Enhancing assessment capacity For teachers of Authority and Authority-registered subjects.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Skills development in the study of a world religion
Advertisements

Analyzing Student Work
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
Key Stage 3 National Strategy Standards and assessment: session 3.
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
What is Monitoring? Information for panellists. Quality assurance of Authority subjects Monitoring poses the question: “How well is the school implementing.
Evaluating Student Work in a Standards-based Framework.
Dr Jim Briggs Masterliness Not got an MSc myself; BA DPhil; been teaching masters students for 18 years.
Workshop: Translating graduate attributes into classroom learning A/Prof Simon Barrie Institute for Teaching and Learning Hong Kong Institute of Education.
Assessing Student Learning: Using the standards, progression points and assessment maps Workshop 1: An overview FS1 Student Learning.
Consultation on Senior Cycle Science Anna Walshe Brendan Duane
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
How well did the assessment task do what we wanted it to do? Janina Drazek Manager — Assessment & Comparability, QCAR Queensland Studies Authority.
Consistency of Assessment
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Thinking, reasoning and working mathematically
Queensland Studies Authority Quality-assurance processes.
MATHEMATICS KLA Years 1 to 10 Understanding the syllabus MATHEMATICS.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
INTRODUCTION TO THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION’s ACHIEVEMENT CHART Bedford Park PS September 2013.
Bloom’s Critical Thinking Level 1 Knowledge Exhibits previously learned material by recalling facts, terms, basic concepts, and answers.
 A set of objectives or student learning outcomes for a course or a set of courses.  Specifies the set of concepts and skills that the student must.
‘Positively defined learning outcomes’ Harriet Barnes Standards, Quality and Enhancement 19 June 2015.
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
DVC Level 1 Achievement Standards
Supporting Learning With Digital Literacy. Goals of Meeting Information tools to share with your staff; launching survey on instruction using technology.
PLANNING YOUR EPQ How to write a great research paper – Cambridge Uni.
Introducing the Queensland system of externally moderated school-based assessment in Years 11–12.
Presenting History Using Photostory January 2010 History Connected Teaching American History Grant Connections to Standards: Massachusetts History and.
The New Studies of Religion Syllabus Implementation Package: Session Two.
Session 2 Learning Outcomes: articulating our expectations Active Learning Initiative Patrick A. Frantom, Ph.D. Department of Chemistry Adapted from Driscoll,
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
national qualification framework and the learning outcomes based education Petar Bezinović University of Rijeka and Institute for Social Research in Zagreb.
Quick Flip Questioning for Critical Thinking Kobets S.A. Lyceum №87.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Stages 1 and 2 Wednesday, August 4th, Stage 1: Step 5 National and State Standards.
Research Methods and Techniques Lecture 8 Technical Writing 1 © 2004, J S Sventek, University of Glasgow.
Writing Student-Centered Learning Objectives Please see Reference Document for references used in this presentation.
Exploring Evidence.
VELS The Arts. VELS (3 STRANDS) Physical, Personal and Social Learning Discipline-based Learning Interdisciplinary Learning.
Stages of monitoring Information for panellists. Monitoring Occurs mid-way through the course of study Review panels consider how schools have implemented.
Does this learning goal focus on what the student will do? Objective: Conservation of energy A.Yes B.No C.Depends on context.
Bloom’s Critical Thinking Questioning Strategies A Guide to Higher Level Thinking Adapted from Ruth Sunda and Kyrene de las Brisas.
The advantages of adopting learning outcomes
Source : The Problem Learning and innovation skills increasingly are being recognized as the skills that separate students who are.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
The Achievement Chart Mathematics Grades Note to Presenter:
The School Effectiveness Framework
Using the Tool for schools to quality assure an assessment instrument.
Aspect 1 Defining the problem - Problem: The design context will normally offer a variety of potential problems to solve. A focused problem and need is.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
Stage 1 Integrated learning Coffee Shop. LEARNING REQUIREMENTS The learning requirements summarise the knowledge, skills, and understanding that students.
Dr Jane Tonge Senior Examiner
Integration of Australian Curriculum English Implementation Workshops Term 3, 2015.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Investigate Plan Design Create Evaluate (Test it to objective evaluation at each stage of the design cycle) state – describe - explain the problem some.
©2007 RUSH University Medical Center Writing Effective Learning Objectives Chris Zakrzewski, MS Ningchun Han, EdD.
Writing Learning Outcomes Best Practices. Do Now What is your process for writing learning objectives? How do you come up with the information?
MATHEMATICS KLA Years 1 to 10 Planning MATHEMATICS Years 1 to 10.
Creating a Positive Learning Environment
Writing Great Learning Outcomes
Research Skills.
Partnership for Practice
Structuring the independent fieldwork investigation
Technology and Living Third Consultation
Learning outcomes in higher education
Dance 2019 v1.1 IA3 high-level annotated sample response
An overview of course assessment
Presentation transcript:

Enhancing assessment capacity For teachers of Authority and Authority-registered subjects

What are schools responsible for?

Years 11–12 subject pages Syllabuses and implementation advice

Scroll down More resources Years 11–12 subject pages

Highlighted standards Where to find: Highlighted standards

Highlighted standards

Annotated sample student responses are available for many subjects Where to find: Annotated sample responses

Annotated sample student responses

Annotated non-written student responses Effective construction and clear communication of intended and explicit meaning applying deep knowledge and critical understanding of materials, technologies, techniques and processes The student makes informed decisions about media use The artwork clearly embodies the intentions stated in the research phase

Documents to assist assessment design Assessment design

Context framework for assessment Adapted from: Queensland Studies Authority 2008, Building Student Success: A guide to the Queensland Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Framework, QSA, Brisbane.

Identify curriculum Syllabus/SAS General objectives Standards Using the general objectives (GOs) to plan assessment Develop assessment Work program Assessment plan Consider teaching and learning experiences

Synthesis and evaluation By the conclusion of the course, students should: synthesise information on health issues to make decisions, formulate actions and solutions evaluate data and justify recommendations, conclusions, strategies … Determining the GOs and standards Using the syllabus and the school work program, determine which dimension/s of the GOs will be assessed. The dimension of the general objectives chosen for a particular assessment instrument

Activity — identify a general objective Choose one dimension of the general objectives for your subject, e.g. synthesis and evaluation. Highlight each of the cognition words (action words). Choose one general objective cognition word that matches a word you would like to work with on the handout list, e.g. justify.

Health Education example Synthesis and evaluation Synthesis and evaluation uses information gained, including the application of concepts and theories, to make decisions, reach conclusions, solve problems and justify solutions and/or actions. Synthesis is the creation of meaning and coherence from a wide variety of sources. From: Health Education Senior Syllabus 2010, Queensland Studies Authority, p.4

By the conclusion of the course, students should: synthesise information on health issues to make decisions, formulate actions and solutions evaluate data and justify recommendations, conclusions, strategies and actions make decisions about strategies to communicate ideas. Evaluation involves the ability to use criteria and evidence to appraise the extent to which alternative ideas, proposals or solutions to a problem are appropriate, effective or satisfying.

Activity — select a sample action Use the handout Planning learning experiences and assessment: Using the general objectives Select the cognition word (sample action) that you are going to focus on and highlight this word.

Complete the element of the general objective that you are going to expand on. Activity — select an aspect of the GO

Consider what learning experiences could be used to develop this particular aspect of the general objectives. Activity — consider learning experiences

How could students demonstrate this learning in an assessment task/item? Activity — consider assessment Write some assessment ideas that might allow the students to demonstrate the aspect of the general objective.

Activity — completed sample

Consider teaching and learning experiences Making judgments about student responses Make judgments Identify curriculum Syllabus/SAS General objectives Standards Develop assessment Work program Assessment plan

Making judgments — alignment The dimension/s of the general objectives chosen for a particular assessment instrument Standards descriptors: drawn from syllabus dimension/s and standards to inform assessment design and instrument-specific criteria and standards (also known as a criteria sheet). Standards matrix

Criteria are the properties or characteristics by which student work is judged or appraised. Criteria and standards link to the general objectives. Standards descriptors are statements that succinctly convey required qualities or features that can be matched to student work at various standards. Making judgments — criteria and qualities

Use the Standards matrix Highlight the degree words from A to E for the standard that best matches the general objective you have been working with. Activity — making judgments

Standard AStandard C The student work has the following characteristics: insightful synthesis of significant information and ideas providing discerning decisions, actions or solutions synthesis of information and ideas providing decisions, actions or solutions critical evaluation that comprehensively justifies recommendations, conclusions, strategies and actions evaluation and brief justifications of recommendations, conclusions, strategies and actions discerning and effective choice of communication strategies that enhance meaning and impact. suitable choice of communication strategies that convey meaning.

Activity — making judgments Examine the standards from the syllabus you used for the activity. Consider the assessment idea you have devised. Discuss Standard A and Standard C Find differences between the qualitative words in the two standards and evidence that may be seen in student responses. Standard AStandard C critical evaluation that comprehensively justifies recommendations, conclusions, strategies and actions evaluation and brief justifications of recommendations, conclusions, strategies and actions

Using evidence to make judgments Teachers make judgments about: student responses to assessment instruments levels of achievement using a folio of student responses.

Resources Learning experiences and assessment instruments should be planned and refined with reference to: Syllabus general objectives and standards The school’s work program Quality assuring senior assessment instruments: A tool for schools Designing effective assessment instruments for Authority and Authority-registered subjects.

Constructing quality assessment Adapted from: Queensland Studies Authority 2008, Building Student Success: A guide to the Queensland Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Framework, QSA, Brisbane.