Changes from AACR2 for Texts Barbara B. Tillett, Chief, Policy and Standards Division For LC Digital Futures and You Jan. 12, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RDA Test Train the Trainer Module 2: Structure [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Advertisements

Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
Serials/Integrating Resources Charlene Chou March 18 th,
Session 6 Issues in Cataloging Loose-leaf Integrating Resources Original content by Rhonda K. Lawrence Head of Cataloging, UCLA Law Library.
RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ACCESS: A COBEC WORKSHOP JANUARY 29, 2014 GUY FROST VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY RDA Toolkit, Basic Cataloging.
MARC 21, FRBR, RDA Review terminology (especially for non-native English speakers) Conceptual models Elements Attributes Future: Probably not a bib record,
RDA & Serials. RDA Toolkit CONSER RDA Cataloging Checklist for Textual Serials (DRAFT) CONSER RDA Core Elements Where’s that Tool? CONSER RDA Cataloging.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
Identifying Manifestations and Items 1 James/Kuhagen for VLA -- Feb. 5, 2013 “Heads up:” Several of the instructions being discussed today were revised.
RDA Test at LC Module 1: Overview What RDA Is; Structure.
Module B: Identifying works User task = identify.
Module 8 Series in AACR2 and RDA: What’s the same? What’s different?
RDA: A New Standard Supporting Resource Discovery Presentation given at the CLA conference session The Future of Resource Discovery: Promoting Resource.
LC reference staff briefing Nov. 30, 2010 Judy Kuhagen Policy and Standards Division Library of Congress.
RDA Test “Train the Trainer” Module 4: Identifying Works and Expressions [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
AACR3: Resource Description and Access Presented by Dr. Barbara Tillett Chief, CPSO Library of Congress 2004.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen OLAC 2006 Conference October 27, 2006
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen Cornell University May 16, 2006
Joy Anhalt Richard Stewart Reaching Forward May 6, 2011.
Module 5: Relationships -- in bibliographic records and in authority records.
RDA AND AUTHORITY CONTROL Name: Hester Marais Job Title: Authority Describer Tel: Your institution's logo.
RDA for Print Materials 5 June 2013 Vicki Sipe. Resource Description and Access Timeline Tested and analyzed during Implemented March 31, 2013.
RDA Test “Train the Trainer Module 1: What RDA is and isn’t [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Module C: Identifying expressions User task: identify.
Module F: Relationships: in bibliographic and authority records User task: relate.
5/14/2003ALAO Spring Workshop 2003 Providing Access Cataloging –Requirements –One record or separate records for multiple formats –CONSER policy for simultaneous,
Based on an earlier presentation made at the BCLA Annual Conference in 2010 Prepared for Pan-Canadian RDA Training by: Linda Woodcock, Technical Services.
Structure AACR2 Part I - Description Part II - Headings, Uniform titles, References RDA Attributes (of entities) Relationships (between entities)
Music Library Association SDC Open Meeting Feb. 18, 2005 AACR3: Summary of Part I Draft ( and a glimpse into Parts II and III) Kathy Glennan University.
Module 5: Relationships -- in bibliographic records and in authority records LC RDA for NASIG - June 1, 2011.
Air Force, Navy & USMC Librarians' Training Workshop -- June 24, 2010 Judith A. Kuhagen Policy and Standards Division Library of Congress.
Cataloguing Electronic resources Prepared by the Cataloguing Team at Charles Sturt University.
CONSER RDA Bridge Training [date] Presenters : [names] 1.
RDA Toolkit With thanks to Lori Robare (University of Oregon) and Robert Maxwell (Brigham Young University) for most of these slides.
Module 8 Series in AACR2 and RDA: What’s the same? What’s different?
RDA Test “Train the Trainer” Module 5: Identifying Persons [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Module 8: Changes to RDA LC RDA for NASIG - June 1, in general and for serials.
From AACR2 to RDA: An Evolution Kathy Glennan University of Maryland.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen RDA Forum ALA Annual Meeting, New Orleans, June 24,
Module 3: Identifying works and expressions LC RDA for NASIG - June 1, 2011.
RDA in NACO Module 6.a RDA Chapter 11: Identifying Corporate Bodies—Overview Recording the Attributes.
RDA Toolkit is an integrated, browser-based, online product that allow user to interact with a collection of cataloging-related documents and resources.
The Future of Cataloging Codes and Systems: IME ICC, FRBR, and RDA by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Cataloging Policy & Support Office Library of Congress.
RDA in NACO Module 4.a Module 4.b Module 4.c RDA Chapter 9: Identifying Persons— Overview Recording the Attributes.
Serials Cataloging with RDA. What is a serial? A resource issued in successive parts usually bearing numbering that has no predetermined conclusion (e.g.,
Cataloguing integrating resources with RDA OLA Preconference workshop, January 29, 2014 Emma Cross Cataloguing Librarian, Carleton University Library.
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard ACOC Seminar, September 2007.
 Why do we catalog?  Why do we classify?  What aspects are important?  What aspects can we let go of?
Module 3: Identifying works and expressions Library of Congress RDA Preconference for MLA/DLA May 4, 2011.
AACR2 Pt. 1, Monographic Description LIS Session 2.
RDA Compared with AACR2 Presentation given at the ALA conference program session Look Before You Leap: taking RDA for a test-drive July 11, 2009 by Tom.
RDA and Special Libraries Chris Todd, Janess Stewart & Jenny McDonald.
RDA, the Next Phase Joy Anhalt Marjorie Bloss Richard Stewart.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
RDA Update Background Implementation plan Basics FRBR New MARC fields in CruzCat UCSC training plan (A number of slides are from Lori Robare’s “RDA For.
Description of Bibliographic Items. Review Encoding = Markup. The library cataloging “markup” language is MARC. Unlike HTML, MARC tags have meaning (i.e.,
AACR2 versus RDA Presentation given at the CLA Pre-Conference Session From Rules to Entities: Cataloguing with RDA May 29, 2009 by Tom Delsey.
Module 4 Key differences from AACR2 Structure This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia License
RDA Training University of Nevada, Las Vegas May2013 Module 3 RDA Basics Using the RDA Toolkit.
RDA: a new cataloging standard for a digital future RDA Update Forum ALA Midwinter Meeting Philadelphia, PA January 13, 2008 John Attig ALA Representative.
A BCLA/BCCATS PRECONFERENCE APRIL 22, :30 – 5:00 PM SPEAKERS: LINDA WOODCOCK (KWANTLEN POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY) SUSAN ANDREWS (UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH.
1 Overview of the U.S. RDA Test by Tina Shrader Cataloging Section Head and CONSER Coordinator National Agricultural Library June 28, 2010.
Strengthening Hybrid RDA/AACR2 Bibliographic Records La Donna Riddle Weber – November 2015.
Book Cataloging with RDA. RDA Instructions & Guidelines General things: – Core elements (required) – Alternative guidelines and instructions – Optional.
Relationship in RDA Section 8 : Recording Relationships between Works, Expressions, Manifestations, & Items By: Habirah Binti Mohamad Pusat Bibliografi.
RDA Training at EAL Session eight—Special topics, Serials, Integrating Resources & E-resources Charlene Chou May 7 th,
Key differences from AACR2 Structure 1. Learning Outcomes Understand similarities between RDA and AACR2 Understand the structural differences between.
RDA for Law Catalogers Serials and Integrating Resources Melissa Beck UCLA Law Library.
2016 CTP Cataloging Workshop Session one
FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA
Presentation transcript:

Changes from AACR2 for Texts Barbara B. Tillett, Chief, Policy and Standards Division For LC Digital Futures and You Jan. 12, 2010

2 General overview Changes: – from AACR2 or from AACR2 practice –MARC 21 changes Represents LC practice for the RDA Test – some decisions still tentative/in process Specific details in training sessions for LC participants in the RDA Test

3 RDA Test (United States) For more information, go to the Web site maintained by the RDA Test Coordinating Committee:

4 Reminder: foundations of RDA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR; 1998) Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD; 2009) IFLA Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP; 2009)

5 RDA structure Not by class of materials: no separate chapters for books, printed music, etc. Basic goals: identify and relate (from FRBR and FRAD user tasks ) Chapters: separate elements for goals –Assemble those elements when need access points (end of chapters)

6 Summary of organization Ch. 1-7: identify the resource Ch. 8-11, 16: identify the person, family, corporate body associated with the resource Ch : relationships between persons, families, corporate bodies and resources Ch : relationships between resources Ch : relationships between persons, families, and corporate bodies

7 AACR2 to RDA vocabulary heading author, composer, etc. main entry uniform title see reference authorized access point creator preferred title + authorized access point for creator if appropriate 1) preferred title (+ other information to differentiate); 2) conventional collective title Variant access point

8 FRBR terminology Group 1 entities: –Work, expression, manifestation, item Group 2 entities: –Person, family, corporate body Group 3 entities: –Groups 1 and 2 –Concept, object, event, place [not yet in RDA]

9 RDA Test and “bridge” period Continue –MARC 21 to encode bibliographic and authority data using –ISBD punctuation and structure (appendix D) to present bibliographic data –AACR2 punctuation style (appendix E) to present name access points

10 RDA core elements Core elements chosen based on FRBR- identified attributes mandatory for a national level bibliographic record to meet user tasks: –Find, identify, select, obtain “LC Core+” = the RDA core list + those other elements LC usually includes Beyond LC Core+: cataloger’s judgment

11 Choices in RDA Alternatives –Something different from previous instruction Optional omissions/additions –Less or more than in previous instruction “or” instructions –Related to the resource or cataloger’s judgment “Policy of agency”: language and script of the catalog, calendar, etc.

12 Cataloging documentation More emphasis on cataloger judgment Approximately 1/4 of existing LCRIs are being retained and revised/simplified for RDA (see separate sheet) Revised LCRI content, policy decisions for alternatives/options and other choices, and identification of LC Core+ will be added to RDA Online

13 TOOLSRESOURCES

14 Annotations and comments in a “Sticky note”

15 Annotations in RDA Will contain LC practice for the RDA Test: –Retained and rewritten LCRI content –Decisions on options, alternatives, agency policy, etc., if cataloger judgment not to be applied Catalogers can add their own comments

16 RDA: Workflows

17 Other possible workflows Multipart monograph Reproduction of a monograph Early printed book Book with multiple languages/scripts Serial Integrating loose- leaf Integrating website Direct access electronic resource Identifying a person Identifying a corporate body Recording a relationship to a related work

18 ICP “representation” principle “Take what you see” “Accept what you get” –Example: Do not abbreviate words in transcribed fields MARC 260: ABC Publishing Company – do not change to “ABC Pub. Co.” MARC 250: Third revised edition – do not change to “3rd rev. ed.”

19 Representation and errors Do not correct errors in transcribed fields –No more “[sic]” or “[i.e., _____]” –AACR2 exception retained for title proper of serial or of integrating resource –Explain in note, give access point if important 245$a Teusday’s tasks. 246 $i Corrected title: $a Tuesday’s tasks 260 $a Chicago : $b Smith Pubblishers, $c 2010.

20 GMD replacement Three elements: –Content type* (MARC 336) –Media type(MARC 337) –Carrier type*(MARC 338) Caution: don’t confuse Carrier type with Extent (300 $a) * Core elements

encoding Repeat as needed to represent resource Subfield $2 for vocabulary Templates in Voyager for resources Leader/06: continue to give primary content type if more than one (336) 006: continue to give for some serials and some electronic resources

examples Book: 300 $a 238 pages : $b … 336 $a text $2 marccontent 337 $a unmediated $2 marcmedia 338 $a volume $2 marccarrier Print serial: 300 $a volumes : $b … 336 $a text $2 marccontent 337 $a unmediated $2 marcmedia 338 $a volume $2 marccarrier

examples Website (with maps, text, and photographs): 300 $a 1 online resource 336 $a text $2 marccontent 336 $a cartographic image $2 marccontent 336 $a still image $2 marccontent 337 $a computer $2 marcmedia 338 $a online resource $2 marccarrier Online PDF: 300 $a 1 online resource (39 pages): $b… 336 $a text $2 marccontent 337 $a computer $2 marcmedia 338 $a online resource $2 marccarrier

24 Statements of responsibility Single statement naming more than one person, family, or corporate body –RDA instruction for RDA Test: transcribe as found (no longer “rule of 3”) –RDA option generally not applied by LC for RDA Test: transcribe first name and give bracketed summary about information not transcribed Related action: how many access points for those persons/families/bodies

25 Statement of responsibility example 245 $a … / $c by Susan Brown, Melanie Carlson, Stephen Lindell, Kevin Ott, and Janet Wilson. Or, if option applied: 245 $a … / $c by Susan Brown [and four others]

26 Numbering for serials Transcribe terms and months as on the resource Alternative applied by LC for numerals: record numerals as found on the resource Possible to give numbering as an unformatted note (MARC 362 1#)

27 Serial numbering examples Volume X, number 1 – do not change to “Vol. 10, no. 1” January 2010 – do not change to “Jan. 2010”

28 Publication, etc., statements lacking information Not using “[s.l.]” and “[s.n.]”; instead: –[Place of publication not identified] –[Publisher not identified] –[Date of publication not identified] Macros in Voyager for supplied wording related to publication, distribution, and manufacture

examples (Description of carrier) 300 $a v, 199 pages : $b illustrations (some color), maps, color portraits ; $c 30 cm. 300 $a 86 pages, 21 unnumbered pages : $b illustrations, 1 folded map ; $c 24 cm + $e 1 manual (5 pages ; 20 cm). 300$a volumes : $b illustrations ; $c 26 cm.

examples (Description of carrier) 300 $a 1 online resource (Carrier description for an updating Web site: may choose to omit elements for file type, encoding format, and file size due to frequent changes in the integrating resource over time.) 300$a 1 CD-ROM ; ‡c 4 3/4 in.

31 Series statement (4XX) Transcribe series numbering as found volume 32 – do not change to “v. 32” tomo 4 – do not change to “t. 4” Band LXXXVIII – do not change to “Bd. 88”

32 Naming a work Multiple creators No longer “rule of 3” Always: –Creator with primary responsibility –If primary responsibility is shared or not stated, first-named creator Related decision: how many additional access points for other creators

33 Multiple creators: example 100 $a Brown, Susan. 245 $a Heroes / $c by Susan Brown, Melanie Carlson, Stephen Lindell, Kevin Ott, and Janet Wilson. 700 $a Carlson, Melanie. 700 $a Lindell, Stephen. 700 $a Ott, Kevin. 700 $a Wilson, Janet. [AACR2: entered under title if more than three creators]

34 Treaties First-named signatory for all treaties AACR2 exception retained for treaties with one government on one side and 2+ governments on other side: use single government Related decision: how many additional access points for other signatories

35 Bible Do not abbreviate “Old Testament” and “New Testament” to “O.T.” and “N.T.” Use “Bible. Old Testament,” “Bible. New Testament,” and “Bible. Apocrypha” when naming those aggregate works For individual books and other groups of books, do not include name of testament after “Bible”

36 “Polyglot” no longer used Access points for each language expression 245$a Antigo Testamento Poliglota : $b Hebraico, Grego, Português, Inglês. 546 $a Text in Greek, Hebrew, Portuguese, and English in columns on facing pages. 730$a Bible. $p Old Testament. $l Hebrew … 730$a Bible. $p Old Testament. $l Greek … 730$a Bible. $p Old Testament. $l Portuguese … 730$a Bible. $p Old Testament. $l English …

37 Authority data elements from FRAD For persons, families, and corporate bodies (Group 2 entities) Not all will be included in authorized access points (headings) but could be available for identification and for later differentiation as needed

38 Person attributes added to MARC 21 authority format 046: special coded dates 370: associated place 371: address 372: field of activity 373: affiliation 374: occupation 375: gender 377: associated language

39 Non-human entities Now in scope as persons, e.g., –Miss Piggy –Snoopy LC to consider as persons? –If in the Subject file, move to the Names file

40 Corporate body attributes added to MARC 21 authority format 046: special coded dates 370: associated place 371: address 372: field of activity 377: associated language

41 Relationships Persons/families/corporate bodies with resources Shakespeare is the author of Hamlet Between resources Serial abc is continued by XYZ Serial Between persons/families/corporate bodies X relates to Y

42 Persons … with resources Two methods to relate persons with resources: –Identifier: LC will not use alone for RDA Test –Authorized access point Relationship designators in RDA appendix I Recorded in bibliographic and/or authority data

43 Examples: persons … with resources Authorized access point: 100 $a Lindgren, Astrid, $d $a Pippi Långstrump. $l English 245 $a Pippi Longstocking / $c Astrid Lindgren ; translated by Tiina Nunnally. 700$a Nunnally, Tiina, $d $e translator

44 Between resources Three methods: –Identifier: LC will not use alone for RDA Test –Authorized access point –Description (structured or unstructured) Relationship designators in appendix J Recorded in bibliographic and/or authority data

45 Examples: between resources Authorized access point (probably LC’s choice): 100 $a Brown, Dan, $d $a Digital fortress. $l French 245 $a Forteresse digitale. 700 $i Translation of $a Brown, Dan, $d $t Digital fortress. Structured description : 100 $a Brown, Dan, $d $a Digital fortress. $l French 245 $a Forteresse digitale. 500 $a Translation of: Digital fortress / Dan Brown. –- 1st ed. -- New York : St. Martin’s Press, –- 371 pages ; 22 cm

46 Examples: between resources Unstructured description and three identifiers: 245 $a Journal of professional counseling, practice, theory, & research $t TCA journal ‡x ‡w (DLC) ‡w (OCoLC) [780 indicators 00 = relationship “Continues”]

47 Between persons … corporate bodies Two methods: –Identifier: not used alone by LC for RDA Test –Authorized access point Relationship designators in appendix K Recorded in authority data

48 Examples: between persons … corporate bodies Authorized access point: 100$a Snodgrass, Quintus Curtius, $d $a Clemens, Samuel, $d $i real identity

49 TOOLSRESOURCES

50 Webcasts for review “FRBR: Things You Should Know, But Were Afraid to Ask” “Cataloging Principles and RDA” “Resource Description and Access: Background Overview”

51 Questions about RDA? Contact PSD via