OAVSNP 2014 Charlotte Alverson, NPSO Pattie Johnson, TRI Sally Simich, ODE 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collecting and Using Post-School Outcome Data New Mexico Cadre Summer Camp June 11-12, 2007.
Advertisements

Post School Outcomes – State Indicator 14 Chicago Public Schools Office of Specialized Services.
State Performance Plan (SPP) Indicator #14 Post School Outcomes Study Cohort III: Exiters Technical Assistance Session #2 Presented by The New.
Improving Post-School Outcomes for Youth with Mental Health Issues Improving Post-School Outcomes for Youth with Mental Health Issues Secondary Transition.
Cohort Graduation Exit Code Review December 18, 2014.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
This document was developed by the National Post-School Outcomes Center, Eugene, Oregon, (funded by Cooperative Agreement Number H326U090001) with the.
Each Year, nationwide, 1.2 million students fail to graduate from high school!
Arizona Statewide Post School Outcomes (PSO) Survey Results Summer 2014 Collection SY 2012–13 Exiters.
Using and Understanding Post School Outcome Data Collection Presented by Kentucky Post School Outcome Center (KyPSO) Beth Miller Harrison, Ph.D. Tony LoBianco,
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
Charlotte Y. Alverson, Ed. S. Secondary Transition State Planning Institute Charlotte, NC May 8, 2008 Blueprint for Success: Helpful Hints for Writing.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part D—Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
Partnering with Local Programs to Interpret and Use Outcomes Data Delaware’s Part B 619 Program September 20, 2011 Verna Thompson & Tony Ruggiero Delaware.
High School Exit Interview Jeff Williams Dave Malott.
1 Working with Contractors for Indicator 14: Tips and Strategies Capacity Building Institute Charlotte, NC May 8, 2008.
Data and Fiscal Management Monthly Webinar May 5, 2015.
Your Students, Your Outcomes: Using Your PSO Reports Sally Simich, ODE Pattie Johnson, TRI Charlotte Alverson, NPSO 1.
1 Oregon Post School Data Collection Jackie Burr, Oregon Department of Education (ODE) Pattie Johnson, Teaching Research Institute (TRI)
Clarification Week…. How’s it going? Do you need anything from us?
Got Data! Now What? Charlotte Y. Alverson April 14, 2011.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
Indicator 14 and Kentucky’s Continuous Monitoring Process (KCMP) Prepared by Kentucky Post School Outcome Center (KyPSO) Human Development Institute University.
CCTS 1.Type your name and address (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2.CCTS will conduct a sound.
State of Oregon Department of Human Services
Do We Have all the Workers? Strategies for Gaining Representativeness Loujeania W. Bost, Ph.D. NDPC-SD & Deanne Unruh, Ph.D. NPSO State Planning Institute.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report.
Four Years Out: Differences in Postschool Experiences of Youth With Disabilities Who Did and Did Not Complete High School Findings from the National Longitudinal.
Everyone Counts, Everyone In: Essentials for Participation in the 2015 Post School Outcomes (PSO) Survey Requirements, Data Collection, and Results Spring.
“TAKING IT TO SCALE” A Statewide Model For Delivering Transition Services presented at 2007 CEC Annual Convention April 18-21, 2007 Louisville, Kentucky.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
“I NEVER PLANNED NOT TO GO TO COLLEGE”: VOICES OF YOUNG ADULTS WITH ASPERGER SYNDROME TRANSITIONING TO COLLEGE PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM A QUALITATIVE STUDY.
Practical suggestions to increase the response rate when gathering post-school outcomes data. OSEP Approved January 2007 On the web at:
Collecting Post-school Data Webinar #2 November 18, 2009 Presented by: Center for Change in Transition Services Cinda Johnson, Wendy Iwaszuk, Denny Hasko,
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
National High School Center Summer Institute What’s the Post-School Outcomes Buzz? Jane Falls Coordinator, National Post-School Outcomes Center Washington,
1 Post-Secondary Outcomes Data Collection 2008 Jackie Burr, Oregon Department of Education Pattie Johnson, Teaching Research Institute.
Richard Henderson Evelyn S. Johnson A NNUAL P ERFORMANCE R EPORT U PDATE Richard O’Dell Division of Special Education Idaho State Department of Education.
New Mexico Post-School Outcomes Sub-group Analysis 2009 A Comparison of Outcomes by Ethnicity and Gender and Strategies to Address Disparities NPSO Presentation.
Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions Revised May 2010 (Revisions indicated in red font)
New Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions 3 rd Annual Secondary Transition State Planning Institute Charlotte, NC May12-14,
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale - 2 Understanding and Sharing BERS-2 Information and Scoring with Parents, Caregivers and Youth May 1, 2012.
Reporting Updated 05/2014. Handbook References Chapter 3: Administrative Guidance – Demographic Report – Match Report – Annual Report – Deaf and Hard.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Pennsylvania Post School Outcome Survey (PaPOS) Utilizing the Data Results for Longitudinal Planning.
1 State Performance Plan (SPP) Indicator # Measurement 1Graduation 2Dropout 3Statewide Assessments 4Suspension and Expulsion 5Least Restrictive Environment.
Bill Wilson Center Bill Wilson Center’s vision is to prevent poverty in the next generation by connecting youth and families to housing, education, employment,
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
Transition Improvement Plan (TIP) Introduction to the Indicator 14 Post School Outcomes (PSO) Report
Cumberland County Schools Transition. Indicator 1 Graduation Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diploma is.
Transforming the Future with PSO Data.  Understand why collecting PSO data is so important for district decisions on how to best serve students  Learn.
Transforming the Future with PSO Data
Session Outcomes Overview of Project STAY OUT
Data Use Toolkit Charlotte Y. Alverson
Transition Resources for Youth
Post Secondary Outcomes Sally Simich, Oregon Department of Education
Improving Local Programs with Outcome Data Charlotte Alverson, NTACT
Trend Data Guest Speakers: Pattie Johnson, TRI Sally Simich, ODE
Transition: Preparing for Life after High School
Post-Secondary Outcomes Data Collection 2008
Wisconsin Transition Improvement Grant (TIG) Transition Improvement Plan (TIP) Tools to Improve the Postsecondary education and employment outcomes.
Frequently Asked Questions (Revisions indicated in red font)
Post Secondary Outcomes Sally Simich, Oregon Department of Education
Utilizing Indicator 14 data and Evidence Based Resources 2017
Ohio Longitudinal Transition Study (OLTS)
Indicator B-13 Data Collection Changes – Survey Results
CHILD COUNT FY 2019 October 1, CHILD COUNT FY 2019 October 1, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

OAVSNP 2014 Charlotte Alverson, NPSO Pattie Johnson, TRI Sally Simich, ODE 1

Q and A about PSO »How many of you called students in the past for PSO data collection? »How many of you will call students this spring/summer for PSO data collection? »Share positive strategies for those who may be new to the process »Tell us about any trouble or concerns you’ve encountered »How many of you have seen your district data after they were collected?

»PSO data are collected on youth who the districts report left school the previous year, including graduates, age-outs, dropouts, and excludes youth who were not expected to return, but did. »All districts are required to participate each year. Student selection is based on a stratified sample designed to generate a representative sample of leavers to ensure generalizable information. »Districts select who will conduct the interviews, and data entry is open from June through September. Interviews can be completed with young adult or their family members. 3

»Response rate – one measure of the quality of interview data ˃ Defined as the number of completed interviews divided by the number of youth eligible to take the survey »Representativeness – measure of how similar those who respond to the interview are to the target population ˃ Parameter guidelines set by NPSO, and approved by OSEP, as +/-3% 4

YearLDEDID All Others FemaleMinorityDropout 2010Yes No 6% low 2011Yes No 6% low 2012Yes No 6% low 2013Yes No 8% low Completing Interviews with a representative sample of the students who left school the previous year allows Oregon to make statements about all students by disability, gender, race/ ethnicity and dropout.

How many calls would it take to make a difference? »Dropouts: ˃ Statewide, dropouts make up around 25% of the leaver population (1,081 youth). ˃ If each of the districts completed one more interviews with a youth who dropped out, the percent completed for this very important group of leavers would increase from: 18% to 47% ˃ Learning from these youth would have a huge impact on the quality of transition programs in the districts and throughout the state

»Lets look at some overall data trends over the four years of consistent data collection

Sample Leavers, Response Rate, and Completed Interviews for Four Years

Districts with 1-50 annual leavers Every single youth who gets a job, or goes on to get more training has a huge impact on the data, but most important: the district had a huge impact on that youths’ future. Districts with over 50 annual leavers If each of the 19 large districts completed 7 additional interviews next year, the response rate would top 80%. Knowing about the outcomes for 4 of 5 leavers will greatly impact the quality and usefulness of the data collection. We need to know how well prepared the youth who leave our districts are for a successful transition to adult life.

»Required: ˃ Understand if your district has completed enough interviews with the right group of former students. ˃ Look at the current year PSO response rate, engagement rate, and outcomes + What looks out of place? How do you compare to same size districts? To the state? ˃ Look at the trend over the last 4 years to assess direction the district is going. + Are more kids working? In competitive settings? + Do you have an increase in kids in college? Other training? Are you satisfied that the district is doing all it can do?

»There are two new follow up reports on the PSO 2.0 application site »We will show examples of the new report. »Engagement Report includes information on who is engaged and if your sample matches the total leavers »Interview Summary Report summarize your interview data, including the open ended responses. »Comparable reports from 2010, 2011, and 2012 will be available as soon as we make sure everything lines up!

. 16 Goal

17

18

»The Post School Outcomes Data Reports are on the PSO 2.0 Application ˃ Access is provided through District Security Administrator ˃ District and Building level reports available ˃ Exit data entry now open, signed agreement to participate required ˃ Follow Up list of leavers to interview will be posted early April ˃ Data entry for the Follow Up starts June 1 st ˃ Districts must have updated contact information + Primary Exit and Follow Up contacts, + District staff conducting the follow up interviews, + Secondary transition educators. ˃ The Contact List allows state staff to inform appropriate district representatives of trainings and other transition related information.

Questions for the district to consider when looking at reports What do the most recent data show? Can we make district-wide statements using our results, or have we missed dropouts or other groups? Are our students going on to school within a year? Are they able to get and keep jobs for at least 3 months? What percentage of our students are actively working or learning within a year of leaving? Do we have more than a third of our leavers who haven’t done any work or training after leaving high school? Are we getting better at launching successful students?

»Look at the PSO data for your district »Identify areas of strength and areas for improvement »Share and discuss data with stakeholders »Use data to determine what changes are needed »Call Sally and Pattie with questions

For more information: Sally Simich Transition Specialist, Oregon Department of Education Pattie Johnson Teaching Research Institute, Western Oregon University Charlotte Y. Alverson National Post School Outcomes Center, University of Oregon

24