Quality Control B. von Haller 8th June 2015 CERN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of the CTP O.Villalobos Baillie University of Birmingham April 23rd 2009.
Advertisements

Kondo GNANVO Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne FL.
CWG10 Control, Configuration and Monitoring Status and plans for Control, Configuration and Monitoring 16 December 2014 ALICE O 2 Asian Workshop
1 Databases in ALICE L.Betev LCG Database Deployment and Persistency Workshop Geneva, October 17, 2005.
Status and roadmap of the AlFa Framework Mohammad Al-Turany GSI-IT/CERN-PH-AIP.
DATA PRESERVATION IN ALICE FEDERICO CARMINATI. MOTIVATION ALICE is a 150 M CHF investment by a large scientific community The ALICE data is unique and.
August 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Software Workshop Ann Arbor ATLAS Computing Planning ATLAS Software Workshop August 1998 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also.
Chiara Zampolli in collaboration with C. Cheshkov, A. Dainese ALICE Offline Week Feb 2009C. Zampolli 1.
Tools and software process for the FLP prototype B. von Haller 9. June 2015 CERN.
FLP data flow – FLP prototype Filippo Costa ALICE O 2 9 th June 2015 WUHAN, CHINA.
REVIEW OF NA61 SOFTWRE UPGRADE PROPOSAL. Mandate The NA61 experiment is contemplating to rewrite its fortran software in modern technology and are requesting.
Test Of Distributed Data Quality Monitoring Of CMS Tracker Dataset H->ZZ->2e2mu with PileUp - 10,000 events ( ~ 50,000 hits for events) The monitoring.
JCOP Workshop September 8th 1999 H.J.Burckhart 1 ATLAS DCS Organization of Detector and Controls Architecture Connection to DAQ Front-end System Practical.
Experiences, limitations and suggested improvements The ALICE DQM Software and ROOT ROOT Users Workshop Barthelemy von Haller & Adriana Telesca for the.
ALICE Upgrade for Run3: Computing HL-LHC Trigger, Online and Offline Computing Working Group Topical Workshop Sep 5 th 2014.
Costin Grigoras ALICE Offline. In the period of steady LHC operation, The Grid usage is constant and high and, as foreseen, is used for massive RAW and.
CMS pixel data quality monitoring Petra Merkel, Purdue University For the CMS Pixel DQM Group Vertex 2008, Sweden.
Infrastructure for QA and automatic trending F. Bellini, M. Germain ALICE Offline Week, 19 th November 2014.
4 th Workshop on ALICE Installation and Commissioning January 16 th & 17 th, CERN Muon Tracking (MUON_TRK, MCH, MTRK) Conclusion of the first ALICE COSMIC.
GDB Meeting - 10 June 2003 ATLAS Offline Software David R. Quarrie Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
TRT Offline Software DOE Visit, August 21 st 2008 Outline: oTRT Commissioning oTRT Offline Software Activities oTRT Alignment oTRT Efficiency and Noise.
ALICE Pixel Operational Experience R. Santoro On behalf of the ITS collaboration in the ALICE experiment at LHC.
RPC DQM status Cimmino, M. Maggi, P. Noli, D. Lomidze, P. Paolucci, G. Roselli, C. Carillo.
Linda R. Coney – 5 November 2009 Online Reconstruction Linda R. Coney 5 November 2009.
Jean-Roch Vlimant, CERN Physics Performance and Dataset Project Physics Data & MC Validation Group McM : The Evolution of PREP. The CMS tool for Monte-Carlo.
1 Checks on SDD Data Piergiorgio Cerello, Francesco Prino, Melinda Siciliano.
CWG4 – The data model The group proposes a time frame - based data model to: – Formalize the access to data types produced by both detector FEE and data.
Pierre VANDE VYVRE for the O 2 project 15-Oct-2013 – CHEP – Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Predrag Buncic Future IT challenges for ALICE Technical Workshop November 6, 2015.
Oracle for Physics Services and Support Levels Maria Girone, IT-ADC 24 January 2005.
DQM for the RPC subdetector M. Maggi and P. Paolucci.
TDAQ Experience in the BNL Liquid Argon Calorimeter Test Facility Denis Oliveira Damazio (BNL), George Redlinger (BNL).
O 2 Project Roadmap P. VANDE VYVRE 1. O2 Project: What’s Next ? 2 O2 Plenary | 11 March 2015 | P. Vande Vyvre TDR close to its final state and its submission.
A. Gheata, ALICE offline week March 09 Status of the analysis framework.
Predrag Buncic ALICE Status Report LHCC Referee Meeting CERN
The MEG Offline Project General Architecture Offline Organization Responsibilities Milestones PSI 2/7/2004Corrado Gatto INFN.
CWG13: Ideas and discussion about the online part of the prototype P. Hristov, 11/04/2014.
The DCS Databases Peter Chochula. 31/05/2005Peter Chochula 2 Outline PVSS basics (boring topic but useful if one wants to understand the DCS data flow)
Analysis experience at GSIAF Marian Ivanov. HEP data analysis ● Typical HEP data analysis (physic analysis, calibration, alignment) and any statistical.
CWG9 Data Quality Monitoring, Quality Assurance and Visualization B. von Haller CERN.
Monitoring for the ALICE O 2 Project 11 February 2016.
ALICE O 2 project B. von Haller on behalf of the O 2 project CERN.
Proposal for the MEG Offline System Assisi 9/21/2004Corrado Gatto General Architecture Computing Model Organization & Responsibilities Milestones.
ALICE O 2 | 2015 | Pierre Vande Vyvre O 2 Project Pierre VANDE VYVRE.
Calibration algorithm and detector monitoring - TPC Marian Ivanov.
 offline code: changes/updates, open items, readiness  1 st data taking plans and readiness.
The ALICE data quality monitoring Barthélémy von Haller CERN PH/AID For the ALICE Collaboration.
Meeting with University of Malta| CERN, May 18, 2015 | Predrag Buncic ALICE Computing in Run 2+ P. Buncic 1.
VI/ CERN Dec 4 CMS Software Architecture vs Hybrid Store Vincenzo Innocente CMS Week CERN, Dec
Current activities and short term plans 24/04/2015 P. Hristov.
M. Caprini IFIN-HH Bucharest DAQ Control and Monitoring - A Software Component Model.
Barthélémy von Haller CERN PH/AID For the ALICE Collaboration The ALICE data quality monitoring system.
ALICE Offline Week – 22 Oct Visualization of embedding Matevz Tadel, CERN Adam Kisiel, Ohio State University.
DAQ thoughts about upgrade 11/07/2012
ANALYSIS TRAIN ON THE GRID Mihaela Gheata. AOD production train ◦ AOD production will be organized in a ‘train’ of tasks ◦ To maximize efficiency of full.
CWG9 and Event Display B. von Haller CERN.
QC-specific database(s) vs aggregated data database(s) Outline
«The past experience with JCOP in ALICE» «JCOP Workshop 2015» 4-5 November 2015 Alexander Kurepin.
O2 Project – Phase 2 Predrag Buncic
DPG Activities DPG Session, ALICE Monthly Mini Week
LHC experiments Requirements and Concepts ALICE
Controlling a large CPU farm using industrial tools
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
Jacek Otwinowski (for the DPG QA tools and WP7 groups)
ProtoDUNE SP DAQ assumptions, interfaces & constraints
Data Quality Monitoring of the CMS Silicon Strip Tracker Detector
QA tools – introduction and summary of activities
DQM for the RPC subdetector
Offline framework for conditions data
Presentation transcript:

Quality Control B. von Haller 8th June 2015 CERN

CWG9 in a nutshell ▶ Started in May 2013 along with O 2 ▶ Group working on ▶ the Data Quality Monitoring ▶ the Quality Assurance ▶ the Visualization  Quality Control (QC) ▶ For Run 2 and Run 3 B. von Haller | CWG9 DQM-QA-Visualization |

CWG9 Members ▶ Renu Bala ▶ Francesca Bellini ▶ Jakob Blomer ▶ Daniele de Gruttola ▶ Mihaela Gheata ▶ Lukasz Graczykowski ▶ Malgorzata Janik ▶ Andreas Morsch ▶ Jeremi Niedziela ▶ Jacek Otwinowski ▶ Ankita Sharma ▶ Maciej Szymanski ▶ Barthélémy Von Haller B. von Haller | CWG9 DQM-QA-Visualization |

Definitions of DQM and QA Data Quality Monitoring & Quality Assurance B. von Haller | CWG9 DQM-QA-Visualization | ▶ Feedback on the quality of data ▶ Online (DQM) ▶ Make sure to record high quality data ▶ Identify and solve problem(s) early ▶ Offline (QA) ▶ Make sure to analyze high quality data ▶ Identify high quality runs ▶ Involves ▶ [Online gathering of data] ▶ Analysis by user-defined algorithm ▶ Production of monitoring objects such as histograms ▶ Assessment of the quality of the data based on the objects ▶ Storage of monitoring data ▶ Visualization (+ human assessment of quality)

B. von Haller | CWG9 DQM-QA-Visualization | CWG9 Tasks Group focusing on the data Quality Assurance, online and offline, and the visualization of its results as well as of the visualization of the data itself ▶ Run 3 ▶ Study how to monitor data efficiently and in plenty without interfering with the data taking ▶ Discuss QA output and results, incremental QA and procedures to formalize if the results are acceptable or not ▶ Determine the needs, and design the software, to access, visualize the results ▶ Define and develop the software to visualize data, raw and reconstructed ▶ Technical Design Report and prototyping 4 Dataflow Monitoring Object Generation Automatic Quality Assessment Automatic Quality Assessment Storage Visualization

B. von Haller | CWG9 DQM-QA-Visualization | QC Servers Possibility to use EPNs or dedicated machines EPNs Synchronous Asynchronous TF Building Data Reduction 1 Detector Reco. Final reconstruction Calibration 2 QC objects Time Frame QC TF QC Compressed TF QC Event QC Compressed TF QC Event QC AOD QC CTF QC Calibration 1 Event Extraction FLPs RAW QC ~1% RAW, Sub-TF QC Repo QC objects + quality Trending Correlation Automatic Checks Mergers Legend O2 Dataflow step QC Task QC objects (e.g. histo) Physics data transport QC Infrastructure QC objects + quality Specific Web App Generic Web Application Specific Web App Specific Web Applications Web Server & REST API ALICE Experiment Extra QC tasks Advanced QC Local Aggregation Extra QC tasks Auxiliary monitoring CTP LHC DCS TF, CTF, AOD ALICE Detectors 5 Time Slicing Data Reduction 0 Calibration 0 RAW QC Sub-TF QC

Current and future tasks ▶ Run 3 ▶ QC prototyping ▶ Merging (naive and complex approaches) ▶ Web ROOT gui ▶ Basic functionalities to integrate with first prototype of an FLP (see next slide for details) B. von Haller | CWG9 DQM-QA-Visualization |

EPNs B. von Haller | FLP proto - QC | QC Servers Possibility to use EPNs or dedicated machines Synchronous Asynchronous TF Building Data Reduction 1 Detector Reco. Final reconstruction Calibration 2 QC objects Time Frame QC TF QC Compressed TF QC Event QC Compressed TF QC Event QC AOD QC CTF QC Calibration 1 Event Extraction FLPs Time Slicing Data Reduction 0 RAW QC Calibration 0 ~1% RAW, Sub-TF QC Repo QC objects + quality Trending Correlation Automatic Checks Mergers Legend O2 Dataflow step QC Task QC objects (e.g. histo) Physics data transport QC Infrastructure QC objects + quality Specific Web App Generic Web Application Specific Web App Specific Web Applications Web Server & REST API ALICE Experiment RAW QC Sub-TF QC Extra QC tasks Advanced QC Local Aggregation Extra QC tasks Auxiliary monitoring CTP LHC DCS ITS Half layer 7

FLPs B. von Haller | FLP proto - QC | QC Servers Possibility to use EPNs or dedicated machines ~1% RAW, Sub-TF QC Repo QC objects + quality Automatic Checks Legend O2 Dataflow step QC Task QC objects (e.g. histo) Physics data transport QC Infrastructure QC objects + quality Specific Web App Web Server & REST API ALICE Experiment Extra QC tasks Advanced QC 8 QC functionality for FLP prototype : Get raw data or STF samples locally or from another machine. Process the data, produce histos and send them to central QC infrastructure Check the quality of the histograms Store histos and quality in a repository Display the histos and their quality Time Slicing Data Reduction 0 RAW QC Calibration 0 RAW QC Sub-TF QC Local Aggregation ITS Half layer

Current and future tasks ▶ Run 3 (continued) ▶ Actual implementation – 5 areas ▶ Mergers ▶ General Framework and API ▶ Repository ▶ Automatic checkers, correlation, trending ▶ Clients ▶ Event Display - Visualization ▶ Evolve Run 1 and Run 2 ED for Run 3 ▶ Time Frames and Run 3 events as input ▶ Geometry ▶ Total Event Display ▶ Data converters : ESD -> xml/json ; Run3-ESD -> xml/json ▶ Geometry converter : AliRoot -> 3d Studio max B. von Haller | CWG9 DQM-QA-Visualization |

O 2 and detectors schedule B. von Haller | CWG9 DQM-QA-Visualization | Today 6/15 ITS half-layer test 1/17 TPC read-out test 4/17 ITS surface test 9/18 TPC RCUs installation CR1 1/19 Data taking Cosmics with core detectors 7/19 TPC pre-commissioning on surface 7/19 TPC commissioning in cavern 1/20 End of commissioning 6/20 O2 system v1 - 1 CRU, 1 FLP, basic data processing, control, logging, QC, monitoring 1/17 O2 system v2 - 1 detector (e.g. ITS) full read-out capability 4/18 10% Data processing and storage HW installation 9/18 90% Data processing and storage HW installation 11/19 Full system ready 2/20 Detectors milestones O2 milestones

CWG9 schedule ▶ Q ▶ FLP prototype, basic QC: data sampling, general api and framework, some checkers, repository, basic client ▶ Q ▶ Mergers (work already started) ▶ Clients (including generic) ▶ Automatic checkers, correlation, trending ▶ Q ▶ Fully ready for cosmics ▶ Event Display ▶ Still to be exactly defined, should be ready Q ▶ Waiting for data format ▶ Work already started on converter and geometry extraction B. von Haller | CWG9 DQM-QA-Visualization |

Conclusion ▶ CWG9 gathers all QC stakeholders ▶ Requirements and architecture available ▶ Next main milestone is Q ▶ Prototyping has started ▶ We are looking for motivated and competent developers to work on the QC framework or on prototyping specific parts B. von Haller | CWG9 DQM-QA-Visualization |

B. von Haller | CWG9 DQM-QA-Visualization |

Past work ▶ Run 2 ▶ Event Display ▶ Run 2 preparation ▶ Run 3 ▶ System Requirements Specifications (SRS) ▶ Delivered ▶ TDR ▶ Architecture and design of the Data Quality Control and Event Display ▶ Defined milestones and required manpower B. von Haller | CWG9 DQM-QA-Visualization |