The North American Carbon Program (NACP) Multi-Scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison (MsTMIP) Project Introductions Overview.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Anna M. Michalak Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

Advertisements

Changes in the seasonal activity of temperate and boreal vegetation The critical role of Autumn temperatures. Shilong Piao, Philippe Ciais, Pierre Friedlingstein,

Resolving CO 2 Flux Estimates from Atmospheric Inversions and Inventories in the Mid-Continent Region Stephen M. Ogle 1, Andrew Schuh 1, Dan Cooley 1,

Multi-Scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – A Systematic Approach for Evaluating Land-Atmosphere Flux Estimates February 4 th,

CMIP5: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5

Improving Understanding of Global and Regional Carbon Dioxide Flux Variability through Assimilation of in Situ and Remote Sensing Data in a Geostatistical.

Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy North American Carbon Balance – Results from the Regional Synthesis Project of the North America Carbon.

Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Estimating the North American Carbon Balance Using Inter- Comparison Among Inversions, Regional Terrestrial.

Lessons learned through Model Intercomparison (MIP) Studies: Land-atmosphere-ocean interactions and the challenges of coupled modeling through model intercomparison.

CMS – 2012 Reduction in Bottom-Up Land Surface CO 2 Flux Uncertainty in NASA’s Carbon Monitoring System Flux Project through Systematic Multi-Model Evaluation.

US Forest Disturbance Trends observed with Landsat Time Series Samuel N. Goward 1 (PI), Jeffrey Masek 2, Warren Cohen 3, Gretchen Moisen 4, Chengquan Huang.

An Assessment of the Carbon Balance of Arctic Tundra: Comparisons among Observations, Models, and Atmospheric inversions A. David McGuire and Co-authors.

At-A-Glance Agenda Mon 31 Jan AmeriFlux Tue 1 Feb AmeriFlux & NACP Wed 2 Feb NACP Thu 3 Feb NACP Fri 4 Feb NACP 8:30–10:30AmeriFlux Programmatic Issues.

Objective –Attempt to utilize flux tower records to evaluate the validity of continental flux estimates submitted to the regional interim synthesis activity.

Andrew Schuh 1, Stephen M. Ogle 1, Marek Uliasz 1, Dan Cooley 1, Tristram West 2, Ken Davis 3, Thomas Lauvaux 3, Liza Diaz 3, Scott Richardson 3, Natasha.

Estimating biophysical parameters from CO 2 flask and flux observations Kevin Schaefer 1, P. Tans 1, A. S. Denning 2, J. Collatz 3, L. Prihodko 2, I. Baker.

The North American Carbon Program: An Overview for AmeriFlux investigators Kenneth Davis The Pennsylvania State University Co-chair, NACP Science Steering.

Office of Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research J Michael Kuperberg, Ph.D. Dan Stover, Ph.D. Terrestrial Ecosystem Science AmeriFlux.

Data assimilation of atmospheric CO 2 at ECMWF in the context of the GEMS project Richard Engelen ECMWF Thanks to Soumia Serrar and Frédéric Chevallier.

Elements of a Data Management Plan Alison Boyer Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Elements of a Data Management Plan

MAPPING NACP PROGRESS ONTO LONG-TERM CARBON CYCLE SCIENCE GOALS Anna M. Michalak.

A New U.S. Carbon Cycle Science Plan Anna Michalak, Gregg Marland, Rob Jackson, Chris Sabine and the Carbon Cycle Science Working Group.

Soil characteristics, an important terrestrial ecosystem modeling input, affects the photosynthesis, respiration, evapotranspiration, or other biosphere.

Regional Model-Data Comparison: An NACP Interim Synthesis Project Coordinators: Andy Jacobson, Mac Post, Debbie Huntzinger, Bob Cook Participants: Dozens.

Global net land carbon sink: Results from the Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP) December 9, 2013 AGU Fall Meeting,

Coordinated US Initiative on Emissions Research Introduction and Goals Claire Granier and Greg Frost NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Chemical Sciences.

Arctic Sea Ice Predictability & the Sea Ice Prediction Network (SIPN) Decline in the extent and thickness of Arctic sea ice is an active area of scientific.

Estimating Terrestrial Wood Biomass from Observed Concentrations of Atmospheric CO 2 Kevin Schaefer 1, Wouter Peters 2, Nuno Carvalhais 3, Guido van der.

Sharon M. Gourdji, K.L. Mueller, V. Yadav, A.E. Andrews, M. Trudeau, D.N. Huntzinger, A.Schuh, A.R. Jacobson, M. Butler, A.M. Michalak North American Carbon.

Citing Data Sets in the Literature: ORNL DAAC Practices Robert Cook, Suresh SanthanaVannan, and Daine Wright Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge.

Mid-Continent Intensive Campaign Synthesis Stephen M. Ogle Natural Resources Ecology Laboratory Colorado State University Co-Investigators: K. Davis, A.

The role of the Chequamegon Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study in the U.S. Carbon Cycle Science Plan Ken Davis The Pennsylvania State University The 13 th ChEAS.

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 Vegetation/Ecosystem Modeling and Analysis Project (VEMAP) Lessons Learned or How to Do.

An Assessment of the Carbon Balance of Arctic Tundra in North America: Comparisons among Observations, Models, and Atmospheric inversions A. David McGuire.

Spatial and temporal patterns of CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes from North America as estimated by process-based ecosystem model Hanqin Tian, Xiaofeng Xu and other.

Joint Canada-Mexico-USA (North American*) Carbon Program Planning Meeting January 25–26, 2007 *By North America we mean the North American land, adjacent.

North American Carbon Program Sub-pixel Analysis of a 1-km Resolution Land-Water Mask Source of Data: The North American sub-pixel water mask product is.

Intercomparison of Global Scale Ecological Models and Field Data Intercomparison of Global Scale Ecological Models and Field Data Objective To assess how.

Evaluation of land model simulations across multiple sites and multiple models: Results from the NACP site-level synthesis effort Peter Thornton 1, Gautam.

Presented by Global Coupled Climate and Carbon Cycle Modeling Forrest M. Hoffman Computational Earth Sciences Group Computer Science and Mathematics Division.

DLESE Data Services 2005 Workshop. Overview Outcomes of 2004 DLESE Data Services Workshop Plans and Structure of the 2005 DLESE Data Services Workshop.

North American Carbon Sources and Sinks: Magnitude, Attribution and Uncertainty Anthony King Daniel Hayes Deborah Huntzinger Tristram West Wilfred Post.

ESG Observational Data Integration Presented by Feiyi Wang Technology Integration Group National Center of Computational Sciences.

Site-Level Model-Data Comparison A Proposed NACP Interim Synthesis Project Ken Davis, Peter Thornton, Kevin Schaefer, Dan Riciutto Coordinators.

An alternative explanation to the size and location of the missing sink Robert Andres 1 Skee Houghton 2 1 Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National.

NACP A High-Resolution Daily Surface Weather Database for NACP Investigations Peter E. Thornton 1, Robert B. Cook 2, W. Mac Post 2, Bruce E. Wilson 2,

Cyberinfrastructure to promote Model - Data Integration Robert Cook, Yaxing Wei, and Suresh S. Vannan Oak Ridge National Laboratory Presented at the Model-Data.

Presented by Global Coupled Climate and Carbon Cycle Modeling Forrest M. Hoffman Computational Earth Sciences Group Computer Science and Mathematics Division.

ORNL DAAC: Introduction Bob Cook ORNL DAAC Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Modeling CO 2 emissions in Prairie Pothole Region using DNDC model and remotely sensed data Zhengpeng Li 1, Shuguang Liu 2, Robert Gleason 3, Zhengxi Tan.

A comparison of recent model- and inventory- based estimates of the continental-scale carbon balance of North America A. David McGuire USGS / University.

A Modeling and Synthesis Thematic Data Center for the North American Carbon Program Robert B. Cook 1, Yaxing Wei 1, W. Mac Post 1, Peter E. Thornton 1,

CFusion and NCEO. NCEO Components Ciais et al IGOS-P Integrated Global Carbon Observing Strategy Global Carbon Data Assimilation System.

NASA Carbon Monitoring System (NASA-CMS) NASA Carbon Monitoring System Science Team Overview George Hurtt NASA-CMS Science Team Leader Department of Geographical.

State of the Carbon Cycle (NACP and GCP): Have components and their uncertainties changed over time? Anna M. Michalak With contributions from: Kevin Bowman,

Fundamental Dynamics of the Permafrost Carbon Feedback Schaefer, Kevin 1, Tingjun Zhang 1, Lori Bruhwiler 2, and Andrew Barrett 1 1 National Snow and Ice.

Presented by LCF Climate Science Computational End Station James B. White III (Trey) Scientific Computing National Center for Computational Sciences Oak.

A model-data intercomparison of CO 2 exchange across North America: Results from the North American Carbon Program Site Synthesis Christopher R Schwalm.

Biospheric Models as Priors Deborah Huntzinger, U. Michigan.

North American Carbon Program Data Management Planning Workshop January 25 – 27, 2005 New Orleans, LA Sponsored by the Carbon Cycle Interagency Working.

Anna M. Michalak Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences University of Michigan Reconciling.

NASA Earth Exchange (NEX) A collaborative supercomputing environment for global change science Earth Science Division/NASA Advanced Supercomputing (NAS)

Surprises in the anthropogenic carbon budget Why OCB is so important! Jorge Sarmiento Princeton University Co-lead author of the US Carbon Cycle Science.

North American Carbon Program 4 th All-Investigator Meeting Albuquerque, NM February 4 th – 7 th, 2013 Overview of Meeting Agenda Deborah Huntzinger Co-Chair.

NASA Ames Research Center Ecological Forecasting Lab presenter: Sam Hiatt NASA PI: Dr. Ramakrishna Nemani Hirofumi Hashimoto, Forrest Melton, Andrew Michaelis,

The Human Component of the Global Carbon Cycle

NACP Site MDC “Are the various measurement and modeling estimates of carbon fluxes consistent with each other - and if not, why?” Simulated vs. observed.

Carbon Model-Data Fusion

Presentation transcript:

The North American Carbon Program (NACP) Multi-Scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison (MsTMIP) Project Introductions Overview

Introductions – Core Team MsTMIP Management Team AffiliationContact Info Deborah Huntzinger (Science PI) Northern Arizona Anna Michalak (PI) Carnegie Institution for Science Kevin Schaefer National Snow and Ice Data Center, University of Colorado Andre Jacobson National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, University of Colorado Wilfred M. Post Environmental Science Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Robert Yaxing

Introductions – Collaborators MsTMIP CollaboratorsAffiliationContact Info Peter Thornton Oak Ridge National Lab Forrest Rama Nemani NASA Ames Research Center Weile Project websitePublichttp://nacp.ornl.gov/MsTMIP.shtml Project wikiPrivatehttp://mstmipsynthesis.pbworks.com/ NASA NEX MsTMIP project page Privatehttps://c3.nasa.gov/nex/projects/1208/ Project Websites and Wikis

MsTMIP - Modeling Teams Model team contact Affiliation (Model) Ning of Maryland (VEGAS) Hanqin University (DLEM) Maoyi (CLM-VIC) Josh (Multi-model) Atul Illinois Urbana Champaign (ISAM) Bobby (Rob) H. Applied Geosolutions, LLC and University of New Hampshire (SIPNET) Changhui of Quebec (TRIPLEX-GHG) Ben (LPJ-wsl) Robert of Alberta (Ecosys) Altaf University, Canada (CLASS-CTEM-N+) Shuguang (Leo) EROS (GEMS) Philippe Ciais, Nicolas Viovy LSCE (ORCHIDEE) Dan (TEM; CLM-CN) Ian State University (SiB) Kevin of Colorado (SiB-CASA) Weile (Biome-BGC) Tony King, Dan Riccuito, Mac Post ORNL (GTEC)

MsTMIP - Goals Extension of the NACP Interim Synthesis Activities Provide feedback to the TBM community in order to improve diagnosis and attribution of carbon fluxes at regional and global scales Evaluate TBMs by direct comparison with observations – Model-observation comparison of NEE and component fluxes; – Model-observation comparison of carbon stocks; – Comparison of transported TBM fluxes to atmospheric CO 2 concentration measurements; and – TBM model-model comparison of NEE and component flux estimates.

MsTMIP – Where are we? Simulation protocol has been developed (on website) Environmental driver data is processed and ready to go. Reference output subroutine library developed. Ready to start simulations

Timeline for Fall / Winter Spin – up for baseline simulations complete by October, 2011 Workshop in October, 2011 All simulations complete by January, 2012 Collect and process observational datasets (August through December, 2011) Model evaluation metrics develop by January, Working meeting at Fall AGU in December 2011.