© Curriculum Foundation1 Section 2 The nature of the assessment task Section 2 The nature of the assessment task There are three key questions: What are.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
To achieve a Level 7 you need to…. To achieve a Level 6 you need to…
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
Scientific Enquiry, Scientific Process or Problem Solving?
School Sports Coaching Apprenticeship ASSESSMENT Understanding primary school.
Life Without Levels The Year of the Curriculum: Bridging Unit
© Cambridge International Examinations 2013 Component/Paper 1.
The Year of the Curriculum What are we trying to achieve? How shall we organise learning? How shall we evaluate success? How do we make it happen? How.
Thinking Skills Approaches and Plenaries. What do we mean by Thinking Skills? Thinking Skills is a method used by teachers to challenge their pupils to:
© Curriculum Foundation1 Section 3 Assessing Skills Section 3 Assessing Skills There are three key questions here: How do we know whether or not a skill.
The Foundation Stage Assessment for Learning. Programme Session oneIntroduction Rationale for AfL COFFEE Session twoSharing learning intentions Success.
Hertfordshire County Council
Effective Marking & Feedback in Writing
Assessment January ‘Attainment’ & ‘Progress’ Attainment: This is the score, grade, mark or level that is achieved from a particular task or activity.
Assessment without levels 8th October 2014
Types of Essays... and why we write them.. Why do we write essays? Hint: The answer is NOT ‘because sir/miss told me to’
Reflective practice Session 4 – Working together.
Unit 4 The new national curriculum in context © Curriculum Foundation Part 3 Keeping track of progress.
Edexcel GCSE History Guidance to Students: The Controlled Assessment
Thinking Actively in a Social Context T A S C.
Unit 5: Measuring what we value The Year of the Curriculum What are we trying to achieve? How shall we organise learning? How shall we evaluate success?
Evaluation and Testing course: Exam information 6 th semester.
© Curriculum Foundation Part 2 What do we want our pupils to do with their learning? Unit 3 What is the new national curriculum asking for?
Ian Hodgkinson HMI 19 June 2015
© Curriculum Foundation1 Part 2 Assessing our wider aspirations Part 2 Assessing our wider aspirations.
Thinking Skills Approaches A way of promoting active learning.
Writing FRQ’s for the APHG Exam Robert Cox Pearland High School.
The Year of the Curriculum : Life Without Levels The programme consists of a Bridging Unit and five further units: (Have you completed the Bridging Unit.
Writing Analytically.
The Year of the Curriculum : Life Without Levels The programme consists of a Bridging Unit and five further units: (Have you completed the Bridging Unit.
Unit 4 The new national curriculum in context © Curriculum Foundation Part 2 Classroom techniques.
© New Zealand Ministry of Education copying restricted to use by New Zealand education sector. Page 1 Consider the Evidence Evidence-driven.
© Curriculum Foundation Part 3 Assessing a rounded curriculum Unit 3 What is the new national curriculum asking for?
Breaking Down the Prompt
The Power of Formative Assessment to Advance Learning.
Developing Reasoning, Explanation and Fluency St Helens Teaching Alliance Tara Loughran
Soaring to the heights of personal success Enabling candidates to raise grades from B to A and from A to A*
Cambridge Pre-U Getting Started In-service Training Liberating learning Developing successful students.
Intermediate 2 Software Development Process. Software You should already know that any computer system is made up of hardware and software. The term hardware.
Welcome to Year 6 SATs meeting Brindle St James’ CE Primary School.
The Assessment Maze Life After Levels November 2015 An information session for parents to explain the changes to assessment.
Writing. Academic Writing Allow about 20 minutes In TASK 1 candidates are presented with a graph, table,chart or diagram and are asked to describe, summarise.
Developing subject knowledge and practice in fractions. To identify some of the difficulties and misconceptions which children have & implications for.
N ational Q ualifications F ramework N Q F Quality Center National Accreditation Committee.
Life without Levels Assessing children without levels.
Assessment at KS3 for the New GCSEs Dr Alex Holmes ASE 2016 Saturday 9 th T184.
Parent Workshop Year 2 Assessment without levels January 2016.
Assessment at KS3 for the New GCSEs Dr Alex Holmes ASE 2016 Saturday 9 th T184.
Key Stage 3 National Strategy Planning and teaching mathematics 2 Geometry, ratio and proportion, and problem solving.
Welcome to Math 6 Our subject for today is… Divisibility.
The Year of the Curriculum: Life Without Levels The programme consists of a bridging unit and five further units: © Curriculum Foundation1 Bridging Unit.
Assessment and PSHE By far the weakest aspect of teaching was the assessment of pupils’ learning which was often less robust for PSHE education than for.
In-Service Teacher Training Assessment in IGCSE Biology 0610 Session 2: Question papers and mark schemes.
A research and policy informed discussion of cross-curricular approaches to the teaching of mathematics and science with a focus on how scientific enquiry.
ON LINE TOPIC Assessment.  Educational assessment is the process of documenting, usually in measurable terms, knowledge, skills, attitudes and beliefs.
CERTIFICATE IN ASSESSING VOCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT (CAVA) Unit 1: Understanding the principles and practices of assessment.
Introducing Ethical Capability Focus on Objectives  an overview of the Ethical Capability curriculum  introduction of an ethical issue planning.
What questions could you ask students about this image? Key Stage 3 Pupil Key Stage 4 Pupil Key Stage 5 Pupil.
Key Updates. What has changed? National Curriculum Early Years baseline assessment SATS Teacher Assessments Assessment without levels, expected standards.
Maths No Problem; A Mastery Approach.
Information for Parents Key Stage 3 Statutory Assessment Arrangements
Assessment and Reporting Without Levels February 2016
Assessment in Language Teaching: part 1 Lecture # 23
In-Service Teacher Training
Level 4 Counselling: Catherine Drewer
Medway Leaders Course 2014 A quick romp through the exciting world of
Thinking Skills Approaches
Maths No Problem; A Mastery Approach.
This is the second module of the Collaborative Backward Design series
Writing competence based questions
Presentation transcript:

© Curriculum Foundation1 Section 2 The nature of the assessment task Section 2 The nature of the assessment task There are three key questions: What are we doing when we assess? How can we be sure that we are accurate in our assessments? What different approaches are there? There are three key questions: What are we doing when we assess? How can we be sure that we are accurate in our assessments? What different approaches are there?

© Curriculum Foundation2 In Unit 5 of the first programme, we looked at what it is that we are actually trying to do when we assess. In essence we are trying to find out what someone has learned, either as we go along (formative) or at the end (summative). And the bit of learning that we are interested in is usually to do with the aims we set in our lesson, unit or whole curriculum. Or we might be checking before we start to see whether they have already learned what we are about to teach them (initial assessment). The learning concerned is actually contained inside someone’s head.

© Curriculum Foundation3 Any idea what this is? Yes, it’s a picture of the neural networks of the brain. What about this next picture?

© Curriculum Foundation4 These are the synapses – where nerve cells interconnect. When we learn something, a new connection is made and the pathway becomes more complex.

© Curriculum Foundation5 So, if learning is about making new connections in the brain, then assessment is about finding out what new connections have been made. Perhaps the process should look like this. (That’s a brain they’re all looking at, by the way. This is a GCSE exam of the future.)

© Curriculum Foundation6 As we cannot actually get inside our pupils’ brains, we just have to do the best we can. Assessment is not an exact science. In order to find out what is going on inside someone’s brain, we have to observe their behaviour in certain controlled situations. At the simplest, we ask them some questions and see what they say. If they say “Paris” when we ask them what is the capital of France, we conclude that they know what the capital of France is. So the big issue for assessment is how valid are the conclusions we can draw from our observations. Simple pieces of knowledge are easy enough, but it starts getting more complex when we get into deeper understanding. Can we really conclude that someone understands something complex from the basis of their answers to some questions? And would everyone respond similarly to the same questions, even if they had equal understanding?

© Curriculum Foundation7 Do you remember ‘reliability’ and ‘validity’ from Unit 5 of the first Programme? Reliability in assessment means that whoever carries it out would come to the same conclusion. Validity means that we are actually assessing the thing we want to assess. Unfortunately, the two are often at the opposite ends of a line of tension. The more reliable an assessment is, the less valid it seems to be. And vice versa. We gave IQ tests as an example. They are high in reliability, but we are not sure if they are measuring intelligence or the ability to answer IQ test questions – so low in validity. Assessments made by teachers in the course if their work are often the most valid, but there is always a question of subjectivity and whether all teachers would come to the same conclusion. So they are low on reliability. Reliability Validity

© Curriculum Foundation We mention “know” and “understand” here – and these are some of the ‘building blocks’ of the curriculum that we looked at in Unit 1. Do you remember what they were? They are important to letting us look into the brain, and to deal with the issues of validity and reliability.

Unit 1 looked at these ‘building blocks’ of the curriculum : Knowledge Skills Understanding Possession of information Ability to perform mental or physical operation Development of a concept: putting knowledge in a framework of meaning

Knowledge Skills Understanding State, name, label, draw, identify, describe Carry out, perform, find, investigate, explore Explain, justify, analyse, give reasons for If you recall, each of these levels of expectation had some related verbs that made them explicit. These help us unlock what is in the brain. If you recall, each of these levels of expectation had some related verbs that made them explicit. These help us unlock what is in the brain. These are the verbs that also help us make the assessments.

© Curriculum Foundation 11 But what implications do these three forms of learning have for assessment? This is what we shall be looking at across this programme of Units. But here is a short outline to go on with. But what implications do these three forms of learning have for assessment? This is what we shall be looking at across this programme of Units. But here is a short outline to go on with. Knowledge Skills Understanding

© Curriculum Foundation12 Knowledge is on the whole the easy bit to assess because usually a simple question will be sufficient. We can be both valid and reliable in our assessment of knowledge. Not only that, we can assess whole classes at a time because we can do it through written papers. This is probably why we are so keen on doing it. Understanding is much harder to assess because this is where we really need to get inside the brain. Because we cannot actually do so, we need to look for ‘proxy measures’ such as the ability to explain or give reasons. These will give us some idea about the extent of understanding. This is best done through oral questioning of individual students in a series of different situations over time. Much more expensive – and much less popular. It also runs into issues of reliability.

© Curriculum Foundation13 So, that’s all very technical – but this Unit is supposed to be about making use of assessment! This is where we come back to those pairs of assessment words: Formative - summative Diagnostic - evaluative Initial - ipsitive Did you notice some definitions appearing in earlier slides? Did you spot them? In fact, these six terms are all different uses of assessment.

© Curriculum Foundation14 Here are some short definitions : Initial is to establish a baseline or starting point Formative is to check how learning is progressing to make adjustments to the course or to teaching as you go along Summative is to get a final picture of learning – often for reporting or accountability reasons or to award a qualification Diagnostic is to find out why someone is not learning as well as they should Evaluative is to find out how well a programme or institution is doing (rather like the SATs) Ipsative is finding out how well someone in doing in relation to their previous performance. Initial is to establish a baseline or starting point Formative is to check how learning is progressing to make adjustments to the course or to teaching as you go along Summative is to get a final picture of learning – often for reporting or accountability reasons or to award a qualification Diagnostic is to find out why someone is not learning as well as they should Evaluative is to find out how well a programme or institution is doing (rather like the SATs) Ipsative is finding out how well someone in doing in relation to their previous performance.

© Curriculum Foundation15 Of course, all of these are uses that we will wish to make of assessment at some point in a year: establishing a baseline or starting point, getting a final picture of learning, finding out why someone is not learning as well as they should, finding out how well someone in doing in relation to their previous performance. You might also want to find out how well a lesson or unit of work went or, if you are a school leader, how well a class or the whole school is doing. But most importantly as teachers, we want to check how well learning is progressing so that we can make adjustments to our teaching as we go along. This is the formative use, and there is much more to follow about this in this unit. Of course, all of these are uses that we will wish to make of assessment at some point in a year: establishing a baseline or starting point, getting a final picture of learning, finding out why someone is not learning as well as they should, finding out how well someone in doing in relation to their previous performance. You might also want to find out how well a lesson or unit of work went or, if you are a school leader, how well a class or the whole school is doing. But most importantly as teachers, we want to check how well learning is progressing so that we can make adjustments to our teaching as we go along. This is the formative use, and there is much more to follow about this in this unit.

© Curriculum Foundation16 In Unit 1, we referred to the Note for inspectors: use of assessment information during inspections in 2014/15 This states that inspectors will: spend more time looking at the range of pupils’ work to consider what progress they are making in different areas of the curriculum talk to leaders about schools’ use of formative and summative assessment and how this improves teaching and raises achievement evaluate how well pupils are doing against relevant age-related expectations as set out by the school and the national curriculum (where this applies)

© Curriculum Foundation17 So Ofsted see both formative and summative as important. But to make any use at all of assessment, we have to be clear about what sort of learning we are assessing: knowledge, understanding or skills. They each have their different methods. As we have seen, knowledge is the most straightforward. Understanding is fairly straightforward if it can be done orally – the issue is one of time. But skills, especially mental skills, are difficult. We shall look at these separately in the next section. So Ofsted see both formative and summative as important. But to make any use at all of assessment, we have to be clear about what sort of learning we are assessing: knowledge, understanding or skills. They each have their different methods. As we have seen, knowledge is the most straightforward. Understanding is fairly straightforward if it can be done orally – the issue is one of time. But skills, especially mental skills, are difficult. We shall look at these separately in the next section.