Porewater Collection and Risk Evaluation 27 th Alabama Water Resources Conference Orange Beach, AL Jacob Gruzalski Environmental Standards, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ABSTRACT Background. Sydney Harbour (SH), Nova Scotia has long been subject to effluent and atmospheric inputs of metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
Advertisements

Contaminants at the Estuary Interface Jon Leatherbarrow 1 Rainer Hoenicke 2 Lester McKee 1 1 San Francisco Estuary Institute 2 California Resources Agency.
Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
Battlement Mesa Health Impact Assessment and Exposure/Health Study Stakeholders Meeting Roxana Witter, MD, MSPH John Adgate, PhD, MSPH Lee Newman, MD,
Fish Bioaccumulation Studies Associated with the Kingston Fly Ash Release Marshall Adams - Oak Ridge National Lab Tyler Baker - TVA Allison Fortner - Arcadis.
Irene Seco Manuel Gómez Alma Schellart Simon Tait Erosion resistance and behaviour of highly organic in-sewer sediment 7th International Conference on.
Maryland Assateague Coastkeeper Baltimore Harbor Waterkeeper Chester Riverkeeper Choptank Riverkeeper Patuxent Riverkeeper Sassafras Riverkeeper Severn.
Imagine the result The TVA Kingston Ash Recovery Project: Ecological Risk Approach Daniel Jones † Suzy Young † Amber Stojak † Neil Carriker ‡ † ARCADIS.
NASSCO and Southwest Marine Sediment Investigation Preliminary Results Thomas Ginn, Ph.D. Dreas Nielsen June 18, 2002.
TVA and The Kingston Ash Spill Environmental Disaster By: Tikedra Kellum.
Assessing and Communicating Risk: A Partnership to Evaluate a Superfund Site on Leech Lake Tribal Lands Groundwater Movement and Contamination By Cindy.
Atmospheric Particulate Matter in Proximity to Mountaintop Coal Mines Allan Kolker 1, Mark A. Engle 1,2, William H. Orem 1, Calin A. Tatu 1, Michael Hendryx.
Basic concepts (Early Diagenesis, chapters 2-3) Transport and Physical properties Sedimentation without diagenesis (reactions that alter solid composition.
River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office 100 Area and 300 Area Component of RCBRA Steve.
HydroQual Capabilities for Pathways Analysis in Support of Natural Resource Damage Assessment.
All of these organizations have at least one thing in common…
Hyojin Kim May 9 th 2008 California Water Symposium.
Trends in Bioaccumulation of Fly Ash Contaminants by Aquatic Invertebrates Downstream of the Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston Fossil Plant John G. Smith,
BASFORD GAS WORKS REMEDIATION USING SOIL WASHING TECHNOLOGY.
Phytotechnologies for Environmental Restoration and Management Micah Beard, M.S. Shaw Environmental, Inc.
Great Lakes Monitoring Inventory and Gap Analysis: Recommendations for Addressing Shortfalls and Improving Monitoring Coordination in the Great Lakes Basin.
Hypothesis If levels of mercury are tested in soil and sediment then more mercury will be found in sediment because mercury gets into the water by wet.
Determination of sediment phosphorus concentrations in St. Albans Bay, Lake Champlain: Assessment of internal loading and seasonal variations of phosphorus.
Ecological Risk Assessment Definition -Evaluates the likelihood that adverse ecological effects may occur or are occurring as a result of exposure to one.
Larry Champagne, TCEQ Margaret Roy, Centerline Env. Consulting
Hydrologic Issues in Mountaintop Mining Areas Ronald Evaldi, USGS-WSC, Charleston, WV Daniel Evans, USGS-WSC, Louisville, KY Hugh Bevans, USGS-WSC, Charleston,
The situation in Norway concerning sediments/dredging Tore Lundestad, Port of Borg, Norway.
Vadose-zone Monitoring System
Module 4: Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS. 2 Module Objectives  Explain the purpose of the scoping phase of the RI/FS  Identify existing data which.
Presentation of Findings - Dissolved Methane Method Study Shale Network Workshop May 7-8, 2015 State College, PA Presented by Rock J. Vitale, CEAC Environmental.
February 18, 2004 Public Meeting Barge 120 Spill Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts.
Sediment Quality in the Corpus Christi Bay Sediment Quality in the Corpus Christi Bay Natalie Bartosh GIS in Water Resources, Fall 2003 Dr. Maidment, The.
Ross MacNames Edward Jackson Samantha Quiroga.  Elevated levels of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) found in sediment of the Little Brazos River
GFOA PS3260 Contaminated Sites Workshop Thursday, November 14, 2013 Whitehorse, YT.
INVESTIGATING BIOGEOCHEMICAL CONTROLS ON METAL MIXTURE TOXICITY USING STABLE ISOTOPES AND GENE EXPRESSION Grant # 1R01ES Project Period 8/18/2014.
Brownfields Health Risks & Remediation Diogo Cadima Topic ‘A’ Term Project CET 413.
TVA Kingston Ash Recovery Project Roane County, TN Project Update September, 2012 Neil Carriker.
Environmental Processes Partitioning of pollutants 3.iii Sorption in living media (bioavailability)
23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program Passive Sampling Case Study: United Heckathorn Superfund Site Rachelle S. Thompson, MS, PE US EPA Region 9.
Modeling to Understand Stormwater Management Efforts Portland Harbor Superfund Site Dawn Sanders City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services September.
Linda C. Schaffner AIWA Conference November 18, 2010.
OHHI Beach Modeling Group Meeting March 23, 2006 GLERL, Ann Arbor, MI Project Summary Project Title: Predicting Pathogen Fate in the Great Lakes Coastal.
Presented by Gary Lippner & Glenn Moeller 3 - Year Storm Water Monitoring Action Plan.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
Measurement of Airborne Particulates around Sand Mines and Processing Plants Jeron Jacobson  Zachary Kroening  Kimberly Shermo Dr. Crispin Pierce  Department.
Assessing changes in contaminant fluxes following removal of a dam in the Pawtuxet River Results and Discussion Methods and Approach Passive samplers (polyethylene;
Evaluation of Intrinsic Biodegradation and Amendments to Support Enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery of Sediments Tom Krug and David Himmelheber, Geosyntec.
Watershed interactions and water quality assessment of previously mined mineralized areas Willow Creek Demonstration Watershed, Madison Co., MT,
PART -III Analytical Methods for Metal Speciation in Water and Solids
Porewater: NJDEP Site Remediation Program regulatory perspective
Dredging 2012 San Diego, California October 23, 2012 Ruth L. Forman, CEAC – Environmental Standards, Inc. Rock J. Vitale, CEAC – Environmental Standards,
Brian Hitchens and Sam Williams PCBs in the Urban Environment: Implications for Long-Term Sustainability Of Low-Threshold Remediation.
In Situ Sediment Treatment: State of the Practice
Strategic Planning for Contaminated Sediment Projects: Setting the Course for Proper Project Execution Howard L. Cumberland Geosyntec Consultants October.
B1 Fe(0) and Coke as “Active” Cap Media for PCB Destruction/Sequestration Gregory V. Lowry Kathleen M. Johnson Paul J. Murphy Meghan L. Smith EPA-TIO Anacostia.
Proposed Topics for Application of Sediment Quality Objectives.
How Do People use Earth’s Resource?
The Size, Sorting and Roundness of Sand. Energy Levels of Water  Moving water provides a large amount of energy that is required to transport large sand.
INTRODUCTION TO ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING. EIA Scientific Tools and Techniques2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be able to: 
GO C3Analyze and Evaluate Mechanisms Affecting the Distribution of Potentially Harmful Substances within an Environment. Transport of Materials Through.
David K. Paylor Virginia State Board of Health March 17, 2016.
TTWG Report & Technical Topics SRRTTF Meeting Dave Dilks March 16, 2016.
WVONGA Annual Fall Meeting Wheeling, West Virginia September 11, 2013 Gerald L. Kirkpatrick, P.G. Bryce E. Stearns The Dirty Dozen 12 Ways Your Environmental.
Applied Fieldwork Enquiry
Sedimentary Rocks.
Trace Elements in Dan River Sediment after the 2014 Coal Ash Spill Ricardo P. Fernandez, Caleb Shockley, and Madeline E. Schreiber Department of.
Welcome.
Models for Assessing and Forecasting the Impact of Environmental Key
Pearce Creek DMCF Baseline Exterior Monitoring Spring 2017 Results
BOSTON HARBOR DEEP DRAFT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Presentation transcript:

Porewater Collection and Risk Evaluation 27 th Alabama Water Resources Conference Orange Beach, AL Jacob Gruzalski Environmental Standards, Inc.

Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following individuals for their significant contributions and input:  Dr. Bill Rogers - Tennessee Valley Authority  Dr. Neil Carriker - Tennessee Valley Authority  Mr. Rock Vitale - Environmental Standards, Inc.  Mr. David Thal - Environmental Standards, Inc.  Dr. James Markwiese - Environmental Standards, Inc. 2

Objectives  Define Porewater  Reason for Porewater Collection and Analysis  Importance of Proper Porewater Sampling  Overview of Case Studies  Conclusions 3

Porewater Basics 4

Sediment  Sediment is naturally occurring material that is broken down by processes of weathering and erosion and transported by wind, water, or ice.  Sediment is comprised of an aqueous and solid phase. 5

Porewater – Definition  Porewater is the water filling the spaces between grains of the solid phase of sediment o Sand, silt, and clay  Porewater is the aqueous phase of sediment  By definition porewater cannot exist separate from the solid phase of sediment in the environment 6

Porewater – Ecological Significance  Sediment porewater is a primary exposure pathway of contaminants to the benthic community.  These organisms then have the potential of introducing contaminants into the food chain (fish, aerial feeding birds). 7

Pictorial Conceptual Site Model 8

Why Analyze Porewater? 9

Why analyze porewater?  To collect complete information on sediment contamination  Chemical concentration profiles in sediment porewater are widely used in studies and investigations into contaminant exposure, fate, and transport.  To evaluate potential exposure pathways o Bioavailable vs. Total o Line of evidence in ecological risk assessments o Toxicity testing 10

Why analyze porewater? (cont.)  An understanding of porewater in relation to sediment properties provides for the following: o Complete picture of the exposure to the benthic aquatic environment; o Comprehensive identification of contaminant sources and sinks and their extent; o Prediction of contaminant flux across the sediment-water interface. 11

Why analyze porewater? (cont.)  Evaluating concentrations in porewater is important to differentiate bioavailability of the contaminant from total concentration of the contaminant in the sediment.  This is possible only if porewater data truly reflects the in-situ conditions.  Many sampling and processing techniques do not address the possibility of geochemical transformation during porewater collection and extraction. 12

Porewater Collection 13

Porewater Collection  Collection and processing methods have the potential to cause geochemical changes to the porewater, primarily through oxidation.  This oxidation can lead to biased results that do not accurately represent the natural conditions.  Results can be biased to indicate both higher and lower concentrations compared to in-situ conditions.  What does this mean?  The collection and processing technique selected should be able to produce the most “realistic” data possible 14

Case Studies  Ubatuba Bay, Brazil, River Study  Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston Ash Recovery Project 15

Ubatuba Bay, Brazil, River Study  Aim of study to present results of chemical analysis of ammonium ions from porewater extracted in oxygen-free environment  Sediment samples collected from four river estuaries on Ubatuba Bay in southeast Brazil  Historically, rivers have received discharges of raw sewage 16

Ubatuba Bay, Brazil, River Study (cont.)  Six samples collected from each location and split into two groups  One sample group processed in oxygen-free environment and other sample group exposed to the atmosphere 17

Ubatuba Bay, Brazil, River Study (cont.) 18

Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston Ash Recovery Project (TVA KRP)  Large release of fly ash spilled from containment area at the Kingston, TN, fossil plant in December  Approximately 5.4 million cubic yards of ash released from containment area with the majority discharging into the Emory River.  Two high flow storm events shortly after release 19 December 22, 2008

TVA KRP  In addition to the chemical constituents in fly ash (primarily metals – As, Se), this release also had the ecological impacts of large deposits of ash on the bottom of the river  Fly ash removed from the Emory River by hydraulic and mechanical dredging  Extensive sampling and monitoring program executed throughout the life of the project (ongoing) 20

TVA KRP – Porewater Sampling  Due to the nature of the project, multiple organizations are involved  Porewater samples have been collected by TVA and third-party researchers  Sampling occurred over multiple years at same general locations  Multiple porewater sampling methodologies have been implemented 21

As Porewater vs Total (sediment) 22 As Porewater (mg/L) Total As – Sediment (mg/kg)

As Sequential Extraction Procedure 23

TVA KRP - Summary  PW vs Total As concentrations between the collection methods suggest aerobic technique results in biased (high) data  Sediments included in TVA study have little to no sulfides  SEP data and previously published literature suggest Fe oxide is binding potentially bioavailable As.  Exposure to atmosphere during processing releases As to the porewater 24

Summary  If porewater sample collection is planned, proper collection and processing methods are essential.  The documented effects of oxidation of porewater during collection drives the need for collection and processing of porewater in oxygen-free environment.  Improper sample collection can lead to biased data not reflective of in-situ conditions.  Evaluating in-situ conditions needed to assess bioavailability of contaminants. 25

QUESTIONS? 26

Contact Environmental Standards, Inc. “Setting the Standards for Innovative Environmental Solutions” Headquarters 1140 Valley Forge Road | PO Box 810 | Valley Forge, PA | Virginia 1208 East Market Street | Charlottesville, VA | Tennessee 8331 East Walker Springs Lane, Suite 402 | Knoxville, TN | Texas Richmond Avenue, Suite 350 | Houston, TX | Web | 27