Streamgage Datum Conversion Eastern Region Height Modernization Consortium Webinar March 4, 2014 Jim Kolva, USGS, Office of Surface Water.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lessons From the NAVD 88 Project Dave Zilkoski May 11-12, Federal Geospatial Summit Geospatial Solutions Require an Integrated, Collaborative.
Advertisements

Tidal and Geodetic Vertical Datums State Geodetic Advisor, NGS National Ocean Service, NOAA Sacramento, CA October, 2005 Workshop.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 5/7/2015 Adopting National Standards for Tidal and Geodetic Datums Jim Garster US Army Corps of Engineers.
Arizona Height Modernization Program - AZHMP
Assistant Administrator National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service September 18, 2008 John H. Dunnigan Toward National Height.
Mission Statement SC Height Modernization Status In the NGS Database (Height Mod Project) In progress Proposed.
Tidal Datums Text and Figures Source: NOAA/NOS CO-OPS Tidal Datums related publications.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting Tuesday, November 3, 2009 Juliana Blackwell Director,
NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES Updating the International Great Lakes Datum Plan Overview Center for Operational Oceanographic.
Ohio Height Modernization Related Activities Great Lakes Regional Forum Sept 24-25, 2008 Madison, Wisconsin David Conner Geodetic Advisor to the State.
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
Refinements to the North American Datum of 1983 Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National Adjustment of 2011 Dr. Neil D. Weston Chief, Spatial Reference.
Flood Analysis of Scioto River Using HEC-RAS/GIS Converting HEC-2 Data for HEC-RAS /ArcView GIS Analysis and Inundation Mapping (A pilot using Big Darby.
Feedback on the New Datums 2015 Geospatial Summit April 13 to 14, 2015 U.S. Geological Survey Kari J. Craun.
DAVE REED HYDROLOGIST IN CHARGE NOAA/NWS LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER FORECAST CENTER Datums and Stages - Importance to the NOAA/NWS Hydrologic Services Program.
Feedback on the New Datums 2015 Geospatial Summit April 13 to 14, 2015 North Carolina Geodetic Survey Gary W. Thompson.
Illinois Height Modernization Sheena K. Beaverson.
Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA
Streamgage Datum Conversion Great Lakes Region Height Modernization Consortium meeting New Cumberland, PA April 13, 2011.
Flood Risk Management Program Rolf Olsen Institute for Water Resources U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
International Great Lakes Datum Overview Presented at a Height Modernization Program meeting January 9, 2014 by David Conner Geodetic Advisor to the State.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Inter-Agency Datum Establishment and Conversion Collaboration in Missouri. Paul H. Rydlund Jr. PLS.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Height Modernization Coordination Meeting Paul H. Rydlund Jr. PLS U.S. Geological Survey Missouri.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey ESTABLISHMENT OF THE USGS GPS COMMITTEE, CHARGE AND CURRENT PROGRESS NAVD 88 DATUM CONVERSION UPDATE.
VDATUM: the Vertical Datum Transformation Tool
Feedback on the New Datums 2015 Geospatial Summit April 13 to 14, 2015 US Army Corps of Engineers Jim Garster.
Mission Statement SC Height Modernization Status In the NGS Database (Height Mod Project) In progress Proposed.
GEODETIC INFRASTRUCTURE Walter Volkmann Manager of Technical Operations L. D. Bradley Land Surveyors Gainesville, Florida.
FLOOD STUDY Oswego County, NY FEMA REGION II February 7, 2011.
The Future of the National Geodetic Survey Dr. Dru A. Smith Chief Geodesist, NGS/NOAA CSRC, Coordinating Council Spring Meeting La Jolla, CA April 28,
National Flood Conference April 22, 2009 Victor Hom Hydrologic Services Division Office of Climate, Water and Weather NOAA’s National Weather Service National.
Transition of the ORGN from NAD 83(CORS96) epoch to NAD 83(2011) epoch Ken Bays, PLS Lead Geodetic Surveyor Oregon DOT March 2013 ODOT.
Great Lakes Regional Height Modernization Meeting March 23, 2010 Height Modernization in Indiana Who we are How we got here Thomas A. Mahon, LS.
Geoid Modeling at NOAA Dru A. Smith, Ph.D. National Geodetic Survey National Ocean Service, NOAA November 13, 2000.
NOAA’s National Height Modernization Program Zelda LeCoat National Geodetic Survey National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Height Modernization Making the Most of the Indiana HARN and the INDOT CORS March 14, 2007 By William A. Schmidt, PE, LS Manager of Aerial Engineering,
Lecture 18: Vertical Datums and a little Linear Regression GISC March 2009 For Geoid96.
AEC Summit NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey Update Brian Shaw Geodesist.
USGS Overview Workshop on Improved Quality of Data and Data Exchange for Climate Research and Analysis NOAA National Climatic Data Center Bill Hazell,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Silver Jackets Innovative Collaboration to Maximize Solutions.
HWM Depth Grid Process Overview.
The GRAV-D Project and The Future of NAD 83 and NAVD 88 A briefing for FEMA leadership Dru Smith, Chief Geodesist NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey.
National Spatial Reference System: Present and Future Marti Ikehara, Geodetic Advisor NOAA’s NGS, Sacramento
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Marie C. Peppler USGS FIM Program Liaison Flood Inundation Mapping Program Project needs overview.
Status and Plans of the National Geodetic Survey’s Gravity Database Update Daniel R. Roman and Yan Ming Wang October 13-14, 2005 Austin, Texas.
IWRSS & Fusion Team Brief Missouri Basin River Forecasters’ Meeting Wednesday, January 29, 2014 Noreen Schwein National Hydrologic Services Policy Leader.
MISSISSIPPI HEIGHT MODERNIZATION PROJECT JUNE 11, 2009 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
Why do Millimeters Matter? NOAA Models and Tools Support High Accuracy Positioning for Ecosystem Restoration and Ecological Research Surface too low: too.
2015 International Great Lakes Datum Height Modernization Project Dave Rigney NGS Geodetic Advisor Michigan Great Lakes Region Height.
NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES Updating the International Great Lakes Datum Laura Rear McLaughlin Center for Operational.
The Height Modernization Program in the United States and the Future of the National Vertical Reference Frame 1 Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey,
VRSWG Update Renee Shields Height Modernization Manager National Geodetic Survey January 10, 2012.
Height Modernization in the U.S.: Implementing a Vertical Datum Referenced to a Gravimetric Geoid Model Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey, U.S.A.
Mississippi River Recovery Task Force Bob Hainly Task Force Member 2012 USACE Flood Risk Management Representing: and Silver Jackets Workshop USGS Water.
VRSWG Update Renee Shields Height Modernization Manager National Geodetic Survey July 24, 2012.
Harrisburg Flood Inundation Mapping Project – Many Agencies Working Together USACE Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets Workshop 23 August 2012 Presented.
Flood Inundation Mapping Program
The Delta Levees Program
Height Modernization Activities at NGS Christine Gallagher National Partner Meeting April 30, 2014.
GREAT LAKES REGION HEIGHT MODERNIZATION CONSORTIUM NATIONAL HEIGHT MODERNIZATION PARTNER MEETING APRIL 14, 2015.
National Height Modernization Program Strategic Plan Renee Shields, Height Modernization Program Manager.
NOAA’s NWS and the USGS: Partnering to Meet America’s Water Information Needs Peter Gabrielsen Chief, Hydrologic Services Division Eastern Region NOAA’s.
Height Mod in Kentucky Height Modernization Forum Flint, Michigan January 26, 2006 Ross Mackay Kentucky Geodetic Advisor.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting 11 January 2011 Ronnie Taylor Acting Director,
WESTERN REGION HEIGHT MOD WEBINAR NOVEMBER 19,
October 24, 2005 Silver Spring, Maryland MinnesotaDixon Hoyle MichiganDave Rigney Illinois Chris Pearson Ohio Dave Conner KentuckyRoss Mackay Convocation.
Geodetic Control and Datums Where is it? How Accurately can we map it?
Fusion Team Brief Missouri Basin River Forecasters’ Meeting Wednesday, January 25, 2012 Noreen Schwein Deputy for Hydrologic Services NWS Central Region.
Elevation and Geodetic Control Workgroup
Lecture 17: Geodetic Datums and a little Linear Regression
Presentation transcript:

Streamgage Datum Conversion Eastern Region Height Modernization Consortium Webinar March 4, 2014 Jim Kolva, USGS, Office of Surface Water

Topics for Discussion Problem from USGS Water perspective Problem from USGS Water perspective Database Facts Database Facts How Height Modernization might help the conversion effort? How Height Modernization might help the conversion effort?

Problem Most USGS streamgages have a datum surveyed or estimated to NGVD29. Most USGS streamgages have a datum surveyed or estimated to NGVD29. Streamgages established since 2002 and surveyed using a Global Positioning System (GPS) should have datum set to NAVD88. Streamgages established since 2002 and surveyed using a Global Positioning System (GPS) should have datum set to NAVD88.

Problem

Problem

Problem

Problem Mixing vertical Datums creates confusion; Mixing vertical Datums creates confusion; This mixture of Altitude Datums has created a confusing situation for streamgage information users attempting to model flood plain inundation, establish flood profiles or use other hydrologic applications. This mixture of Altitude Datums has created a confusing situation for streamgage information users attempting to model flood plain inundation, establish flood profiles or use other hydrologic applications. In some areas of the country, the difference between NGVD29 and NAVD88 can be over 4 feet. In some areas of the country, the difference between NGVD29 and NAVD88 can be over 4 feet.

Partner Applications of Information – NWS AHPS

USGS/NWS/FEMA Flood Inundation Initiatives

Policy Guidance from USGS NAVD88 is the recommended datum established in the Federal Geographic Data framework (Office of Water Information Technical memorandum ).

NAVD of 1988 NGVD of 1929 SW Station Datums in the USGS NWIS >48,200 SW stations >2,200 SW stations

Database facts 84,944 Surface-Water sites 84,944 Surface-Water sites 62,032 determined elevation from Maps 62,032 determined elevation from Maps 7,737 from Levels 7,737 from Levels 8,023 unknown source 8,023 unknown source 1,269 from a GPS 1,269 from a GPS 4,771 already reported to NAVD88 4,771 already reported to NAVD88

Database facts 84,944 Surface-Water sites 84,944 Surface-Water sites 62,032 determined elevation from Maps 62,032 determined elevation from Maps Convert these to NAVD88 directly because within existing accuracy limitations unless a determination of need for more accuracy due to data use. Convert these to NAVD88 directly because within existing accuracy limitations unless a determination of need for more accuracy due to data use.

Database facts 125 sites in NGS database (NGSIDB)for NAVD88 have a “gage” description. 125 sites in NGS database (NGSIDB)for NAVD88 have a “gage” description. Assumed to be USGS streamgages Assumed to be USGS streamgages Additional sites may be present but did not show up in the search Additional sites may be present but did not show up in the search Approximately 17,000 sites need to have some analysis and conversion. Approximately 17,000 sites need to have some analysis and conversion.

NGS assistance in GPS surveys NGS is doing updating work and GPS surveys throughout the country NGS is doing updating work and GPS surveys throughout the country North Carolina and Michigan -- Will survey in at least one reference mark at active gages in work areas North Carolina and Michigan -- Will survey in at least one reference mark at active gages in work areas Working on best ways to easily provide reference mark descriptions and gage locations to contractors doing this work and best way to report back to USGS. Working on best ways to easily provide reference mark descriptions and gage locations to contractors doing this work and best way to report back to USGS.

Priority stations USGS, NGS, USACE and NWS developing priority lists of gages for conversion USGS, NGS, USACE and NWS developing priority lists of gages for conversion Pilot study in Missouri Pilot study in Missouri MO has been working with Darrell Pratte, NGS Geodetic Coordinator with the Missouri DNR. Darrell has volunteered to serve in a role of oversight for field surveys and provide some personnel. MO has been working with Darrell Pratte, NGS Geodetic Coordinator with the Missouri DNR. Darrell has volunteered to serve in a role of oversight for field surveys and provide some personnel. Plan was developed for conversion of gages in Missouri. Includes survey plans for those stations identified as needing that level of attention. Plan was developed for conversion of gages in Missouri. Includes survey plans for those stations identified as needing that level of attention.

Funding Sources Unfunded mandate to USGS Water Science Centers Unfunded mandate to USGS Water Science Centers Some will need GPS surveys to meet required accuracies or because of instability issues. Some will need GPS surveys to meet required accuracies or because of instability issues. Can the Eastern Region Height Mod partner with the USGS efforts? Can the Eastern Region Height Mod partner with the USGS efforts?

Issues to be resolved Accuracy of the conversion. Accuracy of the conversion. Resources Resources Time and manpower Time and manpower Money Money Data already converted to elevation in database – Florida efforts Data already converted to elevation in database – Florida efforts

Questions and Comments??