1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parts of a Lesson Plan Any format that works for you and your JTEs is ok… BUT! Here are some ideas that might help you set up your LP format. The ALTs.
Advertisements

Guiding Principle Five Mentoring needs to be tailored to the needs of the individual teacher and, at the same time, verifying their skills as teachers.
Research Findings & Monitoring White Board Usage User Type.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 June 12, 2012 Welcome BT BOCES, SV, ME, Chenango Forks, Newark Valley, Windsor, Tioga and Vestal.
Day 2: Learning and Teaching Session 2: Recording Evidence NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
5D+ Teacher Evaluation Model Professional Learning Phase 1
December 13, 2011 ICSD facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back! Can I have your attention please?
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1.
TCRP TEACHER ADVISORY PANEL MEETING October 2011 Derrick Chau, VP Instruction Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach
Study vocabulary words. Unit 1 quiz on Thursday! Objective
Effective Evaluation Feedback: Getting People to Commit to Changing Practice.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
5 SIMPLE RULES FOR THE LANGUAGE LEARNING CLASSROOM By Nicole Long.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Welcome!
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Welcome Back!
Broome-Tioga BOCES Network Team… the ENTIRE team! (Pat Walsh, Barb Phillips, Jennifer Dove)
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
RTTT Teacher Evaluator Training Day 8 Based on the Training of Teaching Learning Solutions (TLS) and Community Training and Assistance Center (CTAC)
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back! Can I have your attention please?
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back! Can I have your attention please?
Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Day 3 Welcome Back!
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
© TNTP 2014 March Principal Training. / 2 Do Now Reflect on your progress from the last session: How successful were you in supporting a teacher to identify.
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Fourth session of the NEPBE II in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 25th, 2013 Assessment Instruments.
Agenda: PD What drives PD? +/- of Traditional PD Analyzing Data/Categorizing Data Characteristics of Effective PD PAGES SWOT EQ: How can you create.
Bell Ringer What did you do to motivate students in the first few weeks of school?
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
A brief introduction to
MDC Training Wednesday, October 22, Learning Targets Teachers will be able to….. Explain how formative assessment helps with student learning Identify.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training February 27, 2012 Part 1 – Welcome Back!
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back!
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back!
Hosted by Julie Milder Unpacking the Classroom Environment and Culture and Professional Collaboration and Communication Dimensions of 5D+
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1.
 Pre-Observation Conference  Priority component: 1e (Designing Coherent Instruction)  Observation  Priority components: 3c, 3d (Engaging Students in.
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
Back to School 2013 – 2014 Social Science – Pat Reed Welcome.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Welcome!
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Observation System Kidderminster College January 2012.
Teachscape Reflect Poo Part of a Continuous Improvement Process art of a Continuous Improvement Process.
1 Rubrics: A powerful assessment tool for you, your students & your programs Dannelle D. Stevens, Ph.D. Professor Emerita, Portland State University Syracuse.
Giving Clear, Specific Directions
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Setting Objectives and Providing Feedback
Lead Evaluator Training
The Framework for Teaching
Race to the Top~November Session
Lead Evaluator Training
Lead Evaluator Training
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Revising and Editing.
Lead Evaluator Training Part 1
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Lead Evaluator Training
Can I have your attention please?
Lead Evaluator Training
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1

 The 9 Required Components of Lead Evaluators Training

 Identify current practices for defining teacher actions and student actions while observing  Explain the difference between current practice and evidence based observation  Describe requirements for schools to develop inter-rater agreement and inter-rater reliability with a chosen rubric  Identify and define criteria for one area of effective instruction around which evidence collection will be focused  Describe your district’s intent for your participation in this workshop

Collection of factual information Free of bias or opinion Based on specific criteria Used to provide feedback for reflection and improvement of teacher practice

Allows for consistency Provides “concrete” feedback to the teacher Based on facts—easily supported

Free of Bias or Opinion: Free of prejudice or judgment in favor of or against someone or something--usually not based on fact Example: The students were seated in rows in the classroom. Non-Example: The teacher discourages collaboration in her classroom by arranging the students in rows.

Free of Bias or Opinion: Free of prejudice or judgment in favor of or against someone or something--usually not based on fact Example: The students were seated in rows in the classroom. Non-Example: The teacher discourages collaboration in her classroom by arranging the students in rows.

Example: The teacher stated to the students, “Turn and face your partner. Share two facts you read in the article.” Non-Example: I love the way you had the students work with a partner to share facts from the article.

Example: The teacher stated to the students, “Turn and face your partner. Share two facts you read in the article.” Non-Example: I love the way you had the students work with a partner to share facts from the article.

“Using the blank map on your desk, label the continents” was written on the white board.

There was no confusion in the classroom because Mr. Smith’s directions were presented clearly.

“Using the blank map on your desk, label the continents” was written on the white board. There was no confusion in the classroom because Mr. Smith’s directions were presented clearly.

“Using the blank map on your desk, label the continents” was written on the white board. There was no confusion in the classroom because Mr. Smith’s directions were presented clearly. Insufficient wait time was provided to the students.

“Using the blank map on your desk, label the continents” was written on the white board. There was no confusion in the classroom because Mr. Smith’s directions were presented clearly. Insufficient wait time was provided to the students.

“Using the blank map on your desk, label the continents” was written on the white board. There was no confusion in the classroom because Mr. Smith’s directions were presented clearly. Insufficient wait time was provided to the students. 9 out of 10 students in the class created a t-chart in their notebooks.

“Using the blank map on your desk, label the continents” was written on the white board. There was no confusion in the classroom because Mr. Smith’s directions were presented clearly. Insufficient wait time was provided to the students. 9 out of 10 students in the class created a t-chart in their notebooks. It is evident that Ms. Jones loves to teach. She is enthusiastic and warm towards her students.

“Using the blank map on your desk, label the continents” was written on the white board. There was no confusion in the classroom because Mr. Smith’s directions were presented clearly. Insufficient wait time was provided to the students. 9 out of 10 students in the class created a t-chart in their notebooks. It is evident that Ms. Jones loves to teach. She is enthusiastic and warm towards her students.

 Practice collecting evidence using set criteria  Compare and contrast evidence collected during shared observations  Review written observation documents and provide feedback to evaluators (Superintendent or designee)

Question: How do I begin to collect evidence? There is so much to look for! ANSWER: Focus on evidence that makes a difference! Select a category or “criteria” of effective teaching that makes a difference in students’ learning.

What are examples of categories (elements/criteria) that make a difference? What do you value?

Also known as...

 Evidence is observable (overt)  Evidence is of ALL students  Evidence is congruent to the objective When does checking for understanding occur??

 OK?  Any questions?  Using a “check” to be sure the student is paying attention Is a ticket out the door a check for understanding?

 What is good evidence?  What is weak evidence?

Video 1

The teacher said, “Always—is that a present tense magic word or a past tense magic word?” The teacher asked, “Is he right?” Four students snapped to indicate that the student was correct. The teacher asked, “What is the magic word that tells us if we need to answer in the present tense or the past tense?”

Students were each given an envelope with a sentence written on it. The teacher directed the students to highlight the “magic words” to indicate past or present tense. Each envelope contained a “cut up” sentence. The students were directed to put the words in order to create a sentence—using the correct “magic word.”

 Define what your district expects you to do with what you have learned today  Identify the presence or absence of “check for understanding” in your present evaluation tool  Practice collecting evidence of “check for understanding”  Check yourself – did your evidence contain bias or opinion?  Identify the presence or absence of “check for understanding” in one of the NYSED approved rubrics

Thank you! See you November 8, 2011 Same time, same place!