Cross-National Microsimulation using EUROMOD How does it work and what can it do? Holly Sutherland Institute for Social and Economic Research, University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How do public policies affect individual households? Design and uses of EUROMOD: an EU-wide tax/benefit model Herwig Immervoll OECD IZA, Bonn ISER, University.
Advertisements

Plenary session VIII: Steps and suggestions to write the country study Marco V Sanchez (UN-DESA) Third training workshop on Assessing Development Strategies.
Income inequality within couples and redistribution through the tax-benefit system: the case of the UK Holly Sutherland Institute for Social and Economic.
Eurostat T HE E UROPEAN PROCESS OF ENHANCING ACCESS TO E UROSTAT DATA A LEKSANDRA B UJNOWSKA E UROSTAT.
A Minimum Income in Italy Letizia Ravagli InGRID Winter School: Using EUROMOD for cross country microsimumation ISER 28 February 2014 Istituto Regionale.
CHILD POVERTY AND CHILD RELATED POLICIES: A COMPARISON OF ROMANIA AND CZECH REPUBLIC Silvia Avram*, Eva Militaru**, Silvia Cojanu**, Cristina Stroe** *National.
Inflation Report August 2013 Demand. Chart 2.1 Contributions to four-quarter growth in nominal GDP (a) (a)At market prices. Contributions may not sum.
Introduction to STINMOD and Microsimulation Modelling in Australia Ben Phillips: Principal Research Fellow, NATSEM, 21 Feb 2015.
Microsimulation at HM Treasury: methods and challenges David Roe and Doug Rendle ESRC/BSPS UK Microsimulation:
Comparative Methods in Research on Gender Wendy Sigle-Rushton ESRC Methods Festival 2 July 2008 St. Catherine’s College, Oxford.
Successful policy mixes to tackle the impact of rising inequality on children - an EU-wide comparison - András Gábos TÁRKI Social Research Institute Changing.
Activities using EUROMOD in Serbia. Building SRMOD: initiative SRMOD: first tax and benefit micro-simulation model for Serbia SRMOD is based on EUROMOD.
A microeconometric model for analysing efficiency and distributional effects of tax reforms Evidence from Italy and Norway Rolf Aaberge (Research Department,
Manos Matsaganis & Panos Tsakloglou Athens University of Economics FBBVA Microsimulation Workshop Madrid November 2004 Microsimulation and the analysis.
Cross-National Microsimulation using EUROMOD How does it work and what can it do? Holly Sutherland Institute for Social and Economic Research, University.
TAXBEN: the IFS’ static tax and benefit micro-simulation model Mike Brewer Programme Director, Direct Tax and Welfare team Institute for Fiscal Studies,
EUROMOD : the flexibility to “add new countries” Holly Sutherland Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex (with Francesco Figari,
Influence of the adopted methodological solutions on the assessments of the monetary poverty range. The case of Poland. Seminar on Poverty Measurement.
© Institute for Fiscal Studies Child poverty, tax and benefit policy and the labour market since Robert Joyce.
SWITCH: Methods and Applications Michael Savage 25 th June 2015 SWITCH Team: T. Callan, M. Savage, B. Colgan, J.R. Walsh.
1 Survey Data in ECA : Frequency, Coverage, Consistency and Access By Victor Sulla ECS-PE.
Data Sources and Quality Improvements for Statistics on Agricultural Household Income in 27 EU Countries Berkeley Hill Emeritus Professor of Policy Analysis.
The redistributive effects of Personal Income Tax reforms during the Great Recession in Spain M. Adiego (IEF), O. Cantó (UAH), M. Paniagua (IEF) and T.
Intergenerational contributions to childcare across Europe Alison Smith University of Edinburgh.
Research on redistributive effects of Croatian fiscal system Ivica Urban Institute of Public Finance.
Andrea Brandolini Banca d’Italia, Department for Structural Economic Analysis LAC-EU Economic Forum 2013 “Globalization, International Trade and the Welfare.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Handbook on Supply and Use Table: Compilation, Application, and Good Practices.
+ Economic well-being and distributional effects of housing-related policies in 3 EU countries Virginia Maestri AIAS – University of Amsterdam 2 nd Microsimulation.
ILUTE Microsimulation Modelling of Social/Financial Processes – An Overview Antoine Haroun June 2004.
A DECADE OF TAX - BENEFIT POLICIES IN BELGIUM. A SIMULATION EXERCISE TO ESTIMATE THE CHANGE IN REDISTRIBUTIVE EFFECT. Dieter Vandelannoote (University.
The distributional impact of in kind public benefits in five European countries Alari Paulus Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of.
Tax-benefit micro simulation model for Serbia (SRMOD) based on EUROMOD platform: construction and first application Jelena Zarkovic Rakic Faculty of Economics.
1 BBVA Foundation workshop November 2004 MADRID Aino Salomäki DG: Economic and Financial Affairs European Commission MICROSIMULATION AS A TOOL FOR.
Policy Analyses at IZA Hilmar Schneider IZA IDSC Scientific Advisory Board Meeting, Bonn, May 29, 2009.
SAMS AND MICRO-DATA: NEW AREAS OF RESEARCH Paul Schreyer OECD IIOA Towards New Horizons of Innovation, Environment and Trade Kitakyushu July 2013.
Eddy van Doorslaer Erasmus University Rotterdam Equity in Health Care Finance and Delivery in Europe: the ECuity Project European Health Forum, Gastein,
InGRID Kick-off meeting Innovative solutions for comparative policy indicators and analysis, WP22 Leuven, 9 April 2013.
International Differences in Labor Market Status and Transitions During the Pre- Retirement Years James Banks Arie Kapteyn Jim Smith Arthur van Soest.
Tax-benefits indicators from a work incentives perspective Comments upon Christopher Heady and Herwig Immervoll – “Rewarding Jobs: Government Policy and.
Income Distribution in the European Union Silvia Avram, Horacio Levy, Alari Paulus, Holly Sutherland Bucharest, 10 th November 2012.
ACTIVE WELFARE STATE POLICIES AND WOMEN LABOUR PARTICIPATION IN SPAIN Xisco Oliver and Amedeo Spadaro University of the Balearic Islands 2nd Microsimulation.
MORE TARGETING, LESS REDISTRIBUTION? AN ENQUIRY INTO THE ROLE OF POLICY DESIGN IVE MARX, LINA SALANAUSKAITE, GERLINDE VERBIST CENTRUM VOOR SOCIAAL BELEID.
Using EUROMOD to nowcast risk of poverty in the EU Jekaterina Navicke, Olga Rastrigina and Holly Sutherland ISER, University of Essex 2013 EUROMOD research.
ESDS International Celia Russell and Susan Noble Economic and Social Data Service University of Manchester ESDS International Conference 2007.
ESDS resources for managing and analysing data Beate Lichtwardt Economic and Social Data Service UK Data Archive Research Method Festival, Oxford 1 July.
Reducing extreme poverty in Greece the role of a guaranteed minimum income scheme Manos Matsaganis Athens University of Economics & Business Chrysa Leventi.
Observatório Pedagógico MOVING THE GOALPOSTS NOT ONCE BUT TWICE: MINIMUM INCOME BENEFIT IN PORTUGAL Carlos Farinha Rodrigues ISEG / University of Lisbon.
Household Economic Resources Discussant Comments UN EXPERT GROUP MEETING 9 September 2008 Garth Bode, Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Distributional and Poverty Effects of Income Tax Reform in Serbia Sasa Randjelovic Jelena Zarkovic Rakic University of Belgrade – Faculty of Economics.
Behavioural and Welfare Effects of Basic Income Schemes Ugo Colombino (Department of Economics and CHILD-CCA ) and M. Locatelli, E. Narazani, I. Shima.
1 OECD Family Database Inaugaral ISCI Conference, Chicago, USA June, 2007 Annette Panzera OECD Social Policy.
Autumn School Dynamic MSM16-18 November 2015 | L-Esch-sur-Alzette Slide 1 Note Combining LIAM2 and EUROMOD: a (useful?) possibility.
Autumn School Dynamic MSM16-18 November 2015 | L-Esch-sur-Alzette Slide 1 A gentle introduction to microsimulation Gijs Dekkers.
A model to generate lifetime incomes for a population cross-section The Lifetime INcome Distributional Analysis Model: LINDA Justin van de Ven
Who Pays for Austerity? The Design and Distributional Effects of Fiscal Consolidation in the European Union Holly Sutherland 2013 LIS Summer Lecture Abbaye.
Expenditure Forecasting Presentation to the GNPBO June 2016.
Microsimulation modelling to inform policy debate: the case of SWITCH Tim Callan Economic and Social Research Institute.
Stuart Adam (IFS) James Browne (IFS) Chris Heady (OECD)
Access to European Statistical System microdata
Overview of the Rapid Assessment protocol (Costing tool)
Deriving a reliable measure of household income – DWP
Social Expenditure across OECD countries: concepts and indicators
Preferential VAT rates, cash transfers and redistribution
Item 11: Taxes and social contributions
EAPN Seminar: 2010 and beyond – the legacy we want!
ITEM 3 - WORK CARRIED OUT SINCE LAST WG MEETING (16-17 JUNE 2005)
InGRID winter school in ‘Cross country microsimulation’ Day 1
Income distribution: flash estimates 2016 (FE) Item 3.6 of the agenda
Item 11: Taxes and social contributions
Euromod Item 4.2 of the agenda
Presentation transcript:

Cross-National Microsimulation using EUROMOD How does it work and what can it do? Holly Sutherland Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, UK 3 rd ESRC Research Methods Festival, Oxford 30 June – 3 July 2008 Session 38

2 Abstract and outline EUROMOD is a tax-benefit microsimulation model for the EU. It is used to answer "what if" questions about the effects of fiscal and social policies, and policy reforms, on household incomes. Thus it provides "data" for analysis according to the user's own specification and question of interest. See What are microsimulation models? Cross-national microsimulation and EUROMOD More about EUROMOD – Framework, design and data – Comparability across countries – Becoming a EUROMOD user

3 Microsimulation models Microsimulation models provide data for analysis Tax-benefit models are “static” and deal with household income, re-calculating income components (cash benefit entitlements and personal tax liabilities) under alternative scenarios – “Organised arithmetic” (lots of it…) Consistent results for income-related indicators, including: – budgetary effects – income distributions (poverty and inequality indicators) – redistributive effects – gainers and losers – indicators of work incentives (RRs METRs) “Budget constraints” (=incomes under alternative conditions) for modelling individual choices at the micro level Due to changes in – Tax and benefit policies (actual, proposed or illustrative) – Household/individual characteristics or macro conditions

4 What are the main inputs? 1.Microdata on households and individuals, from income surveys or administrative data 2.Coded policy rules 3.An interface or framework for changing the rules and assumptions, usually via parameters  Contrast with analysis of income data taken directly from a survey – more detail on components of taxes/benefits; can be more up-to-date; both net and gross income – “what if” questions – tested, consistent, documented, organised, “branded” – replicable results…multi use and multi user

5 A multi-country model for cross-national research Consistent results across countries – Comparative analysis of the effects of policies and policy reforms – EU-level outputs – Policy learning across countries: “policy swapping”  Understanding the effects of tax-benefit systems on different populations  “Borrowing” policies that seem effective in one country (e.g. UK WFTC) But policy structures are very different across countries in several dimensions: – Policy design (e.g. rates, brackets, scales, limits) – Unit of assessment (e.g. family vs. household) – Definition of personal characteristics (e.g. who counts as a child?) – Income assessments (e.g. tax base) – Interaction with other policies (e.g. taxable or not) Data sources and requirements are different too.

6 EUROMOD EUROMOD is a multi-country tax-benefit model: unique It was built because of difficulties in making national model calculations comparable, funded by a series of EC FP projects ( ) National models exist in most of the EU15 and some of the 12 NMS Typically much more flexible than national models but in some cases covering the tax-benefit systems in less detail or more selectively 19 EU countries: EE, PL, HU, SI + EU15 Data either matches policy year or precedes it a few years (then uprated); three datasets (DK, IR, IT) from

7 EUROMOD base datasets for EU15+4 (June 2008) CountryDatasetDate of collection AustriaAustrian version of ECHP1999 BelgiumPanel Survey on Belgian Households2002 DenmarkEuropean Community Household Panel1995 FinlandIncome distribution survey2001 FranceBudget de Famille (HBS)2000/1 GermanyGerman Socio-Economic Panel2002 GreeceHousehold Budget Survey2004/5 IrelandLiving in Ireland Survey1994 ItalySurvey of Households Income and Wealth1996 LuxembourgPSELL NetherlandsSociaal-economisch panelonderzoek2000 PortugalEuropean Community Household Panel2001 SpainEU-SILC2005 SwedenIncome distribution survey2001 UKFamily Expenditure Survey (HBS)2000/1 EstoniaHousehold Budget Survey2005 HungaryEU-SILC2005 PolandHousehold Budget Survey2005 SloveniaHousehold Budget Survey / Personal Income Tax database2005

8 EUROMOD structure Code (e.g., tax schedule) Model input data (e.g., imputed gross income) Parameters (e.g., tax rates) Policy rules (e.g., income tax) Micro output (e.g., net income) Specific analysis Tools (e.g., summary statistics) Original data (e.g., ECHP, FES) Run- interface

9 Main menu

10 Policies

11 Choice of data/policy years

12 Examples of EUROMOD use EUROMOD WPs illustrate types of model use – EM3/02 P Feres, H Immervoll, C Lietz, H Levy, D Mantovani and H Sutherland: Indicators for Social Inclusion in the European Union: how responsive are they to macro-level changes? EM1/04 H Immervoll, H Jacobsen Kleven, C Thustrup Kreiner, E Saez: Welfare Reform in European Countries: A Micro-Simulation Analysis EM2/06 O Bargain and K Orsini: Beans for Breakfast? How Exportable is the British Workfare model? EM4/06 H Levy, C Lietz and H Sutherland: A Basic Income for Europe's Children? EM2/07 M Matsaganis and M Flevotomou: The impact of mortgage tax relief in the Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Italy and Greece EM6/07 F Figari, H Immervoll, H Levy and H Sutherland: Inequalities within couples: market incomes and the role of taxes and benefits in Europe EM2/08 A Paulus and A Peichl: Effects of Flat Tax Reforms in Western Europe on Equity and Efficiency

13 Current limitations and future plans Age of underlying data in some countries * Direct taxes and cash benefits only; no indirect taxes or non-cash benefits * Most contributory benefits are not fully simulated * Static calculations only * Benefit take up is assumed to be 100%; no tax evasion* Tax benefit systems for 1998 (EU15), 2001 (EU15), 2003 (some), 2005 (some)* EU only * Permission to access some datasets is restricted * * work is underway or planned to remedy these limitations….

14 Becoming a EUROMOD user Training and support – 2008 Summer training course (fully booked) – Other courses? – ECASS visits to Essex (for non UK-based people) Find out more The model itself, documentation etc can be downloaded free Data access is an issue Have a clear idea of what you want to use it for Get in touch!