KMA NMSC Abstract Operational COMS(Communication, Ocean and Meteorological Satellite) Cloud Detection(CLD) algorithm shows that fog and low-level clouds.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Image Interpretation for Weather Analysis Part I 29 October 2009 Dr. Steve Decker.
Advertisements

Slide: 1 Version 1.1, 30 June 2004 APPLICATIONS OF METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION (MSG) METEOROLOGICAL USE OF THE SEVIRI IR3.9 CHANNEL Author:Jochen Kerkmann.
Atmospheric Correction Algorithm for the GOCI Jae Hyun Ahn* Joo-Hyung Ryu* Young Jae Park* Yu-Hwan Ahn* Im Sang Oh** Korea Ocean Research & Development.
Upgrades to the MODIS near-IR Water Vapor Algorithm and Cirrus Reflectance Algorithm For Collection 6 Bo-Cai Gao & Rong-Rong Li Remote Sensing Division,
 nm)  nm) PurposeSpatial Resolution (km) Ozone, SO 2, UV8 3251Ozone8 3403Aerosols, UV, and Volcanic Ash8 3883Aerosols, Clouds, UV and Volcanic.
Visible and Infrared (IR) Weather Satellite Interpretation 1. Visible satellite images are coded from black to white according to the amount of reflected.
VIIRS Cloud Phase Validation. The VIIRS cloud phase algorithm was validated using a 24-hour period on November 10, Validation was performed using.
Cloud Masking and Cloud Products MODIS Operational Algorithm MOD35 Paul Menzel, Steve Ackerman, Richard Frey, Kathy Strabala, Chris Moeller, Liam Gumley,
NRL09/21/2004_Davis.1 GOES-R HES-CW Atmospheric Correction Curtiss O. Davis Code 7203 Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 20375
Hayden Oswald 1 and Andrew Molthan 2 NASA Summer Intern, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 1 NASA SPoRT Center, NASA/MSFC, Huntsville, Alabama.
Satellites and Radar – A primer ATMO 203. Satellites Two main types of satellite orbits – Geostationary Earth Orbiting Satellite is 35,786 km (22,236.
Image Interpretation for Weather Analysis Part I 21 October 2010 Dr. Steve Decker.
Xin Kong, Lizzie Noyes, Gary Corlett, John Remedios, Simon Good and David Llewellyn-Jones Earth Observation Science, Space Research Centre, University.
Satellite Imagery Meteorology 101 Lab 9 December 1, 2009.
GOES-13 Science Team Report SST Images and Analyses Eileen Maturi, STAR/SOCD, Camp Springs, MD Andy Harris, CICS, University of Maryland, MD Chris Merchant,
Image Interpretation for Weather Analysis Part I 11 November 2008 Dr. Steve Decker.
Incorporating Meteosat Second Generation Products in Season Monitoring Blessing Siwela SADC Regional Remote Sensing Unit November
Satellite basics Estelle de Coning South African Weather Service
Quick Review of Remote Sensing Basic Theory Paolo Antonelli CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison Benevento, June 2007.
1 KARI Proprietary Material COMS-1 Program, Introduction to COMS Development Plan COMS Program Office Korea Aerospace Research Institute.
Meteorolojik Uzaktan Algılamaya Giriş Erdem Erdi Uzaktan Algılama Şube Müdürlüğü 7-8 Mayıs 2012, İzmir.
OC3522Summer 2001 OC Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Summer 2001 Scattering by Clouds & Applications.
Orbit Characteristics and View Angle Effects on the Global Cloud Field
FRAM, Montreal, Que 15 June 2005 Analysis of Hazardous Fog and Low Clouds Using Meteorological Satellite Data Gary P. Ellrod NOAA/NESDIS, Camp Springs,
EUMETSAT METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CONFERENCE 15/09/2013 – 20/09/2013, VIENNA EUMETSAT METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CONFERENCE 15/09/2013 – 20/09/2013, VIENNA.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss High Resolution Snow Analysis for COSMO
New Products from combined MODIS/AIRS Jun Li, Chian-Yi Liu, Allen Huang, Xuebao Wu, and Liam Gumley Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite.
Version 1.0, 20 April 2005 Slide: 1 APPLICATIONS OF METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION (MSG) RGB IMAGES: PART 04 RGB COMPOSITES WITH CHANNELS AND THEIR INTERPRETATION.
Satellite-derived Sea Surface Temperatures Corey Farley Remote Sensing May 8, 2002.
AGU 2002 Fall Meeting NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Validation of GOES-8 Derived Cloud Properties Over the Southeastern Pacific J.
SATELLITE METEOROLOGY BASICS satellite orbits EM spectrum
USING OF METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION HIGH RESOLUTION VISIBLE DATA FOR THE IMPOVEMENT OF THE RAPID DEVELOPPING THUNDERSTORM PRODUCT Oleksiy Kryvobok Ukrainian.
Cloud Top Properties Bryan A. Baum NASA Langley Research Center Paul Menzel NOAA Richard Frey, Hong Zhang CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison MODIS Science.
1 of 26 Characterization of Atmospheric Aerosols using Integrated Multi-Sensor Earth Observations Presented by Ratish Menon (Roll Number ) PhD.
11 Ice Cover and Sea and Lake Ice Concentration with GOES-R ABI Presented by Yinghui Liu Presented by Yinghui Liu 1 Team Members: Yinghui Liu, Jeffrey.
Version 1.0, 30 November 2004 Slide: 1 METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION (MSG) DUST DETECTION Author:Jochen Kerkmann Contributors:H.-J. Lutz.
Characteristics of Fog/Low Stratus Clouds are composed mainly of liquid water with a low cloud base Cloud layers are highly spatially uniform in both temperature.
Cloud Mask: Results, Frequency, Bit Mapping, and Validation UW Cloud Mask Working Group.
Next Week: QUIZ 1 One question from each of week: –5 lectures (Weather Observation, Data Analysis, Ideal Gas Law, Energy Transfer, Satellite and Radar)
High impact weather studies with advanced IR sounder data Jun Li Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS),
Preparing for GOES-R: old tools with new perspectives Bernadette Connell, CIRA CSU, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA ABSTRACT Creating.
Version 1.0, 14 May 2004 Slide: 1 APPLICATIONS OF METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION (MSG) FOG DETECTION Author:Jochen Kerkmann (EUMETSAT)
Using MODIS and AIRS for cloud property characterization Jun W. Paul Menzel #, Steve Chian-Yi and Institute.
Real-time Display of Simulated GOES-R (ABI) Experimental Products Donald W. Hillger NOAA/NESDIS, SaTellite Applications and Research (STAR) Regional And.
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
Validation of Satellite-derived Clear-sky Atmospheric Temperature Inversions in the Arctic Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Axel Schweiger 3, Jennifer.
Cloud property retrieval from hyperspectral IR measurements Jun Li, Peng Zhang, Chian-Yi Liu, Xuebao Wu and CIMSS colleagues Cooperative Institute for.
Clouds Ice cloud detection using the 8.7  m channel: areas of ice clouds (in particular thin cirrus) are red (positive difference), clear ground and water.
KMA Proprietary Material 4 th GOES-R Users’ Conference 1 Introduction to Communication, Ocean & Meteorological Satellite Hee-Hoon Lee Korea Meteorological.
Data acquisition From satellites with the MODIS instrument.
Developing a Dust Retrieval Algorithm Jeff Massey aka “El Jeffe”
May 15, 2002MURI Hyperspectral Workshop1 Cloud and Aerosol Products From GIFTS/IOMI Gary Jedlovec and Sundar Christopher NASA Global Hydrology and Climate.
1 GLIMPSING THE FIRST PRODUCTS FROM VIIRS Dr. Wayne Esaias NASA GSFC Thomas F. Lee Jeffrey Hawkins Arunas Kuciauskas Kim Richardson Jeremy Solbrig Naval.
Shaima Nasiri University of Wisconsin-Madison Bryan Baum NASA - Langley Research Center Detection of Overlapping Clouds with MODIS: TX-2002 MODIS Atmospheres.
Volcanic Ash and Dusting Monitoring with Geostationary Satellite Yukio Kurihara (Mr.), Meteorological Satellite Center (MSC) / Japan Meteorological Agency.
NASA, CGMS-44, 7 June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS LIMB CORRECTION OF POLAR- ORBITING IMAGERY FOR THE IMPROVED INTERPRETATION.
Data Distribution/dissemination Method
Cloud Detection: Optical Depth Thresholds and FOV Considerations Steven A. Ackerman, Richard A. Frey, Edwin Eloranta, and Robert Holz Cloud Detection Issues.
Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Korea Meteorological Administration, May 2015 KMA Progress on COMS Cloud Detection Presented to.
GSICS Web Meeting, 17 November 2011
Dust detection methods applied to MODIS and VIIRS
Best practices for RGB compositing of multi-spectral imagery
VIIRS and the Fort McMurray Fire VISIT Satellite Chat (18 May 2016)
USING GOES-R TO HELP MONITOR UPPER LEVEL SO2
GOES visible (or “sun-lit”) image
ABI Visible/Near-IR Bands
Geostationary Sounders
In the past thirty five years NOAA, with help from NASA, has established a remote sensing capability on polar and geostationary platforms that has proven.
GOES -12 Imager April 4, 2002 GOES-12 Imager - pre-launch info - radiances - products Timothy J. Schmit et al.
Representing Climate Data II
Presentation transcript:

KMA NMSC Abstract Operational COMS(Communication, Ocean and Meteorological Satellite) Cloud Detection(CLD) algorithm shows that fog and low-level clouds are often undetected in the day-night transition areas. In this study, we introduce COMS CLD algorithm improvement for reducing discontinuity using ‘normalized reflectance test’ and ‘brightness temperature difference (BTD ) test’. The results of new approaches compare to the operational looks like to improve low-level clouds detection including sea fog around the Korean Peninsula. And this technique will be applied to the next Korean geostationary meteorological satellite Geo-KOMPSAT-2A CLD algorithm. COMS COMS is the first multi-purpose geostationary satellite of Korea for Meteorology, Ocean and Communication.  Meteorological Imager  Multispectral imaging radiometer : 1 visible and 4 infrared channels  Mission: ① Continuous monitoring of imagery and extracting of meteorological products ② Early detection of severe weather phenomena ③ Monitoring of climate change and atmospheric environment Operational COMS Cloud Detection Algorithm  COMS CLD Algorithm consists of 6 major tests (16 minor tests). 1.Single channel reflectance testREF VIS, REF SWIR 2.Dual channel reflectance ratio testRatio VIS/SWIR 3.Single channel temperature testBT SWIR, BT IR1, BT IR2 4.Dual channel temperature difference testBTD IR1-SWIR, BTD IR1-WV, BTD IR1-IR2, BTD IR2-SWIR, BTD IR2-SWIR 5.Homogeneity test of 3x3 pixels STDDEV VIS 3x3, STDDEV SWIR 3x3, STDDEV IR1 3x3, STDDEV IR2 3x3 6.Dual channel temperature difference test (Sunglint) BTD SWIR-IR1 Spatial Resolution1x1 pixel 2 (4 x 4 km 2 ) Time zone SeparationDaySZA < 85˚,Day+SunglintSZA < 85˚ and Sunglint Night95 ˚ < SZA, Twilight85˚ < SZA < 95˚ Discontinuity of the Cloud Mask in Time  Discontinuity of operational COMS CLD There are clouds in the SWIR and VIS images(red circle and square) continuously but COMS CLD algorithm can’t detect on 2045 and 2100 UTC. This discontinuity due to different detection test for different time zone. (1) Normalized Visible Test Normalized VIS reflectance test at dwan and daytime (60 < SZA and 55 < VZA) Helpful to detect cloud at high SZA Li and Shibata’ (2006) normalization factor for neglecting solar angle dependency -Stable near 90˚ (SZA) than inverse cosine -Stable normalization reflectance until 93˚ (SZA) Very dark and hard to distinguish cloud and clear pixel without normalization. Using normalization factor of Li and Shibata represents stable normalization approach to 90˚ (SZA). (2) BTD Test BTD is useful to detect fog and low cloud. Because, the 3.7μm is more sensitive to water droplet than 11μm However, brightness temperature at 3.7μm is rapidly increase or decrease near day/night transition zone by solar reflection component For that reason, ’BTD test’ has been only used at nighttime in operational COMS cloud detection algorithm Although the week point of this test, we used it at day/night transition with its threshold value of the first order function of SZA Results The improved CLD algorithm is reduced discontinuity using ‘normalized reflectance test’ and ‘brightness temperature difference (BTD ) test’. The results of new approaches compare to the operational looks like to improve low-level clouds detection including sea fog around the Korean Peninsula. Plans We will improve the operational COMS CLD algorithm to solve discontinuity using BTD and normalized reflectance in transition region. And this technique will be applied to the next Korean geostationary meteorological satellite Geo-KOMPSAT-2A CLD algorithm(See the poster #3-42). KMA Satellite Conference will be held in South Korea, on September, 2015 References Chung, C. Y., H. K. Lee, H. J. Ahn, M. H. Ahn, and S. N. Oh, 2006, Developing Cloud Detection Algorithm for COMS Meteorological Data Processing System, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 22, Derrien, M. and H. Le Gleau, 2010, Improvement of cloud detection near sunrise and sunset by temporal-differencing and region-growing techniques with real-time SEVIRI, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 31, Li, J. and Kiyotaka Shibata, 2006, On the Effective Solar Pathlength, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 63, COMS Cloud Mask UTC (0500 KST) UTC (0545 KST) UTC (0600 KST) UTC (0745 KST) UTC (0845 KST) COMS SWIR Image COMS VIS Image (Top) Operational COMS Cloud Mask in the East Asia on 2000 ~ 2345 UTC(0500 ~0845 KST) April 30, White, blue, green pixel represents cloudy, clear land, clear sea, respectively. (Middle) SWIR (3.75μm) images at the same time (Bottom) Same as middle except for VIS (0.68μm) VIS reflectance GOOD Visible reflectance is an eidetic way to distinguish between cloud and clear sky. BAD Visible reflectance is not used at twilight and dawn area because it rapidly shrinks to high solar zenith angle. BTD GOOD It is very useful to detect low clouds at nighttime. BAD It doesn’t use at twilight/dawn region in the COMS cloud detection algorithm. Reducing solar angle dependency!  Normalization VIS test Set dynamic threshold values!  BTD test (at Twilight, Daytime) COMS Cloud Mask 2000 UTC (0500 KST)2045 UTC (0545 KST)2100 UTC (0600 KST)2245 UTC (0745 KST)2345 UTC (0845 KST) BTD Red Line Blue Line Norm. VIS image Improvement Cloud Mask Red Line : SZA = 95˚ Blue Line : SZA = 85˚ Flow chart for the COMS Cloud Detection. (Chung et al., 2006) List of the COMS cloud detection tests are used in STEP 6 (Fig. 2). Shading box means that test is used applicable time. Motivation Comparison of normalized factor of Li and Shibata and the inverse cosine factor. Dashed line represents the inverse cosine method, and solid line represents Li and Shibata’ method. List of the COMS cloud detection tests are used in STEP 6 threshold test. Shading box means that test is used applicable time. Comparison of normalized factor of Li and Shibata and the inverse cosine factor. Dashed line represents the inverse cosine method, and solid line represents Li and Shibata’ method. The same figure except for BTD , Norm. VIS and improvement CLD. MI (Meteorological Imager) GOCI (Geostationary Ocean, Color Imager) Communication Antenna (Ka-band) Solar Array Channel Number Channel Full Width at Half Maximum (μm) Spatial Resolution Half- Amplitude (IFOV in μrad) (km) Required Range of Measurement LowerUpper VIS (1km) %(Albedo) SWIR (4km) 4-350K WV (4km)4-330K IR (4km)4-330K IR (4km)4-330K