District System of Support A systems approach to supporting effective master scheduling.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Parents as Partners in Education
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Implementing Values through Community Action Research Dr Josephine Bleach
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
Building a Data Culture Data Guru Roles, Responsibilities & Expectations.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS Coaching Makes a Difference Expanding and Refining the Coaches Role Oregon 1.
Session Materials  Wiki
Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Common Principles of Effective Practice (CPEP)
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Timberlane Regional School District
Stage 1: Planning, Design & Preliminary Tasks Master Scheduling for Academies, Pathways, & Smaller Learning Communities.
Organizational Conditions for Effective School Mental Health
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
Public School 29 Professional Development Day December 1, 2014 Presenters: Anna Arrigo & Marygrace DiForte.
CCASN Master Schedule Guide A Guide to Scheduling Linked Learning Pathways, Academies, and other Small Learning Communities.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Raising standards, improving lives The use of assessment to improve learning: the evidence 15 September Jacqueline White HMI National Adviser for Assessment.
Session Materials  Wiki
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Educational Program Review Mrs. Diane Fisher, CPA Chief Executive Officer High School Cafeteria March 4, 2014.
Knowledgeable and Skillful Leadership
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Russell Frank, Ph.D. Director II Assessment and Accountability Services Mike Barney Director II Instructional Services Getting LTELs Ready for College.
FASA Middle School Principal ’ s Leadership Academy Don Griesheimer Laura Hassler Lang July 22, 2007.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Changing the Systemic Culture of a School-Based PLC
REGIONAL TRAINING UNIT Leading and Managing Achievements and Standards in the Special School and the Learning Community.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Learning Teaching and Family Support Retreat April 24, :00 am – 3:00 pm Wiki site
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Stage 5: Fine-tuning, Readjustment & Assessment. Fine-Tuning & Readjustments  Adjustments for new/transfer students  Adjustments for students who withdraw/
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Impact-Oriented Project Planning
Presentation transcript:

District System of Support A systems approach to supporting effective master scheduling

The Role of the District in Supporting Effective Master Scheduling

Some Systems Definitions  A system is a set of elements that function as a whole to achieve a common purpose.  A subsystem is a component of a larger system; for example, a high school is a subsystem of a larger district (supra-) system.  Systems are often characterized by synergy – the idea that the whole (system) is greater than the sum of its parts (elements), since the relationship among elements adds value to the system.

The District as a Learning Organization A District as a learning organization is a system… “where people continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire, where new and expansive patterns of thinking are nurtured, where collective aspiration is set free, and where people are continually learning to see the whole together. “ – Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization

A programmatic approach vs. a systemic approach  Tackling apparent “symptom/s” rather than addressing the underlying cause of the problem  Seeing the water rise in a sinking boat (symptom) and bailing the water out (quick fix) rather than fixing the leak (real problem)

Problem Statement  Principal Support: Site principal does not adequately understand academy needs and therefore does not provide the level of support necessary for high quality implementation  Collaboration Time: Academy teachers do not have adequate collaboration time to design, monitor, and evaluate multidisciplinary projects, examine data, and address student needs (source: R. Stearns & M. Henson)

Programmatic Solution  Principal Support: A district administrator or external support provider takes the principal under his/her wing to promote awareness; or replace the principal with someone who is more supportive.  Collaboration Time. On an academy-by- academy basis, negotiate scheduling solutions and/or union waivers that would allow for additional planning time. (source: R. Stearns & M. Henson)

Systemic Solution  Principal Support. Establish an ongoing principal leadership development program that systematically builds awareness and capacity of site administrators to deeply understand, support, and provide bold leadership that promotes high quality academy implementation  Collaboration Time. Establish district-wide policies and practices that support common planning time for academy teacher teams as a priority when developing master schedules. (source: Roman Stearns (ConnectEd California) & Mike Henson (NAF) )

Effective District systems  An effective educational system (District) optimizes not only the relationship among the elements (the schools, etc.) but also between the educational system and its environment.  An effective educational system (District) is more open, more organic, more pluralistic, and more complex; it is less hierarchical and more about distributed leadership and collaborative work; it functions as a highly purposeful learning organization.

A system’s approach  Acknowledges the District’s role in supporting and creating capacity for effective Master Scheduling  Considers the interrelationships, interdependencies, and competencies among the components and levels of the system

A systemic approach  Recognizes that a desired change in one part of a system is accompanied by changes in other components and levels that are necessary to support the desired change.  Recognizes interrelationships, interdependencies, and competencies between the District’s educational system and the larger community, including parents/families.

A systems approach Districts are best positioned to align the master schedule development process with other key reforms such as implementation of the Common Core, human-capital and capacity building strategies, acceleration and intervention supports for students, performance and accountability standards, postsecondary partnerships, and internal and external relationships. Districts are best positioned to design for scalability and long term sustainability.

Systemic Approach A clear focus on the importance of effective master schedules in creating the necessary conditions for quality teaching and learning and supporting all students to graduate college and career ready Commitment to Linked Learning pathways/ college and career academies as the model for high school redesign and to schedules that support interdisciplinary learning communities.

A systems approach  Requires balance and clarity on division of labor between district and school sites.  Requires rethinking structures, policies, and practices  Creates coherence by identifying system-wide goals & outcomes; developing a framework/roadmap for the scheduling process; clarifying any non-negotiables; and encouraging creative use of resources.

A systemic approach  Aligns work throughout the system  Promotes collaboration, continuous learning, trust, and transparency  Includes commitment to collection, analysis, and use of data in a continuous improvement process  Includes a shared sense of ownership and responsibility at all levels in the system

Working systemically involves  Scanning the System  Analyzing the System (collect & organize data, gap analysis)  Planning Action  Taking Action and Monitoring Progress  Assessing and Reflecting on Outcomes

A Systems Approach in the Master Schedule Context A few examples Developing District-wide Master Schedule Framework with Guiding Principles and a Master Schedule Timeline Developing a platform, “flexible” guidelines, templates, and supporting materials for site- specific Master Schedule Notebooks with expectations of “stage- specific deliverables”

Systems Approach in the Master Schedule Context  Providing training, mentoring, coaching, and other technical assistance  Building the master schedule knowledge and skills of those responsible at the school sites;  Building a community of practice around master scheduling

Systems Approach in the Master Schedule Context  Regularly providing data to inform the Master Schedule Process  Convening Master Schedule Teams for “Master Schedule Rounds” – a la Instructional Rounds and Collaborative Assessments, both formative and summative

An Invitation to Share CCASN will continue to add and refine resources and tools included in the CCASN Master Schedule Guide. We invite you to share your own master schedule tools, strategies, and effective practices. Please share resources and suggestions with Patricia Clark and/or Phil Saroyan THANK