Produce Safety/Juice HACCP Regulation Embassy Seminar November 7, 2003 Michelle A. Smith, Ph.D. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Food and Drug.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SUPPLIER CONTROL. It given that no raw material or ingredient shold be accepted by a food industry, if it is known to contain parasites, undesirable microorganisms,
Advertisements

LGMA California Leafy Green Marketing Agreement
FDA’s Proposed Rule under FSMA for Preventive Controls
PROCURING LOCALLY GROWN PRODUCE. Why Choose Locally Grown  Freshness  Holds longer in storage  Shipping costs may be lower  It can help your community.
California Department of Public Health Food and Drug Branch San Joaquin County All Hazards Workshop August 2008.
EUREPGAP The European Principles of Food Safety. Increasing awareness of food safety in consumers greater variety of foods available for the consumer.
Chapter 12 The Seafood HACCP Regulation. Objective In this module, you will learn: u What are the requirements of the seafood HACCP regulation u How to.
Establish Verification Procedures (Task 11 / Principle 6)
1 Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration
Food Safety and Inspection Service Pathogen Reduction/HACCP.
Processed Food Industry Expanding Exports to the United States Carl C Reynolds.
Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.
Proposed Rules under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act
Food Safety and Government Regulations Food Animal Quality Assurance Youth Curriculum Guide.
Good Hygiene Practices along the coffee chain The Codex General Principles of Food Hygiene Module 2.3.
Proposed Rules under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Version 1/15/2013.
Objectives Objectives: Food safety management systems
Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration 1.
Food Safety Is Risky Business Food Safety Is Risky Business Nancy Flores, Ph.D., Extension Food Technology Specialist Various.
Food Safety Richard Paterini Food Safety Supervisor
Proposed Rules to Help Ensure the Safety of Imported Food 1.
(H.L.) HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS

Natural Resource Concerns. In 2007 there were a number of food borne illness attributed to fresh produce People became sick Business’s lost market share.
Future Editions This manual, future additions and the latest updates are available at the following website:
Ashland Specialty Ingredients IFAC’s cGMP Audit Guide How the Food Ingredient Industry has Responded to FSMA and Food Safety Audits Priscilla Zawislak.
Food Safety and Inspection Service U. S. Department of Agriculture
FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D says “Preventing problems before they cause harm is not only common sense, it is the key to food safety in the.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Apple Cider Food Safety Workshop FDA’s Good Agricultural Practices Dr. Michelle A. Smith July 15, 1999.
Food Safety Modernization Act Proposed Rules Tim Slawinski Food and Dairy Division Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development.
Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) for Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Growers New England Extension Food Safety Partnership Project funded by USDA CSREES – Project.
Preparing for the Food Safety Modernization Act
“The HACCP Approach to Analyzing and Managing Food Safety” January 10, 2008.
FDA Regulatory Counseling Lake Bluff, Illinois, USA (847) Regulatory Update Richard O. Wood 2014 Mid-Year Meeting.
Proposed Regulations for Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVPs)
Donald A. Kautter, Jr. Consumer Safety Officer Division of HACCP Programs Washington, D.C. United States of America Juice HACCP Final Rule.
Impact of FSMA on the Regulation of Domestic and Imported Animal Food by Daniel G. McChesney, Ph.D. at Wild Bird Feeding Industry 2011 Annual Meeting Naples,
1 FSIS Notice Notice of Reassesment for E. Coli O157:H7 Control And Completion of Checklist for all beef operations.
1 Thank you for visiting our site and welcome to the “Introduction to ISO 22000” Presentation that you requested. For more information.
Public Meeting: Sprout Safety
Food Safety Plans  GAP/Food Safety Plan  Processor/Preventive Controls Food Safety Plans Produce Food Safety Plan.
Preventive Controls for Human Food S upplemental Proposal 1
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
Foreign Supplier Verification Programs Supplemental Proposal 1.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION go.osu.edu/AQCA Youth Food Animal Quality Assurance Curriculum Guide Food Safety and Government Relations.
8-2 Service Objectives: Food safety management systems Active managerial control Hazard Analysis Critical Control point (HACCP)
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
& Food Safety Modernization Act Update North American Agricultural Marketing Officials July 15,
 This notice provides new instructions to Enforcement Investigations and Analysis Officers (EIAOs) and Public Health Veterinarians who were trained in.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Overview of Trim Sampling Compliance Guidelines and Discussion Daniel Engeljohn,
USDA Public Meeting; Control of E. coli O157:H7
Awareness Training: ‘HARPC’ for Food Safety Complimentary Presentation by Quality Systems Enhancement 1790 Wood Stock Road Roswell GA E. mail:
FDA Preventive Control Regulation Ernest Julian, Ph.D., Chief Office of Food Protection RI Department of Health AFDO 2014.
Hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP)
Luke F. LaBorde Associate Professor of Food Science Penn State University October 6, 2011 Food Safety Certification for Ag Producers.

The Seafood HACCP Regulation
INDIANA AGRICULTURE Grow With Us!.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
Food Safety and Government Relations
FSMA Implementation Jennifer Thomas
E. Coli & Fresh Produce: Some Lessons Learned
Food Safety Interventions
Lynn G. Turner, Ph.D. Department of Food Science
What Is VQIP? FDA required to establish a program to provide for the expedited review of food imported by voluntary participants. Eligibility is limited.
EU Food Safety Requirements: - Hygiene of Foodstuffs -
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs
Presentation transcript:

Produce Safety/Juice HACCP Regulation Embassy Seminar November 7, 2003 Michelle A. Smith, Ph.D. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Food and Drug Administration

Outline Fresh Produce – Microbial Food Safety - Background/outbreaks - Guidance to minimize contamination -Implementation/Surveys Juice HACCP –The regulation –Implementation –Update

Fresh Produce - Concerns Grown in non-sterile environment Opportunities for contamination Likely to be consumed raw (factors consistent w/ “high risk foods”)

US Produce Outbreaks:

Produce Associated Outbreaks ( )  Pathogens  Salmonella spp., Shigella flexneri, E. coli O157:H7, Hepatitis A, Cyclospora, Cryptosporidium  Vehicles  Unpasteurized apple cider/juice, basil, cantaloupe, cole slaw, green onions, lettuce, frozen mamey, mesclun mix, unpasteurized orange juice, parsley, scallions, strawberries, tomatoes, raspberries, mango

The U.S. Produce Safety Initiative Announced October 1997 Goal: To reduce, to the greatest extent possible, foodborne illness associated with fresh produce consumed in the U.S., regardless of where the produce was grown

Guide to Minimize Microbial Food Safety Hazards for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Guidance for Industry October 1998

The Guide Broadscope - practices common to the growing and packing of most fresh produce Guidance only - NO NEW REQUIREMENTS Risk reduction, not elimination

Use of the Guide Increase awareness of common microbial hazards for fresh produce Useful when recommended practices are adapted to specific operations - Assess individual operations - Institute appropriate practices

Table of Contents Water Manure and Municipal Biosolids Worker Health and Hygiene Sanitary Facilities Field/Packing Facility Sanitation Transportation Traceback

Water Microbial hazards/quality –Agricultural water –Post harvest water uses Control of Potential Hazards –Know and protect water quality at source, during distribution, and at point of use –When and how water is used may impact water quality needs –Antimicrobials, monitoring, minimize water contact

Implementation Encourage adoption of guidance Training – GAPs, Farm Investigations, Laboratory Methods Microbial surveys of domestic and imported produce USDA/NASS survey of domestic agricultural and packing practices

Training Domestic and International – Extension Specialists, Growers, State and Federal Health and Agriculture Officials Areas covered – GAPs/GMPs, traceback, epidemiology, case studies, farm visits, investigation techniques, microbiology, sampling and analysis, participant presentations

Agricultural Practices Survey 30 commodities 10,000 growers and packers 14 States – 85% acreage Document current practices htmwww.usda.gov/nass/pubs/rptscal. htm, go to “June 2001”, select “13”, select “Fruits and Vegetables Ag Practices”

Microbiological Surveys Produce Obtain baseline data on incidence of contamination Identify vehicles and causes Focus Research aimed at reducing contamination Assess efforts to reduce foodborne illness Modify policy, fine tune GAPs and GMPs

Selection of Commodities Epidemiological Outbreak Data Commodity Characteristics Growing Conditions and practices Post-harvest handling Consumption

Imported Produce Survey samples each of 8 products –Broccoli, cantaloupe, celery, cilantro, loose- leaf lettuce, parsley, scallions, strawberries –Culantro, tomatoes –Pathogens tested: E. coli 0157:H7, Salmonella, Shigella toc.html#prod

Imported Produce Survey –95.6% free of target pathogens –NO E. coli 0157:H7 –Salmonella – 35/1003 samples positive –Shigella – 9/1003 samples positive

Domestic Produce Survey –98.8% free of target pathogens –NO E. coli 0157:H7 –Salmonella – 35/1003 samples positive –Shigella – 9 samples positive

IMPORTED PRODUCE SURVEY

Domestic Produce Survey Results –Percentage of Samples Positive for Pathogen Cantaloupe5 of % Celery0 of % Cilantro2 of 852.4% Green onions3 of 933.2% Lettuce1 of % Parsley1 of 901.1% Strawberries0 of % Tomatoes0 of %

Produce Food Safety!

The Juice HACCP Final Rule In the Federal Register of January 19, 2001, FDA published final regulations to ensure the safe and sanitary processing of fruit and vegetable juices. These regulations mandate the application of HACCP principles to the processing of juice (21 CFR part 120) Go to: look under “HACCP”

Juice HACCP Regulation Definition of Juice: Aqueous liquid expressed or extracted from one or more fruits or vegetables Puree used in a beverage of the edible portion of one or more fruits or vegetables Concentrate of such liquid or puree Used in a beverage

Effective Dates Based on the size of the business: –January 22, medium and large businesses –January 21, small businesses –January 20, very small businesses

Written Hazard Analysis Section 120.7: Identify food hazards Evaluate each hazard to determine if the hazard is reasonably likely to occur Identify control measures that can be applied Review current processes to determine if modifications are necessary Identify critical control points

HACCP Plan Section Must be developed by a trained individual(s) and be written Specific to each location and to each type of juice processed, except: –may group types of juice together, and –may group types of production methods together, if the hazards and CCP controls, etc. are essentially the same

Contents of the HACCP Plan List all food hazards that are reasonably likely to occur List the CCPs List the critical limits that shall be met at each CCP List the monitoring procedures Include any corrective action plans List the validation and verification procedures Provide for a record keeping system

Juice HACCP Inspections Full coverage in effect Jan 2004 Initial domestic inspections, Oct 2002 Outcomes: NAI, VAI (Form 483), OAI (possibility of Warning Letter or Untitled Letter)

FY 04 HACCP Inspections 500 Planned for domestic firms Priority: Unpasteurized juice, follow-up of VAIs and OAIs, 1 st time inspections 200 Planned for importers

First Inspections - Educational 51% of Initial Inspections were No Action Indicated (NAI) 37% Voluntary Action Indicated (VAI) 4% Official Action Indicated (OAI) Very few Warning Letters

Requirements for Imported Products Every importer of juice shall: Obtain the juice from a country that has an active memorandum of understanding (MOU) or similar agreement with the U.S. FDA, OR

Requirements for Imported Products Have and implement written procedures for ensuring that the juice received for import into the United States was processed according to the requirements of the juice HACCP regulation. Section

These procedures shall provide, at a minimum: Product specifications that are designed to ensure that the juice is not adulterated, and Affirmative steps to ensure that the products being offered for entry were processed under controls that meet the requirements of the regulation

Obtaining from the foreign processor the HACCP plan and prerequisite program records of the lot being offered for import; Obtaining either a continuing or lot specific certificate from an appropriate foreign government inspection authority or competent third party; Regularly inspecting the foreign processor's facilities, Affirmative steps may include:

Maintaining on file a copy, in English, of the foreign processor's hazard analysis and HACCP plan and a written guarantee that the food was processed according to the requirements; Periodically testing the imported food, and maintaining on file a copy, in English, of a written guarantee that the food was processed in accordance with the rule; or Other verification measures that provide an equivalent level of compliance with the requirements Affirmative steps may include:

Recent additions available at Q and A’s Part 2 Final guidance on juice HACCP training curricula Juice HACCP Alliance Curriculum available at Final bulk transport guidance for high brix concentrates Final Hazards and Controls Guide (soon)

Summary Active juice HACCP inspectional program Highest priority on unpasteurized juice Educational approach 1 st inspection only High priority on follow up of VAIs and OAIs Importers should have documentation for product specs and affirmative steps