Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

Graduation and Employment: Program Evaluation Using Dr. Michele F. Ernst Chief Academic Officer Globe Education Network.
SLO Assessment Departmental Tools and Examples from the Field Sacramento City College Fall Flex Workshop 8/21/08 8/21/08Presenters: Alan Keys Faculty Research.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
THIS WORKSHOP WILL ADDRESS WHY THE FOLLOWING ARE IMPORTANT: 1. A comprehensive rationale for funding; 2. Measurable objectives and performance indicators/performance.
Best Practices in Assessment, Workshop 2 December 1, 2011.
Program Review: The Foundation for Institutional Planning and Improvement.
STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT PLANNING Presentation to CLAS Unit Heads Nov. 16, 2005 Maria Cimitile Julie Guevara Carol Griffin.
ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS FOR TSPC ACCREDITATION Assessment and Work Sample Conference January 13, 2012 Hilda Rosselli, Western Oregon University.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
1 KapCC Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Framework Faculty Senate SLO Committee Presented by Kristine Korey-Smith.
Portfolios. ULTIMATE GOAL: A portfolio should be something a student can take to job or college interviews. It serves as documentation of achievements.
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Guide to Evidence for WASC Accreditation Dr. Robert Gabriner City College of San Francisco Student Learning Outcomes Workshop Strand 3.
Assessment at UW-Platteville What we are doing to assess student learning? What improvements we have made as a result?
LEARNING PROFILE Title of Degree Program PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS (Description, Unique Experiences, Inputs, Outcomes) (EXAMPLES) Year Established. Accreditation.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
1 Cosumnes River College’s Institutional Self Study Norv Wellsfry Fall 2007.
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration – Initiated in 2003 – Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
August 3,  Review “Guiding Principles for SLO Assessment” (ASCCC, 2010)  Review Assessment Pulse Roundtable results  Discuss and formulate our.
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration –Initiated in 2003 –Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
LEARNING OUTCOMES WORKSHOP Dr. Jan Hillman University of North Texas January 8, 2007.
Department Mission Statement and Program Learning Outcomes.
Student Services Assessment Workshop College of the Redwoods Angelina Hill & Cheryl Tucker Nov 28 th & 30 th, 2011.
Student Learning Outcome Assessment: A Program’s Perspective Ling Hwey Jeng, Director School of Library and Information Studies June 27,
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Learning Outcomes Made Easy Using the Best Tools Jeffrey D. Keith, Ph.D. J. Kelly Flanagan, Ph.D. Russell T. Osguthorpe, Ph.D. Danny R. Olsen, Ph.D. Tom.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
Educational Effectiveness Fall Faculty Retreat 2006 Leanne Neilson Halyna Kornuta.
ASSESSMENT OF CORE SKILLS/ GENERAL EDUCATION OUTCOMES Angelina Hill, PhD Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Full-Time Faculty In-Service: Program and Student Learning Outcomes Fall 2005.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
Evidence and Standard Two. The Big Picture The Big Picture Standard Two is about: Curriculum Curriculum Planned, overseen curriculum – with clear outcomes.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
“Performance Measures – A Dialogue” INTRODUCTIONS Presenters Larry Dendy – Pitt Community College Ladelle Harmon – McDowell Community College Bill Lefevers.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
VT University Libraries: Identifying, Teaching, and Assessing What Matters Most Office of Academic Assessment Ray Van Dyke,
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
College of Education Graduate Programs
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Resources for Science 1.
Texas Tech University PROGRAM-LEVEL ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP WRAP-UP SESSION FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 11,
Learning Goals at St. John Fisher College Peter J. Gray, Ph.D. Director of Academic Assessment United States Naval Academy May 2004.
Introduction to Academic Assessment John Duffield Office of Academic Assessment Georgia State University September 2013.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
UK Office of Assessment. The LEARNING Initiative Dual Track Implementation Strategy Completion Dates Not actively engaged in program level assessment.
MT. SAN JACINTO COLLEGE Accreditation Self Study Report 2011 presented by Rebecca Teague, Accreditation Liaison Officer Steering & Standard Chair Committee.
Getting Ready for the Higher Learning Commission (NCA) July 2011 Dr. Linda Johnson HLC/Assessment Coordinator/AQIP Liaison Southeast Technical Institute.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 1: CONTENT AND PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014.
Educational Effectiveness Assessing WIC Student Learning Outcomes October 2006 Halyna Kornuta.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011
Curriculum and Accreditation
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Accreditation and curriculum
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Presentation transcript:

Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges

ASSESSMENT OF INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY What does the Commission expect? What is the best presentation?

Data the Commission Expects Accreditors are required by the US Department of Education to examine certain data elements. Accreditors ask that colleges and their staffs develop a culture and practice of assessment based in evidence, and a culture and practice of incorporating data and analyses into decision making and efforts to improve. Accreditors expect institutions to pursue research questions in greater depth over time.

Student Achievement Data

Does the institution collect data on, analyze, and reflect on Student Readiness for college and Student Progress through college? Student Readiness:   Student preparedness for college   Student learning needs continued…

Student Achievement Data Student Progress:   Course completion data   Student progress to next course   Persistence semester to semester   Student program completioncontinued…

Student Achievement Data   Degree and Certificate completion   Student graduation rate   Student transfer rate   Student job placement   Licensure information   Other achievement data?

Student Learning Outcome Data

  Evidence of defined and established SLOs at course, certificate, and degree program levels (inc. gen. ed.)   Evidence of dialogue about SLO development, analysis, and their use for improvement of instruction and services Continued…

Student Learning Outcome Data   Evidence that SLOs are measured and analyzed to improve instruction and services, evaluate institutional effectiveness, and plan improvements   Evidence that students are learning (samples of student work or summary data on SLOs) Guide to Evaluating Institutions

Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes Direct Assessment Methods

Measure competencies or attainment levels reached by students (skills, abilities, knowledge)

Direct Assessment Methods include such things as… Capstone experiences Classroom assessment techniques Music/Dance productions Evaluation by employers Exit exams and interviews Licensure information continued…

Direct Assessment Methods include such things as… Paintings, drawings and other samples of student work Portfolios (which are reviewed for evidence of learning and development) Practicum and internship evaluation Tests with grading rubrics

BEWARE of methods (sometimes referred to as indirect assessment) which only assume learning has occurred Grades Success rates Retention rates Enrollment patterns Degrees/Certificates awarded Placement Outcomes of special programs

Assessment of General Education Student Services Library and Learning Support Services

Assessment of General Education   Evidence that faculty have dialogue about the philosophy of gen. ed.   Inclusion of humanities and fine arts, natural sciences, social sciences   Evidence that students can investigate, analyze, use critical thinking skills, relate to others, have a sense of responsibility for actions, and be lifelong learners

General Education Assessment Methods  Capstone projects or experiences  Portfolios of student work samples  Tests with grading rubrics

Assessment of Student Services   Student Services undergoes program review   Recognizes its role as contributing to student development   Assessment of each service is occurring

Student Services Assessment Methods   Surveys   Retention and completion rates   Extracurricular activities and their role in developing leadership, self-esteem, and confidence   Assessment of Learning Strategies Courses and Learning Communities   Analysis of “alert plans” continued

Student Services Assessment Methods   Follow up on special needs students   Exit interviews with students   Assessing Orientation Programs   Assessing Career Planning Programs   Outcomes of students who utilized services (vs. non-users)

Assessment of Library and Learning Support Services Library and Learning Support Services undergo program review Recognizes its role in contributing to the achievement of student learning outcomes Provides ongoing instruction and support to develop skills in information competency

Library and Learning Support Services Assessment Methods Surveys Surveys Student evaluation of program quality Student evaluation of program quality Skills assessment Skills assessment Research and Assessment of student achievement of SLOs Research and Assessment of student achievement of SLOs

ASSESSMENT OF INSTITUTIONAL RESOURCES, STRUCTURES, AND PROCESSES

Basic Data on Institutional Effectiveness Data on educational mission/community or student needs. What are the educational programs that the institution offers? What community needs (e.g., labor market needs, special population needs) are the programs designed to meet?

Basic Data on Institutional Effectiveness Data on institutional resources – their quality and quantity. Descriptions and analyses of staff, funds, facilities, equipment, technologies: What are these resources? Are they sufficient and appropriate to serve the college’s mission? How have they changed over time, and why? What does program review suggest about needs for resource improvement?

Basic Data on Institutional Effectiveness Data on institutional processes – their qualities and use. Descriptions and analyses of processes for governance, curriculum, hiring, registering, etc. What are these processes? Are they sufficient and appropriate to serve the college’s mission? How have they changed over time, and why? What does program review suggest about needs for process improvement?

Basic Data on Institutional Effectiveness Data on educational programs – their quality and effectiveness   Descriptions of regular program reviews that assess currency of program content and the degree to which existing programs respond sufficiently to community demand and student needs. Are programs sufficient and appropriate to serve the college’s mission? How have they changed over time, and why? What does program review suggest about needs for improvement in educational programs?

Presentation of Data

Data and Analyses on Educational Effectiveness Student Achievement – measuring student progress: Data on Incoming Students: Demographic data – who are they? Data on Student Educational Goals Students Incoming Educational Levels Assessment Test Results High School or GED Education Prior College experience/coursework continued

Data and Analyses on Educational Effectiveness Data and analyses on student achievement of educational goals or milestones Course, program and degree completion Persistence to next semester Transfer or Job Placement/Advancement Other relevant data and analyses such as: Time to completion or degree Course taking patterns Data that has been generated to answer questions the institution raises /special studies

Data and Analyses on Educational Effectiveness Student Learning Outcomes – measuring student learning: Institutional definitions of SLOs at course, program, certificate, or degree levels Institutional mapping showing assignment of SLOs to courses or learning experiences for programs, certificates, or degrees Assessment tools defined or described and presented to team, including tests, portfolios, rubrics, etc. Aggregate data on learning results as the college collects and uses it. (course, program, certificate, and degree levels)

Archiving and Presenting Data Used for College Dialogue Archiving and Presenting Data Used for College Dialogue Fact Books online or hard copy Fact Books online or hard copy On-line Program Review Data/updated annually On-line Program Review Data/updated annually Key data trends presented in decision making settings – such as committee meetings. Key data trends presented in decision making settings – such as committee meetings. Board and college multimedia presentations with data on institutional effectiveness. Board and college multimedia presentations with data on institutional effectiveness. What ever works for the institution to distribute data and encourage its use. What ever works for the institution to distribute data and encourage its use.

Presenting Data and Analyses to Accreditors Self Study Report – Introduction Self Study Report – Introduction Fact Books on line or hard copy Fact Books on line or hard copy On line program review data On line program review data Key data trends in institutional reports Key data trends in institutional reports Team Room documents Team Room documents

Things to Remember Accreditors want institutions to be self- assessing, self-reflective and self-improving organizations. How a college chooses to engage in collecting and analyzing data, developing important research questions and a practice of inquiry, and implementing improvements is probably somewhat unique at each institution. Accreditors want institutions to be self- assessing, self-reflective and self-improving organizations. How a college chooses to engage in collecting and analyzing data, developing important research questions and a practice of inquiry, and implementing improvements is probably somewhat unique at each institution. Accreditor templates should be minimum requirements so as not to limit how an institution engages in self-evaluation over time. Accreditor templates should be minimum requirements so as not to limit how an institution engages in self-evaluation over time. continued… continued…

Things to Remember Accreditation is a peer review process. An institution’s peers will be evolving their own expectations of how data can be presented over time. Expectations will rise. Accreditation is a peer review process. An institution’s peers will be evolving their own expectations of how data can be presented over time. Expectations will rise. Accreditors look at institutional resources, structures, processes, and outcomes. They will examine how a college uses its data and analyses as well data on student achievement and student learning outcomes. Accreditors look at institutional resources, structures, processes, and outcomes. They will examine how a college uses its data and analyses as well data on student achievement and student learning outcomes.