1 Department of Defense Earned Value Central Repository Debbie Tomsic, OUSD(AT&L) John McGahan, Tecolote October 31, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EUCLID Student Award Processing Preview Demonstrations Student Systems Presented by Matthew Taylor Student Systems.
Advertisements

1 ANSI/EIA A STANDARD Earned Value Management Systems Proposed Changes Discussion January 31, 2007 NDIA Program Management Systems Committee.
More CMM Part Two : Details.
FEDERAL TECHNICAL DATA SOLUTION (FedTeDS) - FINAL RULE FAR 5.102, Availability of solicitations Implements President’s Management Agenda & eGov Initiative.
1 NDIA Earned Value Management Application Guide Status Report May 3, 2005.
Federal Awardee Performance & Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) Overview J. Lisa Romney Defense Procurement & Acquisition Policy.
CENTRAL CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION (CAGE CODES) DFARS Case 2003-D040 DFARS Parts 204, 212, 213 and 252 are amended to remove policy on Central Contractor.
1 EVM Policy July 2013 NAVY CEVM 2 Outline DoDI DFARS DFARS DFARS June 2012 AT&L Policy Letter.
Compliance Application Notice Process Update and Discussion with NERC MRC.
The National Declassification Center Releasing All We Can, Protecting What We Must Public Interest Declassification Board NDC Project Update April 22,
Public Vouchers Further information is available in the Information for Contractors Manual under Enclosure 5 The views expressed in this presentation are.
Program Visibility, Analysis, and Reporting (PVAR)
EPLC Deliverables Sherry Brown-Scoggins & Wanda Hall
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Pre-Proposal Conference Sourcing and Contracts Management System (CMS) Solution Request for Proposal FQ
Change Advisory Board COIN v1.ppt Change Advisory Board ITIL COIN June 20, 2007.
Validating IPMRs, CPRs, and IMS Deliverables NAVY CEVM
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
PCARSS: Transfers of Accountability
Coordination with MARSS Student Number Fall 2013.
Project Management Process Overview
SWIS Digital Inspections Project (SWIS DIP) Chris Allen, Information Management Branch California Integrated Waste Management Board November 5, 2008 The.
Copyright © 2009 NDIA PMSC Robert Loop August 2009 NDIA PMSC Guides Working Group Status.
UNCLASSIFIED DoD COST REPORTING OVERVIEW CSDR & EVM-CR 1.
1 WARFIGHTER SUPPORT ENHANCEMENT STEWARDSHIP EXCELLENCE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT WARFIGHTER-FOCUSED, GLOBALLY RESPONSIVE, FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE SUPPLY CHAIN.
1 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Reporting Requirements Presented by: Darryl Grant Procurement Analyst Division of Acquisition Policy &
Earned Value Management Systems (EVMS) Defense Support Team (DST) and Report to Congress Mr. Richard Ginman OUSD(A&T)/DPAP Presentation to National Defense.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program July 23, 2003 eAuthentication Initiative Agency Responsibilities and Funding Discussion eGovernment.
1 Earned Value Management (EVM) Center ‘Moving Forward’ Presented by Mr. David Kester Director, Program Integration Division April 25, 2007.
MP Online Data Entry Project Update WMS / ROS August 2013 Troy Anderson.
Revised Department of Defense Earned Value Management Policy Deborah A. Tomsic Senior Program Analyst Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition,
OSD Earned Value Management Activities Update Larry L. Axtell Senior Program Analyst Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology.
XML Working Group Joan Ugljesa NDIA PMSC April 25,
BCF-262 EVMS Validation and Surveillance. BCF-262 DAU Catalog Description EVMS Validation and Surveillance The earned value management system (EVMS) validation.
UN/CEFACT XML Schema Status and Data Exchange Requirement Guidelines Joan Ugljesa NDIA PMSC August 26, 2010.
GSA Expo 2010 DoD Travel Programs Customer Assistance Tools and Services Mr. Joe Ward and Ms. Margaret Hebert GSA Expo May 2010.
Earned Value Management Update Nancy L. Spruill Director, Acquisition Resources and Analysis Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology.
0 Office of Performance Assessments and Root Cause Analyses (PARCA) PARCA EVM Update Presenter: Phone:
Office of Management and Budget NDIA Program Management Systems Committee May 3, 2005 EVMS Compliance Requirements David Muzio.
Earned Value Management Presented By: Steve Krivokopich May , 2006.
XML Working Group Joan Ugljesa NDIA PMSC August 7,
1 NDIA Earned Value Management Application Guide Status Report August 16-17, 2005 Wayne Abba Walt Berkey David Muzio David Treacy NDIA EVM Application.
SWIS Digital Inspections Project Chris Allen, Information Management Branch California Integrated Waste Management Board August 22, 2008.
Earned Value Management Update Nancy L. Spruill Director, Acquisition Resources and Analysis Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology.
1 Felisha Hitt, Senior Procurement Analyst March 18, 2008 Defense Acquisition Regulations System
Standard Unique Health Identifier for Health Care Providers April 9, th Annual HIPAA Summit Gail Kocher Highmark.
1 Program Management Systems Committee (PMSC) Contract / Subcontract Issues Working Group Industry Issues and Position Summary 13 August 2008.
10/20/ Welcome to Overview for Grants.
Transitioning to the ACE Platform Omari Wooden Assistant Division Chief, Trade Outreach and Regulations December 11, 2015.
For Official Use Only – Pre-Decisional Improving Acquisition Execution Situational Awareness: Central Repository Pilot Status Report Debbie Tomsic (AT&L/ARA)
Independent Expert Program Review (IEPR) February 2006.
Migration From MILS USTRANSCOM Draft Plan For Migration from the MILS John Will
Defense Cost and Resource Center Contractor Cost and Software Data Reporting: An Update Ron Lile May 2006.
UN/CEFACT XML Schema Status and Data Exchange Requirement Guidelines Joan Ugljesa NDIA PMSC January 29,
Nadine Kurita LUSI DOE Review July 23, 2007 PMCS 1 Project Management Cost and Schedule Nadine Kurita ANSI/EIA-748-A Standard.
Strength through Industry & Technology How is the Government Managing for Value? Program Management Systems Committee March 11, 2007 The Voice of the Industrial.
Small Business Programs Tatia Evelyn-Bellamy Director Small Business Division Small Business Center February 2016.
1 The Voice of the Industrial Base 1 IBR Guide NDIA PMSC Working Group NDIA PMSC Meeting August 7, 2007 Prepared by; NDIA IBR Working Group August 2007.
6/13/2016 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1 Starting a Facilities Flow Lee David
Brownfield Register Making Data Standards Work Kevin Flanagan April 2016.
Subcontracting Program Updates Janice Buffler, Associate Director Subcontracting/Regional Councils DoD Office of Small Business Programs 1.
Program Visibility, Analysis, and Reporting (PVAR)
Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS)
North Carolina’s Transition to CMDP
CSDR Submit-Review Website Submitter Guide
Background (history, process to date) Status of CANs
Department of Defense Earned Value Central Repository Debbie Tomsic, OUSD(AT&L) John McGahan, Tecolote October 31, 2007.
Independent Expert Program Review (IEPR)
EVM Policy NAVY CEVM July 2013
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

1 Department of Defense Earned Value Central Repository Debbie Tomsic, OUSD(AT&L) John McGahan, Tecolote October 31, 2007

2 Agenda About Earned Value Management (EVM) DoD EVM Policy Earned Value (EV) Central Repository (CR) CR Interface with DAMIR and Service Systems

3 EVM is the use of an integrated management system that coordinates work scope, schedule, and cost goals and objectively measures progress toward these goals EVM is a widely accepted industry best practice for project management in government and commercial sectors Governed by industry standard (ANSI/EIA-748) The 32 EVM system guidelines in ANSI/EIA-748 address nine management processes A management control tool for program managers About Earned Value Management

4 DoD EVM Policy

5 < $20M < $50M but > $20M > $50M Thresholds Cost/Incentive Equal to or Above Threshold Cost/Incentive Less Than Upper Threshold but Equal to or Above Lower Threshold Cost/Incentive Less Than Threshold Contracts Requirements - Compliance with EVM system standard - Formal EVM system validation - Contract Performance Report - Integrated Master Schedule - Integrated Baseline Reviews - Ongoing surveillance - Compliance with EVM system standard - No formal EVM system validation - Contract Performance Report (tailored) - Integrated Master Schedule (tailored) - Integrated Baseline Reviews - Ongoing surveillance - EVM optional (risk-based decision) - Cost-benefit analysis required Applies to cost/incentive contracts awarded after April 2005 Applies to cost/incentive contracts awarded after April 2005 DoD EVM Policy

6 EVM policy applied to DoD contracts via Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) clauses (new clauses to be released soon) Reporting requirements put on contract via Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs) Data Item Descriptions (DIDs) provide instructions for completing reports –Contract Performance Report (cost and schedule reporting) –Integrated Master Schedule (schedule reporting) –Contract Funds Status Report (funding projection) Common, product-oriented work breakdown structure required for EVM reports and Cost and Software Data Reports EVM Reporting Requirements It’s important to get the requirements right up front - fixing problems later is more painful It’s important to get the requirements right up front - fixing problems later is more painful

7 Sources of Information on EVM Refer to policy and guidance documents, to include frequently asked questions on DoD EVM web site: Use contract requirements checklist as quick reference and refer questions to points of contact Key to success is integrated approach between program management, EVM, and contracting personnel Key to success is integrated approach between program management, EVM, and contracting personnel

8 EV Central Repository

9 In August 2006, USD(AT&L) announced initiatives to improve acquisition execution situational awareness –Improve collection, transparency, and availability of key program data –Improve data analysis to facilitate timely and effective management action Acquisition Data Consolidation –Demonstrate feasibility of establishing an automated CR for key acquisition data, e.g., Contract Performance Reports (CPRs) –Evaluate and improve contracting approaches for EVM and Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) –Assess and improve EVM and CSDR policies, processes, and reporting formats EV Central Repository: Background and Objectives “There is the need for improved collection, transparency, and availability of key program data” “There is the need for improved collection, transparency, and availability of key program data”

10 Centralized reporting, collection, and distribution of EVM data Complete, accurate, timely, and secure transfer of electronic data directly from contractor to CR Secure and controlled warehousing of data Controlled, timely, and secure access to data by authorized users Benefits of CR Altering the way defense acquisition data is gathered and distributed Altering the way defense acquisition data is gathered and distributed

11 Participating Programs –Army: ARH, JLENS, Land Warrior –Navy: SM-6, MUOS, P-8A (MMA) –Air Force: SBIRS High, C-17, Global Hawk Pilot began in December 2006 with submission of November CPRs Key Results –Successful reporting of CPRs and Contract Funds Status Reports (CFSRs) –CR provided secure controls and ready access to authorized users –Implemented with minimum cost and disruption to PMs and contractors –Demonstrated that data transparency is achievable and will help improve situational awareness In July 2007, USD(AT&L) directed full implementation of CR system on all EVM reports for ACAT I programs Phase 1: Pilot Project “The CR pilot results provide the foundation for full implementation” “The CR pilot results provide the foundation for full implementation”

12 Complete Phase 1 to finalize policies, procedures, and business rules Systematically phase in remaining ACAT ID and IC programs by January 2008 with ACAT IA being added in follow-on phase Finalize documentation (CR manual and user guides) by February 2008 EVM reports to be included in the CR –CPR (typically monthly) –CFSR (typically quarterly) –Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) (typically monthly to PM but initially will be quarterly to CR) All CR report files eventually will be submitted in XML format following formal publication of United Nations Center for Trade Facilitation and eBusiness XML standards and availability of software to process data Phase 2: Full Implementation “The goal is to have the ACAT ID and IC programs operational in the CR system with their January 2008 submissions” “The goal is to have the ACAT ID and IC programs operational in the CR system with their January 2008 submissions”

13 ERM Plan to Add Programs to CR

14 Implementation of EV CR

15 Individual contract CDRLs DIDs for CPR, CFSR, and IMS USD(AT&L) memos - August 2006 and July 2007 Central Repository Manual User guides –Registration Guide –Reviewer Guide –Submitter Guide –Analyst Guide CR Policy: Guiding Documents Refer to the manual and user guides on CR web site for detailed guidance and instructions Refer to the manual and user guides on CR web site for detailed guidance and instructions

16 Necessary CDRL changes –Add CR to distribution addressee list ( [all CDRLs] –Request periodic upload of CPR history file [CPR CDRL] –Any changes to ensure that current EVM policy is being followed regarding submission of CPR in ANSI X Transaction Set (i.e., TRN or wInsight XML files) [CPR CDRL] Example CDRLs for CPR, CFSR, and IMS available at CDRL Changes Adding the CR to the CDRL distribution list is a no cost change Adding the CR to the CDRL distribution list is a no cost change

17 CR will be sole source for DoD EVM reports for ACAT I programs –Contractors will have one submission point –Program offices, Services, and OSD analysts will have one authoritative source – all looking at the same data at (nearly) the same time –OSD will have more timely access to Level 1 data in DAMIR system For new contracts, CR should be designated sole distribution addressee on CPR and CFSR CDRLs For existing contracts, a Single Process Initiative will make CR the sole addressee for CPR and CFSR (in early 2008) IMS will have dual path (to the program office as required by the CDRL and to the CR quarterly) until file size and format issues are resolved CR is Sole Source for EVM Reports “Effective immediately, all new ACAT I programs will structure their contracts with EVM…so the addressee…for data is the CR” “Effective immediately, all new ACAT I programs will structure their contracts with EVM…so the addressee…for data is the CR”

18 Applies to ACAT 1D and 1C program contracts with EVM reporting requirements What is submitted and when? –What’s on contract; due on contracted dates CPR – monthly upload as required on CDRL CFSR – as required on CDRL IMS – quarterly upload of all CDRL-required items –One submission per task/contract/subcontract –Event-driven upload of history file Initial submission (and after re-baselines) If using wInsight, a WSA or backup file Or else, equivalent “history” file CR Business Rules Must be complying with correct EVM policy based on when contract was awarded Must be complying with correct EVM policy based on when contract was awarded

19 Submission form factors –CPR: Formats 1-5 as defined on contract Formats 1-4 EDI 839 or XML (e.g., wInsight TRN or XML) Formats 1-4 Human readable (e.g., Excel) Format 5 Human readable (e.g., MS Office) –CFSR: Human readable (e.g., Excel) –IMS: Coordinated with CR Help Desk –No executables, macros, or links –Gradual transition to XML schema Submission process –Day 0: Contractor submits to CR Reviewer and submitter teams notified Level 1 extract data sent to Service databases (AIM, Dashboard, SMART) - 10-day review window before published to DAMIR –Day 10: Level 1 extract data published to DAMIR unless rejected CR Business Rules Must be complying with correct EVM policy based on when contract was awarded Must be complying with correct EVM policy based on when contract was awarded

20 Existing contracts –If subcontractors submit EVM reports directly to the PMO, the subs must submit them to the CR –If the prime contractor submits reports for subcontractors, the prime must submit them to the CR New contracts –CR must be the sole addressee on the CDRL (whether directly from the sub or via the prime) Subcontractor Submissions Requirements flow down to applicable subcontracts via DFARS Requirements flow down to applicable subcontracts via DFARS

21 Access CR from DCARC public site – –Via the Knowledge Portal Or directly: Access DCARC Portal Accessing the CR Digital certificate or DoD CAC required Digital certificate or DoD CAC required

22 Analyst –Access published data submissions archived in repository –For example, OSD staff, Cost Agency staff, and DCMA Headquarters staff Submitter –Authorized on one or more contracts to submit data Access submission events for assigned contracts Prepare and submit data to CR –Receive submission status notifications –For example, materials developers, weapon system contracts CR is Role Based Business rules govern reporting, access, and availability of data Business rules govern reporting, access, and availability of data

23 Reviewer –Assigned to one or more contracts, for acceptance/ rejection of submissions –Lead reviewer: Defines submission events (submission dates, identified CDRLs, etc.) Identifies submitters and reviewers Final decisions for accept/reject and PUBLISH –Supporting reviewer: Accept/reject vote and comment –Receive notification when data submission is available for review –For example, program office (government, support contractors), DCMA CR is Role Based Business rules govern reporting, access, and availability of data Business rules govern reporting, access, and availability of data

24 A -12 to 17 business days* 0 – CDRL-required submission date +10 calendar days or less * -- Effective with new contracts beginning April Legacy contracts have up to 25 calendar days from As Of date Report As Of date Submitter uploads reports to CR on the proper submission event Data viewable only by assigned review and submitter teams Lead reviewer publishes submission and it moves to repository Data forwarded to DAMIR Reports viewable by all approved analysts or Lead reviewer rejects submission triggering rejection notice and resubmit B C Business Process Flow

25 Lead reviewer sets up submission events for CPR, CFSR, and IMS All reviewers and submitters should be registered Lead reviewer sets up review teams and submitter teams PM submits the names of lead reviewer and alternate to DCARC DCARC forwards all requirements to lead reviewer Lead reviewer submits the CDRLs of all direct reporting contracts, subcontracts, and tasks Lead reviewer submits required information on all EV reports submitted to the PMO PMO adds the CR to the CDRL distribution lists for CPR, CFSR, and IMS Lead reviewer notifies contractor of requirements Lead reviewer submits the name, org., and contact info of all reviewers and submitters Reviewers and submitters begin registration process Contractor submits first submission on the CDRL-required due date Contractor submits the WSA or equivalent backup file days Getting Started Actions Before First CR Submission

26 PM submits the names of lead reviewer and alternate to DCARC DCARC forwards all requirements to lead reviewer Lead reviewer submits the CDRLs of all direct reporting contracts, subcontracts, and tasks Lead reviewer submits required information on all EV reports submitted to the PMO PMO adds the CR to the CDRL distribution lists for CPR, CFSR, IMS Lead reviewer notifies contractor of requirements days Timeline: Steps 1 and 2

27 Lead reviewer submits the name, org., and contact info of all reviewers and submitters Reviewers and submitters begin registration process Lead reviewer sets up submission events for CPR, CFSR, and IMS All reviewers and submitters should be registered Lead reviewer sets up review teams and submitter teams Contractor submits first submission on the CDRL- required due date Contractor submits the WSA or equivalent backup file 5 0 Due Date Timeline: Steps 3, 4, and 5

28 CR Interface with DAMIR and Service Systems

29 CR is authoritative source for objective (contractor- submitted) EVM data (e.g., CPR) –CR makes Level 1 data available to Service systems on Day 1 –CR pushes Level 1 data to DAMIR on Day 10 –Outside CR - PM review team reviews data in Service system and/or PM system Services control subjective EVM data (e.g., PM estimates, assessments, etc.) –Services define/support interoperability with DAMIR for subjective data (Service systems make PM inputs available to DAMIR) –Services define/manage review process –Services are able to leverage investment in current systems and business practices (Service-specific innovations) Interface Concept of Operations Results in reduced manual data entry and more timely access to data for DAES/SAR reporting Results in reduced manual data entry and more timely access to data for DAES/SAR reporting

30 DAMIR –Provide push web service to support objective data from CR –Pull subjective data from Services systems –Merge objective/subjective data streams into a single record Service Systems –Access objective data in CR (push and/or pull) –Support DAMIR pull of subjective data EV CR –Implement DAMIR push web service (objective data only) –Support Services using DAMIR-like push service –Provide optional pull web service Implementation Requirements OSD is accommodating desired Service-specific approaches

31 Some contracts require multiple CPRs per month (for a single “task”) –CPRs may not be mutually exclusive (costs don’t add) –May be aggregated into a single record (effort number) in DAMIR –Requires analyst manual effort; may not remain consistent Contracts and reporting requirements need to be consistent between DAMIR, Services, and CR Programs/contracts not compliant with EVM policy (non- standard data formats and submission requirements) Known Issues Program-unique issues being handled on a case-by-case basis Program-unique issues being handled on a case-by-case basis

32 Schedule Milestones Now available for download/comment: – under the EVM-CR public areahttp://dcarc.pae.osd.mil –Updated: CR Users Guide (draft) –New: CR Web Service Specification (draft)

33 Policy and implementation questions Mike Metcalf, IDAJack Cloos, IDA (703) (703) Technical questions John McGahan, Tecolote (253) CR Points of Contact Or contact the CR Help Desk at (253)