Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Concrete Carbonation Frédéric Duprat Alain Sellier Materials and Durability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optimal Shape Design of Membrane Structures Chin Wei Lim, PhD student 1 Professor Vassili Toropov 1,2 1 School of Civil Engineering 2 School of Mechanical.
Advertisements

Structural reliability analysis with probability- boxes Hao Zhang School of Civil Engineering, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia Michael Beer Institute.
Hongjie Zhang Purge gas flow impact on tritium permeation Integrated simulation on tritium permeation in the solid breeder unit FNST, August 18-20, 2009.
Workshop at Indian Institute of Science 9-13 August, 2010 Bangalore India Fire Safety Engineering & Structures in Fire Organisers:CS Manohar and Ananth.
Explosive joining of dissimilar metals: experiment and numerical modeling Anan’ev S.Yu., Andreev A.V., Deribas A.A., Yankovskiy B.D. Joint Institute for.
Cracking, Deflections and Ductility Code Provisions and Recent Research October 2006 Serviceability and Ductility The Other Limit States.
Investigation of Consolidation Promoting Effect by Field and Model Test for Vacuum Consolidation Method Nagasaki University H.Mihara Y.Tanabasi Y.Jiang.
IFB 2012 Materials Selection in Mechanical Design
An Experimental Study and Fatigue Damage Model for Fretting Fatigue
Distribution of Microcracks in Rocks Uniform As in igneous rocks where microcrack density is not related to local structures but rather to a pervasive.
João Paulo Pereira Nunes
Activity and Concentration Activity – “effective concentration” Ion-ion and ion-H 2 O interactions (hydration shell) cause number of ions available to.
OUTLINE SPATIAL VARIABILITY FRAGILITY CURVES MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS CONCLUSIONS EFFECTS DESIGN RECOMMEND BEARING CAPACITY OF HETEROGENEOUS SOILS APPENDIXOUTLINE.
Micromechanics Contribution to the Analysis of Diffusion Properties Evolution in Cement-Based Materials Undergoing Carbonation Processes Journées Scientifiques.
Brief Presentation of CATFOAM: LTTE Foam Particulate Filter Modeling Approach and Software Volos, December.
Erdem Acar Sunil Kumar Richard J. Pippy Nam Ho Kim Raphael T. Haftka
Reliability based design optimization Probabilistic vs. deterministic design – Optimal risk allocation between two failure modes. Laminate design example.
MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements Practical considerations in FEM modeling Prof. Suvranu De.
Lecture #19 Failure & Fracture
Purdue University School of Civil Engineering West West Lafayette, Indiana Autogenous Shrinkage, Residual Stress, and Cracking In Cementitious Composites:
Computational Fracture Mechanics
Constraining and size effects in lead-free solder joints
Tests of Hardened Concrete. Stress Balance for equilibrium  loads = external forces  internal forces = stress Axial tension.
Mechanical characterization of lead- free solder joints J. Cugnoni*, A. Mellal*, Th. J. Pr. J. Botsis* * LMAF / EPFL EMPA Switzerland.
University of Stuttgart Institute of Construction Materials (IWB) 1/34 Discrete Bond Element for 3D Finite Element Analysis of RC Structures Steffen Lettow.
Prof. Sarosh H Lodi NED University of Engineering and Technology What Works and Does not Work in the Science and Social Science of Earthquake Vulnerability,
Concrete 2011 Time to Dump the Rectangular Stress Block? Doug Jenkins - Interactive Design Services.
CHAPTER 8 APPROXIMATE SOLUTIONS THE INTEGRAL METHOD
Interval-based Inverse Problems with Uncertainties Francesco Fedele 1,2 and Rafi L. Muhanna 1 1 School of Civil and Environmental Engineering 2 School.
“Investigating the Effect of Nano-Silica on Recycled Aggregate Concrete” Colby Mire & Jordan Licciardi Advisor: Mohamed Zeidan ET 493.
ECE/ChE 4752: Microelectronics Processing Laboratory
COLUMNS. COLUMNS Introduction According to ACI Code 2.1, a structural element with a ratio of height-to least lateral dimension exceeding three used.
1. By Dr. Attaullah Shah Swedish College of Engineering and Technology Wah Cantt. CE-401 Reinforced Concrete Design-II.
Introduction to virtual engineering László Horváth Budapest Tech John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics Institute of Intelligent Engineering.
Technical University of Łódź Department of Strength of Material and Structures M.Kotelko, Z. Kołakowski, R.J. Mania LOAD-BEARING CAPACITY OF THIN-WALLED.
PROBABILISTIC MODELLING OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES DEGRADATION B. Teplý, P. Rovnaníková, P. Rovnaník, D. Vořechovská Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic.
Sykora & Holicky - Durability Assessment of Large Surfaces… 1 Durability Assessment of Large Surfaces Using Standard Reliability Methods M. Sykora & M.
Lehký, Keršner, Novák – Determination of concrete statistics using fracture test and inv. analysis based on FraMePID-3PB DETERMINATION OF STATISTICAL MATERIAL.
Brussels, February 2008 – Dissemination of information workshop1 EUROCODES Background and Applications EN :2006 Eurocode 2 – Design of Concrete.
Component Reliability Analysis
Engineering Doctorate – Nuclear Materials Development of Advanced Defect Assessment Methods Involving Weld Residual Stresses If using an image in the.
Random Finite Element Modeling of thermomechanical behavior of AGR bricks Jose David Arregui Mena, Louise Lever, Graham Hall, Lee Margetts, Paul Mummery.
BsysE595 Lecture Basic modeling approaches for engineering systems – Summary and Review Shulin Chen January 10, 2013.
Application of the Direct Optimized Probabilistic Calculation Martin Krejsa Department of Structural Mechanics Faculty of Civil Engineering VSB - Technical.
Concrete 2003 Brisbane July 2003 Design Of Pre-cast Buried Structures For Internal Impact Loading.
Msc. eng. Magdalena German Faculty of Civil Engineering Cracow University of Technology Budapest, Simulation of damage due to corrosion in RC.
6. Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics
Casing Integrity in Hydrate Bearing Sediments Reem Freij-Ayoub, Principal Research Engineer CESRE Wealth from Oceans.
Diffusional Limitation in Immobilized Enzyme System Immobilized enzyme system normally includes - insoluble immobilized enzyme - soluble substrate, or.
1 Corrosion Induced Cracking: Analytical and Non-Linear Fracture mechanics Modelling OSTRAVA Institute of Structural Mechanics Faculty of Civil.
294-7: Effects of Polyacrylamide (PAM) Treated Soils on Water Seepage in Unlined Water Delivery Canals Jianting (Julian) Zhu 1, Michael H. Young 2 and.
Karst Chemistry II. Conductivity – Specific Conductance Conductance – the electrical conductivity of aqueous solution, and is directly related to the.
Two problems with gas discharges 1.Anomalous skin depth in ICPs 2.Electron diffusion across magnetic fields Problem 1: Density does not peak near the.
Safety and soil-structure interaction: a question of scales Denys BREYSSE CDGA, Université Bordeaux I Probamat – JHU Baltimore – 5-7/01/2005.
SP2Support WP 2.1Track bed quality assessment Task Numerical modelling of poor quality sites First phase report on the modelling of poor.
Numerical Simulations of Atmospheric Carbonation in Concrete Components of a Deep Geological Intermediate Low Level Waste Disposal NUCPERF 2012 P. Thouvenot.
Probabilistic Design Systems (PDS) Chapter Seven.
Probabilistic safety in a multiscale and time dependent model Probabilistic safety in a multiscale and time dependent model for suspension cables S. M.
Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran A Probabilistic Approach To Modeling Fatigue.
1 ROAD & BRIDGE RESEARCH INSTITUTE WARSAW Juliusz Cieśla ASSESSSMENT OF PRESTRESSING FORCE IN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BRIDGE SPANS BY THE PROOF LOAD.
Moisture Diffusion and Long-term Deformation of Concrete
Methods  Two codes were coupled together to establish a robust simulator for thermo-hydro-mechanic-chemical coupling issue raised in CCS projects, as.
Long term behaviour of glass and steel in interaction with argillite in deep geological conditions O. Bildstein (1), V. Devallois (1), V. Pointeau (1),
How long will your concrete bridge last?
Optimal design of composite pressure vessel by using genetic algorithm
Chapter 3 Component Reliability Analysis of Structures.
Christopher R. McGann, Ph.D. Student University of Washington
RAM XI Training Summit October 2018
CE-401 Reinforced Concrete Design-II
Service Life Prediction Model for Concrete Structures
Presentation transcript:

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Concrete Carbonation Frédéric Duprat Alain Sellier Materials and Durability of Constructions Laboratory INSA / UPS - Toulouse - France

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results CO 2 CO 2 pressure on external edges for most of concrete structures CO 2 ingress: carbonation

CO 2 Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results CO 2 pressure on external edges for most of concrete structures CO 2 ingress: carbonation Precipitation of calcite

CO 2 Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results CO 2 pressure on external edges for most of concrete structures CO 2 ingress: carbonation Precipitation of calcite Dissolution of calcium fixed by cement hydrates

CO 2 Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results CO 2 pressure on external edges for most of concrete structures CO 2 ingress: carbonation Precipitation of calcite Dissolution of calcium fixed by cement hydrates Decrease of pH in pore solution

CO 2 pressure on external edges for most of concrete structures CO 2 ingress: carbonation Precipitation of calcite Dissolution of calcium fixed by cement hydrates Decrease of pH in pore solution Favourable conditions to initiation and development of corrosion CO 2 Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results

c Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results Physical parameters: - diffusion coefficient - concrete cover thickness Predicting model Mean values Given date: depassivation no depassivation

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results Physical parameters: - diffusion coefficient - concrete cover thickness Predicting model Given date: depassivation no depassivation Mean values Random incertainties c c  (c) Laws of probability

Physical parameters: - diffusion coefficient - concrete cover thickness Predicting model Given date: depassivation no depassivation Mean values Random incertainties Laws of probability Probabilistic approach Given date: probability of depassivation e Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results

Diffusion term Capacity term Concentration Porosity Saturation Diffusion Sink term : precipitation of calcite Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results

g CO 2  Strongly non-linear term Numerical instability around the carbonation front Change of variable Agressive species CO 2g Dissolved species Ca S Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Diffusion term Capacity term Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Strongly non-linear term Numerical instability around the carbonation front Change of variable Diffusion term Capacity term Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results Agressive species CO 2g Dissolved species Ca S

All consumed CO 2 reacts with Ca S in hydrates < (a) <10 -2 negligible (D eq ) non-linear Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Diffusion term Capacity term Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Diffusion term Capacity term Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results

G Ca Sm Ca SM D eqm D eqM D eq Ca S D eq (Ca S ) L Conservation of flow Ca S(G) D eq * Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Diffusion term Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results

Influence of cracking Reference diffusion Tortuousity, connectivity of cracks Tension volumic strain Gazeous diffusion Magnifying the diffusion coefficient Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results Equivalent Ca S diffusion coefficient field Mechanical strain field Loading and mechanical properties Magnified CO 2 diffusion coefficient field Physical properties: CO 2 diffusion coefficients tortuousity, saturation degree Initial condition: Ca S =2500 mol/m 3 Initial equivalent Ca S diffusion coefficient field Boundary condition: Ca S =0 along the edges t=t 0 Solid calcium field: Ca S Convergence for Ca S field ? no t=t f ? yes t=t +  t no Start End yes

Practical application: reinforced concrete beam 6 m 25 cm 5.2 kN/m 55 cm E b MPa m 2 /s m 2 /s  0.5  0.15 S r 0.3 Carbonation profiles 1month5 years20 years35 years 50 years Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results

Carbonation depth Carbonated zone Ca S << 2500 mol/m 3 Non-carbonated zone Ca S = 2500 mol/m 3 A B AB Non-carbonated Ca S profiles between A and B E b MPa m 2 /s m 2 /s  0.5  0.15 S r 0.3 Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Practical application: reinforced concrete beam Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results 6 m 5.2 kN/m 25 cm 55 cm

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results Diffusion coefficient Tortuousity / Connectivity Concrete Young's modulus Loading Cover thickness G(U) = 0 u1u1 u2u2 Concrete cover c AB P*  O Carbonation depth d AB Finite element analysis Failure G(U) < 0 [ c AB < d AB ] A B A B Performance G(U) > 0 [ c AB > d AB ]

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results Reliability index  = min(U T U) 1/2 with G(U)=0 Rackwitz-Fiessler's algorithm Significant computational cost Very much time consuming Non-guaranteed convergence Non-linear FEM 1 G(U) computation at T=60 years  12 minutes CPU time Gradient not accurately estimated Direct approach

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results Response surface approach Reliability index  = min(U T U) 1/2 with Q(U)=0 Quadratic response surface with mixed terms a 0, a i, a ii, a ij determined by least square method (N+1)(N+2)/2 numerical observations 1 "center point" 2N axial points out-of-axes points star shape experimental design Successive experimental designs are necessary

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results Reliability index  = min(U T U) 1/2 with Q(U)=0 Response surface approach u1u1 u2u2 ED (1) Q(U) (1) =0 P* G(U)=0 P* (1)

P* G(U)=0 Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results Reliability index  = min(U T U) 1/2 with Q(U)=0 Response surface approach u1u1 u2u2 ED (2) Q(U) (2) =0 P* (2)

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results P* (m) #1 Previous P* (m) outside the ED (m) ED (m+1) "recentered" on P* (m) ED (m) P0P0 u1u1 u2u2 Building the experimental design P* G(U)=0

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results u1u1 u2u2 Building the experimental design ED (m+1) |1||1| |2||2| ED (m+1) "recentered" on P* (m) #1 Previous P* (m) outside the ED (m) +  i |  0.25  0 = N ½ + U* (m) P* G(U)=0

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results u1u1 u2u2 Building the experimental design Q(U) (m) =0 Q(U) (m) <0 Q(U) (m) >0 ED (m+1) "recentered" on P* (m) #1 Previous P* (m) outside the ED (m) +  i |  0.25  0 = N ½ + ED (m+1) 22 U (m) P* G(U)=0

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results u1u1 u2u2 Building the experimental design #2 Previous P* (m) inside the ED (m) ED (m) P* (m) P0P0 P1P1 P2P2 P0P0 P* G(U)=0 Retained points: cos(P 0 P i,P 0 P* (m) ) > 0

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results u1u1 u2u2 Building the experimental design Retained points: cos(P 0 P i,P 0 P* (m) ) > 0 #2 Previous P* (m) inside the ED (m) ED (m+1) P* (m) P2P2 Complementary points: symmetrical transformed / P* (m) P* G(U)=0

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results u1u1 u2u2 Building the experimental design Retained points: cos(P 0 P i,P 0 P* (m) ) > 0 #2 Previous P* (m) inside the ED (m) ED (m+1) P* (m) Complementary points: symmetrical transformed / P* (m) P* G(U)=0 Bringing the transformed points closer to P* (m) P2P2

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results u1u1 u2u2 Building the experimental design Retained points: cos(P 0 P i,P 0 P* (m) ) > 0 #2 Previous P* (m) inside the ED (m) ED (m+1) P* (m) Complementary points: symmetrical transformed / P* (m) P* G(U)=0 Bringing the transformed points closer to P* (m)

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results u1u1 u2u2 Building the experimental design Retained points: cos(P 0 P i,P 0 P* (m) ) > 0 #2 Previous P* (m) inside the ED (m) ED (m+1) Complementary points: symmetrical transformed / P* (m) P* G(U)=0 Bringing the transformed points closer to P* (m) P0P0 ED (m+1) "recentered" on P* (m)

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results Start First experimental design ED (0) RF algorithm: P* (0) ED (m)  ED (0) ; P* (m)  P* (0) P* (m) inside the ED (m) ? Finite element anlysis RF algorithm: P* (m+1) | P* (m+1) P* (m) | < 0.15 End Building the ED (m+1) with procedure #2 yes Building the ED (m+1) with procedure #1 no Reliability index  yes ED (m)  ED (m+1) P* (m)  P* (m+1) no

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results Practical application: reinforced concrete beam Material properties: Concrete strength Reference diffusion coefficient Turtuousity factor Concrete probes of low scale Variance reduction Concrete probes of similar scale No change

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results Practical application: reinforced concrete beam Material properties: Concrete strength Reference diffusion coefficient Turtuousity factor Distribution Mean CoV Lognormal 35 MPa 0.1 Concrete probes of similar scale No change

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results Practical application: reinforced concrete beam Material properties: Concrete strength Reference diffusion coefficient Turtuousity factor Distribution Mean CoV Lognormal 35 MPa 0.1 Lognormal m 2 /s 0.8 Uniform [0.1 to 0.9]

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results Practical application: reinforced concrete beam Material properties: Concrete strength Reference diffusion coefficient Turtuousity factor Distribution Mean CoV Lognormal 35 MPa 0.1 Lognormal m 2 /s 0.8 Uniform [0.1 to 0.9] Loading parameter: Live load E1max 1.04 kN/m Geometrical parameter: Concrete cover thickness Lognormal 2 cm 0.2

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results Practical application: reinforced concrete beam Efficiency of the adaptative RSM T=2 yearsT=30 years

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results Practical application: reinforced concrete beam Variation of the reliability with time  SLS Significant decrease of the reliability index Reliability index lower than threshold value recommended by Eurocodes after T=30 years

Probabilistic Assessment of Corrosion Risk due to Carbonation Baltimore January Introduction Carbonation modeling Probabilistic approach Results Practical application: reinforced concrete beam Variation of the sensitivity factors with time Diffusion coefficient and cover thickness for T < 35 years Tortuousity factor and loading play a role for T > 35 years