Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 1 Quality of Bioequivalence.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
Advertisements

PRINCIPLES OF A CALIBRATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Good Clinical Practices
Presentation of BE data in a product dossier Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
HOT TOPICS ARCHIVING OR HOW NOT TO DUMP YOUR RUBBISH!
The Early Phase (0-I-II) Clinical Drug Research Unit of Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC) prof dr L. Van Bortel Drug Research Unit Maastricht.
Clinical QA Data Audits A GCP Point of View Linda Del Paggio GCP Compliance BioBridges, LLC.
SOP Melody Lin, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office for Human Research Protections Director, International Activities Santiago, Chile August.
1st Global QA Conference & 21st SQA Annual Meeting Falcon Consulting Group, LLC 1 Phase I Clinical Study Audits “A Deeper Scrutiny” Cheryl J. Priest, R.N.
Developed by Klinikos; Roy Fraser (2012) Investigator Study File
Managing Sponsorship Research Services University of Oxford.
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 1 Regulatory Requirements.
Slide 1 of 19D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept Training Workshop for Evaluators from National Medicines Regulatory Authorities in East African Community.
Pharmaceutical Product Quality Assurance Through CMC Drug Development Process Presented by Darlene Rosario (Aradigm) 21 October 2003 Meeting of the Advisory.
Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCPs)
Good Laboratory Practices (GLPs)
World Health Organization
Good Laboratory Practice
Regulatory Overview.
Quality Assurance in Bio-availability / Bio-equivalence studies. DR
Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines Quality of BE Data Dr. Henrike Potthast Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable.
Recapture of Day 1 Suchart Chongprasert, Ph.D. Food and Drug Administration “Practical Aspects in Performing Clinical and Bioanalytical Parts in BA/BE.
Good Clinical Practice (GCP)- An introduction Dr Noor Ibrahim Mohamed Sakian.
Target Institute of Medical Education & Research (TIMER) Provides Clinical Research services to Pharmaceutical, Biotechnology product companies right.
Regulatory Authority Governing Clinical Trials Anthony J. Minisi, MD Director, Cardiology Fellowship Program.
Carolyn Hommel Good Clinical Practice Program FDA February 25, 2004
A S Nanivadekar Introduction to GCP. A S Nanivadekar Outline Definition and scope Definition and scope Purpose of clinical research Purpose of clinical.
CONFIDENTIAL Copyright  Cato Research Ltd. 1 How do clinical trials relate to the MRF1? Lynn Katsoulis SAPPRA 23 March 2007.
Elements of Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Regulatory Coordinator –SCTR SUCCESS Center QA Monitor – NIDA Clinical Trials Network Stephanie Gentilin,
MODULE I Close-Out Visit/Monitoring Reports Jane Fendl April 24, Versions: Final 24-Apr-2010.
PERSONNEL TRAINING IN BIOANALYSIS DR. SHIVPRAKASH MANAGING DIRECTOR SYNCHRON RESEARCH SERVICES PVT. LTD., INDIA.
Good Laboratory Practice CFR 21 Part 58 A Review for OCRA US RAC Study Group September 2005 Ginger Clasby, MS Promedica International
Joint Research & Enterprise Office Training The team, the procedures, the monitor and the Sponsor Lucy H H Parker Clinical Research Governance Manager.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
WHO Workshop on Assessment of Bioequivalence Data Addis Ababa, 31. August – 3. September Frequent Deficiencies Dr. Henrike Potthast
CLINICAL TRIALS – PHASE III. What are phase III trials  Confirmatory phase (Therapeutic confirmatory trial)  Trials are done to obtain sufficient evidence.
The Global Health Network Marijke Geldenhuys 19 September 2014 Adhering to the GCP Principles.. what does that even mean?
Quality of Bioequivalence Data Alfredo García - Arieta Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
Training Workshop: Training of BE Assessors Kiev, October 2009 Frequent Deficiencies Dr. Henrike Potthast Training workshop: Training.
New Rules for Clinical Investigations in Germany
30/02/2008 Dept. of Pharmaceutics 1 Salient Features of Quality Assurance Dr. Basavaraj K. Nanjwade M.Pharm., Ph.D Associate Professor Department of Pharmaceutics.
Module C FDA Regulations Regulatory Documents Patricia E. Koziol 1Module C Final Version 10-apr-2010.
Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte Pt WHO-consultant 1 WHO Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Quality, Good Manufacturing Practice &
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 1 Statistical Considerations.
CONDUCTING COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENTS Allen Ditch Director Corporate Quality Bristol Myers Squibb Medical Research Summit March 6, 2003.
Lifespan GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE Record Management GCP May 2005.
Korea Food & Drug Administration Deputy director Kwang-Soo Joo Korea FDA Sep. 29, 2000 : Korean Good Clinical Practice & Relative Guidelines How to Manage.
Good Laboratory Practice - general information Pirkko Puranen Senior Inspector, Ph.D. Inspectorate.
Good Laboratory Practice
Responsibilities of Test Facility Management, Study Director, Principal Investigator and Study Personnel G. Jacobs Belgian GLP Monitorate Zagreb, 17 December.
The First Conference for Medicines Regulatory Authorities In Sudan and Neighboring Countries Khartoum December 2014 Alain PRAT, Technical Officer,
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Tanzania, August 2006 Dr. Barbara Sterzik, BfArM, Bonn 1 Bioequivalence dossier requirements for the prequalification project WHO Training Workshop.
Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Monitoring Practices
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
נמטוציטים משושנת ים Eli. S Lec. No.2.
LNH Pharma A Trusted Partner.
Administering Informed Consent Issues for Discussion
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Quality Assurance and Quality Control in Generics
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
UK Legal Requirement for Notification of Serious Breaches of Good Clinical Practice or The Trial Protocol John Poland, PhD Senior Director, Regulatory.
Dramatic Change in Data Review Handling with Analytical Tools
Elements of an Organized Regulatory Binder
Good Laboratory Practices
Good Laboratory Practice CFR 21 Part 58
Good clinical practice
Presentation transcript:

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 1 Quality of Bioequivalence Studies Evaluation of Quality and Interchangeability of Medicinal Products 10 – 14 September 2007 Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania Dr. Henrike Potthast; Temporary Advisor to WHO

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 2 Quality of Bioequivalence Studies  e.g. acc. to Directive 2001/20/EC: “The verification of compliance with the standards of good clinical practice and the need to subject data, information and documents to inspection in order to confirm that they have been properly generated, recorded and reported are essential in order to justify the involvement of human subjects in clinical trials.” FGCP & GLP Ffinding/definition of inspection triggers

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 3 Quality of Bioequivalence Studies  General Requirements  BE studies as a substitute for clinical and preclinical data  Quality of the BE study is of decisive importance for approval of the product

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 4 Quality of Bioequivalence Studies  Environmental triggers - examples  random selection acc. to annual inspection program  information from other regulatory authorities F type of product (e.g. particular narrow therap. range) F lack of previous inspections for product/applicant/location F……  general indication for inspection

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 5 Quality of Bioequivalence Studies  Early phase triggers - examples  history of (serious) problems for sponsor, CRO, sites, labs F involvement of clinical site/CRO/labs in many studies F business related issues (e.g. bankruptcy, mergers) F lack of audit certificates F…..  Still general indication without direct implication of trial data

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 6 Quality of Bioequivalence Studies  Evaluation phase triggers - examples  protocol gives incomplete/illogical information F numerous protocol violations F unsatisfactory explanation for protocol violations F data too clean/too messy F number of missing values/drop outs/nds….  Findings due to knowledge from literature and other studies; type of generic product already known

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 7 Quality of Bioequivalence Studies  Evaluation phase triggers – contd.  conflicting (PK-)results as compared to known data F insufficient documentation (clinic, analytics, statistics) F missing documentation F implausibility/inconsistency of clinical or analytical data (e.g. long half-life – short wash-out – no carry-over?!) Fdoubtful statistics or change in the analysis….

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 8 Quality of Bioequivalence Studies  Information exchange Fevaluation of triggers positive (negative – non serious/’formal’) negative – serious  request/list of questions  e.g. EMEA inspection data base since 2004

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 9 Quality of Bioequivalence Studies  Evaluation/Inspection based on source data/raw data e.g. Fprint-outs of chromatograms  signed CRFs  analytic protocols Ftime schedules Flist of providers …….

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 10 Quality of Bioequivalence Studies Data verification & QA issues  GCP compliance statement available?  audit/monitoring reports available?  protocol valid, i.e. signed (incl. amendments)?  was the protocol followed?  genuine study subjects/volunteers?  archiving of source/raw data?  violations of the protocol justified? ….

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 11 Quality of Bioequivalence Studies Data verification & QA issues ctd.  excluded subjects - traceable?  consistent trial results?  final responsibility of investigators (signing)?  source of investigative products?  batch information available?  handling of investigative products?

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 12 Quality of Bioequivalence Studies Data verification & QA issues ctd.  validation of bioanalytical method?  timing  validation characteristics  adherence to GLP  SOPs available……  calibrated equipment?  computer systems????  archiving of bioanalytical raw data

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 13 Quality of Bioequivalence Studies Data verification & QA issues ctd.  statistical plan adhered to?  transfer of analytical data to statistics  main pharmacokinetic characteristics  method of determination  nd values considered?  statistical outcome and conclusions consistent?  archiving of statistical raw data

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 14 Quality of Bioequivalence Studies Regulatory & ethical issues  independent ethics committee?  ethical approval based on appropriate documentation?  protocol  amendments  investigators brochure; SPC  subjects information informed consent  approval of competent authority in time?  subjects from vulnerable populations?  signing of subjects available?

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 15 Quality of Bioequivalence Studies Regulatory & ethical issues ctd.  insurance of subjects adequate?  adequately instructed personnel?  investigators  technicians  suppliers…..  safety evaluation assured throughout the trial?  retention samples sufficient?  storage of retention samples?

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 16 Quality of Bioequivalence Studies THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION