Extremes of the Variable Radiation.
10-year vision for Solar/Heliosphere area Scenario: Simulations of the time-dependent corona and solar wind based on incoming and archived solar magnetograph.
What are the Forms of Hazardous Radiation? Stanley B. Curtis Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, ret. & Dept. of Environmental Health University of.
NASA Sun-Solar System Connection Roadmap 1 Targeted Outcome: Phase , Safeguarding our Outbound Journey Determine Extremes of the Variable Radiation.
GEANT-4/Spenvis User Meeting November 2006 Solar Energetic Particle Modelling Activities at ESA A.Glover 1, E. Daly 1,A. Hilgers 1, SEPEM Consortium 2.
03/18/091 Earth-Moon-Mars Radiation Environment Module: System Overview and Model Validation K. Kozarev, N. A. Schwadron, L. Townsend, M. Desai, M. A.
CISM SEP Modeling Background The major SEP events come from the CME-generated coronal and interplanetary shock(s) These “gradual”events can have a “prompt”
Practical Models of Solar Energetic Particle Transport Leon Kocharov Space Research Laboratory University of Turku, Finland Requirements.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology A New JPL Interplanetary Solar High- Energy.
GCR Methods in Radiation Transport F.A. Cucinotta And M.Y. Kim NASA Johnson Space Center.
Identifying Interplanetary Shock Parameters in Heliospheric MHD Simulation Results S. A. Ledvina 1, D. Odstrcil 2 and J. G. Luhmann 1 1.Space Sciences.
MHD Modeling of the Large Scale Solar Corona & Progress Toward Coupling with the Heliospheric Model.
Acute Radiation Risks and Countermeasures for Space Radiation Francis A. Cucinotta NASA, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, TX October 30, 2006.
NASA Sun-Solar System Connection Roadmap 1 Targeted Outcome: Phase , Safeguarding our Outbound Journey Determine Extremes of the Variable Radiation.
RT Modelling of CMEs Using WSA- ENLIL Cone Model
Modeling suprathermal proton acceleration by an ICME within 0.5 AU: the May 13, 2005 event K. A. Kozarev 1,5 R. M. Evans 2, M. A. Dayeh.
Tuija I. Pulkkinen Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki, Finland
Modeling Coronal Acceleration of Solar Energetic Protons K. A. Kozarev, R. M. Evans, N. A. Schwadron, M. A. Dayeh, M. Opher, K. E. Korreck NESSC Meeting,
Solar Energetic Particle Events: An Overview Christina Cohen Caltech.
Outline of WG 2 Sessions: Interplanetary Phenomena Working Group Leaders: Ian Richardson and Ilia Roussev.
System for Radiation Environment characterization (fluxes, doses, dose equivalents at Earth, Moon and Mars) on hourly thru yearly time frame Example: Snapshots.
From Nymik- COSPAR. SPE estimates from Artic Ice- Core Nitrate Samples.
195 Å image – behind 195 Å image – Sun- Earth line – SOHO/ EIT image 195 Å image – Sun- Earth line – SOHO/ EIT image 195 Å image – ahead SECCHI Extreme.
Comparison of the 3D MHD Solar Wind Model Results with ACE Data 2007 SHINE Student Day Whistler, B. C., Canada C. O. Lee*, J. G. Luhmann, D. Odstrcil,
GCR Primaries (See Wilson et al. poster for latest CRaTER proton albedo map) RELATIVE CONTRIBUTIONS OF GALACTIC COSMIC RAYS AND LUNAR PARTICLE ALBEDO TO.
C. J. Joyce, 1 N. A. Schwadron, 1 L. W. Townsend, 2 R. A. Mewaldt, 3 C. M. S. Cohen, 3 T. T. von Rosenvinge, 4 A. W. Case, 5 H. E. Spence, 1 J. K. Wilson,
M. Kim and F. Cucinotta Example Solar Proton Event Data NASA JSC August 30, 2006.
AFRL/CISM Collaborations
The SEP Acceleration and Transport Link of the Chain
C. J.Joyce 1, J. B. Blake 2, A. W. Case 3, M. Golightly 1, J. C. Kasper 3, J. Mazur 2, N. A. Schwadron 1, E. Semones 4, S. Smith 1, H. E. Spence 1, L.
The Community Coordinated Modeling Center: A Brief Overview NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Lika Guhathakurta
Living With a Star (LWS) and the Vision for Exploration LWS Mission Goal: Develop the scientific understanding necessary to effectively address those aspects.
1 20 January 2005: Session Summary SHINE 2006 Zermatt, Utah, 31 July - 4 August Invited Talks Riley: what was the Alfven speed in the corona at.
Radiation on Planetary Surfaces M. S. Clowdsley 1, G. DeAngelis 2, J. W. Wilson 1, F. F. Badavi 3, and R. C. Singleterry 1 1 NASA Langley Research Center,
Space Radiation Health Effects of Astronauts in Explorative Missions
1 Organ Dose and Organ Dose Equivalent Rate Calculations from October 26, 2003 (Halloween Event) Solar Energetic Particle (SEP) Event using Earth-Moon-
LIP & ESA 18121/04/NL/CH MarsREC An integrated tool for Mars Radiation Environment Characterization and Effects 5º longitude.
Earth-Moon-Mars Radiation Environment Model N. A. Schwadron, K. Kozarev, L. Townsend, M. Desai, M. A. Dayeh, F. Cucinotta, D. Hassler, H. Spence, M. Pourars,
Risk Management Strategies During Solar Particle Events on Human Missions to the Moon and Mars: The Myths, the Grail, and the Reality By Dr. Ronald Turner.
SHINE 2006 Student Day Working Group III summary Zermatt, Utah, July 31 - August 4 Gang Li.
C. J. Joyce, 1 N. A. Schwadron, 1 L. W. Townsend, 2 R. A. Mewaldt, 3 C. M. S. Cohen, 3 T. T. von Rosenvinge, 4 A. W. Case, 5 H. E. Spence, 1 J. K. Wilson,
The Suprathermal Tail Properties are not well understood; known contributors Heated solar wind Interstellar and inner source pickup ions Prior solar and.
Solar Storm Radiation Model (SStoRM) Prepared by: Joshua Lande–Marlboro College, VT and Ron Turner–ANSER, 2900 South Quincy Street, Suite 800, Arlington,
Dose Predictions for Moon Astronauts Image Source: Nicholas Bachmann, Ian Rittersdorf Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences.
Approaches to forecasting radiation risk from Solar Energetic Particles Silvia Dalla (1), Mike Marsh (2) & Timo Laitinen (1) (1) University of Central.
08/4/2009NAS - SHINE-Suprathermal Radial Evolution (1-11 AU) of Pickup Ions and Suprathermal Ions in the Heliosphere N. A. Schwadron Boston University,
Lunar Surface Atmosphere Spectrometer (LSAS) Objectives: The instrument LSAS is designed to study the composition and structure of the Lunar atmosphere.
Breakout Session F: Anomalous and Galactic Cosmic Rays Rick Leske and Maher Dayeh 5 presentations…and lots of discussion.
1 Test Particle Simulations of Solar Energetic Particle Propagation for Space Weather Mike Marsh, S. Dalla, J. Kelly & T. Laitinen University of Central.
A Global Hybrid Simulation Study of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Moon David Schriver ESS 265 – June 2, 2005.
Probabilistic Solar Energetic Particle Models James H. Adams, Jr.1, William F. Dietrich 2 and Michael.A.Xapsos 3 1 NASA Marshall Space Flight Center 2.
N. A. Schwadron1, M. Gorby2, J. Linker2, P. Riley2, T. Torok2, C
Pulkkinen, A., M. Kuznetsova, Y. Zheng, L. Mays and A. Wold
Martian Radiation Env. Modelling Tools (QinetiQ)
ARTEMIS – solar wind/ shocks
Modeling the SEP/ESP Event of December 13, 2006
Earth-Moon-Mars Radiation Environment Model
Student Day Working Group III summary
Probabilistic Solar Particle Flux Forecast Modeling
Richard B. Horne British Antarctic Survey Cambridge UK
Presentation transcript:

Focus Topics and New Strategic Capabilities N. A. Schwadron, K. Kozarev, L. Townsend, M. Desai, M. A. Dayeh, F. Cucinotta, D. Hassler, H. Spence, M. PourArsalan, K. Korreck, R. Squier, M. Golightly, G. Zank, X. Ao, M. Kim, C. Zeitlin, G. Li, O. Verkhoglyadova

Current Capabilities Acute time-dependent radiation environment near Earth, Moon, Mars and throughout the inner heliosphere Linear-Energy-Spectra at the Moon (LET spectra through the heliosphere underway) Testing/model validation via comparison to Ulysses, CRaTER, Marie Radiation environment specified from energetic particle simulations (e.g., PATH code and LFM-Helio coupling underway) Radiation environment through Mars atmosphere Radiation environment through Earth’s atmosphere nearing completion

Module Availability Open source software available on request and distributed through subversion Module Web Interface through the EMMREM Website Module delivered and installed at the CCMC –BRYNTRN radiation transport model running in real time –Working on coupling between BRYNTRN and the ReleASE model EMMREM delivered and up and running at the Space Radiation Group (SRAG)

Drivers, Boundary Conditions, Model Integration Boundary conditions specified from observed energetic particle fluxes and solar wind measurements from spacecraft at or inside 1 AU (Helios, ACE, GOES, SOHO) Model Coupling –MHD models (e.g., ENLIL, LFM-Helio) specify the plasma environment through which energetic particle simulations run Energetic particle modules couple to ENLIL, which in turn has inner BC’s from source surface models using synoptic maps and photospheric magnetograms Coupling with Modeled CMEs (e.g., Cone Model CMEs via ENLIL) –Radiation environment coupled with particle simulations (particle simulation codes become drivers) –Radiation environment from predictive models using energetic particle precursors (e.g., coupling to the Release model)

Future Capabilities Needed Probabilistic solar particle flux forecast modeling Coupling between EMMREM and integrated risk models for comprehensive SPE scenario models Radiation environment from extreme events –How bad can the environment be? –How probable are extreme events? –What is the physics behind extreme events? Further modeling of events with BC’s from inside 1 AU to validate forecasting methods –Messenger –Events and coupling with Release model –Future: Solar Orbiter, Solar Probe Plus

Future - Physics of SEPs Determine Peak intensity and Fluence gradients inside 1 AU Role of CME shocks vs flares (e.g., determine coronal heights where CMEs first drive SEP-producing shocks) CME shock acceleration efficiency (e.g., quasi-parallel vs quasi- perp, preceding CMEs, seed particle variability) Generation and dissipation of self-excited waves and their effects on streaming limits and rigidity-dependent spectral breaks Role of rigidity-dependent scattering and diffusion on particle fluxes at 1 AU Multiple observational vantage points beyond 1 AU to determine gradients, understand transport, and validate models (e.g., Cassini, Mars missions, planetary probes)

7 EMMREM Framework Schwadron et al., Space Weather Journal, 2010

EMMREM: Primary Transport Energetic Particle Radiation Environment Module (EPREM) Physical 3-D kinetic mode for the transport of energetic particles in a Lagrangian field- aligned grid (Kota, 2005) including pitch-angle scattering, curvature and gradient drift, perpendicular transport Capable of simulating transport of protons electrons and heavier ions Currently driven by data at 1 AU (Goes, SOHO/ERNE) Run on an event-by-event basis

9 EPREM simulations Kozarev et al., submitted to SWJ Dayeh et al., submitted to SWJ

Source reveals extremely broad longitudinal distribution

11 EMMREM: Secondary Transport Radiation transport – Input is time series from EPREM. - BRYNTRN (BaRYoN TraNsport) code for light ions, primarily for SEP calculations; - HZETRN code for high Z primary and secondary ions transport – for SEP and GCR calculations; Look-up tables for Mars atmosphere. - HETC-HEDS (High-Energy Transport Code – Human Exploration and Development of Space) Monte Carlo code; Look-up tables for Earth atmosphere Scenarios - Earth - Moon - Mars - Interplanetary Completed EMMREM framework capable of performing radiation calculations that account for time-dependent positions, spacecraft and human geometry, spacesuit shielding, atmospheres and surface habitats.

Doses exceed limits with spacesuit shielding, below limits for spacecraft shielding

Dose rate and dose at Martian atmospheric heights

Radiation Exposure from Large SPE Events BFO dose rate during Aug SPE Event Cumulative dose Myung-Hee et al., 2006

15 Coupling to MHD Coupling between EPREM and WSA/Enlil

16 Kozarev et al., submitted to SWJ Testing coupling to WSA/Enlil runs with cone model Coupling to a new MHD code being developed at BU (LFM-helio) underway Coupling to MHD

Results of Physics-Based Simulated Event (PATH Code)

18 EMMREM Web interface Currently available: - GOES proton input - EPREM runs on request - BRYNTRN runs on request - Sim results visualization New functionality soon: - Mars radiation environment - LET specra for comparison with CraTER - Earth atmospheric radiation environment - Catalogue of historical events with radiation environment information

19 EMMREM at CCMC Delivered and installed EMMREM successfully. More information about the model at: =EMMREM

Space Radiation Environment Integrated Risk Projection Radiation Shielding Initial Cellular and Tissue Damage DNA breaks, tissue microlesions DNA repair, Recombination, Cell cycle checkpoint, Apoptosis, Mutation, Persistent oxidative damage, & Genomic Instability Tissue and Immune Responses Risks: Acute Radiation Syndromes Cancer Cataracts Neurological Disorders Mitigation: - Shielding materials - Radioprotectants -Pharmaceuticals Risk j (age,sex,mission) Risk Assessment: -Dosimetry -Biomarkers -Uncertainties -Space Validation Risks: Chronic: Cancer, Cataracts, Central Nervous System, Heart Disease Acute: Lethality, Sickness, Performance EMMREM

Major Questions for Acute Risk Models What are the dose-rate modification (DRM) effects for SPE Acute risks? What are the Relative Biological Effectieness (RBE’s) for protons and secondaries? How do DRM and RBE’s vary with Acute risks? Are there synergistic effects from other flight stressors (microgravity, stress, bone loss) or GCR on Acute risks? For which Acute risks are countermeasures needed? How can the effectiveness of Acute countermeasures be evaluated and extrapolated to Humans?

Acute Radiation Risks Research Overall Objectives –Accurate Risk assessment models support Permissible Exposure Limits (PEL) Determination Informed Consent Process Operational Procedures –Dosimetry –EVA timelines –Solar Forecasting Requirements Shielding Requirements Countermeasure (CM) Requirements Approach –Probabilistic Risk Assessment applied to Solar Particle Events (SPE) –Models of acute risks used to evaluate acute CMs for SPE and Lunar Surface conditions –EMMREM provides a tool to evaluate and assess acute risks

Probabilistic Solar Particle Flux Forecast Modeling

SPE Database for the Recent Solar Cycles

Propensity of SPEs: Hazard Function of Offset  Distribution Density Function  =1783 rd day Typical Nonspecific Future Cycle Model-based Prediction of SPE Frequency based on the Measurements of SPE Flux

Approaches 1.Cumulative frequency distribution of recorded SPEs 2.Model for the realistic application and the dependence of multiple SPEs:  Non-constant hazard function defined for the best propensity of SPE data in space era  Non-homogenous Poisson process model for SPE frequency in an arbitrary mission period  Cumulative probability of SPE occurrence during a given mission period using fitted Poisson model 3. Simulation of  30, 60, or 100 distribution for each mission periods by a random draw from Gamma distribution