ASTM Ball Task Force Update SGMA Annual Meeting Dallas, Texas, October 2, 2003 Lloyd Smith, Washington State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ANALYSIS OF THE LIGHT WEIGHT DEFLECTOMETER IN-SITU STRESS AND STRAIN
Advertisements

DLS VERIFICATION TESTING FIELD TESTS TO CHECK DLS OPERATIONS.
AND ELEMENTS OF MACHINES
Travis Frank Ned Feltham Corey Clarke Shawn Belliveau
P10505 – Cold Pressure Fusing II Performance Review Team Fusion 5/7/2010.
What’s the Deal with the Humidor? 1 Alan Nathan University of Illinois El Tiante.
Why ASTM F2219? SGMA Annual Meeting Dallas, Texas, October 2, 2003 Lloyd Smith, Washington State University.
Air Flow Bench Presented By: Saket Karajgikar & Nikhil Lakhkar Advisor: Prof. Dereje Agonafer.
The National Crash Analysis Center The George Washington University Un-Constrained Models Comparison For Elastic Roof – Production Roof – Strong Pillars.
B Persson, LTH Building Materials, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden ON THE TEMPERATURE EFFECT ON SELF-DESICCATION OF CONCRETE Experimental setup: l 250.
How to find the heavier one by weighing 2 times only?
Paul Kendall Alex Perez.  Virtually all of a cars linear energy is transferred to the brakes as thermal energy.  The faster the car stops, the less.
P.V. PANEL WIND LOAD EFFECTS M ARCH 2011 Arman Hemmati, Brady Zaiser, Chaneel Park, Jeff Symons, Katie Olver Interim Review II TEAM 12.
Kansas State University Biomechanics Lab Center of Percussion & the sweet spot Earlier studies indicated that the COP is the sweet spot, the best place.
Generic Simulation Approach for Multi-Axis Machining, Part 2: Model Calibration and Feed Rate Scheduling Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering.
Measurement of Kinematics Viscosity Purpose Design of the Experiment Measurement Systems Measurement Procedures Uncertainty Analysis – Density – Viscosity.
Quality Control Testing
1.  100% Servo-Electric Motion Control  Three independent drives  Quick Change Tool load/unload  Advanced Controls  Lean cell Friendly  Rigid Construction.
By Narain Hariharan Aishwarya Baranikumar
Hardness Ability to resist deformation, penetration, wear, abrasion, and cutting. Surface, or uniform throughout the metal. Brinell and Rockwell Hardness.
Compressed Air Piping Systems by Asahi/America
Bouncing Balls 1 Bouncing Balls. Bouncing Balls 2 Introductory Question If you place a tennis ball on a basketball and drop this stack on the ground,
Polyvinyl Acetate Adhesives Forestry 485 Lecture 3-4.
When Ash Meets Cowhide: The Physics of the Ball-Bat Collision Alan M
April 4-5, 2003 Summit Meeting 1 April 4-5, 2003 Summit Meeting Oklahoma City, OK.
Robust Design Integrated Product and Process Development MeEn 475/476 “Great Product, Solid, and just always works.” - CNET user review of MacBook Pro.
Module 1, Part 3: Process validation Slide 1 of 22 © WHO – EDM – 12/2001 Validation Part 3: Process validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing.
Kettering University, Flint, MI
MUEV Phase III By: Kevin Jaris & Nathan Golick. Introduction Petroleum is a finite resource. Demand for clean energy is driving the increase in the production.
Forces in 1 Dimension Chapter Force and Motion Force is push or pull exerted on object Forces change motion –Makes it important to know the forces.
BIOMECHANICS OF WORK.
Sampling and Testing Concrete Mixes MATERIAL TESTING LABORATORY
States of Matter! Molecules are vibrating. Molecules are moving faster. Definite volume No definite shape Definite volume Definite shape From CPO focus.
Certain situations exist where:  If one quantity increases, the other quantity also increases.  If one quantity increases, the other quantity decreases.
Physics in Your Life: Softball Alexa Geiswhite Period 11 January 22, 2008.
Measurement of density and kinematic viscosity
SGMA Meeting Dallas, October 2, 2003 Go Red Sox! Page 1 The Trampoline Effect: What is it all about? Alan M. Nathan Department of Physics University of.
EQ: What changes an object’s motion?. Friction and Gravity  What happens when you jump on a sled on the side of a snow-covered hill?  What happens at.
Section Notes Physical science focuses on nonliving things.
Chapter 5 Outline Applying Newton’s Laws Statics Dynamics Friction Static friction Kinetic friction Fluid resistance Circular Motion Fundamental forces.
Concrete Field Sampling
Bouncing Balls 1 Bouncing Balls. Bouncing Balls 2 Introductory Question If you place a tennis ball on a basketball and drop this stack on the ground,
Johnny Fajardo. Statement of Problem In hitting for distance, which bat allows a farther hit, a wood one or a corked one.
High Speed Test Results ASA Equipment Testing & Certification Committee Oklahoma, OK April 5-6, 2003 Lloyd Smith, Ph.D., P.E.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
University of Kentucky April 25, 2003 Page 1 When Ash Meets Cowhide: The Physics of the Baseball-Bat Collision Colloquium, U. of Kentucky, April 25, 2003.
My Inner Planets By Gabriela Mendoza Mercury Mercury’s minimum distance from Earth is 48 million miles. A year in Mercury is equal to Earth days.
Friction, Gravity, & Elastic Forces
Barometry  Evangelista Torricelli credited with invention of barometer.  Gasparo Berti may have been first.
Welcome EIE Instruments Pvt Ltd. Use Mortar Testing Equipment To Determine Cement Or Mortar Compressive Strength Builders and construction industry uses.
REDUCING VARIABILITY IN TEST RESULTS
Airfoil in a Wind Tunnel Experiment #6
BEARINGS Suported by. Introduction Different types of bearing are used extensively throughout our machines to join stationary part to a moving part. Suported.
Kinetic Energy and Changes of State
Lab Tools.
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurement
D-Lab 2: Spindle March 17th 2008.
EXTENDED SURFACE HEAT TRANSFER EXPERIMENT
Friction, and Gravity.
Date of download: 11/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Lab 6 – The Impulse-Momentum Theorem
Receptacle Classifications
Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions
Potential and Kinetic Energy
FAA/GMU Project Development of AL MAT224 Dataset (V2.0)
Physical Science.
Evaporation vs. Boiling
Warm-Up! If you push horizontally on your textbook with a force of 1-N to make the book slide at a constant velocity, how much is the force of friction.
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurement
Presentation transcript:

ASTM Ball Task Force Update SGMA Annual Meeting Dallas, Texas, October 2, 2003 Lloyd Smith, Washington State University

1) Static vs. Dynamic Compression Objectives: –Do static and dynamic compression correlate for softballs? –Do COR values at 60 mph and 90 mph correlate? –Does impacting a load cell affect the measured ball COR? –Is the effect of speed on COR different for a cylindrical impact surface? Materials/Instructions: –Three balls types (44/375-leather, 47/375-synthetic, 44/525- leather) –2 manufacturers –Test 1 dozen from each manufacturer at 60 and 90 mph (6 dozen total)

1 ) Static vs. Dynamic Compression Test Procedure: –a) Condition balls to 50% relative humidity for 2 weeks, then weigh balls. –b) Static compression all balls (2 sides) –c) Wait 1 day (minimum) –d) Impact all balls against load cell (dynamic compression and COR) at 60 mph & 90 mph –e) Wait 1 day (minimum) –f) Impact 1 dozen 44/375 balls against a rigid plate (ball COR) –g) Wait 1 day (minimum) –h) Impact 1 dozen 44/375 balls against a round solid rod (mount rod to load cell if it doesn’t affect ball COR measurement)

2) Ball Conditioning Objectives: –What is the effect of humidity on ball COR and compression (static and dynamic)? –Does the ball heat up in high speed impacts? –How quickly does the ball degrade? Materials/Instructions: –.44/375 ball –2 manufacturers –Test 1 dozen from each manufacturer (2 dozen total) –Use dynamic compression setup on all COR tests –Measure ball temperature with non-contact infrared thermometer after each impact –Measure the ball diameter every ten impacts.

2) Ball Conditioning Test Procedure: –a) Condition balls to 30% relative humidity for 2 weeks (lab conditions). –b) Measure static compression, COR at 60 mph, and weight of all balls. –c) Condition balls to 50% relative humidity for 2 weeks. –d) Measure static compression, COR at 60 mph, and weight of all balls. –e) Impact 6 balls from each manufacturer 100 times consecutively at 90 mph. –f) Impact 6 balls from each manufacturer 10 times at 90 mph –g) Wait 1 hour (minimum) –h) Repeat f) & g) until each ball has been impacted 100 times.

3) Ball Scaling Objectives: –Verify that the effect of variation in ball COR and weight can be normalized when finding the BBS Materials/Instructions: –.44/375 ball –2 manufacturers –Test ½ dozen balls from each manufacturer (1 dozen total) –Use previous studies to select balls that fit the following criteria: COR Group: Static compression of ± 5 lbs Weight of ± oz COR varying ± 0.01 Weight Group: Static compression of ± 5 lbs COR of ± Weight varying from 6.25 oz to 6.75 oz

3) Ball Scaling Test Procedure: –a) Select high performance, durable bat –b) Impact the bat at 22.0” from pivot point 6 times with each ball. –c) Normalize the results. –d) Test each ball for static compression, dynamic compression, COR and measure the weight

Tasks 1) Static vs. Dynamic Compression –90% complete 2) Ball Conditioning –not started 3) Ball Scaling (Normalizing) –not started

Testing Sequence Study of 44/375 balls, 3 replicates COR (60 mph), Scan, (110 mph) –Comp/COR/Comp (Mfg A) 17% compression decrease –Comp/1 hr/Comp (Mfg B) 4% compression increase –COR/Comp/COR (Mfg A ) 0.2% COR increase –COR/Scan(5)/COR (Mfg B) 2% COR increase –COR/Scan(20)/COR (Mfg B) 2% COR increase –COR/Scan(40)/30 days/COR (Mfg B) 3% COR decrease

Measuring COR 60 mph 90 mph

60 mph COR vs. 90 mph COR

Average COR Comparison

Dynamic Compression

Measuring Dynamic Compression 60 mph 90 mph

Effect of Load Cell on COR

Load Cell COR vs. Light Gate COR 60 mph 90 mph

Load Cell COR vs. Light Gate COR 110 mph

Static vs. Dynamic Compression 60 mph 90 mph

Static vs. Dynamic Compression 60 mph 90 mph average variation: dynamic 0.8%, static 1.5%

Effect of Humidity Measurable effect on compression –20% RH change => ~ 40 lbs Small effect on COR

Some Ball Degradation Data /375 balls, Mfg B –Compression tested –Impacted bat 40 times –Compression tested again –Compression decreased 35 lbs –Standard deviation was 15 lbs

Summary Compression test should precede COR test Mandatory extra hits to measure ball COR Effect of load cell on measured ball COR appears small Dynamic and static compression correlate Some rate affects are apparent with dynamic compression Experimental measure of dynamic compression is ongoing