Compensation
Compensation Used to Serve Organizations Goals Enhance Employee Needs but Create Profits Relative Worth of Job Significant Part of HRM Formal Policy Essential
Compensation Policy Objectives To Reward Past Performance To Remain Competitive in Marketplace To Maintain Equity Among Employees To Motivate Future Performance To Maintain a Realistic Budget To Attract New Employees To Reduce Turnover
Indirect Compensation Total Compensation Direct Compensation Indirect Compensation Base Pay Wages Salary Incentives Commissions Piece rate Bonuses Stock Options Profit Sharing Gainsharing Pay for Time Not Worked Vacations Breaks Holidays Sick Days Jury Duty Insurance Plans Medical Hospital Dental Life Surgical Security Plans Pension Social Security Disability Insurance Employee Services Educational Assistance Recreational Programs Food Services
Compensation Policy Concerns Pay a Fair Base Pay Rate Reward Enhanced Performance
Pay-for-Performance Standard Standard by which managers tie compensation to employee effort and performance.
Pay-for-Performance Standard Merit Pay Cash Bonuses Incentive Pay Goal: Increase Performance 15-35%
Pay Equity An employee’s perception that compensation received is equal to the value of the work performed.
Motivating Value of Compensation Pay Equity (Perception of fair value) Pay Expectancy (Rewards, Received = Expected) Pay Secrecy
Bases for Compensation Hourly Monthly Daily Annual Piecework Straight Commission
Hourly Work Work paid on an hourly basis. HOUR
Piecework Work paid according to the number of units produced.
FLSA Classification of Compensation Exempt (Management/Professional) Non-Exempt (hourly) Pay: 1.5 times hourly rate over 40 hrs/week
Exempt Employee Employees not covered by the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act. “Management”
Nonexempt Employees Employees covered by the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act. “Labor”
External and Internal Factors Affecting the Wage Mix External Factors Conditions of the labor market Area wage rates Cost of living Collective bargaining Government Influence Internal Factors Worth of job Employee’s relative worth Employer’s ability to pay Wage Mix Wage Mix
External Influences on Wage Rates Labor Market Conditions Area Wage Rates (Surveys) Cost of Living (CPI Adjustments) Collective Bargaining Government
Internal Influences on Wage Rates Worth of the Job Employee's Relative Worth (merit) Employer's Ability to Pay (competitiveness)
Consumer Price Index (CPI) Measure of the average change in prices over time in a fixed “market basket” of goods and services. “Inflation Influence”
Escalator Clauses Clauses in labor agreements that provide for quarterly cost-of-living adjustments in wages, basing the adjustments upon changes in the consumer price index.
Real Wages Wage increases larger than rises in the consumer price index; that is, the real earning power of wages.
Job Evaluation Systematic process of determining the relative worth of jobs in order to establish which jobs should be paid more than others within an organization.
Job Evaluation Determine "Relative" Worth of Jobs Hierarchy of Jobs (ranking) Assign Pay Rates Purpose: Establish Internal Equity
Four Basic Systems Job Ranking Job Grading Point System Factor Comparison
Job Ranking System Simplest and oldest system of job evaluation by which jobs are arrayed on the basis of their relative worth.
Job Ranking System Establish Committee Define all Jobs Identify Critical Factor (Responsibilities of Importance) Rank Every Job by Critical Factors
Job Classification System System of job evaluation by which jobs are classified and grouped according to a series of predetermined wage grades.
Job Grade System Determine Number of Grades (e.g. 20) Describe Each Grade Review Each Job Description Fit Job into Grade “Government”
Point System Quantitative job evaluation procedure that determines the relative value of a job by the total points assigned to it.
Point System (Quantitative) Identify Compensatable Factors (e.g.) Skill Responsibility Effort Environment Establish Degree Within each Factor (e.g. 1-9) Create a Point Manual Defines Factors (3-9) Definitive Degrees (1-9) Analyze each Job Assign Points Rank by Points
Hay Profile Method Knowledge Mental Activity Accountability Job evaluation technique using three factors – knowledge, mental activity, and accountability – to evaluate executive and managerial positions. Knowledge Mental Activity Accountability
Point Values for Job Factors of the National Metal Trades Association 1st Degree 2nd Degree 3rd Degree 4th Degree 5th Degree Skill 1. Job knowledge 14 28 42 56 70 2. Experience 22 44 66 88 110 3 initiative and ingenuity Effort 4. Physical demand 10 20 30 40 50 5. Mental or visual demand 5 15 25 Responsibility 6. Equipment or process 7. Material or product 8. Safety of others 9. Work of others Job Conditions 10. Working conditions 11. Hazards SOURCE: Developed by the National Metal Trades Association. Reproduced with permission of the American Association of Industrial Management, Springfield, MA.
Description of Knowledge Factors and Degrees of the National Metal Trades Association This factor measures the knowledge or equivalent training required to perform the position duties. 1st Degree Use of reading and writing, adding and subtracting of while numbers; following of instructional use of fixed gauges, direct reading instruments, and similar devices where interpretation is not required. 2nd Degree Use of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division of numbers including decimals and fractions; simple use of formulas, charts, tables, drawings, specifications, schedules, wiring diagrams; use of adjustable measuring instruments; checking of reports, forms, records, and comparable data where interpretation is required. 3rd Degree Use of mathematics together with the use of complicated drawings, specifications, charts, tables; various types of precision measuring instruments. Equivalent to one to three years applied trades training in a particular or specialized occupation. 4th Degree Use of advanced trades mathematics, together with the use of complicated drawings, specifications, charts, tables, handbook formulas; all varieties of precision measuring instruments. Equivalent to complete accredited apprenticeship in a recognized trade, craft or occupation; or equivalent to a two-year technical college education. 5th Degree Use of higher mathematics involved in the application of engineering principles and their performance of related practical operations, together with a comprehensive knowledge of the theories and practices of mechanical, electrical, chemical. Civil, or like engineering field. Equivalent to complete four years of technical college or university education. SOURCE: Developed by the National Metal Trades Association. Reproduced with permission of the American Association of Industrial Management, Springfield, MA.
Factor Comparison System Similar to Point System Distinguished by "Key Jobs" Compensatable Factors Skill Responsibility Mental Effort Working Conditions Physical Effort Assign & Value to Factor Each Job is Assigned a Factor Add up Values to get Wage Rate
Characteristics of Key Jobs Have importance to employees and organizations Vary in terms of job requirements Possess relatively stable job content Are used as important jobs in salary surveys
Compensation Structure Job Evaluation First Assign a Wage Rate Second Base Rate on Wage "Survey" Geographical Area of Worker Draw
Components of the Wage Structure Range Steps Midpoint of Range Rate Range Range Overlap Wage Classes
Wage and Salary Survey Surveys of the wages paid to employees of other employers in the surveying organization’s relevant labor market.
Wage and Salary Surveys Select key jobs. Determine relevant labor market. Select organizations. Decide on information to collect: wages/benefits/pay policies. Compile data received. Determine wages and benefits to pay.
Wage Curve Curve in a scattergram representing the relationship between relative worth of jobs and wage rates.
Wage Rates Point Value of Jobs
Survey Data Government Statistical Survey Employer Initiated Survey By Job Classification World Wide Web
Pay Grades Groups of jobs within a particular class that are paid the same rate or rate range.
SINGLE RATE STRUCTURE Evaluated Points Wage Rates 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00 Organization wage curve 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Wage Classes
Point Conversion Table Wage Class Point Range Hourly Rate Range 1 101-150 $14.25-15.50 2 151-200 $15.25-16.50 3 201-250 $16.25-17.50 4 251-300 $17.25-18.50 5 301-350 $18.25-19.50 6 351-400 $19.25-20.50 7 401-450 $20.25-21.50 8 450-500 $21.25-22.50
Wage Structure with Increasing Rate Ranges
Issues in Rate Structures Wage Rate Compression Narrow Difference from Job to Job White-Grey-Blue Collar Impact Low Morale/Turnover/Behavior Two Tier Wage Systems A/B Scales Time of Employment Grandfathering Cost of Living Comparison (COLA)
Government Regulations Overtime Mandate (1 1/2 times over 40 hours) Pay Prevailing Rates in Area Minimum Wages Child Labor (16-19 yrs) Equal Rights for All
Comparable Worth The concept that male and female jobs that are dissimilar, but equal in terms of value or worth to the employer, should be paid the same.
Wage-Rate Compression Compression of differentials between job classes, particularly the differential between hourly workers and their managers.
Advantages of Incentive Pay Programs Employee effort is focused on important targets Rewards are variable costs linked to results Incentives are directly related to improved performance Incentives reward those responsible for higher performance
Straight Piecework Incentive plan under which employees receive a certain rate for each unit produced.
Differential Piece Rate Compensation rate under which employees whose production exceeds the standard amount of output receive a higher rate for all of their work than the rate paid to those who do not exceed the standard amount.
Employee Opposition to Incentive Plans Production standards are set unfairly. Incentive plans are really “work speedup.” Incentive plans create competition among workers. Increased earnings result in tougher standards. Payout formulas are complex and difficult to understand. Incentive plans cause friction between employees and management.
Six Components of Effective Incentive Plan Administration Grant incentives based on performance Adequate financial resources to reward performance Clearly defined and accepted performance standards Easily understood payout formula Reasonable administrative costs Wide coverage of employees
Merit Guidelines Guidelines for awarding merit raises that are ties to performance objectives.
Motivating Through Merit Raises
Bonus Incentive payment that is supplemented to the base wage.
Team or Group Incentive Plan Compensation plan where all team members receive an incentive bonus payment when productive or services standards are met or exceeded.
Standard Hourly Plan Incentive plan that sets rates based upon the completion of a job in a predetermined standard time.
Criticisms of Executive Incentive Plans Incentive payments are excessive compared with return to stockholders. Time periods for judging and rewarding performance are too short. Quarterly earnings growth is emphasized at the expense of research and development. Emphasis is placed upon equaling or exceeding executive salary survey averages. Benefits do no relate closely to individual performance
Perquisites Special benefits given to executives; often referred to as perks.
Executive Perquisites Company-provided car Free financial consulting Club memberships Use of company plane and yacht Low-cost or no-cost loans Special travel allowances Limousine service Kidnap and ransom protection Free legal counseling Family member travel allowances Home entertainment allowance Payment of children’s educational expense Executive dining room Estate planning
Straight Commission Plan Compensation plan based upon a percentage of sales.
Straight Salary Plan Compensation plan that permits salespeople to be paid for performing various duties that are not reflected immediately in their sales volume.
Combined Salary and Commission Plan Compensation plan that includes a straight salary and a commission.
Gainsharing Plans Programs under which both employees and the organization share the financial gains according to a predetermined formula that reflects improved productivity and profitability.
Profit Sharing Any procedure by which an employer pays, or makes available to all regular employees, in addition to base pay, special current or deferred sums based upon the profits of the enterprise.
Relationship of Compensation Management to Other HRM Functions
Compensation Hot Links Abbott, Langer, and Associates ERI Hewitt Associates Office Team Robert Half America’s Job Bank World at Work (Formerly ACA)