First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Policy and Programs Committee CSEFEL Proposal
Advertisements

Quality Rating & Improvement Systems Powerful Policy for Improving and Unifying Early Care and Education Anne Mitchell Early Childhood Policy Research.
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION/ CENTRAL CALIFORNIA MIGRANT HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEM CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEMS Training Plan * Outcomes Awareness.
The State Interagency Coordinating Council (SICC) conducted a stakeholder survey March 22 and April 17, 2013.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems IDEA Part C and Part B 619 Data Systems: More Findings from the DaSy Center Needs Assessment Donna Spiker.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Excellence Counts in Early Learning and School Age Care CENTER FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION.
Embedding the Early Brain & Child Development Framework into Quality Rating and Improvement Systems Meeting Name Presenter Name Date 1.
A Presentation at the 2013 QRIS National Meeting Camille Catlett FPG Child Development Institute (NC) Andy Gomm Family, Infant, and Toddler Program (NM)
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
RtI in Early Childhood Lisa Kelly-Vance, UNO and Kristy Feden, Papillion- LaVista Schools.
USDE and DHHS Listening and Learning Panel on Family Engagement
Addressing Disproportionality through Technical Assistance: A Case Study of New York Project 405 Team Metropolitan Center for Urban Education New York.
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
Speakers Dr. Blanca Enriquez, Director, Office of Head Start
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
Components of Quality Program Assessment Tools.  “Inclusion has legal status in legislation mandating educational services for all children with disabilities.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
EEC Board Policy and Research Committee Meeting April 7, 2014 Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge Grant (RTT-ELC)
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Wisconsin Departments of Health and Family Services (DHFS) And Public Instruction (DPI) OSEP Child Outcomes.
1 Peer Assistance and Coaching (PAC) Race to the Top – Early Learning Challenge Grant.
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs Overview to Trends and Issues in Quality Services Jane Nell Luster,
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
TOGETHER WE’RE BETTER Collaborative Approaches to Including Children With and Without Disabilities Camille Catlett & Jennie CoutureNovember 9, 2012.
Kelly Maxwell, Ph.D. Senior Scientist and Associate Director Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute TQRIS 2012 Inclusion.
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Using Data for Program Improvement Christina Kasprzak, NECTAC/ECO Ann Bailey, NCRRC July 2010.
Vermont’s Early Childhood & Family Mental Health Competencies A story of Integration & Collaboration  How can they help me?
Massachusetts State Advisory Council (SAC) on Early Childhood Education and Care Review of Grant and Work Plan December
1 General Supervision. 2 General Supervision (and Continuous Improvement) 1.What are the minimum Components for General Supervision ? 2.How do the Components.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 3http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
©2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 13 Using Program Assessments to Look at Children in Groups “Pointing the finger of blame at others.
Evaluation of the Indiana ECCS Initiative. State Context Previous Early Childhood System Initiatives –Step Ahead –Building Bright Beginnings SPRANS Grant.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems CEDS: Common Data Elements and Definitions for Part C and 619 Programs Meredith Miceli, OSEP Missy Cochenour,
Vermont Early Childhood MTSS
2009 OSEP Project Directors Meeting Martha Diefendorf, Kristin Reedy & Pat Mueller.
Using Data for Program Improvement State and Local Activities in Minnesota Lisa Backer: 619 Coordinator/Part C Data Manager Loraine Jensen: Part C Coordinator.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems IDEA Part C and Part B 619 Data Systems: More Findings from the DaSy Center Needs Assessment Donna Spiker.
Collaboration Between 619 and Delaware Stars Verna Thompson and Rena Hallam.
A University Center for Excellence in Developmental Disability Education, Research and Service (UCEDD) How Does the PED FOCUS TQRIS Support the Full Participation.
1 Early Intervention Monitoring Wyoming DDD April 2008 Training.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference, September 2014 Digging into “Data Use” Using the DaSy Framework.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision.
Understanding the Data on Preschool Child Find and Transition Annual Performance Report Indicator 12 February, 2016
Michele Winship, Ph.D.  Compliance with HB 153/SB 316 requirements?  Seek out and get rid of “bad” teachers? OR  Improve teaching.
Achieving Results: The Potential of QRIS
WELCOME TO FIT FOCUS.
Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Revisions Overview
Monitoring Child Outcomes: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems (DaSy)
Early Childhood Transition APR Indicators and National Trends
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems (DaSy)
OSEP “Hot Topics in Early Childhood” Meeting
Integrating Results into Accountability Procedures and Activities
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
The Norwalk Story: How one community is using the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ®) to build a system for developmental screening for young children.
Implementing, Sustaining and Scaling-Up High Quality Inclusive Preschool Policies and Practices: Application for Intensive TA September 10, 2019 Lise.
Presentation transcript:

First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part C.  The FIT Program contracts with 34 provider agencies across the state that serve one or multiple counties.  We serve over 13,000 children birth to age 3 and their a families.  And.. The Roadrunner is our state bird! In case you were wondering… 1DaSy Conference NM TQRIS

 Community Based Assessment – 2 day site visit looking at compliance issues  Annual Performance Report – FIT Providers collect and analyze their data 9 indicators and develop an improvement plan as part of a local APR  Focused monitoring – 1-2 day onsite review of a specific compliance area that has been determined through complaint, CBA or other mechanism to need attention. 2DaSy Conference NM TQRIS

3  Race To the Top – Early Learning Challenge grant application said NM will apply a TQRIS to: ▪ Child care ▪ Pre-K ▪ Head Start & Early Head Start ▪ Home Visiting ▪ Preschool Special Education ▪ Early Intervention – FIT Program

 TQRIS will be developed for each of the following: DaSy Conference NM TQRIS4

 My first reaction was – what this got to do with the FIT Program?  This is for classroom based programs…  This is for programs just starting out looking at quality…  This has to do with reimbursing providers at different rates… 5DaSy Conference NM TQRIS

 TQRIS criteria developed for center based settings building on a previous “Reach for the Stars” TQRIS system for child care DaSy Conference NM TQRIS6

 TQRIS criteria for center based settings:  Essential elements of quality will be used as a framework  Criteria will be developed specific to Part C early intervention DaSy Conference NM TQRIS7

A opportunity to shift:  From just measuring compliance to measuring quality practices  From state external monitoring to verification  From corrective action plans (from that external monitoring) to a Continuous Quality Improvement  From universal training and TA to targeted coaching and consultation to help agencies increase their quality …So we have moved from skeptic to champions 8DaSy Conference NM TQRIS

9  Tiered – Incentives and expectations provided based upon designation of providers at various levels of quality  Quality – Evidence based practices to be measured that will promote child development and support families.  Rating - determined though the use of a number of tools  Improvement – Improvement activities to improve performance  System – to be applied to all early childhood program with common framework, but criteria and tools specific to each early learning program

 Stakeholder group will help develop TQRIS criteria based on:  DEC recommended practices,  NECTAC Key Principles and Practices  Literature review  Professional wisdom  Stakeholders will:  Help determine a set of guiding principles for the TQRIS development, and  Make recommendations regarding criteria selection DaSy Conference NM TQRIS10

 Potential FIT TQRIS criteria (examples only):  Quality IFSPs  Evaluation and Assessment practices  Quality Early Intervention Practices (observational tool)  Transdisciplinary Team Practices  Inclusion Practices  Reflective Practices / reflective supervision  Practices for working with specific disabilities  Cultural and language (incl. Support for dual language learners)  Staff Qualifications & Professional Development DaSy Conference NM TQRIS11

DaSy Conference NM TQRIS12  Early Intervention Quality Practices:  Provider agency receives training and coaching in the use of an “observational tool” to assess implementation of quality practices by staff  Provider agency utilizes video or direct observation of early intervention session to form basis for reflection with staff on their implementation of quality practices  Provider agency utilizes results of tool to address staff’s need for professional development (mentorship, training etc.)  FIT Program verifies provider agencies use of tool with fidelity and that they addressed staff’s support needs.

DaSy Conference NM TQRIS13  Quality EI Practices (example only): 3 Star4 Star5 Star Agency conducts observation tool with staff irregularly Agency conducts observation tool with staff at least once a year Agency conducts observation tool with staff at least twice a year Agency conducts observational tool with poor level of fidelity Agency conducts observational tool with some fidelity Agency conducts observational tool with a high level fidelity Agency conducts inconsistent professional development with staff identified as needing improvement Agency conducts good professional development with staff identified as needing improvement Agency conducts strong professional development with staff identified as needing improvement

 Need to determine how we will incorporate the NM Early Learning Guidelines into our TQRIS. DaSy Conference NM TQRIS14

DaSy Conference NM TQRIS15

DaSy Conference NM TQRIS16  Hired a FOCUS TQRIS lead for the FIT Program  Contract established with University of NM to:  Help develop and validate quality assessment tools  Provide training and coaching in use of tool(s) and how to improve quality.  Foundational training in use of video & reflective supervision  Work with ICC Quality Committee and expanded stakeholder group to develop quality criteria  Work closely with other early learning programs to promote alignment.

DaSy Conference NM TQRIS17  Now – Summer 2015  Develop quality criteria and tools  Establish video technology demonstration projects (through Dec 2016)  Summer Summer 2016  Pilot TQRIS criteria and tools with 4-5 providers  Verify agency’s quality rating star level.  Validate tools and change as needed.  Validate overall TQRIS star rating rubric  Establish statewide standards and policies and procedures, including incentives and timelines  Role out TQRIS statewide over 1-2 years.

DaSy Conference NM TQRIS18

DaSy Conference NM TQRIS19