Teacher Development and Evaluation Model October 22, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Analyzing Student Work
Effective use of protocols: Don't waste my time Bethann M. McCain Educational Consultant, CIU #10.
Campus Improvement Plans
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
WASC Parent Focus Group #2: Organization October 8, 2012.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Professional Learning Communities. Today’s Learning Targets ✓ I can explain common formative assessments. ✓ I can unwrap a standard. ✓ I can identify.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
Missouri Integrated Model Mid-Year Meeting – January 14, 2009 Topical Discussion: Teams and Teaming Dr. Doug HatridgeDonna Alexander School Resource SpecialistReading.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Timberlane Regional School District
Principal Professional Learning Team August 2012.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
The Professional Learning and Evaluation Model. Missouri Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation Measures educator performance against research-based,
April The time we spend at meetings to achieve this mission is valuable and must be utilized effectively and efficiently. * Assume best intentions.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
GARDEN CITY DISTRICT LEADERSHIP November 6, 2012.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
SUMMER INSTITUTEJULY 7-8, 2015 | TULSA, OK Maximizing Impact Using the Global Focus List to Review Interventions.
Welcome! Find your “vertical team” table Be sure you know everyone at your table. We will begin at 8:30!
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
Office of Service Quality
Office of Service Quality
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
NOVEMBER 2011 PRINCIPAL PROFESSIONAL LEARNING TEAM.
Coffee County School System Sept A Vision for Public Education in Georgia.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Required Skills for Assessment Balance and Quality: 10 Competencies for Educational Leaders Assessment for Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders.
Using the CLASS tool to Improve Instructional Practices in Early Childhood Tracie Dow and Felicia Owo.
Evaluation: An Opportunity to leverage learning at all levels School Board Presentation – May 22, 2013.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
ADVANCED (SACS) SYSTEM SUMMARY FY15. STANDARD ONE INDICATORS 1.1-The system engages in a systematic, inclusive and comprehensive process to review, revise.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Collaborative Leadership
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Development and Evaluation Model October 22, 2012

Review of Norms The time we spend at meetings to achieve this mission is valuable and must be utilized effectively and efficiently. Assume best intentions and seek clarification when needed. Think, speak, and act in the best interests of students and the adults who support their development. Be there ready to begin on time, be prepared, and be accountable. Avoid side conversation. Seek to build trust by keeping an open mind (even though change is a risk), maintaining a safe and supportive environment that encourages growth and development, nurture risk-taking and innovation, and forgive mistakes. Challenge assumptions and risk personal discomfort to provide opportunities to learn. Abide by group decisions and support those decisions with professional behavior. Maintain a healthy humor, celebrate and laugh together. Keep cell phones silent and leave all non-emergency calls to attend to after the meeting or during breaks.

Essential Question To what extent is the Professional Learning and Evaluation Model contributing to the achievement of Goal #5 of the Strategic Plan? Goal #5 Recruit, employ, develop and retain an exceptional staff dedicated to and representative of Parkway’s diverse community.

Topical Question How can we incorporate the state requirement of measurements of student growth in learning to the Parkway Professional Development and Evaluation Model?

Goals Review implementation of the Parkway Professional Learning and Evaluation Model Determine Parkway’s action to incorporate student growth in Parkway’s teacher evaluation model

Data Protocol Phase I Predictions (5 Minutes) o Surfacing perspectives, beliefs, assumptions, predictions, possibilities, questions, and expectations Phase II Observations (20 Minutes) o Analyzing the data for patterns, trends, surprises, and new questions that “jump” out Phase III Inferences (10 Minutes) o Generating hypotheses, inferring, explaining, and drawing conclusions. Defining new actions and interactions and the data needed to guide their implementation. Building ownership for decisions

What did we learn about the new model from analyzing the data? MIP Most Important Point o What is the Most Important Point to be conveyed to staff members regarding the new Professional Learning and Evaluation Model? o Write your response on a note card. o Circle Share

Missouri Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation Measures educator performance against research-based, proven practices associated with the improvement of student performance Uses multiple ratings to differentiate levels of performance Highlights a probationary period of adequate duration to ensure sufficient induction and socialization support for new teachers and leaders Includes measures of growth in student learning as a significant part of the evaluation of professional practice at all levels Provides ongoing, timely, deliberate and meaningful feedback on performance relative to research-based targets Requires standardized, periodic training for evaluators to ensure reliability and accuracy Utilizes the results and data to inform decisions regarding personnel, employment determinations and policy regarding employment 8

Enduring Understandings Parkway stakeholders will understand that… An effective evaluation instrument provides feedback to teachers about their practice and connects to professional development. An effective evaluation instrument emphasizes collaboration between teacher and administrator throughout the process. An effective evaluation instrument must be designed in such a way as to facilitate consistency in use among evaluators and evaluatees. Highly effective evaluation instruments focus on mission ‐ related student learning outcomes Highly effective evaluation instruments provide clear descriptions of the role and responsibility of the teacher inside and outside of the classroom.

Missouri Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation Measures educator performance against research-based, proven practices associated with the improvement of student performance Uses multiple ratings to differentiate levels of performance Highlights a probationary period of adequate duration to ensure sufficient induction and socialization support for new teachers and leaders Includes measures of growth in student learning as a significant part of the evaluation of professional practice at all levels Provides ongoing, timely, deliberate and meaningful feedback on performance relative to research-based targets Requires standardized, periodic training for evaluators to ensure reliability and accuracy Utilizes the results and data to inform decisions regarding personnel, employment determinations and policy regarding employment 10

Student Growth The state of Missouri Office of Educator Quality requires the use of measures of growth in student learning as a part of the evaluation process a)More than a once a year test, although state assessments should be included where available b)Multiple measures showing growth in learning across two points in time (DESE Presentation to District Leadership – Fall 2012)

Measures of growth in student learning 12 Essential Principle #4 Key Components Is a significant part of the evaluation process Includes multiple measures of growth in student learning Includes formative and summative measures Highlights growth in student learning Includes state assessments and additional district assessments

Questions to Consider What is already included in the Domain: Monitoring, Assessment and Feedback aligned to the principle? Where (in the model) are we going to include this measurement? What are we going to use for this measurement? o What assessments do we have in place that we can use? o What needs to be created?

What is already included in Monitoring, Assessment and Feedback? Review the Domain (Including the Overview Paragraph) o What do we have? What is missing? Individual Notes Table Consensus Group Share

Adding a Criteria TQ: Where in the model are we going to include this?

Examples 16 SummativeFormativeAdditional EOC MAP Standardized Achiev Semester Exam Benchmark Common Formative Assessments Curriculum Based Measurements Pre-Test Observation Student Work Samples Portfolios Projects Presentations

What “summative, formative, and additional” assessments exist in Parkway? How can every teacher demonstrate student growth in a systemic fashion? What needs to be created? o Timeline 17 Multiple Measures

Next Steps What are our next steps?